Anne-Geneviève Marcelin

Discordance Between Cerebral Spinal Fluid and Plasma HIV Replication in Patients with Neurological Symptoms Who Are Receiving Suppressive Antiretroviral Therapy

OBJECTIVE We report data on 11 patients with neurological symptoms and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) viremia contrasting with suppressed plasma HIV RNA during receipt of combined antiretroviral therapy. DESIGN We retrospectively identified instances of central nervous system (CNS) symptoms in patients who had been receiving stable combination antiretroviral therapy. Discordance between plasma and CSF HIV RNA levels was defined by any detectable CSF HIV RNA level >200 copies/mL while plasma levels were <50 copies/mL or by a CSF HIV RNA level that was 1 log greater than the plasma HIV RNA level. RESULTS Eleven patients had experienced acute or subacute neurological symptoms. All but one patient had CSF pleocytosis and/or elevated protein levels. The median CSF HIV RNA level was 880 copies/mL (range, 558-12,885 copies/mL). Patients had been receiving stable combination antiretroviral therapy for a median of 13 months (range, 10-32 months). Eight of 11 patients had a plasma HIV RNA level <50 copies/mL, and 3 had plasma HIV RNA blips with their CSF HIV RNA level >1 log higher than their plasma HIV RNA level. Resistance-associated mutations were detected in 7 of 8 CSF HIV RNA genotypic strains. The median number of resistance-associated mutations was 6 (range, 2-8) to nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors and 3 (range, 1-9) to protease inhibitors. One patient had a virus harboring nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor mutations. The median central nervous system penetration-effectiveness (CPE) rank was 2 (range, 1-3), and 5 patients had a CPE 1.5. After antiretroviral therapy optimization based on genotypes and CPE, all patients clinically improved, with normalization of CSF. CONCLUSIONS Despite successful suppression of plasma viremia with antiretroviral therapy, HIV may replicate in CSF, with development of CSF HIV resistance resulting in acute or subacute neurological manifestations.

Increasing prevalence of transmitted drug resistance mutations and non-B subtype circulation in antiretroviral-naive chronically HIV-infected patients from 2001 to 2006/2007 in France

OBJECTIVES To estimate the prevalence of transmitted drug resistance mutations and non-B subtype circulation in antiretroviral-naive chronically HIV-1-infected patients in France. METHODS Resistance mutations were sought in samples from 530 newly diagnosed HIV-1-infected patients from October 2006 to March 2007. Protease and reverse transcriptase mutations were identified from the 2007 Stanford Resistance Surveillance list. RESULTS Reverse transcriptase and protease resistance mutations were determined in 466 patients with duration of seropositivity <5 years. 42% of patients were infected with non-B subtype strains (CRF02 18.3%). The overall prevalence of viruses with protease or reverse transcriptase mutations was 10.6% (95% confidence interval 6.7-16.3). The prevalence of protease inhibitor, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance-associated mutations was 4.7%, 5.8% and 2.8%, respectively. Frequency of resistance was not different in patients infected with B (9.5%) and non-B (CRF02 7.8% and other 11.2%) subtypes. Baseline characteristics such as gender, age, transmission group, country of transmission, disease stage, CD4 counts and viral load were not associated with the prevalence of transmitted drug resistance. CONCLUSIONS In France in 2006/2007, the prevalence of transmitted drug-resistant variants was 10.6%. Prevalence of transmitted drug resistance was comparable in B and non-B subtypes. Prevalence of non-B subtypes is still rising.

