Michael Duerr

An evaluation of sirolimus in renal transplantation

Introduction: Sirolimus is a powerful antiproliferative immunosuppressive drug approved for the prevention of kidney allograft rejection. By its unique mechanism of action, sirolimus provides a multitude of clinical potential and has been used effectively in different drug combinations. Extensive experience has been gained regarding the best timing of its application, side effect profile and potential benefits and limitations compared with other immunosuppressive drugs. Areas covered: The authors evaluate the recent experience with sirolimus in kidney transplantation. Pivotal randomized controlled trials were used to provide an overview with special attention to pharmacokinetic and dynamic aspects of sirolimus, its current clinical use as well as perspectives for its future role. Expert opinion: Sirolimus enriches the possibilities of immunosuppressive therapies after renal transplantation. Beneficial effects toward kidney function by allowing CNI sparing, lower incidence of malignancies and less viral infections have been suggested. Sirolimus should be used cautiously in de novo patients for reasons of wound healing. An early conversion to a sirolimus-based CNI-free regimen has shown promising results, whereas late conversion is more challenging. Finally, sirolimus-associated side effects are causing tolerability concerns and frequent discontinuations. Future research should aim to better define the therapeutic window and those patients most likely to benefit.

Rituximab in Combination With Bortezomib, Plasmapheresis, and High-Dose IVIG to Treat Antibody-Mediated Renal Allograft Rejection

Background Current treatment strategies for antibody-mediated renal allograft rejection (AMR) are not sufficiently effective. In most centers, “standard of care” treatment includes plasmapheresis (PPH) and IVIG preparations. Since several years, modern therapeutics targeting B cells and plasma cells have become available. We investigated, whether combined administration of rituximab and bortezomib in addition to PPH and high-dose IVIG is useful. Methods Between November 2011 and January 2013, we treated 10 consecutive patients with biopsy-proven AMR with rituximab (500 mg), bortezomib (4× 1.3 mg/m2), PPH (6×), and high-dose IVIG (1.5 g/kg) (group A). This group was compared with a group of 11 consecutive patients treated with an identical regimen without rituximab between July 2010 and November 2011 (group B). Results Median follow-up was 41(33-46) months in group A and 55(47-63) months in group B. At 40 months after treatment, graft survival was 60% in group A and 64% in group B, respectively (P = 0.87). Before and after treatment, serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and proteinuria were not different between groups. A significant reduction in donor-specific HLA antibody mean fluorescence intensity was observed in group A (25.2%, P = 0.046) and B (38.3%, P = 0.01) at 3 months posttreatment. In group A, more patients suffered from side effects compared with group B (infections: 70% vs 18%, P = 0.02). Conclusions The addition of rituximab to bortezomib, PPH, and high-dose IVIG did not further improve graft survival. Instead, we observed an increase of side effects. Therefore, combined administration of bortezomib and rituximab in addition to PPH and IVIG should be regarded with caution.

Everolimus with cyclosporine withdrawal or low-exposure cyclosporine in kidney transplantation from Month 3: a multicentre, randomized trial

Background. Randomized trials have shown that early adoption of everolimus-based immunosuppressive regimens without a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) improves long-term kidney graft function, but the optimal strategy for CNI minimization remains uncertain. Methods. In a prospective, randomized, multicentre, 12-month trial, 499 de novo kidney transplant patients were randomized at Month 3 to (i) remain on standard CNI (cyclosporine) therapy with mycophenolic acid, (ii) convert to everolimus with mycophenolic acid or (iii) start everolimus with reduced CNI and no mycophenolic acid (clinical trials registry: ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT00514514). Results. The primary endpoint, change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (Nankivell) from randomization to Month 12, was significantly greater in the CNI-free arm versus standard CNI therapy: mean difference 5.6 mL/min/1.73 m 2 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8-8.3 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , P < 0.001]. The improvement in eGFR in the CNI-free arm was also higher than in the low-CNI group (mean difference 5.5 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , 95% CI 2.8-8.2 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , P < 0.001), while results were similar in the low-CNI and standard CNI arms. The post-randomization incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 11.7%, 8.1% and 7.9% in the CNI-free, low-CNI and standard CNI groups, respectively (CNI-free versus standard CNI, P = 0.27; low-CNI versus standard CNI, P = 1.00). Adverse events led to study drug discontinuation in 28.7%, 15.5% and 15.2% of CNI-free, low-CNI and standard CNI patients, respectively. Conclusions. Everolimus initiation with CNI withdrawal at Month 3 after kidney transplantation achieves a significant improvement in renal function at 12 months, with a similar rate of acute rejection.

Treatment of Acute Antibody-Mediated Renal Allograft Rejection with Cyclophosphamide.

