Annette Sonntag

Effects of the high-affinity corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 1 antagonist R121919 in major depression: the first 20 patients treated

Clinical and preclinical data suggest that unrestrained secretion of corticoctropin-releasing hormone (CRH) in the CNS produces several signs and symptoms of depression and anxiety disorders through continuous activation of CRH(1) receptors. This led to the development of drugs that selectively antagonize CRH(1) receptors suppressing anxiety-like behavior in rats and also in monkey models of anxiety. These findings led to a clinical development program exploring the antidepressive potential of R121919, a water-soluble pyrrolopyrimidine that binds with high affinity to human CRH(1) receptors and is well absorbed in humans. This compound was administered to 24 patients with a major depressive episode primarily in order to investigate whether its endocrine mode of action compromises the stress-hormone system or whether other safety and tolerability issues exist. The patients were enrolled in two dose-escalation panels: one group (n=10) where the dose range increased from 5-40 mg and another group (n=10) where the dose escalated from 40 to 80 mg within 30 days each. Four patients dropped out because of withdrawal of consent to participate (three cases) or worsening of depressive symptomatoloy in one case. We found that R121919 was safe and well tolerated by the patients during the observation period. Moreover, the data suggested that CRH(1)-receptor blockade does not impair the corticotropin and cortisol secretory activity either at baseline or following an exogenous CRH challenge. We also observed significant reductions in depression and anxiety scores using both, patient and clinician ratings. These findings, along with the observed worsening of affective symptomatology after drug discontinuation, suggests that the pharmacological principle of CRH(1)-receptor antagonism has considerable therapeutic potential in the treatment and the prevention of diseases where exaggerated central CRH activity is present at baseline or following stress exposure.

Cortisol response in the combined dexamethasone/CRH test as predictor of relapse in patients with remitted depression: a prospective study

The development and course of depression is causally linked to impairment of central regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) system. Previous research documented that the combined dexamethasone/corticotropin-releasing hormone (DEX/CRH) test identifies HPA dysfunction with high sensitivity. We evaluated the predictive validity for medium-term outcome of the cortisol response in the combined DEX/CRH test in 74 remitted patients previously suffering from major depressive disorder. Of the 74 patients, 61 remained in stable remission and 13 relapsed during the first 6 months after discharge from the hospital. Although the cortisol and ACTH responses in the DEX/CRH test did not differ between the two groups of patients on admission, the responses differed significantly just before discharge (P< 0.05). We defined two dichotomous variables as prediction rules indicating (1) the change between admission and discharge in the cortisol response to the DEX/CRH test, and (2) the effect of the CRH infusion on cortisol as compared to the baseline level in the DEX/CRH test prior to discharge only. An elevated cortisol response in the DEX/CRH test was correlated with a four- to six-fold higher risk for relapse than in individuals with a normal cortisol response. The two proposed rules for predicting relapse within the first 6 months after discharge could be optimized by including age and gender. Hence, an exaggerated cortisol response in the combined DEX/CRH test predicts the recurrence of depressive psychopathology. The test performance can be further optimized if gender and age are taken into account.

Clinical and neurobiological effects of tianeptine and paroxetine in major depression

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are widely used as effective pharmacological agents to treat depressive disorders. In contrast to the SSRIs, which block the presynaptic serotonin (5-HT) transporter and by this route increase the concentration of serotonin in the synaptic cleft, the antidepressant tianeptine enhances the presynaptic neuronal reuptake of 5-HT and thus decreases serotonergic neurotransmission. Both SSRIs and tianeptine are clinically effective; however, their opposite modes of action challenge the prevailing concepts on the need of enhancement of serotonergic neurotransmission. To better understand the differences between these two opposite pharmacological modes of action, we compared the changes induced by tianeptine and paroxetine on psychopathology, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) system, and cognitive functions in a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial including 44 depressed inpatients over a period of 42 days. Depressive symptomatology significantly improved in all efficacy measures, with no significant differences between tianeptine and paroxetine. There was a trend toward better response to the SSRI among women. Assessment of the HPA system showed marked hyperactivity before the beginning of treatment, which then normalized in most of the patients, without significant differences between the two antidepressants. Cognitive assessments showed no significant differences between the two drugs investigated. The results of the current study suggest that the initial effect, i.e., enhancement or decrease of 5-HT release, is only indirectly responsible for antidepressant efficacy, and they support the notion that downstream adaptations within and between nerve cells are crucial. The normalization of the HPA system as a common mode of action of different antidepressants seems to be of special interest.