Factors Associated With Virological Failure in HIV-1–Infected Patients Receiving Darunavir/Ritonavir Monotherapy

BACKGROUND Our objective was to determine virological and clinical characteristics associated with virological failure in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients switching to darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) monotherapy. METHODS The main outcome was virologic rebound, defined as 2 consecutive measurements of HIV-1 plasma RNA viral load (VL) >50 copies/mL. A logistic model was used to investigate which variables were predictive of a virologic rebound at weeks 48 (W48) and 96 (W96). RESULTS Receiving DRV/r monotherapy was associated with virologic rebound at W48 (P = .016) and W96 (P = .002), comparable to triple therapy. In the DRV/r monotherapy group, at W48, having a VL >50 copies/mL at day 0 and even a baseline ultrasensitive VL >1 copy/mL were predictive factors to virologic rebound (P = .042 and P = .025, respectively). At W96, shorter time of prior antiretrovial therapy (ART) exposure (odds ratio [OR] = 2.93 per 5 years decrease; P = .006), higher HIV-1 DNA at day 0 (OR = 2.66 per 1 log(10) copies/10(6) cells increase; P = .04) and adherence <100% (OR = 3.84 vs 100%; P = .02) were associated with an increased risk of rebound. CONCLUSIONS Factors associated with virological failure in patients receiving DRV/r monotherapy were having an initial blip, shorter time of antiretroviral treatment before monotherapy, and an adherence <100% during monotherapy. The importance of prior duration exposure to ART was in agreement with the impact of HIV-1 blood reservoir and VL level at baseline.

New raltegravir resistance pathways induce broad cross-resistance to all currently used integrase inhibitors

OBJECTIVES The possibility of replacing raltegravir or elvitegravir with dolutegravir in heavily treatment-experienced patients failing on raltegravir/elvitegravir has been evaluated in VIKING trials. All studied patients failed by the most common pathways, Y143, Q148 and N155, and dolutegravir demonstrated efficacy except for Q148 viruses. The aim of this study was to explore, in the same way, the behaviour of dolutegravir in comparison with raltegravir and elvitegravir against the atypical resistance integrase profiles, G118R and F121Y, described in HIV-1 patients failing on raltegravir therapy. METHODS The behaviour of integrases with mutations G118R and F121Y towards raltegravir, elvitegravir and dolutegravir was analysed by evaluating phenotypic susceptibility and by means of in silico techniques (investigating binding affinities and the stabilization of the inhibitors in terms of their hydrogen bond network). RESULTS The phenotypic analysis of G118R and F121Y showed high resistance to raltegravir, elvitegravir and dolutegravir with a fold change >100 when the clinically derived integrase was used, and resistance was also seen when mutations were tested alone in an NL43 backbone, but more often with a lower fold change. In silico, results showed that G118R and F121Y enzymes were associated with reduced binding affinities to each of the inhibitors and with a decreased number of hydrogen bonds compared with the wild-type complexes. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that G118R and F121Y mutations, rarely described in patients failing on raltegravir, induced broad cross-resistance to all currently used integrase inhibitors. These results are in accordance with our thermodynamic and geometric analysis indicating decreased stability compared with the wild-type complexes.

Factors associated with proviral DNA HIV-1 tropism in antiretroviral therapy-treated patients with fully suppressed plasma HIV viral load: implications for the clinical use of CCR5 antagonists

OBJECTIVES Most treated HIV-1 patients have undetectable viral loads and the strategies for managing long-term side effects may involve a new class of antiretroviral-like CCR5 antagonists. Tropism determination based on proviral DNA sequence is necessary for patients with a fully suppressed plasma viral load, as assays analysing DNA phenotypes have yet to be developed. We aimed to analyse HIV-1 tropism using proviral DNA sequencing and the associated factors, in a group of patients on antiretroviral (ARV) treatment with an undetectable viral load in plasma. METHODS Blood samples of 140 HIV-1-infected ARV-treated patients with a plasma viral load of <40 copies/mL were studied. All patients had never been treated with CCR5 antagonists. Co-receptor usage was determined using proviral DNA from the V3 env region sequence by Geno2Pheno (false positive rate 10%) and PSSM algorithms. RESULTS Among 140 patients treated using ARV therapy with a fully suppressed plasma viral load, at least 70% of patients had proviral R5-tropic virus. Among all the studied factors (time since HIV infection diagnosis, treatment duration, time since viral load undetectability, HIV subtype, current treatment, age, number of treatment types, sex, genotypic susceptibility score, and nadir and current CD4 cell counts), nadir CD4 T cell count alone was associated with tropism during a multivariate analysis. R5X4/X4 tropism was present in all nadir CD4 categories. CONCLUSIONS Proviral DNA tropism determination should be required, even for patients with a CD4 nadir cell count >350 cells/mm(3), before CCR5 antagonists are used in patients with a fully suppressed plasma viral load.

