Joachim Böttcher

Magnetic resonance imaging of inflammatory breast carcinoma and acute mastitis. A comparative study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of magnetic resonance mammography (MRM) to distinguish inflammatory breast carcinomas (IBC) from acute mastitis (AM). This study compared MRM examinations of two selected groups of patients: 48 subjects with IBC and 42 patients with AM. No statistical differences were revealed between the two groups for morphology of masses and of non-mass-like enhancement, breast enlargement, diffuse skin thickening, abnormal nipple configuration, prominent vessels, and also for cutaneous/subcutaneous, perimamillar and diffuse oedema. However, initial and postinitial dynamic characteristics significantly differed between the two groups (p < 0.001). In IBC, more masses with a greater average size were detected (p < 0.05). The following morphological criteria were also observed more often in IBC (p < 0.05): T2-hypointensity of masses (77.5%/18.2%), blooming sign (62.5%/31.8%), infiltration of pectoralis major muscle (interruption of fat plane: 54.2%/16.7%; pathological enhancement: 33.3%/7.1%), perifocal (66.7%/33.3%), prepectoral (72.9%/31.0%) and intramuscular pectoral oedema (41.7%/7.1%). The main localisation of AM was subareolar, of IBC central or dorsal (p < 0.001). The discrimination between AM and IBC remains a diagnostic challenge because of overlapping imaging features. However, the combination of multiple dynamic and morphological MRM criteria seems to have the potential for a differential diagnosis.

Peripheral bone status in rheumatoid arthritis evaluated by digital X-ray radiogrammetry and compared with multisite quantitative ultrasound

The development of secondary osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has recently become well recognized, characterized by demineralization at axial and in particular periarticular peripheral bone sites. Our aim was to evaluate multisite quantitative ultrasound (QUS) compared to digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR) by the quantification of cortical bone loss dependent on the severity of RA. Fifty-three patients with verified RA underwent QUS measurements (Sunlight Omnisense 7000) with estimation of the speed of sound (QUS-SOS) at the distal radius and at the phalanx of the third digit. Also, bone mineral density (DXR-BMD) and metacarpal index (DXR-MCI) were estimated on metacarpals II-IV using DXR technology. Additionally, Larsen score and Steinbroker stage were assessed. Disease activity of RA was estimated by disease activity score 28 (DAS 28). For the group with minor disease activity (3.2 ≤ DAS ≤ 5.1), QUS-SOS (phalanx) showed a significant association to DXR-BMD (R = 0.66) and DXR-MCI (R = 0.52). In the case of accentuated disease activity (DAS > 5.1), QUS-SOS of the radius revealed a significant correlation to DXR-BMD (R = 0.71) and DXR-MCI (R = 0.84), whereas for QUS-SOS (phalanx) no significant association to the DXR parameters was shown. The DXR parameters and, to a lesser extent, the QUS data also demonstrated pronounced declines in the case of accentuated disease activity (DAS > 5.1). Both DXR-BMD (−25.9 %, P < 0.01) and DXR-MCI (−38.6 %, P < 0.01) revealed a notable reduction dependent on the severity of RA. Otherwise, QUS-SOS marginally decreased, with −2.6% (radius) and −3.9% (phalanx). DXR revealed a significant reduction of DXR-BMD as well as DXR-MCI dependent on the severity of RA and surpassed multisite QUS as a promising diagnostic tool.

CAD for mammography: the technique, results, current role and further developments.

CAD systems, developed to assist the radiologist in the detection of suspicious lesions on mammograms, are currently controversially discussed. The highly sensitive detection of malignant structures including priors by CAD is linked with a low specific performance and a high rate of falsely positive markings. This causes controversial results regarding the effect of CAD systems for the diagnosing radiologist. This review aims to give an overview of the current literature, to state the currently discussed controversial results of CAD and to give an outlook on the next developments, which are not limited to senology, but include many other applications of CAD systems in radiology.