Background Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a major risk for renal allograft survival. Throughout decades, cyclophosphamide treatment has been proven to be effective in patients with antibody-associated autoimmune diseases. We investigated whether cyclophosphamide combined with plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulins is an option for patients with AMR. Methods Between March 2013 and November 2015, we initiated treatment of 13 consecutive patients with biopsy-proven acute AMR with intravenous cyclophosphamide pulses (15 mg/kg adapted to age and renal function) at 3-week intervals, PPH (6×), and high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (1.5 g/kg). Treatment was completed after 6 cyclophosphamide pulses or in case of return to baseline serum creatinine together with reduction of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) below 500 mean fluorescence intensity. Results Eleven of 13 patients completed treatment. Median follow-up was 18 (12-44) months. At the end of follow-up, graft survival was 77% (10/13). The 3 graft losses were caused at least in part by nonadherence and premature termination of treatment. Serum creatinine increased from 1.7±0.4 mg/dL at 3 months before diagnosis to 3.7±2.4 mg/dL at diagnosis (P = 0.01), and decreased to 2.1 ± 0.7 mg/dL at 3 months after diagnosis (P = 0.01). In 7 (64%) of 11 patients, who completed treatment, DSA decreased, in 4 (36%) of 11 DSA were below 500 mean fluorescence intensity after treatment. Dose reductions had to be performed in 3 of 13 patients for leukopenia. We observed 14 hospitalizations in 9 of 13 patients. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first systematic report on cyclophosphamide-based treatment of acute AMR based on modern diagnostics. Treatment was effective and relatively safe. Future studies will show, whether cyclophosphamide proves to be a valuable alternative for the treatment of AMR.

Successful Recovery of Acute Renal Transplant Failure in Recurrent Hepatitis C Virus–Associated Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis

Recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV)–associated membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) in the kidney transplant may lead to continuous graft deterioration and the need for further renal replacement therapy. The novel direct‐acting antiviral agents (DAAs) allow a highly effective and interferon‐free treatment option for chronic HCV‐infected patients. Data on the therapeutic safety and efficacy in HCV‐infected renal transplant patients are sparse, especially for patients with severe renal impairment. We report the case of a 63‐year‐old female HCV‐positive renal transplant patient with biopsy‐proven recurrence of MPGN in the renal graft 3 years after transplant. Because of rapid loss of transplant function and consecutive need for hemodialysis, we initiated a combined anti‐HCV–directed therapy regimen consisting of daclatasvir and simeprevir over 12 weeks. Viral clearance of HCV was obtained as early as 2 weeks after start of treatment. No adverse therapy‐associated side effects were observed, and immunosuppressive dosing remained unchanged. Importantly, graft function fully recovered and hemodialysis was stopped 2 mo after the end of daclatasvir/simeprevir treatment. We report the first case of successful recovery of dialysis‐dependent renal transplant failure after treatment of recurrent HCV‐associated MPGN in a kidney transplant recipient by curing the underlying HCV infection with a combination of novel DAAs.

Treatment of Antibody-Mediated Renal Allograft Rejection

Throughout the past years we stepwise modified our immunosuppressive treatment regimen for patients with antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). Here, we describe three consecutive groups treated with different regimens. From 2005 until 2008, we treated all patients with biopsy-proven ABMR with rituximab (500 mg), low-dose (30 g) intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), and plasmapheresis (PPH, 6x) (group RLP, n = 12). Between 2009 and June 2010, patients received bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2, 4x) together with low-dose IVIG and PPH (group BLP, n = 11). In July 2010, we increased the IVIG dose and treated all subsequent patients with bortezomib, high-dose IVIG (1.5 g/kg), and PPH (group BHP, n = 11). Graft survival at three years after treatment was 73% in group BHP as compared to 45% in group BLP and 25% in group RLP. At six months after treatment median serum creatinine was 2.1 mg/dL, 2.9 mg/dL, and 4.2 mg/dL in groups BHP, BLP, and RLP, respectively (p = 0.02). Following treatment, a significant decrease of donor-specific HLA antibody (DSA) mean fluorescence intensity from 8467 ± 6876 to 5221 ± 4711 (p = 0.01) was observed in group BHP, but not in the other groups. Our results indicate that graft survival, graft function, and DSA levels could be improved along with stepwise modifications to our treatment regimen, that is, the introduction of bortezomib and high-dose IVIG treatment.

Assessment of the Kidney Donor Profile Index in a European cohort

Background Recently, transplant societies have had to change their allocation policies to counter global organ shortages. However, strategies differ significantly and long-term outcomes and cross-regional applicability remain to be evaluated. Methods Therefore, we retrospectively analysed the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) of 987 adult kidney transplants at our centre using data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) as a reference. Results In our cohort, the median KDPI was 66%, with a higher proportion of >85% KDPI kidneys compared with the US cohort (32.3% versus 9.2%). Among elderly patients (≥65 years of age), 62% received >95% KDPI kidneys, which were primarily allocated within the Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP). After 10 years, the rate of death-censored graft survival was 70.5%. Recipients of >85% KDPI kidneys were significantly older, demonstrating higher mortality, poorer graft survival and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate. Patients receiving ≥99% KDPI kidneys had a satisfactory 5-year death-censored graft survival (72.9%). The 5-year survival rate of patients living with a functioning graft exceeded the matched OPTN data in the whole KDPI range, despite a higher proportion of elderly recipients. Multivariate analysis revealed KDPI as an independent risk factor for graft loss (hazard ratio 1.14/10%, P < 0.001), although C-statistics of 0.62 indicated limited discriminative ability for individuals. Conclusion The analysis demonstrated KDPI as a potentially useful tool for donor quality assessment in a European cohort. Most importantly, our analysis revealed acceptable outcomes even for very high KDPI kidneys.