Clinical characteristics and treatment outcome in a representative sample of depressed inpatients – Findings from the Munich Antidepressant Response Signature (MARS) project

Depression is a common and often difficult-to-treat clinical condition with a high rate of patients showing insufficient treatment response and persistence of symptoms. We report the characteristics of a representative sample of depressed inpatients participating in the Munich Antidepressant Response Signature (MARS) project. Eight hundred and forty-two inpatients admitted to a psychiatric hospital for treatment of a major depressive episode, recurrent or bipolar depression were thoroughly characterized with respect to demographic factors, clinical history, and the degree of HPA-axis dysregulation evaluated by means of combined dex/CRH tests, and the predictive value of these factors for treatment outcome is investigated. 80.8% of patients responded to treatment (i.e., improvement in symptom severity of at least 50%) and 57.9% reached remission (i.e., near absence of residual depressive symptoms) at discharge after a mean treatment period of 11.8 weeks. Regression analysis identified early partial response (within 2 weeks) as the most important positive predictor for achieving remission. Previous ineffective treatment trials in the current episode and presence of a migration background are potent negative predictors for treatment outcome. In addition, remitters were characterized by a more pronounced normalization of an initially dysregulated HPA-axis. We could show that a large majority of inpatients suffering from depression benefits from antidepressant treatment during hospitalization. However, a considerable number of patients failed to achieve remission. We demonstrated that this subgroup can be characterized by a set of demographic, clinical and neuroendocrine variables allowing to predict unfavorable outcome at an early stage of treatment.

Treatment of depression with the CRH-1-receptor antagonist R121919: endocrine changes and side effects

A dysregulation of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) system has been hypothesized to account for a myriad of cardinal symptoms of affective disorders. Specifically, increased CRH signalling via CRH type 1 receptors is thought to be an important factor in the pathogenesis of major depression and anxiety disorders. Consequently, a number of drugs have been developed in order to target the postulated increase in CRH/CRH 1 receptor signalling. One of these compounds, R121919, binds with high affinity to CRH1 receptors antagonising the action of CRH. R121919 was recently tested in an open-label study conceptualized as a safety and tolerability study. As part of this study, a thorough endocrine evaluation and detailed clinical laboratory analysis were assessed several times during 30 days of treatment with two different dose regimens of R121919 (5-40 mg vs. 40-80 mg) in 24 patients with a major depressive episode. During treatment with the experimental drug no serious side effects were noted. In particular, there were no adverse effects or impairment of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal system, the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis, the renin-angiotensin system, prolactin or vasopressin secretion. Furthermore, no changes in the serum corticotropin and cortisol concentrations and in the responsivity of corticotropin and cortisol following a CRH stimulation test were noted. No effects of R121919 on clinical laboratory parameters including liver enzymes, EEG and ECG were observed. These results encourage the development of other CRH-1-R antagonists as a novel class of antidepressive drugs.

Hippocampal metabolic abnormalities in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) defines a group of otherwise healthy elderly subjects with a markedly elevated risk of developing Alzheimers disease (AD). In the search for biomarkers of MCI, we assessed whether MCI shares neurochemical abnormalities with AD in areas affected early in the course of the disease. As a secondary study aim, we tested to what extent neurochemical findings reflect neuropsychological deficits. Proton spectroscopy was performed in 19 MCI patients, 18 AD patients and 22 age and gender matched controls (CON) within the parietal gray and white matter (PWM and PGM) and the hippocampus (HIP). The cognitive test battery used included measures compiled by the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimers Disease (CERAD). The N-acetyl-aspartate to creatine ratio (NAA/Cr) was significantly reduced in the HIP of MCI and AD compared with CON (p < 0.05). Only AD patients showed parietal abnormalities, namely significantly elevated myoinositol (mI/Cr and mI/NAA) in PGM, reduced NAA/Cr and elevated mI/NAA in PWM. MCI subjects were significantly impaired in categorical verbal fluency (VF) (p < 0.001) and delayed verbal recall (DVR) (p < 0.001). VF was positively correlated with hippocampal NAA/Cr (p < 0.05) and parietal mI/NAA (p < 0.05). In summary, this study demonstrates shared neurobiological hippocampal abnormalities in MCI and AD, whereas parietal lobe neurochemical profiles and functions were normal in MCI. Thus, biological evidence is provided that MCI represents a precursor stage of AD. Moreover, multivoxel 1H MRS may enable an objective staging of the neurodegenerative process underlying the age-dependent cognitive deficits eventually leading to dementia.

Changes of sleep architecture, spectral composition of sleep EEG, the nocturnal secretion of cortisol, ACTH, GH, prolactin, melatonin, ghrelin, and leptin, and the DEX-CRH test in depressed patients during treatment with mirtazapine.

The noradrenergic and specific serotoninergic antidepressant mirtazapine improves sleep, modulates hormone secretion including blunting of hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenocortical (HPA) activity, and may prompt increased appetite and weight gain. The simultaneous investigation of sleep electroencephalogram (EEG) and hormone secretion during antidepressive treatment helps to further elucidate these effects. We examined sleep EEG (for later conventional and quantitative analyses) and the nocturnal concentrations of cortisol, adrenocorticotropin (ACTH), growth hormone (GH), prolactin, melatonin and the key factors of energy balance, ghrelin, and leptin before and after 28 days of treatment of depressed patients (seven women, three men, mean age 39.9±4.2 years) with mirtazapine. In addition, a sleep EEG was recorded at day 2 and the dexamethasone–corticotropin-releasing hormone (DEX-CRH) test was performed to assess HPA activity at days −3 and 26. Psychometry and mirtazapine plasma concentrations were measured weekly. Already at day 2, sleep continuity was improved. This effect persisted at day 28, when slow-wave sleep, low-delta, theta and alpha activity, leptin and (0300–0700) melatonin increased, and cortisol and ghrelin decreased. ACTH and prolactin remained unchanged. The first two specimens of GH collected after the start of quantitative EEG analysis were reduced at day 28. The DEX-CRH test showed, at day 26, a blunting of the overshoot of ACTH and cortisol found at day −3. The Hamilton Depression score decreased from 32.1±7.3 to 15.5±6.7 between days −1 and 28. A weight gain of approximately 3 kg was observed. This unique profile of changes is compatible with the action of mirtazapine at 5-HT-2 receptors, at presynaptic adrenergic alpha 2 receptors, at the HPA system, and on ghrelin and leptin.

Trimipramine and imipramine exert different effects on the sleep EEG and on nocturnal hormone secretion during treatment of major depression

In a 4-week double-blind clinical trial we compared the effects of the tricyclic antidepressants trimipramine and imipramine on the sleep EEG and on nocturnal bormone secretion in 20 male inpatients with major depression. Both treatments produced rapid significant clinical improvement in depression without severe adverse effects. However, the two drugs had markedly different neurobiologic profiles. Trimipramine enhanced rapid eye movement (REM) sleep and slow wave sleep, whereas imipramine suppressed REM sleep and showed no effect on slow wave sleep. Total sleep time and the sleep efficiency index increased under trimipramine but not under imipramine. Nocturnal cortisol secretion decreased with trimipramine but remained unchanged with imipramine. In contrast to imipramine, trimipramine induced an increase in prolactin secretion compatible with its known antagonism at dopamine (D2) receptors. Imipramine induced a decrease in growth hormone secretion during the first half of the night. Neither of the drugs induced significant changes in plasma testosterone concentration. We conclude that trimipramine is an antidepressant with sleep-improving qualities that possibly acts through inhibition of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical system activity by a yet unknown mechanism.

State markers of depression in sleep EEG: Dependency on drug and gender in patients treated with tianeptine or paroxetine

Tianeptine enhances while paroxetine inhibits serotonin reuptake into neurons; however, both show an antidepressive action. A subgroup of 38 depressed patients from a drug trial comparing the efficacy of tianeptine with that of paroxetine was studied with regard to their effects on sleep regulation, especially in relation to treatment response. We recorded sleep EEGs at day 7 and day 42 after the start of treatment with either compound, which allows measurement of changes due to the antidepressive medication in relation to the duration of treatment. Spectral analysis of the non-REM sleep EEG revealed a strong decline in the higher sigma frequency range (14–16 Hz) in male treatment responders independent of medication, whereas nonresponders did not show marked changes in this frequency range independent of gender. The patients receiving paroxetine showed less REM sleep and more intermittent wakefulness compared to the patients receiving tianeptine. REM density after 1 week of treatment was a predictor of treatment response in the whole sample. Psychopathological features with regard to the score in single items of the HAMD revealed predictive markers for response, some of which were opposite in the gender groups, especially those related to somatic anxiety. Changes in REM density were inversely correlated to the changes in HAMD in the paroxetine, but not the tianeptine, group. Our data suggest the importance of taking gender into account in the study of the biological effects of drugs. The study further points to the importance of the higher sigma frequency range in the sleep EEG of non-REM sleep and REM density as a marker of treatment response.

Toward a reliable distinction between patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer-Type dementia versus major depression

BACKGROUND Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of soluble amyloid precursor protein (sAPP) and its alpha-secreted form (alpha-sAPP) were investigated as a means to distinguish between individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer-type dementia (DAT) and those with major depressive episode (MDE) showing secondary memory deficits. METHODS Twenty-seven patients with MCI, 32 with probable DAT, and 24 with MDE attending a memory clinic were studied. Cerebrospinal fluid levels of sAPP/amyloid precursor-like protein 2 (APLP2) and alpha-sAPP were detected by Western blotting. RESULTS Patients with MDE had the highest CSF levels of total sAPP/APLP2 as compared with MCI and DAT patients (p < .001); sAPP/APLP2 levels were higher in MCI than in DAT subjects. Whereas alpha-sAPP levels did not differ between the MCI and DAT groups, median levels of this peptide were significantly lower in MCI and DAT versus MDE patients. CONCLUSIONS Soluble amyloid precursor protein/APLP2 and alpha-sAPP concentrations in CSF can differentiate between DAT and MCI versus MDE, facilitating early ameliorative interventions and appropriate treatment regimens.