Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Anthony J. Boniello is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Anthony J. Boniello.


Global Spine Journal | 2014

A Review of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Atlantoaxial Dislocations

Sun Y. Yang; Anthony J. Boniello; Caroline E. Poorman; Andy Chang; Shenglin Wang; Peter G. Passias

Study Design Literature review. Objective Atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) is a rare and potentially fatal disturbance to the normal occipital-cervical anatomy that affects some populations disproportionately, which may cause permanent neurologic deficits or sagittal deformity if not treated in a timely and appropriate manner. Currently, there is a lack of consensus among surgeons on the best approach to diagnose, characterize, and treat this condition. The objective of this review is to provide a comprehensive review of the literature to identify timely and effective diagnostic techniques and treatment modalities of AAD. Methods This review examined all articles published concerning “atlantoaxial dislocation” or “atlantoaxial subluxation” on the PubMed database. We included 112 articles published between 1966 and 2014. Results Results of these studies are summarized primarily as defining AAD, the normal anatomy, etiology of dislocation, clinical presentation, diagnostic techniques, classification, and recommendations for timely treatment modalities. Conclusions The Wang Classification System provides a practical means to diagnose and treat AAD. However, future research is required to identify the most salient intervention component or combination of components that lead to the best outcomes.


Spine | 2015

Postoperative Cervical Deformity in 215 Thoracolumbar Patients with Adult Spinal Deformity: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Impact on Patient-Reported Outcome and Satisfaction at 2-Year Follow-up

Peter G. Passias; Alex Soroceanu; Justin S. Smith; Anthony J. Boniello; Sun Yang; Justin K. Scheer; Frank J. Schwab; Christopher I. Shaffrey; Han Jo Kim; Themistocles S. Protopsaltis; Gregory M. Mundis; Munish C. Gupta; Eric O. Klineberg; Virginie Lafage; Christopher P. Ames

Study Design. Retrospective review of prospective multicenter database. Objective. Quantify the incidence of new onset cervical deformity (CD) after adult spinal deformity surgery of the thoracolumbar spine, identify predictors of development, and determine the impact on outcomes. Summary of Background Data. High prevalence of residual CD has been identified after surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity. Development of new onset CD is less understood and its clinical impact unclear. Methods. A total of 215 patients with complete 2-year follow-up and full-length radiographs met inclusion criteria. CD was defined by T1 slope minus Cervical Lordosis (CL) more than 20°, C2–C7 sagittal vertical axis more than 40 mm, or C2–C7 kyphosis more than 10°. Univariate analysis was performed using t tests or tests of proportion. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine independent predictors of new onset CD. The impact of CD on health-related quality of life and satisfaction was measured using repeated measures mixed models or logistic regression as appropriate, accounting for potential confounders. Results. The overall rate of CD at 2 years after surgery was 63%. Univariate analysis revealed that patients who developed new onset CD postoperatively had higher incidence of diabetes (7.35% vs. 1.28%, P = 0.05), increased preoperative C2–C7 sagittal vertical axis (P = 0.04) and C2 slope (P = 0.038), and smaller diameter rods used at surgery (P = 0.032). Independent predictors of new onset CD at 2 years included: diabetes (odds ratio, 10.49; P = 0.046) and increased preoperative T1 slope minus cervical lordosis (odds ratio, 1.08/º; P = 0.022). Ending instrumentation below T4 was a negative predictor (odds ratio, 0.31; P = 0.019). Patients with and without CD experienced improvements in 2-year 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (P = 0.0001), Oswestry Disability Index (P = 0.0001), and Scoliosis Research Society (P = 0.0001). Rates and overall improvement were similar. CD was not associated with decreased satisfaction (P = 0.28). Conclusion. A total of 47.7% of patients without preoperative CD developed new onset postoperative CD after thoracolumbar surgery. Independent predictors of new onset CD at 2 years included diabetes, higher preoperative T1 slope minus cervical lordosis, and ending instrumentation above T4. Significant improvements in health-related quality of life scores occurred despite the development of postoperative CD. Level of Evidence: 2


Journal of Neurosurgery | 2016

Association between preoperative cervical sagittal deformity and inferior outcomes at 2-year follow-up in patients with adult thoracolumbar deformity: analysis of 182 patients.

Justin K. Scheer; Peter G. Passias; Alexandra M. Sorocean; Anthony J. Boniello; Gregory M. Mundis; Eric O. Klineberg; Han J o Kim; Themistocles S. Protopsaltis; Munish C. Gupta; Shay Bess; Christopher I. Shaffrey; Frank J. Schwab; Virginie Lafage; Justin S. Smith; Christopher P. Ames