Validation of the Living Kidney Donor Profile Index in a European cohort and comparison of long-term outcomes with US results

BACKGROUND Recently, a risk index for living donor kidney (LDK) transplantation [living kidney donor profile index (LKDPI)] was proposed to compare LDKs with each other and with deceased donor kidneys (DDKs). Until now, the LKDPI has not been validated externally. METHODS This long-term retrospective analysis included 1305 consecutive adult kidney transplant recipients who were transplanted 2000-16 in our centre. The Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) was calculated in 889 DDKs and the LKDPI in 416 LDKs. Outcome was followed over a median of 6.5 years. RESULTS The median LKDPI was 17 and the median KDPI was 69, with a high proportion of donor kidneys with a very high KDPI (40% KDPI ≥ 80). Categorization of LDK into LKDPI quartiles (LKDPI -45-3, 3-17, 17-33, 33-90) revealed a significant difference in death-censored graft survival. Comparing corresponding subgroups of the LKDPI and KDPI (LKDPI/KDPI 0-20 or 20-40) showed comparable graft survival. A multivariate analysis adjusting for relevant recipient factors revealed the KDPI [hazard ratio (HR) 1.21; P < 0.001) and LKDPI (HR 1.15; P = 0.049) as significant independent predictors of graft loss. Time-to-event receiver operating characteristic analyses for graft survival demonstrated lower predictive discrimination of the LKDPI [area under the curve (AUC) 0.55] compared with the KDPI (AUC 0.66). The 10-year graft survival of LDK recipients was inferior in the USA compared with our centre (79% versus 84%). CONCLUSIONS These results provide external validation of the LKDPI to predict death-censored graft survival and confirm comparability of the LKDPI with the KDPI to discriminate post-transplant outcome.

Onset and progression of diabetes in kidney transplant patients receiving everolimus or cyclosporine therapy: an analysis of two randomized, multicenter trials

BackgroundConversion from calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) therapy to a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor following kidney transplantation may help to preserve graft function. Data are sparse, however, concerning the impact of conversion on posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) or the progression of pre-existing diabetes.MethodsPTDM and other diabetes-related parameters were assessed post hoc in two large open-label multicenter trials. Kidney transplant recipients were randomized (i) at month 4.5 to switch to everolimus or remain on a standard cyclosporine (CsA)-based regimen (ZEUS, n = 300), or (ii) at month 3 to switch to everolimus, remain on standard CNI therapy or convert to everolimus with reduced-exposure CsA (HERAKLES, n = 497).ResultsThere were no significant differences in the incidence of PTDM between treatment groups (log rank p = 0.97 [ZEUS], p = 0.90 [HERAKLES]). The mean change in random blood glucose from randomization to month 12 was also similar between treatment groups in both trials for patients with or without PTDM, and with or without pre-existing diabetes. The change in eGFR from randomization to month 12 showed a benefit for everolimus versus comparator groups in all subpopulations, but only reached significance in larger subgroups (no PTDM or no pre-existing diabetes).ConclusionsWithin the restrictions of this post hoc analysis, including non-standardized diagnostic criteria and limited glycemia laboratory parameters, these data do not indicate any difference in the incidence or severity of PTDM with early conversion from a CsA-based regimen to everolimus, or in the progression of pre-existing diabetes.Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov, NCT00154310 (registered September 2005) and NCT00514514 (registered August 2007); EudraCT (2006-007021-32 and 2004-004346-40).

Five-year outcomes in kidney transplant patients randomized to everolimus with cyclosporine withdrawal or low-exposure cyclosporine versus standard therapy

HERAKLES was a 1‐year randomized, multicenter trial. Patients were randomized at 3 months after kidney transplantation to remain on cyclosporine‐based therapy, switch to everolimus without a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), or switch to everolimus with low‐exposure cyclosporine. Overall, 417 of 497 (83.9%) patients from the core study entered a 4‐year extension study. The randomized regimen was continued to year 5 in 75.9%, 41.9% and 24.6% of patients in the standard‐CNI, CNI‐free and low‐CNI groups, respectively. Adjusted estimated GFR at year 5 was significantly higher in the CNI‐free group versus standard CNI (difference 7.2 mL/min/1.73 m2, P < .001) or low CNI (difference 7.6 mL/min/1.73 m2, P < .001). For patients who continued randomized therapy for 5 years, differences were 14.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 10.1 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. Biopsy‐proven acute rejection occurred during the 4‐year extension study in 7.6%, 8.6%, and 9.0% of patients in the standard‐CNI, CNI‐free and low‐CNI groups, respectively (P = .927). In conclusion, conversion to a CNI‐free everolimus regimen 3 months after kidney transplantation improved long‐term graft function, particularly in patients who continued the CNI‐free regimen. Low CNI with everolimus did not improve renal function. Efficacy was comparable between groups but frequent immunosuppression changes should be taken into account.