Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Annette K. Miltenberger is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Annette K. Miltenberger.


Geophysical Research Letters | 2016

A trajectory-based classification of ERA-Interim ice clouds in the region of the North Atlantic storm track

Heini Wernli; Maxi Boettcher; Hanna Joos; Annette K. Miltenberger; Peter Spichtinger

A two-type classification of ice clouds (cirrus) is introduced, based on the liquid and ice water content, LWC and IWC, along air parcel backward trajectories from the clouds. In situ cirrus has no LWC along the trajectory segment containing IWC; it forms via nucleation from the gas phase. In contrast, liquid-origin cirrus has both LWC and IWC along their backward trajectories; it forms via lifting from the lower troposphere and freezing of mixed-phase clouds. This classification is applied to 12 years of ERA-Interim ice clouds in the North Atlantic region. Between 400 and 500 hPa more than 50% are liquid-origin cirrus, whereas this frequency decreases strongly with altitude (<10% at 200 hPa). The relative frequencies of the two categories vary only weakly with season. More than 50% of in situ cirrus occur on top of liquid-origin cirrus, indicating that they often form in response to the strong lifting accompanying the formation of liquid-origin cirrus.


Meteorological Monographs | 2017

Secondary Ice Production: Current State of the Science and Recommendations for the Future

P. R. Field; R. P. Lawson; P. R. A. Brown; Gary Lloyd; C. D. Westbrook; Dmitri Moisseev; Annette K. Miltenberger; Athanasios Nenes; Alan M. Blyth; T. W. Choularton; Paul Connolly; J. Buehl; Jonathan Crosier; Zhiqiang Cui; Christopher Dearden; Paul J. DeMott; A. Flossmann; A. Heymsfield; Y. Huang; H. Kalesse; Zamin A. Kanji; A. Korolev; A. Kirchgaessner; Sonia Lasher-Trapp; Thomas Leisner; Greg M. McFarquhar; Vaughan T. J. Phillips; Jeffrey L. Stith; Sylvia C. Sullivan

AbstractMeasured ice crystal concentrations in natural clouds at modest supercooling (temperature ~>−10°C) are often orders of magnitude greater than the number concentration of primary ice nucleating particles. Therefore, it has long been proposed that a secondary ice production process must exist that is able to rapidly enhance the number concentration of the ice population following initial primary ice nucleation events. Secondary ice production is important for the prediction of ice crystal concentration and the subsequent evolution of some types of clouds, but the physical basis of the process is not understood and the production rates are not well constrained. In November 2015 an international workshop was held to discuss the current state of the science and future work to constrain and improve our understanding of secondary ice production processes. Examples and recommendations for in situ observations, remote sensing, laboratory investigations, and modeling approaches are presented.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2018

Strong control of Southern Ocean cloud reflectivity by ice-nucleating particles

Jesús Vergara-Temprado; Annette K. Miltenberger; Kalli Furtado; Daniel P. Grosvenor; Ben Shipway; Adrian Hill; Jonathan M. Wilkinson; P. R. Field; Benjamin J. Murray; Kenneth S. Carslaw

Significance Simulated clouds over the Southern Ocean reflect too little solar radiation compared with observations, which results in errors in simulated surface temperatures and in many other important features of the climate system. Our results show that the radiative properties of the most biased types of clouds in cyclonic systems are highly sensitive to the concentration of ice-nucleating particles. The uniquely low concentrations of ice-nucleating particles in this remote marine environment strongly inhibit precipitation and allow much brighter clouds to be sustained. Large biases in climate model simulations of cloud radiative properties over the Southern Ocean cause large errors in modeled sea surface temperatures, atmospheric circulation, and climate sensitivity. Here, we combine cloud-resolving model simulations with estimates of the concentration of ice-nucleating particles in this region to show that our simulated Southern Ocean clouds reflect far more radiation than predicted by global models, in agreement with satellite observations. Specifically, we show that the clouds that are most sensitive to the concentration of ice-nucleating particles are low-level mixed-phase clouds in the cold sectors of extratropical cyclones, which have previously been identified as a main contributor to the Southern Ocean radiation bias. The very low ice-nucleating particle concentrations that prevail over the Southern Ocean strongly suppress cloud droplet freezing, reduce precipitation, and enhance cloud reflectivity. The results help explain why a strong radiation bias occurs mainly in this remote region away from major sources of ice-nucleating particles. The results present a substantial challenge to climate models to be able to simulate realistic ice-nucleating particle concentrations and their effects under specific meteorological conditions.