KSHV After an Organ Transplant: Should We Screen?

The incidence of Kaposi sarcoma (KS) related to Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV/HHV-8) after organ transplantation is 500-1000 times greater than in the general population, and its occurrence is associated with immunosuppressive therapy. The reported incidence of posttransplant KS ranges from 0.5% to 5%, depending on the patients country of origin and the type of organ received, mainly after renal transplantation. Posttransplant KS is caused by two possible mechanisms: KSHV reactivation in patients who were infected before the graft and KSHV contamination from the infected organs donor to the recipient. KSHV reactivation appears to play a greater role in the risk of KS than incident infections. However, some studies, with findings based not only on serological data but also on molecular tracing of the viral infection, have shown that organ-related transmission of KSHV could be more common than previously thought and associated in some cases with severe KSHV-related disease. Precise estimates of KSHV seroprevalence in the organ donor and recipient populations in different countries are lacking. However, studies have reported seroprevalences among donors and recipients that are similar to those among the general population of the country considered. Many studies have suggested the potential utility of screening of KSHV antibodies among organ donors and recipients. However, to date the results of these studies have argued in favor of KSHV screening, even in low-KSHV infection prevalence countries, not to exclude the graft but to have the KSHV status information in order to have the opportunity to monitor, clinically and biologically, patients at risk for KSHV-related disease development. The detection of KSHV antibodies could be done in the days after the transplantation and the results transmitted to the physicians retrospectively. In conclusion, the question of screening donors and recipients for KSHV, even in low-KSHV infection prevalence countries, is still debated, and prospective studies are needed to evaluate the benefit of pre- and posttransplantation strategies.

Integrase inhibitor (INI) genotypic resistance in treatment-naive and raltegravir-experienced patients infected with diverse HIV-1 clades

Objectives The aim of this study was to characterize the prevalence and patterns of genotypic integrase inhibitor (INI) resistance in relation to HIV-1 clade. Methods The cohort comprised 533 INI-naive subjects and 255 raltegravir recipients with viraemia who underwent integrase sequencing in routine care across Europe, including 134/533 (25.1%) and 46/255 (18.0%), respectively, with non-B clades (A, C, D, F, G, CRF01, CRF02, other CRFs, complex). Results No major INI resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) occurred in INI-naive subjects. Among raltegravir recipients with viraemia (median 3523 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL), 113/255 (44.3%) had one or more major INI RAMs, most commonly N155H (45/255, 17.6%), Q148H/R/K + G140S/A (35/255, 13.7%) and Y143R/C/H (12/255, 4.7%). In addition, four (1.6%) raltegravir recipients showed novel mutations at recognized resistance sites (E92A, S147I, N155D, N155Q) and novel mutations at other integrase positions that were statistically associated with raltegravir exposure (K159Q/R, I161L/M/T/V, E170A/G). Comparing subtype B with non-B clades, Q148H/R/K occurred in 42/209 (20.1%) versus 2/46 (4.3%) subjects (P = 0.009) and G140S/A occurred in 36/209 (17.2%) versus 1/46 (2.2%) subjects (P = 0.005). Intermediate- to high-level cross-resistance to twice-daily dolutegravir was predicted in 40/255 (15.7%) subjects, more commonly in subtype B versus non-B clades (39/209, 18.7% versus 1/46, 2.2%; P = 0.003). A glycine (G) to serine (S) substitution at integrase position 140 required one nucleotide change in subtype B and two nucleotide changes in all non-B clades. Conclusions No major INI resistance mutations occurred in INI-naive subjects. Reduced occurrence of Q148H/R/K + G140S/A was seen in non-B clades versus subtype B, and was explained by the higher genetic barrier to the G140S mutation observed in all non-B clades analysed.