Influence of Image-Capturing Parameters on Digital X-Ray Radiogrammetry

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the importance of different image-capturing conditions, which might influence the characteristics of radiographs and, consequently, impact calculations of bone mineral density (BMD) and Metacarpal Index (MCI) using digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR). Radiographs of the left hand of deceased males were acquired three times using systematically varied parameters: 4-8 miliamp seconds (mA); 40-52 kV; film-focus distance (FFD); 90-130 cm; film sensitivity, 200/400; and different image modalities (conventional vs original digital radiographs as well as digital printouts). Furthermore, the interradiograph reproducibility using both conventional equipment and printouts vs originals of digital images and the intraradiograph reproducibility (either conventional or digital printouts) were evaluated. All BMD and MCI measurements were obtained with the DXR technology. The interradiograph reproducibility of DXR-BMD using conventional images under standardized conditions (6 mAs; 42 kV; 1 m FFD; film sensitivity of 200) was calculated to be coefficient of variation (CV) = 0.49% for Agfa Curix film and CV = 0.33% for Kodak T-MAT-Plus film, whereas reproducibility error using digital images ranged from CV = 0.57% (digital printouts; Philips) to CV = 1.50% (original digital images; Siemens). The intraradiograph reproducibility error was observed to be CV = 0.13% (conventional; Kodak film) vs CV = 0.27% (digital printouts; Philips). The BMD calculation was not noticeably affected by changes of FFD, exposure level, or film sensitivity/film brand, but was influenced by tube voltage (CV = 0.99% for Kodak film to CV = 2.05% for Siemens digital printouts). No significant differences were observed between the BMD and MCI data. DXR provides measurements of MCI and BMD with high precision and reproducibility. The measurements are unaffected by all tested image-capturing conditions, with the exception of tube voltage. In addition, different digital image devices clearly have an effect on DXR reproducibility.

Inflammatory Breast Carcinoma in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Comparison with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Although inflammatory breast carcinoma (IBC) accounts for 1%-4% of all breast cancer cases, the appearance of this highly malignant tumor in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is still not well characterized. The aim of this study was to identify typical imaging features of IBC in comparison with noninflammatory locally advanced breast carcinoma (LABC). MATERIALS AND METHODS MRIs of 48 patients with IBC were compared with an equivalent cohort of 52 subjects with LABC. Age and histopathologic subtype were equivalent between the two groups. To delineate characteristic features, a multitude of dynamic and morphologic parameters were evaluated using T1- and T2-weighted sequences. RESULTS No significant differences of prevalences could be found for the following criteria: dynamic tumor signal characteristics, prominent vessels, perifocal edema, axillary lymph node involvement, morphology of focal masses, and morphologic pattern of non-mass like enhancement. Otherwise, the quantity of focal masses and the spatial distribution of the tumoral infiltration significantly differed between the two cancer groups. The following parameters occurred more frequently in the IBC cases: edema (cutaneous/subcutaneous 81.3%, perimamillar 70.8%, diffuse 89.6%, prepectoral 72.9%, intramuscular pectoral 41.7%), thickening (75.0%) and pathologic enhancement (60.4%) of Coopers ligaments, skin thickening (83.3%), punched-out sign (initially strong, focal increase of some dermal or subcutaneous parts followed by slow-continuous enhancement of the surrounding skin; 56.3%). CONCLUSIONS Inflammatory breast carcinoma seems to represent a specific biological entity resulting in typical MRI characteristics. Some of the parameters are supposed to visualize the characteristic extensive lymphovascular infiltration and therefore may improve the diagnosis of IBC.

Computerized digital imaging techniques provided by digital X-ray radiogrammetry as new diagnostic tool in rheumatoid arthritis.

PurposeOur study evaluates digital x-ray radiogrammetry (DXR) and Radiogrammetry Kit (RK) as a new diagnostic method for the measurement of disease-related osteoporosis including quantification of joint space narrowing dependent on the severity of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Materials and MethodsA total of 172 unselected patients with RA underwent computerized measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) and metacarpal index (MCI) by DXR, as well as a semiautomated measurement of joint space distances at the metacarpal–phalangeal articulation (JSD-MCP 2–5), both were analyzed from plain radiographs of the nondominant hand.ResultsCorrelations between DXR-BMD and DXR-MCI vs. parameters of RK were all significant (0.34 < R < 0.61; p < 0.01). An expected negative association was observed between RK parameters and the different scoring methods (−0.27 < R < −0.59). The maximum relative decrease in BMD vs. MCI as measured by DXR between the highest and lowest RA severity group was −27.7% vs. −27.5% (p < 0.01) for the modified Larsen Score, whereas the minimal value of relative DXR-BMD and DXR-MCI reduction could be documented for the Sharp Erosion Score (−20.8% vs. −26.8%; p < 0.01). The relative reduction of mean JSD-MCP using RK significantly varied from −25.0% (Sharp Erosion Score) to −41.2% (modified Larsen Score). In addition, an excellent reproducibility of DXR and RK could be verified.ConclusionDXR in combination with RK could be a promising, widely available diagnostic tool to supplement the different scoring methods of RA with quantitative data, allowing an earlier and improved diagnosis and more precision in determining disease progression.

Computerized quantification of joint space narrowing and periarticular demineralization in patients with rheumatoid arthritis based on digital x-ray radiogrammetry.

