Anna Schiaffino

Impact of the Spanish Smoking Law on Exposure to Second-Hand Smoke and Respiratory Health in Hospitality Workers: A Cohort Study

Background A smoke-free law came into effect in Spain on 1st January 2006, affecting all enclosed workplaces except hospitality venues, whose proprietors can choose among totally a smoke-free policy, a partial restriction with designated smoking areas, or no restriction on smoking on the premises. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the law among hospitality workers by assessing second-hand smoke (SHS) exposure and the frequency of respiratory symptoms before and one year after the ban. Methods and Finding We formed a baseline cohort of 431 hospitality workers in Spain and 45 workers in Portugal and Andorra. Of them, 318 (66.8%) were successfully followed up 12 months after the ban, and 137 nonsmokers were included in this analysis. We obtained self-reported exposure to SHS and the presence of respiratory symptoms, and collected saliva samples for cotinine measurement. Salivary cotinine decreased by 55.6% after the ban among nonsmoker workers in venues where smoking was totally prohibited (from median of 1.6 ng/ml before to 0.5 ng/ml, p<0.01). Cotinine concentration decreased by 27.6% (p = 0.068) among workers in venues with designated smoking areas, and by 10.7% (p = 0.475) among workers in venues where smoking was allowed. In Portugal and Andorra, no differences between cotinine concentration were found before (1.2 ng/ml) and after the ban (1.2 ng/ml). In Spain, reported respiratory symptom declined significantly (by 71.9%; p<0.05) among workers in venues that became smoke-free. After adjustment for potential confounders, salivary cotinine and respiratory symptoms decreased significantly among workers in Spanish hospitality venues where smoking was totally banned. Conclusions Among nonsmoker hospitality workers in bars and restaurants where smoking was allowed, exposure to SHS after the ban remained similar to pre-law levels. The partial restrictions on smoking in Spanish hospitality venues do not sufficiently protect hospitality workers against SHS or its consequences for respiratory health.

Price and cigarette consumption in Europe

Objective: To analyse the variation in demand for tobacco according to price of cigarettes across the European region. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: All the 52 countries of the European region. Participants: For each European country, data were collected on annual per adult cigarette consumption (2000), smoking prevalence (most recent), retail price of a pack of local and foreign brand cigarettes (around 2000), the gross domestic product adjusted by purchasing power parities, and the adult population (2000). Main outcome measure: Price elasticity of demand for cigarettes (that is, the change in cigarette consumption according to a change in tobacco price) across all the European countries, estimated by double-log multiple linear regression. Results: Controlling for male to female prevalence ratio, price elasticities for consumption were −0.46 (95% confidence interval (CI) −0.74 to −0.17) and −0.74 (95% CI −1.13 to −0.35) for local and foreign brand, respectively. The inverse relation between cigarette price and consumption was stronger in countries not in the European Union (price elasticity for foreign brand cigarettes of −0.8) as compared to European Union countries (price elasticity of −0.4). Conclusions: The result that, on average, in Europe smoking consumption decreases 5–7% for a 10% increase in the real price of cigarettes strongly supports an inverse association between price and cigarette smoking.

Gender inequalities in health and health care services use in Catalonia (Spain).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: While socio-economically derived differences in health and health services use have long been a subject of study, differences based on gender, considered as the explicative variable, have scarcely been quantified from population-based data. The aim of this investigation was to analyse inequalities in health and health care services utilisation between men and women in Catalonia (Spain). DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASURES: Data from the Catalan Health Interview Survey, a cross sectional survey conducted in 1994, were used. A total of 6604 women and 5641 men aged 15 years or over were included for analysis. Health related variables studied were self perceived health, restriction of activity (past two weeks), and presence of chronic conditions; health services use variables analysed were having visited a health professional (past two weeks), an optometrist (12 months), or a dentist (12 months); and hospitalisation (past 12 months). Age standardised proportions were computed according to gender, and prevalence odds ratios (OR) were derived from logistic regression equations. MAIN RESULTS: Women more frequently rated their health as fair or poor than men (29.8% v 21.4%; OR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.10, 1.34). More women than men reported having restricted activity days (OR = 1.86; 95% CI: 1.59, 2.18) and chronic conditions (OR = 1.74; 95% CI: 1.60, 1.89). The proportion of women visiting a health professional was slightly greater than that for men (OR = 1.20; 95% CI: 1.09, 1.31), as was the proportion of women visiting an optometrist (OR = 1.21; 95% CI: 1.11, 1.33), and a dentist (OR = 1.43; 95% CI: 1.31, 1.55). The proportion of hospitalisation was lower in women (6.6%) than in men (7.7%; OR = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.63, 0.85). When health services use was analysed according to self perceived health, women declaring good health reported a greater probability of consulting a health professional (OR = 1.35; 95% CI: 1.20, 1.52). There were no differences in respect to hospitalisation, visits to the optometrist and to the dentist. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate a pattern close to the inverse care law, as women, who express a lower level of health and thus would need more health care, are not, however, using health services more frequently than men.

