Anna Kleinsteuber
Charité
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Anna Kleinsteuber.
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation | 2018
Lukas Lehner; Anna Kleinsteuber; Fabian Halleck; Dmytro Khadzhynov; Eva Schrezenmeier; Michael Duerr; Kai-Uwe Eckardt; Klemens Budde; Oliver Staeck
Background Recently, transplant societies have had to change their allocation policies to counter global organ shortages. However, strategies differ significantly and long-term outcomes and cross-regional applicability remain to be evaluated. Methods Therefore, we retrospectively analysed the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) of 987 adult kidney transplants at our centre using data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) as a reference. Results In our cohort, the median KDPI was 66%, with a higher proportion of >85% KDPI kidneys compared with the US cohort (32.3% versus 9.2%). Among elderly patients (≥65 years of age), 62% received >95% KDPI kidneys, which were primarily allocated within the Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP). After 10 years, the rate of death-censored graft survival was 70.5%. Recipients of >85% KDPI kidneys were significantly older, demonstrating higher mortality, poorer graft survival and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate. Patients receiving ≥99% KDPI kidneys had a satisfactory 5-year death-censored graft survival (72.9%). The 5-year survival rate of patients living with a functioning graft exceeded the matched OPTN data in the whole KDPI range, despite a higher proportion of elderly recipients. Multivariate analysis revealed KDPI as an independent risk factor for graft loss (hazard ratio 1.14/10%, P < 0.001), although C-statistics of 0.62 indicated limited discriminative ability for individuals. Conclusion The analysis demonstrated KDPI as a potentially useful tool for donor quality assessment in a European cohort. Most importantly, our analysis revealed acceptable outcomes even for very high KDPI kidneys.
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation | 2018
Gregor Rehse; Fabian Halleck; Dmytro Khadzhynov; Lukas Lehner; Anna Kleinsteuber; Anja Staeck; Michael Duerr; Klemens Budde; Oliver Staeck
BACKGROUND Recently, a risk index for living donor kidney (LDK) transplantation [living kidney donor profile index (LKDPI)] was proposed to compare LDKs with each other and with deceased donor kidneys (DDKs). Until now, the LKDPI has not been validated externally. METHODS This long-term retrospective analysis included 1305 consecutive adult kidney transplant recipients who were transplanted 2000-16 in our centre. The Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) was calculated in 889 DDKs and the LKDPI in 416 LDKs. Outcome was followed over a median of 6.5 years. RESULTS The median LKDPI was 17 and the median KDPI was 69, with a high proportion of donor kidneys with a very high KDPI (40% KDPI ≥ 80). Categorization of LDK into LKDPI quartiles (LKDPI -45-3, 3-17, 17-33, 33-90) revealed a significant difference in death-censored graft survival. Comparing corresponding subgroups of the LKDPI and KDPI (LKDPI/KDPI 0-20 or 20-40) showed comparable graft survival. A multivariate analysis adjusting for relevant recipient factors revealed the KDPI [hazard ratio (HR) 1.21; P < 0.001) and LKDPI (HR 1.15; P = 0.049) as significant independent predictors of graft loss. Time-to-event receiver operating characteristic analyses for graft survival demonstrated lower predictive discrimination of the LKDPI [area under the curve (AUC) 0.55] compared with the KDPI (AUC 0.66). The 10-year graft survival of LDK recipients was inferior in the USA compared with our centre (79% versus 84%). CONCLUSIONS These results provide external validation of the LKDPI to predict death-censored graft survival and confirm comparability of the LKDPI with the KDPI to discriminate post-transplant outcome.
Transplantation Proceedings | 2018
Anna Kleinsteuber; Fabian Halleck; Dmytro Khadzhynov; Anja Staeck; Lukas Lehner; Michael Duerr; Petra Glander; Danilo Schmidt; Klemens Budde; Oliver Staeck
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation | 2016
Anna Kleinsteuber; Dmytro Khadzhynov; Lukas Lehner; Michael Duerr; Fabian Halleck; Klemens Budde; Oliver Staeck
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation | 2016
Dmytro Khadzhynov; Fabian Halleck; Lukas Lehner; Michael Duerr; Anna Kleinsteuber; Danilo Schmidt; Klemens Budde; Oliver Staeck
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation | 2016
Fabian Halleck; Dmytro Khadzhynov; Lukas Lehner; Michael Dürr; Eva Schrezenmeier; Anna Kleinsteuber; Klemens Budde; Oliver Staeck
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation | 2016
Oliver Staeck; Dmytro Khadzhynov; Anna Kleinsteuber; Lukas Lehner; Michael Duerr; Klemens Budde; Fabian Halleck
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation | 2016
Anja Staeck; Dmytro Khadzhynov; Nils Lachmann; Anna Kleinsteuber; Lukas Lehner; Michael Duerr; Klemens Budde; Fabian Halleck; Oliver Staeck
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation | 2016
Oliver Staeck; Dmytro Khadzhynov; Anna Kleinsteuber; Lukas Lehner; Michael Duerr; Klemens Budde; Fabian Halleck
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation | 2016
Dmytro Khadzhynov; Fabian Halleck; Lukas Lehner; Michael Duerr; Anna Kleinsteuber; Klemens Budde; Oliver Staeck