Meteorological Monographs | 2016

Chapter 7. Secondary Ice Production - current state of the science and recommendations for the future

P. R. Field; R. P. Lawson; P. R. A. Brown; Gary Lloyd; C. D. Westbrook; Dmitri Moisseev; Annette K. Miltenberger; Athanasios Nenes; Alan M. Blyth; T. W. Choularton; Paul Connolly; J. Buehl; Jonathan Crosier; Zhiqiang Cui; Christopher Dearden; Paul J. DeMott; A. Flossmann; A. Heymsfield; Y. Huang; H. Kalesse; Zamin A. Kanji; A. Korolev; A. Kirchgaessner; Sonia Lasher-Trapp; Thomas Leisner; Greg M. McFarquhar; Vaughan T. J. Phillips; Jeffrey L. Stith; Sylvia C. Sullivan

AbstractMeasured ice crystal concentrations in natural clouds at modest supercooling (temperature ~>−10°C) are often orders of magnitude greater than the number concentration of primary ice nucleating particles. Therefore, it has long been proposed that a secondary ice production process must exist that is able to rapidly enhance the number concentration of the ice population following initial primary ice nucleation events. Secondary ice production is important for the prediction of ice crystal concentration and the subsequent evolution of some types of clouds, but the physical basis of the process is not understood and the production rates are not well constrained. In November 2015 an international workshop was held to discuss the current state of the science and future work to constrain and improve our understanding of secondary ice production processes. Examples and recommendations for in situ observations, remote sensing, laboratory investigations, and modeling approaches are presented.


Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2018

Large simulated radiative effects of smoke in the south-east Atlantic

H. Gordon; P. R. Field; Steven J. Abel; Ben Johnson; Mohit Dalvi; Daniel P. Grosvenor; Adrian Hill; Annette K. Miltenberger; Masaru Yoshioka; Kenneth S. Carslaw

A 1200 km-square area of the tropical south Atlantic Ocean near Ascension Island is studied with the HadGEM climate model at convection-permitting and global resolutions for a ten-day case study period in August 2016. During the simulation period, a plume of biomass burning smoke from Africa moves into the area and mixes into the clouds. At Ascension Island, this smoke episode was the strongest of the 2016 fire season. We examine the interaction of the smoke with clouds and find it has substantial instantaneous direct, indirect and semi-direct radiative effects, which vary in magnitude between model 5 configurations. The region of interest is simulated at 4 km resolution, with no parameterised convection scheme. The simulations are driven by, and compared to, the HadGEM global model, running at approximately 65 km resolution. For the first time, the UK Chemistry and Aerosol model UKCA is included in a regional model with prognostic aerosol number concentrations advecting in from the global model at the boundaries of the region. 10 The smoke aerosol is simulated realistically, and is found to affect dynamical, microphysical and radiative properties of the atmosphere across the region. The model captures the large-scale horizontal transport of the aerosol adequately, approximately reproducing a transition from pristine to polluted conditions. However, for some of the simulation, the smoke is around 1km too low in altitude and therefore, although the smoke mixes into the clouds earlier than observed. Fire emissions increase the total aerosol burden by a factor 3.7 and cloud droplet number concentrations by a factor of 3, which is consistent with MODIS 15 observations. Strong localised perturbations to heating and cooling rates due to the smoke affect the dynamics: iIn the regional model, the inversion height is reduced by up to 200 m when smoke is included. The smoke also affects precipitation, to an extent which depends on the model microphysics. The microphysical and dynamical changes lead to an increase in liquid water path of 60g m−2 relative to a simulation without smoke aerosol, when averaged over the polluted period. This increase is uncertain, and smaller in the global model. It is mostly due to radiatively driven dynamical changes: the reduced entrainment 20 of dry air from above the cloud layer, rather than precipitation suppression by aerosol. Over the 5-day polluted period, the smoke has substantial direct radiative effects of +11.4W m−2 in the regional model, when averaged over the polluted five days of our case study. The, a semi-direct radiative effect of the smoke,a semi-direct effect of −30.5W m−2, and an indirect effect of −10.1W m−2. Our results show that However, the radiative effects are sensitive tothe structure of the model (global versus regional) and the parameterization of rain autoconversion.are sensitive to the model 25 set-up: the semi-direct effect is smaller in the global model, and also in a simulation with the Kogan (2013) parameterisation of autoconversion and accretion instead of the default, from Khairoutdinov & Kogan (2002). Furthermore, we simulate a liquid water path that is biased high compared to satellite observations by 22% on average, and this leads to high estimates of the domain-averaged aerosol direct effect and the effect of the aerosol on cloud albedo. With these caveats, we simulate a large net cooling across the region, of −27.6W m−2. 30


