Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Anne M. Trainor is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Anne M. Trainor.


Conservation Biology | 2014

Defining and Evaluating the Umbrella Species Concept for Conserving and Restoring Landscape Connectivity

Ian Breckheimer; Nick M. Haddad; William F. Morris; Anne M. Trainor; William R. Fields; R. Todd Jobe; Brian R. Hudgens; Aaron Moody; Jeffrey R. Walters

Conserving or restoring landscape connectivity between patches of breeding habitat is a common strategy to protect threatened species from habitat fragmentation. By managing connectivity for some species, usually charismatic vertebrates, it is often assumed that these species will serve as conservation umbrellas for other species. We tested this assumption by developing a quantitative method to measure overlap in dispersal habitat of 3 threatened species-a bird (the umbrella), a butterfly, and a frog-inhabiting the same fragmented landscape. Dispersal habitat was determined with Circuitscape, which was parameterized with movement data collected for each species. Despite differences in natural history and breeding habitat, we found substantial overlap in the spatial distributions of areas important for dispersal of this suite of taxa. However, the intuitive umbrella species (the bird) did not have the highest overlap with other species in terms of the areas that supported connectivity. Nevertheless, we contend that when there are no irreconcilable differences between the dispersal habitats of species that cohabitate on the landscape, managing for umbrella species can help conserve or restore connectivity simultaneously for multiple threatened species with different habitat requirements.


PLOS ONE | 2016

Energy Sprawl Is the Largest Driver of Land Use Change in United States

Anne M. Trainor; Robert I. McDonald; Joseph Fargione

Energy production in the United States for domestic use and export is predicted to rise 27% by 2040. We quantify projected energy sprawl (new land required for energy production) in the United States through 2040. Over 200,000 km2 of additional land area will be directly impacted by energy development. When spacing requirements are included, over 800,000 km2 of additional land area will be affected by energy development, an area greater than the size of Texas. This pace of development in the United States is more than double the historic rate of urban and residential development, which has been the greatest driver of conversion in the United States since 1970, and is higher than projections for future land use change from residential development or agriculture. New technology now places 1.3 million km2 that had not previously experienced oil and gas development at risk of development for unconventional oil and gas. Renewable energy production can be sustained indefinitely on the same land base, while extractive energy must continually drill and mine new areas to sustain production. We calculated the number of years required for fossil energy production to expand to cover the same area as renewables, if both were to produce the same amount of energy each year. The land required for coal production would grow to equal or exceed that of wind, solar and geothermal energy within 2–31 years. In contrast, it would take hundreds of years for oil production to have the same energy sprawl as biofuels. Meeting energy demands while conserving nature will require increased energy conservation, in addition to distributed renewable energy and appropriate siting and mitigation.


Science of The Total Environment | 2017

Unconventional oil and gas spills: Materials, volumes, and risks to surface waters in four states of the U.S.

Kelly O. Maloney; Sharon Baruch-Mordo; Lauren A. Patterson; Jean-Philippe Nicot; Sally A. Entrekin; Joseph Fargione; Joseph M. Kiesecker; Kate Konschnik; Joseph N. Ryan; Anne M. Trainor; James E. Saiers; Hannah Jacobs Wiseman

Extraction of oil and gas from unconventional sources, such as shale, has dramatically increased over the past ten years, raising the potential for spills or releases of chemicals, waste materials, and oil and gas. We analyzed spill data associated with unconventional wells from Colorado, New Mexico, North Dakota and Pennsylvania from 2005 to 2014, where we defined unconventional wells as horizontally drilled into an unconventional formation. We identified materials spilled by state and for each material we summarized frequency, volumes and spill rates. We evaluated the environmental risk of spills by calculating distance to the nearest stream and compared these distances to existing setback regulations. Finally, we summarized relative importance to drinking water in watersheds where spills occurred. Across all four states, we identified 21,300 unconventional wells and 6622 reported spills. The number of horizontal well bores increased sharply beginning in the late 2000s; spill rates also increased for all states except PA where the rate initially increased, reached a maximum in 2009 and then decreased. Wastewater, crude oil, drilling waste, and hydraulic fracturing fluid were the materials most often spilled; spilled volumes of these materials largely ranged from 100 to 10,000L. Across all states, the average distance of spills to a stream was highest in New Mexico (1379m), followed by Colorado (747m), North Dakota (598m) and then Pennsylvania (268m), and 7.0, 13.3, and 20.4% of spills occurred within existing surface water setback regulations of 30.5, 61.0, and 91.4m, respectively. Pennsylvania spills occurred in watersheds with a higher relative importance to drinking water than the other three states. Results from this study can inform risk assessments by providing improved input parameters on volume and rates of materials spilled, and guide regulations and the management policy of spills.