Similar Evolution of Cellular HIV-1 DNA Level in Darunavir/Ritonavir Monotherapy versus Triple Therapy in MONOI –ANRS136 Trial over 96 Weeks

Background A higher proportion of intermittent viremia (to have a HIV-1 RNA viral load>50 copies/mL not confirmed) was reported in the boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy arm in some studies including MONOI trial, and that could have an impact on the replenishment of the HIV-1 DNA reservoirs. The HIV-1 DNA level is an interesting marker which reflects the size of cellular HIV reservoir. Our objectives were to study the impact of 96 weeks of Darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy versus a triple standard combination on the HIV-1 blood reservoir and factors associated with HIV-1 plasma DNA at baseline in MONOI trial sub-study. Methodology/Principal Findings This sub-study is focused on 160 patients (79 patients in monotherapy arm and 81 in tritherapy arm) for whom blood cells were available both at baseline and at week 96 (W96). Baseline HIV-1 plasma DNA was associated with CD4 nadir, pre therapeutic HIV-1 RNA viral load and baseline HIV-1 RNA measured by ultrasensitive assay. A similar median delta HIV-DNA was observed between D0 and W96 in both arms; 0.35 log copies/106 leucocytes in monotherapy arm versus 0.51 log copies/106 leucocytes in tritherapy arm. Conclusion/Significance Despite a higher proportion of intermittent viremia in monotherapy arm, a similar evolution of cellular HIV-1 DNA level was observed between mono and triple therapy arm. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials. gov NCT00421551

Effect of antiretroviral drugs on the quality of semen.

The aim of this cross‐sectional study was to determine which antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) are associated with changes in the characteristics of semen and the impact of these ARVs according to their score penetration into the male genital compartment. Data from 144 men infected with HIV‐1 enrolled in an Assisted Reproductive Technology program were analyzed retrospectively. A seminal penetration score of ARV was based on the available literature. The nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test and chi‐square test were used. There was no difference on sperm parameters between NRTI, NNRTI, or PI regimen. In patients receiving NRTIs or PIs no differences were observed between antiretrovirals of these classes. However, in patients receiving NNRTIs, nevirapine (n = 22) was associated with a higher percentage of progressively motile spermatozoa (P < 0.0001) versus efavirenz (n = 38) as well as vitality (P = 0.0004). No relationship was observed between semen quality and the penetration score. NRTIs and PIs were not associated with any semen changes. Nevirapine was associated with a better quality of semen versus efavirenz. It would be of interest to validate, improve and test our penetration score in a prospective study. J. Med. Virol. 83:1391–1394, 2011.

Structural effects of amino acid variations between B and CRF02-AG HIV-1 integrases

HIV‐1 integrase is one of the three essential enzyme required for viral replication and has a great potential as a novel target for anti‐HIV drugs. The sequence variability of the entire integrase (IN) was examined in HIV‐1 subtype B and CRF02‐AG antiretroviral naïve infected patients for the presence of naturally occurring polymorphisms IN gene sequences and protein structures from both subtypes were compared. The phylogenetic analysis showed a total concordance between the 3 pol gene sequences for patients identified as subtype B whereas 3% of patients identified as CRF02‐AG showed a mixture of subtypes. The analysis of IN aa sequences showed that 13 positions (K/R14, V/I31, L/I101, T/V112, T/A124, T/A125, G/N134, I/V135, K/T136, V/I201, T/S206, L/I234, and S/G283) differed between subtypes B and CRF02‐AG. As observed in the 3D model of the preintegration complex, these differences may impact the functional property of IN. The fact that most variations were grouped suggests that some of them are linked together through compensatory mechanisms. This comparison allowed us to identify several variations of amino acids in HIV‐1 IN subtype CRF02‐AG that could have a putative impact on anti‐integrase sensitivity. In particular, the region formed by Thr125, Thr124, Val31 contains at least one residue, T125, which variation has been involved in eliciting resistance to the naphtyridine carboxamide L870,810 IN inhibitor. In conclusion, virological response to anti‐integrase should be studied carefully, according to the subtype, in clinical trials. J. Med. Virol. 80:754–761, 2008.