Objectives:The aim of our work was to evaluate digital x-ray radiogrammetry (DXR) for the quantification of disease-related periarticular demineralization and computerized analysis of joint space distances (JSDA) for the measurement of joint space narrowing as a new diagnostic method for the early detection of joint-associated alterations and for monitoring disease progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Materials and Methods:Digital radiographs in 313 patients with varying severity of RA were performed annually and assessed by 2 radiologists using modified Larsen and also the Sharp scores within an observation period of 3 years. The hand radiographs underwent measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) and metacarpal index (MCI) by DXR, as well as computerized JSDA at the metacarpal-phalangeal articulation (JSD-MCP) for a cross-sectional and longitudinal study design. Results:Both DXR-BMD (−29.6%; P < 0.01) and DXR-MCI (−31.0%; P < 0.01) revealed a notable reduction dependent on the severity of RA (from grade 1 to grade 5 of the modified Larsen score); the severity dependent decrease of mean JSD-MCP ranged from –31.9% (P < 0.01; Sharp erosion part) to −39.1% (P < 0.01) for the modified Larsen score. Over an observation period of 3 years, a significant decrease of DXR-BMD (−22.3%) and DXR-MCI (−23.3%) as well as JSD-MCP mean (−17.5%) was observed (P < 0.05), whereas an accentuated decline of DXR and JSDA parameters was verified for patients without disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs or methotrexate therapy. Conclusion:Computerized analysis of hand radiographs by DXR and JSDA is a promising approach to assess the severity and to monitor the progression of RA because DXR and JSDA are timely able to measure periarticular demineralization and also narrowing of JSD-MCP dependent on the severity, the medical treatment and the course of RA.

Detection and classification of different liver lesions: comparison of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI versus multiphasic spiral CT in a clinical single centre investigation.

OBJECTIVE To compare the diagnostic efficacy of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) vs. multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for the detection and classification of focal liver lesions, differentiated also for lesion entity and size; a separate analysis of pre- and postcontrast images as well as T2-weighted MRI sequences of focal and exclusively solid lesions was integrated. METHODS Twenty-nine patients with 130 focal liver lesions underwent MDCT (64-detector-row; contrast medium iopromide; native, arterial, portalvenous, venous phase) and MRI (1.5-T; dynamic and tissue-specific phase 20 min after application of Gd-EOB-DTPA). Hepatic lesions were verified against a standard of reference (SOR). CT and MR images were independently analysed by four blinded radiologists on an ordinal 6-point-scale, determining lesion classification and diagnostic confidence. RESULTS Among 130 lesions, 68 were classified as malignant and 62 as benign by SOR. The detection of malignant and benign lesions differed significantly between combined and postcontrast MRI vs. MDCT; overall detection rate was 91.5% for combined MRI and 80.4% for combined MDCT (p<0.05). Considering all four readers together, combined MDCT achieved sensitivity of 66.2%, specificity of 79.0%, and diagnostic accuracy of 72.3%; combined MRI reached superior diagnostic efficacy: sensitivity 86.8%, specificity 94.4%, accuracy 90.4% (p<0.05). Differentiated for lesion size, in particular lesions <20mm revealed diagnostic benefit by MRI. Postcontrast MRI also achieved higher overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy compared to postcontrast MDCT for focal and exclusively solid liver lesions (p<0.05). CONCLUSION Combined and postcontrast Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI provided significantly higher overall detection rate and diagnostic accuracy, including low inter-observer variability, compared to MDCT in a single centre study.

Detection and classification of contrast-enhancing masses by a fully automatic computer-assisted diagnosis system for breast MRI

To evaluate a fully automatic computer‐assisted diagnosis (CAD) method for breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which considered dynamic as well as morphologic parameters and linked those to descriptions laid down in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI‐RADS) MRI atlas.

Value of digital X-ray radiogrammetry in the assessment of inflammatory bone loss in rheumatoid arthritis

Introduction Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic inflammatory disease characterized by progressive joint destruction based on the synovitis of large and small joints (1,2). The small joints of the hands and feet are particularly affected in the majority of RA patients, leading to destruction of articular tissue, including cartilage and bone (2). Osteoporosis, a typical phenomenon of RA, occurs in two forms: periarticular osteoporosis, adjacent to the inflamed joints, and generalized osteoporosis, resulting in an increased risk of fractures. Periarticular osteoporosis is a specific feature of bone involvement in RA (3,4) and is one of the bone involvement criteria in addition to erosions in the American College of Rheumatology criteria for RA (5). The onset of periarticular bone loss in the hands and feet is an early sign of RA (6) and may precede erosions (7). Periarticular bone loss is mainly caused by the local release of inflammatory agents and is a direct consequence of the inflammatory process (8), whereas generalized bone loss is additionally influenced by immobility and treatment effects (e.g., glucocorticoids) (9–11). In the hand, inflammatory bone loss includes not only the direct periarticular region of the joints, but also the cortical bone of the metacarpal diaphysis, indicating that inflammation-induced bone loss is present independent of direct synovial contact (12–14). Immunologic aspects of periarticular bone loss in RA