Impact of the Spanish Smoking Law on Exposure to Secondhand Smoke in Offices and Hospitality Venues: Before-and-After Study

Background/objectives A smoking law was passed by the Spanish Parliament in December 2005 and was enforced by 1 January 2006. The law bans smoking in all indoor workplaces but only in some hospitality venues, because owners are allowed to establish a smoking zone (venues > 100 m2) or to allow smoking without restrictions (venues < 100 m2). The objective of the study is to assess the impact of the Spanish smoking law on exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) in enclosed workplaces, including hospitality venues. Materials and methods The study design is a before-and-after evaluation. We studied workplaces and hospitality venues from eight different regions of Spain. We took repeated samples of vapor-phase nicotine concentration in 398 premises, including private offices (162), public administration offices (90), university premises (43), bars and restaurants (79), and discotheques and pubs (24). Results In the follow-up period, SHS levels were markedly reduced in indoor offices. The median decrease in nicotine concentration ranged from 60.0% in public premises to 97.4% in private areas. Nicotine concentrations were also markedly reduced in bars and restaurants that became smoke-free (96.7%) and in the no-smoking zones of venues with separate spaces for smokers (88.9%). We found no significant changes in smoking zones or in premises allowing smoking, including discotheques and pubs. Conclusions Overall, this study shows the positive impact of the law on reducing SHS in indoor workplaces. However, SHS was substantially reduced only in bars and restaurants that became smoke-free. Most hospitality workers continue to be exposed to very high levels of SHS. Therefore, a 100% smoke-free policy for all hospitality venues is required.

Social class, education, and smoking cessation: Long-term follow-up of patients treated at a smoking cessation unit

Our objective was to examine social class and educational differences in long-term smoking cessation success among a cohort of smokers attending a specialized smoking clinic. We studied sustained abstinence after cessation among 1,516 smokers (895 men and 621 women) treated for smoking cessation between 1995 and 2001 at a university teaching hospital in the metropolitan area of Barcelona, Spain. We calculated 1-year and long-term (up to 8-year) abstinence probabilities by means of Kaplan-Meier curves and the hazard ratio of relapse by means of Cox regression, after adjusting for other predictors of relapse. Overall abstinence probability was .277 (95% CI = .254-.301). Men and women in social classes IV-V had significant hazard ratios of relapse after long-term follow-up (men: 1.36, 95% CI = 1.07-1.72; women: 1.60, 95% CI = 1.24-2.06), as compared with patients in social classes I-II. The same independent effect was observed for education: Men and women with primary or less than primary studies had higher hazard ratios of relapse (men: 1.75, 95% CI = 1.35-2.25; women: 1.92, 95% CI = 1.51-2.46), as compared with patients with a university degree. Similar estimates were obtained after adjustment for stage of change, Fagerström score for nicotine dependence, and type of treatment. Patients of lower socioeconomic status are at higher risk of relapse, and this association is independent of other well-known predictors of relapse. Social differences have to be taken into account in the clinical setting when tailoring specific actions to treat smoking dependence.

Prevalencia del consumo de tabaco en España entre 1945 y 1995. Reconstrucción a partir de las Encuestas Nacionales de Salud

Fundamento y objetivo: Analizar la evolucion del consumo de cigarrillos en Espana entre 1945 y 1995. Material y metodo: A partir de la informacion individual sobre consumo de tabaco recogida en las Encuestas de Salud de Espana de 1993, 1995 y 1997 se ha reconstruido la prevalencia de fumadores de cigarrillos diarios para el periodo 1945-1995. Resultados: En los varones, la prevalencia de tabaquismo en 1945 fue del 42,4% (intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%, 40,1-44,7%), aumento hasta llegar al 59,1% en 1975 (IC del 95%, 58,0-60,2%), se estabilizo a continuacion durante la decada 1975-1985 y disminuyo hasta la actualidad hasta el 48,9% (IC del 95%, 48,1-49,7%) en 1995. En las mujeres, la prevalencia de tabaquismo fue inferior al 5% hasta la decada de los setenta, momento en que empieza a aumentar de manera sostenida hasta el final del periodo de estudio, con una prevalencia en 1995 del 22,5% (IC del 95%, 21,9-23,1%). Conclusiones: Este analisis permite apreciar la diferente dinamica de la epidemia de tabaquismo entre varones y mujeres en Espana.