Environmental Science & Technology | 2017

Unconventional Oil and Gas Spills: Risks, Mitigation Priorities, and State Reporting Requirements

Lauren A. Patterson; Katherine E. Konschnik; Hannah Jacobs Wiseman; Joseph Fargione; Kelly O. Maloney; Joseph M. Kiesecker; Jean-Philippe Nicot; Sharon Baruch-Mordo; Sally A. Entrekin; Anne M. Trainor; James E. Saiers

Rapid growth in unconventional oil and gas (UOG) has produced jobs, revenue, and energy, but also concerns over spills and environmental risks. We assessed spill data from 2005 to 2014 at 31 481 UOG wells in Colorado, New Mexico, North Dakota, and Pennsylvania. We found 2-16% of wells reported a spill each year. Median spill volumes ranged from 0.5 m3 in Pennsylvania to 4.9 m3 in New Mexico; the largest spills exceeded 100 m3. Seventy-five to 94% of spills occurred within the first three years of well life when wells were drilled, completed, and had their largest production volumes. Across all four states, 50% of spills were related to storage and moving fluids via flowlines. Reporting rates varied by state, affecting spill rates and requiring extensive time and effort getting data into a usable format. Enhanced and standardized regulatory requirements for reporting spills could improve the accuracy and speed of analyses to identify and prevent spill risks and mitigate potential environmental damage. Transparency for data sharing and analysis will be increasingly important as UOG development expands. We designed an interactive spills data visualization tool ( http://snappartnership.net/groups/hydraulic-fracturing/webapp/spills.html ) to illustrate the value of having standardized, public data.


Landscape Ecology | 2016

Movement patterns of three arboreal primates in a Neotropical moist forest explained by LiDAR-estimated canopy structure

Kevin A. McLean; Anne M. Trainor; Gregory P. Asner; Margaret C. Crofoot; Mariah E. Hopkins; Christina J. Campbell; Roberta E. Martin; David E. Knapp; Patrick A. Jansen

ContextMany arboreal mammals in Neotropical forests are important seed dispersers that influence the spatial patterns of tree regeneration via their movement patterns, which in turn are determined by the canopy structure of the forest itself. However, the relationship between arboreal mammal movement and canopy structure is poorly understood, due in large part to the complexity of quantifying arboreal habitat structure.ObjectivesWe relate detailed movement trajectories of three sympatric primate species to attributes of canopy structure derived from airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) in order to understand the role of structure in arboreal movement in the tropical moist forest of Barro Colorado Island, Panama.MethodsWe used high-resolution LiDAR to quantify three-dimensional attributes of the forest canopy of the entire island, high-resolution GPS tracking to map the movement patterns of the monkey species, and step selection functions to relate movement decisions to canopy attributes.ResultsWe found that movement decisions were correlated with canopy height and distance to gaps, which indicate forest maturity and lateral connectivity, in all three species. In the two faster-moving species, step selection was also correlated with the thickness of the crown layer and the density of vegetation within the crown.ConclusionsThe correlations detected are fully in line with known differences in the locomotor adaptations and movement strategies of the study species, and directly reflect maximization of energetic efficiency and ability to escape from predators. Quantification of step selection in relation to structure thus provides insight into the ways in which arboreal animals use their environment.


Integrative Zoology | 2015

The face of conservation responding to a dynamically changing world

Ruscena Wiederholt; Anne M. Trainor; Nicole L. Michel; Patrick D. Shirey; Ronald R. Swaisgood; Doug Tallamy; Susan C. Cook-Patton

In its 40-year history, the science of conservation has faced unprecedented challenges in terms of environmental damage and rapid global change, and environmental problems are only increasing as greater demands are placed on limited natural resources. Conservation science has been adapting to keep pace with these changes. Here, we highlight contemporary and emerging trends and innovations in conservation science that we believe represent the most effective responses to biodiversity threats. We focus on specific areas where conservation science has had to adjust its approach to address emerging threats to biodiversity, including habitat destruction and degradation, climate change, declining populations and invasive species. We also document changes in attitudes, norms and practices among conservation scientists. A key component to success is engaging and maintaining public support for conservation, which can be facilitated through the use of technology. These recent trends in conservation and management are innovative and will assist in optimizing conservation strategies, increasing our leverage with the general public and tackling our current environmental challenges.


Natural Areas Journal | 2015

Conserving biodiversity: Practical guidance about climate change adaptation approaches in support of land-use planning

Oswald J. Schmitz; Joshua J. Lawler; Paul Beier; Craig Groves; Gary Knight; Douglas A. Boyce; Jason Bulluck; Kevin M. Johnston; Mary L. Klein; Kit Muller; D. John Pierce; William R. Singleton; James R. Strittholt; David M. Theobald; Stephen C. Trombulak; Anne M. Trainor


Landscape Ecology | 2013

Empirical estimation of dispersal resistance surfaces: a case study with red-cockaded woodpeckers

Anne M. Trainor; Jeffrey R. Walters; William F. Morris; Joseph O. Sexton; Aaron Moody


Ecological Applications | 2014

Enhancing species distribution modeling by characterizing predator–prey interactions

Anne M. Trainor; Oswald J. Schmitz; Jacob S. Ivan; Tanya M. Shenk


Ecology Letters | 2014

Infusing considerations of trophic dependencies into species distribution modelling

Anne M. Trainor; Oswald J. Schmitz

Collaboration


Dive into the Anne M. Trainor's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jean-Philippe Nicot

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kelly O. Maloney

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sally A. Entrekin

University of Central Arkansas

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge