Nibal Ackl

Effects of the high-affinity corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 1 antagonist R121919 in major depression: the first 20 patients treated

Clinical and preclinical data suggest that unrestrained secretion of corticoctropin-releasing hormone (CRH) in the CNS produces several signs and symptoms of depression and anxiety disorders through continuous activation of CRH(1) receptors. This led to the development of drugs that selectively antagonize CRH(1) receptors suppressing anxiety-like behavior in rats and also in monkey models of anxiety. These findings led to a clinical development program exploring the antidepressive potential of R121919, a water-soluble pyrrolopyrimidine that binds with high affinity to human CRH(1) receptors and is well absorbed in humans. This compound was administered to 24 patients with a major depressive episode primarily in order to investigate whether its endocrine mode of action compromises the stress-hormone system or whether other safety and tolerability issues exist. The patients were enrolled in two dose-escalation panels: one group (n=10) where the dose range increased from 5-40 mg and another group (n=10) where the dose escalated from 40 to 80 mg within 30 days each. Four patients dropped out because of withdrawal of consent to participate (three cases) or worsening of depressive symptomatoloy in one case. We found that R121919 was safe and well tolerated by the patients during the observation period. Moreover, the data suggested that CRH(1)-receptor blockade does not impair the corticotropin and cortisol secretory activity either at baseline or following an exogenous CRH challenge. We also observed significant reductions in depression and anxiety scores using both, patient and clinician ratings. These findings, along with the observed worsening of affective symptomatology after drug discontinuation, suggests that the pharmacological principle of CRH(1)-receptor antagonism has considerable therapeutic potential in the treatment and the prevention of diseases where exaggerated central CRH activity is present at baseline or following stress exposure.

Clinical and neurobiological effects of tianeptine and paroxetine in major depression

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are widely used as effective pharmacological agents to treat depressive disorders. In contrast to the SSRIs, which block the presynaptic serotonin (5-HT) transporter and by this route increase the concentration of serotonin in the synaptic cleft, the antidepressant tianeptine enhances the presynaptic neuronal reuptake of 5-HT and thus decreases serotonergic neurotransmission. Both SSRIs and tianeptine are clinically effective; however, their opposite modes of action challenge the prevailing concepts on the need of enhancement of serotonergic neurotransmission. To better understand the differences between these two opposite pharmacological modes of action, we compared the changes induced by tianeptine and paroxetine on psychopathology, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) system, and cognitive functions in a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial including 44 depressed inpatients over a period of 42 days. Depressive symptomatology significantly improved in all efficacy measures, with no significant differences between tianeptine and paroxetine. There was a trend toward better response to the SSRI among women. Assessment of the HPA system showed marked hyperactivity before the beginning of treatment, which then normalized in most of the patients, without significant differences between the two antidepressants. Cognitive assessments showed no significant differences between the two drugs investigated. The results of the current study suggest that the initial effect, i.e., enhancement or decrease of 5-HT release, is only indirectly responsible for antidepressant efficacy, and they support the notion that downstream adaptations within and between nerve cells are crucial. The normalization of the HPA system as a common mode of action of different antidepressants seems to be of special interest.

Treatment of depression with the CRH-1-receptor antagonist R121919: endocrine changes and side effects

A dysregulation of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) system has been hypothesized to account for a myriad of cardinal symptoms of affective disorders. Specifically, increased CRH signalling via CRH type 1 receptors is thought to be an important factor in the pathogenesis of major depression and anxiety disorders. Consequently, a number of drugs have been developed in order to target the postulated increase in CRH/CRH 1 receptor signalling. One of these compounds, R121919, binds with high affinity to CRH1 receptors antagonising the action of CRH. R121919 was recently tested in an open-label study conceptualized as a safety and tolerability study. As part of this study, a thorough endocrine evaluation and detailed clinical laboratory analysis were assessed several times during 30 days of treatment with two different dose regimens of R121919 (5-40 mg vs. 40-80 mg) in 24 patients with a major depressive episode. During treatment with the experimental drug no serious side effects were noted. In particular, there were no adverse effects or impairment of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal system, the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis, the renin-angiotensin system, prolactin or vasopressin secretion. Furthermore, no changes in the serum corticotropin and cortisol concentrations and in the responsivity of corticotropin and cortisol following a CRH stimulation test were noted. No effects of R121919 on clinical laboratory parameters including liver enzymes, EEG and ECG were observed. These results encourage the development of other CRH-1-R antagonists as a novel class of antidepressive drugs.

Hippocampal metabolic abnormalities in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) defines a group of otherwise healthy elderly subjects with a markedly elevated risk of developing Alzheimers disease (AD). In the search for biomarkers of MCI, we assessed whether MCI shares neurochemical abnormalities with AD in areas affected early in the course of the disease. As a secondary study aim, we tested to what extent neurochemical findings reflect neuropsychological deficits. Proton spectroscopy was performed in 19 MCI patients, 18 AD patients and 22 age and gender matched controls (CON) within the parietal gray and white matter (PWM and PGM) and the hippocampus (HIP). The cognitive test battery used included measures compiled by the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimers Disease (CERAD). The N-acetyl-aspartate to creatine ratio (NAA/Cr) was significantly reduced in the HIP of MCI and AD compared with CON (p < 0.05). Only AD patients showed parietal abnormalities, namely significantly elevated myoinositol (mI/Cr and mI/NAA) in PGM, reduced NAA/Cr and elevated mI/NAA in PWM. MCI subjects were significantly impaired in categorical verbal fluency (VF) (p < 0.001) and delayed verbal recall (DVR) (p < 0.001). VF was positively correlated with hippocampal NAA/Cr (p < 0.05) and parietal mI/NAA (p < 0.05). In summary, this study demonstrates shared neurobiological hippocampal abnormalities in MCI and AD, whereas parietal lobe neurochemical profiles and functions were normal in MCI. Thus, biological evidence is provided that MCI represents a precursor stage of AD. Moreover, multivoxel 1H MRS may enable an objective staging of the neurodegenerative process underlying the age-dependent cognitive deficits eventually leading to dementia.

Toward a reliable distinction between patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer-Type dementia versus major depression

BACKGROUND Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of soluble amyloid precursor protein (sAPP) and its alpha-secreted form (alpha-sAPP) were investigated as a means to distinguish between individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer-type dementia (DAT) and those with major depressive episode (MDE) showing secondary memory deficits. METHODS Twenty-seven patients with MCI, 32 with probable DAT, and 24 with MDE attending a memory clinic were studied. Cerebrospinal fluid levels of sAPP/amyloid precursor-like protein 2 (APLP2) and alpha-sAPP were detected by Western blotting. RESULTS Patients with MDE had the highest CSF levels of total sAPP/APLP2 as compared with MCI and DAT patients (p < .001); sAPP/APLP2 levels were higher in MCI than in DAT subjects. Whereas alpha-sAPP levels did not differ between the MCI and DAT groups, median levels of this peptide were significantly lower in MCI and DAT versus MDE patients. CONCLUSIONS Soluble amyloid precursor protein/APLP2 and alpha-sAPP concentrations in CSF can differentiate between DAT and MCI versus MDE, facilitating early ameliorative interventions and appropriate treatment regimens.

Outcome in delusional depression comparing trimipramine monotherapy with a combination of amitriptyline and haloperidol – A double-blind multicenter trial

BACKGROUND Patients with delusional depression are difficult to treat. The atypical antidepressant trimipramine was effective in a previous 4-week open label pilot study in patients with this disorder. The major neurobiological effect of trimipramine is the inhibition of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) system. In delusional depression HPA overactivity is more distinct than in other subtypes of depression. HPA suppression is thought to contribute to the action of trimipramine. METHODS In a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled multicenter trial we compared the effects of trimipramine monotherapy versus a combination of amitriptyline and haloperidol. Dosage was increased stepwise from 100mg up to 400mg trimipramine and from 100mg up to 200mg amitriptyline combined with 2mg up to 7.5mg haloperidol. The average dose of trimipramine was higher than that of amitriptyline throughout the trial. During sixth week mean dosage (+/-standard deviation) were 356.1+/-61.2mg trimipramine, 184.0+/-23.6 mg amitriptyline and 6.3+/-1.8 mg haloperidol. During six weeks psychometric assessments were performed weekly. For HPA monitoring a dexamethasone/corticotropin-releasing hormone (Dex/CRH) test was performed before active medication and at the end of treatment. Additionally tolerability was monitored by ECG, EEG assessment of extrapyramidal symptoms and akathisia, clinical laboratory routine and recording of blood pressure and heart rate. Adverse events were documented. RESULTS 94 patients were enclosed into the study. The per protocol sample consisted of 33 patients of the trimipramine group and of 24 patients of the amitriptyline/haloperidol group. The decrease of the Hamilton depression (HAMD) score (24 items) showed non-inferiority of trimipramine compared to amitriptyline/haloperidol. Twenty-eight patients (84.84%) in the trimipramine arm and 17 patients (70.83%) in the amitriptyline/haloperidol arm were responders (HAMD <or=50%). Remission (HAMD<8) was found in 18 (54.55%) patients after trimipramine and in 11 (45.83%) patients after amitriptyline/haloperidol. No significant differences were found concerning response and remission. The cortisol and ACTH response in the Dex/CRH test decreased between days 1 and 42 in both groups. Serious side effects were not reported. CONCLUSION In all, trimipramine monotherapy appears to be an effective treatment in delusional depression.

Charakterisierung kognitiver Einbußen von Patienten mit "Mild Cognitive Impairment" (MCI) in der CERAD-Screeningbatterie

Zusammenfassung: Die fruhzeitige Diagnose kognitiver Abbauprozesse ist vor dem Hintergrund der “alternden Gesellschaft” von enormer Bedeutung. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wurde das Potenzial der CERAD-kognitiven Screeningbatterie als Untersuchungsprotokoll zur Diagnostik leichter kognitiver Beeintrachtigungen (MCI, Petersen et al., 1995) sowie als Verlaufsinstrument uberpruft. Die Leistungen von 51 MCI-Patienten wurden mit 81 gesunden Kontrollpersonen verglichen. Die Leistungen der MCI-Gruppe unterschied sich in nahezu allen Subtests der CERAD-Batterie signifikant von denen der Kontrollgruppe. In der Verlaufsuntersuchung an einer Teilstichprobe (n = 18) fanden sich hingegen in der CERAD-Batterie keine signifikanten Veranderungen. Zusammenfassend lasst sich feststellen, dass die CERAD-Batterie bei leichten kognitiven Beeintrachtigungen ein ausreichend valides Screeninginstrument darstellt; fur Verlaufsuntersuchungen scheint sie hingegen weniger gut geeignet zu sein.