Widening social inequalities in smoking cessation in Spain, 1987–1997

In southern Europe, the prevalence of smoking among women has been lower than in northern Europe, with a wider gender and socioeconomic gap compared with most other developed countries. In Spain, a decline in the prevalence of smoking in men has been observed during the past 10 years, while in women the smoking prevalence has increased in the middle age group (16–44 years old) and in higher socioeconomic levels. Smoking cessation has increased slightly,1 but no assessment of the trends in smoking cessation in Spain by gender and socioeconomic level has been reported. The aim of this study was to analyse the pattern of smoking cessation according to gender and education, using data from the four National Health Interview Surveys (NHIS) conducted between 1987 and 1997. Data were obtained from the Spanish NHISs conducted in 1987, 1993, 1995, and 1997 among the non-institutionalised population by means of personal interviews. Sample sizes of the surveys were 27 756 subjects in 1987; 21 120 in 1993; and 6400 both in 1995 and 1997. Non-response rates ranged from 10% in 1987 to 15% in 1997. In the four surveys, a multistage random sampling strategy with stratification was used. The same questionnaire was used …

¿Odds ratio o razón de proporciones? Su utilización en estudios transversales

Background: The most commonly used measures of association in cross-sectional studies are the odds ratio (OR) and the prevalence ratio (PR). Some cross-sectional epidemiologic studies describe their results as OR but use the definition of PR. The main aim of this study was to describe and compare different calculation methods for PR described in literature using two situations (prevalence 20%). Material and methods: A literature search was carried out to determine the most commonly used techniques for estimating the PR. The four most frequent methods were: 1) obtaining the OR using non-conditional logistic regression but using the correct definition; 2) using Breslow-Cox regression; 3) using a generalized linear model with logarithmic transformation and binomial family, and 4) using the conversion formula from OR into PR. The models found were replicated for both situations (prevalence less than 20% and greater than 20%) using real data from the 1994 Catalan Health Interview Survey. Results: When prevalence was low, no substantial differences were observed in either the estimators or standard errors obtained using the four procedures. When prevalence was high, differences were found between estimators and confidence intervals although all the measures maintained statistical significance. Conclusion: All the methods have advantages and disadvantages. Individual researchers should decide which technique is the most appropriate for their data and should be consistent when using an estimator and interpreting it.

Cigarette advertising and female smoking prevalence in Spain, 1982-1997: case studies in International Tobacco Surveillance.

Compared with northern Europe and the U.S., the widespread initiation of cigarette smoking began 20–40 years later among young women in Spain because of strong cultural prohibitions against female smoking. In this study, the authors examined the correlation between the rapid increase in female smoking prevalence and tobacco industry cigarette marketing practices in Spain during a period of rapid social liberalization.

Assessment of exposure to secondhand smoke by questionnaire and salivary cotinine in the general population of Barcelona, Spain (2004-2005).

OBJECTIVES To estimate the prevalence of self-reported exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) in different settings and to describe salivary cotinine concentration and its determinants among non-smokers. METHODS Cross-sectional study of a representative sample (N=775) of adult non-smokers in Barcelona, Spain (years 2004-2005). We assessed exposure to SHS using a questionnaire and measurement of salivary cotinine concentration. We calculated prevalence rates of self-reported exposure and medians and geometric means of salivary cotinine concentration. We adjusted for potential confounding factors with multinomial logistic regression models. RESULTS The prevalence rate of self-reported exposure to SHS among non-smokers in any setting was 75.7% (95% CI: 72.7%-78.8%). The prevalence of exposure to SHS tended to decrease with age. The geometric mean of cotinine concentrations among non-smokers was 1.49 ng/ml (95% CI: 1.39-1.60 ng/ml) among all subjects, and 1.80 ng/ml (95% CI: 1.37-2.35 ng/ml) in subjects who reported exposure to SHS in all settings. In bivariate and multivariate analyses, the cotinine concentration increased with the number of smokers and the number of cigarettes smoked per day in the presence of non-smokers in the household. CONCLUSIONS In this population, self-reported exposure to SHS is very high. Salivary cotinine concentrations in non-smokers are associated with exposure at home.