Archive | 2017

Secondary Ice Production

P. R. Field; R. P. Lawson; P. R. A. Brown; Gary Lloyd; C. D. Westbrook; Dmitri Moisseev; Annette K. Miltenberger; Athanasios Nenes; Alan M. Blyth; T. W. Choularton; Paul Connolly; J. Buehl; Jonathan Crosier; Zhiqiang Cui; Christopher Dearden; Paul J. DeMott; A. Flossmann; A. Heymsfield; Y. Huang; H. Kalesse; Zamin A. Kanji; A. Korolev; A. Kirchgaessner; Sonia Lasher-Trapp; Thomas Leisner; Greg M. McFarquhar; Vaughan T. J. Phillips; Jeffrey L. Stith; Sylvia C. Sullivan

AbstractMeasured ice crystal concentrations in natural clouds at modest supercooling (temperature ~>−10°C) are often orders of magnitude greater than the number concentration of primary ice nucleating particles. Therefore, it has long been proposed that a secondary ice production process must exist that is able to rapidly enhance the number concentration of the ice population following initial primary ice nucleation events. Secondary ice production is important for the prediction of ice crystal concentration and the subsequent evolution of some types of clouds, but the physical basis of the process is not understood and the production rates are not well constrained. In November 2015 an international workshop was held to discuss the current state of the science and future work to constrain and improve our understanding of secondary ice production processes. Examples and recommendations for in situ observations, remote sensing, laboratory investigations, and modeling approaches are presented.


Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2017

Aerosol–cloud interactions in mixed-phase convective clouds – Part 1: Aerosol perturbations

Annette K. Miltenberger; P. R. Field; Adrian Hill; Phil Rosenberg; Ben Shipway; Jonathan M. Wilkinson; Robert Scovell; Alan M. Blyth


Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2015

Sensitivities of Lagrangian modelling of mid-latitude cirrus clouds to trajectory data quality

Erika Kienast-Sjögren; Annette K. Miltenberger; Beiping Luo; T. Peter


Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society | 2016

Revisiting the latent heating contribution to foehn warming: Lagrangian analysis of two foehn events over the Swiss Alps

Annette K. Miltenberger; Silvia Reynolds; Michael Sprenger


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2018

Atmospheric Ice‐Nucleating Particles in the Dusty Tropical Atlantic

H. C. Price; K. J. Baustian; J. B. McQuaid; Alan M. Blyth; Keith N. Bower; T. W. Choularton; Richard Cotton; Zhiqiang Cui; P. R. Field; Martin Gallagher; R. Hawker; A. Merrington; Annette K. Miltenberger; Ryan R. Neely; S. T. Parker; Philip D. Rosenberg; J. W. Taylor; J. Trembath; Jesús Vergara-Temprado; Thomas F. Whale; Theodore W. Wilson; Gillian Young; Benjamin J. Murray

Collaboration


Dive into the Annette K. Miltenberger's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gary Lloyd

University of Manchester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge