Ansgar Malich

Potential MRI Interpretation Model: Differentiation of Benign from Malignant Breast Masses

OBJECTIVE Our objective was to increase the accuracy of breast MRI using a semiquantitative analysis of typical MRI features and their diagnostic potential. The prevalence of recently reported MRI signs of breast lesions were analyzed and compared with other well-known signs. CONCLUSION New MRI features, especially from T2-weighted images, are promising for more reliable and accurate interpretation of breast lesions. Prospective studies of these findings are required to define cut-off values and test clinical practicality.

Electrical impedance scanning for classifying suspicious breast lesions: first results

Abstract. It has long been established that cancer cells exhibit altered local dielectric properties compared with normal cells. Consequently, different electrical conductivity and capacitance are measurable in malignant vs normal tissues. In this study we evaluated the reliability of electrical impedance scanning (EIS), a new technology, for the classification of suspicious lesions: differentiating benign from malignant, and as a primary means of detection of breast cancer. Fifty-two women with 58 sonographically and/or mammographically suspicious findings were examined using electrical impedance scanning. Two different examination modes of TransScan TS2000 (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany), the standard-resolution mode for a routine overview examination, and the targeted high-resolution mode for a local examination of the suspicious lesion were used. All patients were additionally imaged by MR mammography (MRM) and underwent core-biopsy and/or surgical treatment after the EIS examination. With respect to the histopathological findings (29 malignant and 29 benign lesions) 27 of 29 (93.1 %) malignant lesions were correctly identified using the high-resolution mode of EIS, whereas 19 of 29 (65.5 %) benign lesions were correctly identified as benign (10 of 29 benign lesions showed as false-positive findings). Negative and positive predictive values of 90.5 and 73.0 % were observed, respectively. Using the standard-resolution mode 22 of 29 malignancies were correctly detected (sensitivity 75.9 %), whereas 22 of 29 were correctly identified as benign (specificity 72.4 %). Electrical impedance scanning appears to be a promising new technology providing a relatively high sensitivity for the verification of suspicious mammographic and/or sonographic lesions especially using the high-resolution mode for local examinations. Artifacts, such as signals from superficial skin lesions, poor contact, and air bubbles, are currently a limitation.

Tumour detection rate of a new commercially available computer-aided detection system

The aim of this study was to determine the tumour detection rate and false positive rate of a new mammographic computer-aided detection system (CAD) in order to assess its clinical usefulness. The craniocaudal and oblique images of 150 suspicious mammograms from 150 patients that were histologically proven to be malignant were analysed using the Second Look CAD (CADx Medical Systems, Quebec, Canada). Cases were selected randomly using the clinics internal tumour case sampler. Correct marking of the malignant lesion in at least one view was scored as a true positive. Marks not at the location of the malignant lesion were scored as false positives. In addition, mammograms with histologically proven benign masses (n=50) and microcalcifications (n=50), as well as 100 non-suspicious mammograms, were scanned in order to determine the value of false-positive marks per image. The 150 mammograms included 94 lesions that were suspicious due to masses, 26 due to microcalcifications and 30 showed both signs of malignancy. The overall sensitivity was 90.0% (135 of 150). Sensitivity on subsets of the data was 88.7% (110 of 124) for suspicious masses (MA) and 98.2% (55 of 56) for microcalcifications. Eight of 14 false-negative cases were large lesions. The overall false-positive rate was observed as 0.28 and 0.97 marks per image of microcalcifications and masses, respectively. The lowest false-positive rates for microcalcifications and MA were observed in the cancer subgroup, whereas the highest false-positive rates were scored in the benign but mammographically suspicious subgroups, respectively. The new CAD system shows a high tumour detection rate, with approximately 1.3 false positive marks per image. These results suggest that this system might be clinically useful as a second reader of mammograms. The system performance was particularly useful for detecting microcalcifications.

Diagnosis of Arthritis Using Near-infrared Fluorochrome Cy5.5

Purpose:Near-infrared range fluorescence (NIRF) imaging is a potential tool to diagnose biologic processes in vivo. This applicability study sought to define whether imaging with fluorochrome Cy5.5 can identify arthritis in murine antigen-induced arthritis (AIA). Materials and Methods:On day 7 of AIA (n = 9 mice), fluorescence intensities in inflamed and contralateral knee joints (the latter as internal control) were measured before and after intravenous injection of Cy5.5 (until 72 hours). Cy5.5 joint deposition was verified by confocal laser-scanning microscopy. Dye phagocytosis was evaluated in cultured macrophages (cell line PMJ2-R) by FACS analysis. Cy5.5 binding to serum protein was tested by NIRF scanning and gel electrophoresis. Results:Between 2 and 72 hours, the arthritic knee joints showed significantly higher fluorescence intensities compared with contralateral joints. Microscopy confirmed Cy5.5 deposition in the synovial membrane. Cultured macrophages actively phagocytosed Cy5.5. Cy5.5 bound mainly to albumin as the main serum protein. Conclusion:NIRF imaging with Cy5.5 can identify arthritic joints in vivo, likely due to nonspecific deposition.

Further signs in the evaluation of magnetic resonance mammography: a retrospective study.

Purpose:To increase accuracy and reliability of magnetic resonance breast imaging, a new evaluation method might be helpful. The recently suggested evaluation method (Fischer U, et al) resulted in a relevant number of equivocal cases (3 or 4 points). Additional morphologic and dynamic signs as an extension of this score were evaluated. Method and Materials:One hundred thirty-two histologically verified lesions were evaluated by 3 radiologists double-blinded using 2 evaluation methods: 1) method 1 (according to Fischer, et al): 2pt: initial signal increase >100%, washout, centripetal enhancement, 1pt: initial signal increase 50–100%, plateau phenomenon, centrifugal inhomogeneous enhancement, irregular borders, linear, stellar or dendritic structure; and 2) method 2 (according to Malich, et al): 3pt: hook sign (sign of pectoral invasion), 2pt: unifocal edema, blooming. 1pt: hypointensity in T2, lymph nodes >10 mm, skin thickening, adjacent vessels, a lesions distorted inner architecture, disruption of the mamillary edge; −1pt: isointensity in T2, no edema, enhancing septations; −3pt: hyperintensity in T2, non enhancing septations. Method 1 judged a lesion to be malignant if 5 or more points were given and benign if 2 or less points were given, respectively. Method 2 (mean value of 3 radiologists) was tested in those cases in which a clear possible decision using method 1 was not sufficiently possible. Results:Method 1 alone resulted in a negative predictive value of 96.8% and a positive predictive value of 90.8% (without carinoma in situ), a sensitivity of 83.1%, a specificity of 58.8%, and revealed uncertain results (3 and 4 points) in 29 cases (out of 132; 22%). Adding the new scoring system in these 29 equivocal cases and an increase of 2 or more points by using method 2 is supposed to be a sign of malignancy; findings suggest a sensitivity of 90.9% and a specificity of 60% if an increase of maximum 1 is observed in benign lesions. In conclusion, our results show that Göttingen score alone has a sensitivity of 83.1%, a specificity of 58.8%; the second evaluation method reveals a sensitivity of 90.9% and a specificity of 60% in equivocal cases of Göttingen score. Göttingen score then reaches in all cases and second, adding the second evaluation method in equivocal cases, a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 76.5%. Conclusion:The application of a second evaluation method in those cases remaining unclear in Göttingen score can lead to a decrease of uncertainty and a higher sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis in MR mammography. In this study, Göttingen score reaches a sensitivity of 83.1% and a specificity of 58.8%, increasing to a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 76.5% when being extended by a second evaluation method in unclear cases.

Additional value of electrical impedance scanning: experience of 240 histologically-proven breast lesions

The aim of this study was to quantify the clinical value of using electrical impedance scanning (EIS) as an adjunct to other diagnostic techniques in order to identify cancerous tissue based upon its inherent altered local dielectric properties. 210 consecutive women with 240 sonographically and/or mammographically suspicious findings were examined using EIS. All lesions were histologically-proven. 86/103 malignant and 91/137 benign lesions were correctly identified using EIS (87.8% sensitivity, 66.4% specificity). NPV and PPV of 84.3% and 65.2% were observed, respectively. Excluding cases as defined by a priori criteria, i.e. lesions located deeper than 35 mm, lesions larger than 35 mm, and retroareolar lesions, a sensitivity of 85.5% was observed, and for invasive cancers, 91.7%. The detection rate for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) was poor (57.1%, n=14). By adding EIS to mammography and ultrasound, the sensitivity rose from 86.4 to 95.1%, whereas the accuracy decreased from 82.3 to 75.7%. EIS appears to be of interest as an adjunct to breast diagnostic techniques, performing with a reasonable sensitivity. Further investigations on histomorphological characteristics and the reasons for false-negative findings are essential to gain further knowledge about the bioelectricity of breast lesions, and prove the value of this new technology.

Peripheral bone status in rheumatoid arthritis evaluated by digital X-ray radiogrammetry and compared with multisite quantitative ultrasound

The development of secondary osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has recently become well recognized, characterized by demineralization at axial and in particular periarticular peripheral bone sites. Our aim was to evaluate multisite quantitative ultrasound (QUS) compared to digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR) by the quantification of cortical bone loss dependent on the severity of RA. Fifty-three patients with verified RA underwent QUS measurements (Sunlight Omnisense 7000) with estimation of the speed of sound (QUS-SOS) at the distal radius and at the phalanx of the third digit. Also, bone mineral density (DXR-BMD) and metacarpal index (DXR-MCI) were estimated on metacarpals II-IV using DXR technology. Additionally, Larsen score and Steinbroker stage were assessed. Disease activity of RA was estimated by disease activity score 28 (DAS 28). For the group with minor disease activity (3.2 ≤ DAS ≤ 5.1), QUS-SOS (phalanx) showed a significant association to DXR-BMD (R = 0.66) and DXR-MCI (R = 0.52). In the case of accentuated disease activity (DAS > 5.1), QUS-SOS of the radius revealed a significant correlation to DXR-BMD (R = 0.71) and DXR-MCI (R = 0.84), whereas for QUS-SOS (phalanx) no significant association to the DXR parameters was shown. The DXR parameters and, to a lesser extent, the QUS data also demonstrated pronounced declines in the case of accentuated disease activity (DAS > 5.1). Both DXR-BMD (−25.9 %, P < 0.01) and DXR-MCI (−38.6 %, P < 0.01) revealed a notable reduction dependent on the severity of RA. Otherwise, QUS-SOS marginally decreased, with −2.6% (radius) and −3.9% (phalanx). DXR revealed a significant reduction of DXR-BMD as well as DXR-MCI dependent on the severity of RA and surpassed multisite QUS as a promising diagnostic tool.

CAD for mammography: the technique, results, current role and further developments.

CAD systems, developed to assist the radiologist in the detection of suspicious lesions on mammograms, are currently controversially discussed. The highly sensitive detection of malignant structures including priors by CAD is linked with a low specific performance and a high rate of falsely positive markings. This causes controversial results regarding the effect of CAD systems for the diagnosing radiologist. This review aims to give an overview of the current literature, to state the currently discussed controversial results of CAD and to give an outlook on the next developments, which are not limited to senology, but include many other applications of CAD systems in radiology.

A manipulator system for 14-gauge large core breast biopsies inside a high-field whole-body MR scanner

To investigate a robotic manipulator system for MR‐guided breast biopsies inside a 1.5 T whole‐body magnet.

Influence of Image-Capturing Parameters on Digital X-Ray Radiogrammetry

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the importance of different image-capturing conditions, which might influence the characteristics of radiographs and, consequently, impact calculations of bone mineral density (BMD) and Metacarpal Index (MCI) using digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR). Radiographs of the left hand of deceased males were acquired three times using systematically varied parameters: 4-8 miliamp seconds (mA); 40-52 kV; film-focus distance (FFD); 90-130 cm; film sensitivity, 200/400; and different image modalities (conventional vs original digital radiographs as well as digital printouts). Furthermore, the interradiograph reproducibility using both conventional equipment and printouts vs originals of digital images and the intraradiograph reproducibility (either conventional or digital printouts) were evaluated. All BMD and MCI measurements were obtained with the DXR technology. The interradiograph reproducibility of DXR-BMD using conventional images under standardized conditions (6 mAs; 42 kV; 1 m FFD; film sensitivity of 200) was calculated to be coefficient of variation (CV) = 0.49% for Agfa Curix film and CV = 0.33% for Kodak T-MAT-Plus film, whereas reproducibility error using digital images ranged from CV = 0.57% (digital printouts; Philips) to CV = 1.50% (original digital images; Siemens). The intraradiograph reproducibility error was observed to be CV = 0.13% (conventional; Kodak film) vs CV = 0.27% (digital printouts; Philips). The BMD calculation was not noticeably affected by changes of FFD, exposure level, or film sensitivity/film brand, but was influenced by tube voltage (CV = 0.99% for Kodak film to CV = 2.05% for Siemens digital printouts). No significant differences were observed between the BMD and MCI data. DXR provides measurements of MCI and BMD with high precision and reproducibility. The measurements are unaffected by all tested image-capturing conditions, with the exception of tube voltage. In addition, different digital image devices clearly have an effect on DXR reproducibility.