OBJECTIVE A high prevalence of cervical deformity (CD) has been identified among adult patients with thoracolumbar spinal deformity undergoing surgical treatment. The clinical impact of this is uncertain. This study aimed to quantify the differences in patient-reported outcomes among patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) based on presence of CD prior to treatment. METHODS A retrospective review was conducted of a multicenter prospective database of patients with ASD who underwent surgical treatment with 2-year follow-up. Patients were grouped by the presence of preoperative CD: 1) cervical positive sagittal malalignment (CPSM) C2-7 sagittal vertical axis ≥ 4 cm; 2) cervical kyphosis (CK) C2-7 angle > 0; 3) CPSM and CK (BOTH); and 4) no baseline CD (NONE). Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores included the Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary (PCS and MCS) scores of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire (SRS-22), and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of these scores at 2 years. Standard radiographic measurements were conducted for cervical, thoracic, and thoracolumbar parameters. RESULTS One hundred eighty-two patients were included in this study: CPSM, 45; CK, 37; BOTH, 16; and NONE, 84. Patients with preoperative CD and those without had similar baseline thoracolumbar radiographic measurements and similar correction rates at 2 years. Patients with and without preoperative CD had similar baseline HRQOL and on average both groups experienced some HRQOL improvement. However, those with preoperative CPSM had significantly worse postoperative ODI, PCS, SRS-22 Activity, SRS-22 Appearance, SRS-22 Pain, SRS-22 Satisfaction, and SRS-22 Total score, and were less likely to meet MCID for ODI, PCS, SRS-22 Activity, and SRS-22 Pain scores with the following ORs and 95% CIs: ODI 0.19 (0.07-0.58), PCS 0.17 (0.06-0.47), SRS-22 Activity 0.23 (0.09-0.62), SRS-22 Pain 0.20 (0.08-0.53), and SRS-22 Appearance 0.34 (0.12-0.94). Preoperative CK did not have an effect on outcomes. Interestingly, despite correction of the thoracolumbar deformity, 53.3% and 51.4% of patients had persistent CPSM and persistent CK, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Patients with thoracolumbar deformity without preoperative CD are likely to have greater improvements in HRQOL after surgery than patients with concomitant preoperative CD. Cervical positive sagittal alignment in adult patients with thoracolumbar deformity is strongly associated with inferior outcomes and failure to reach MCID at 2-year follow-up despite having similar baseline HRQOL to patients without CD. This was the first study to assess the impact of concomitant preoperative cervical malalignment in adult patients with thoracolumbar deformity. These results can help surgeons educate patients at risk for inferior outcomes and direct future research to identify an etiology and improve patient outcomes. Investigation into the etiology of the baseline cervical malalignment may be warranted in patients who present with thoracolumbar deformity.


Spine | 2016

The Impact of Advanced Age on Peri-Operative Outcomes in the Surgical Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Nationwide Study Between 2001 and 2010.

Cyrus M. Jalai; Nancy Worley; Bryan J. Marascalchi; Vincent Challier; Shaleen Vira; Sun Yang; Anthony J. Boniello; John A. Bendo; Virginie Lafage; Peter G. Passias

Study Design. Retrospective multicenter database review. Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate national postoperative outcomes and hospital characteristics trends from 2001 to 2010 for advanced age CSM patients. Summary of Background Data. Recent studies show increases in US cervical spine surgeries and CSM diagnoses. However, few have compared national outcomes for elderly and younger CSM patients. Methods. A Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) analysis from 2001 to 2010, including CSM patients 25+ who underwent anterior and/or posterior cervical fusion or laminoplasty. Fractures, 9+ levels fused, or any cancers were excluded. Measures included demographics, outcomes, and hospital-related data for 25 to 64 versus 65+ and 65 to 75 versus 76+ age groups. Univariate and logistic regression modeling evaluated procedure-related complications risk in 65+ and 76+ age groups (OR[95% CI]). Results. Discharges for 35,319 patients in the age range of 25 to 64 years and 19,097 at the age 65+ years were identified. Average comorbidity indices for patients at 65+ years were higher compared to the 25 to 64 years age group (0.79 vs. 0.0.44, P < 0.0001), as was the total complications rate (11.39% vs. 5.93%, P < 0.0001) and charges (


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume | 2016

Predictors of Revision Surgical Procedure Excluding Wound Complications in Adult Spinal Deformity and Impact on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Satisfaction

Peter G. Passias; Alexandra Soroceanu; Sun Yang; Frank J. Schwab; Christopher P. Ames; Anthony J. Boniello; Justin D. Smith; Christopher I. Shaffrey; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Gregory Mundis; Douglas C. Burton; Eric Klineberg; Robert A. Hart; D. Kojo Hamilton; Daniel M. Sciubba; Shay Bess; Virginie Lafage

57,449.94 vs.


The International Journal of Spine Surgery | 2015

Surgical Treatment Strategies for High-Grade Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review

Peter G. Passias; Caroline E. Poorman; Sun Yang; Anthony J. Boniello; Cyrus M. Jalai; Nancy Worley; Virginie Lafage

49,951.11, P < 0.0001). Hospital course for aged 65+ patients was longer (4.76 vs. 3.26 days, P < 0.0001). Mortality risk was higher in the 65+ cohort (3.38[2.93–3.91]), adjusted for covariates. 65+ patients had increased risk of all complications except device-related, for which they had decreased risk (0.61[0.56–0.67]). Patients 76+ years displayed increased hospital charges (


The International Journal of Spine Surgery | 2015

Perioperative Risks Associated with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Based on Surgical Treatment Strategies.

Angel E. Macagno; Shian Liu; Bryan Marascalchi; Sun Yang; Anthony J. Boniello; John A. Bendo; Virginie Lafage; Peter G. Passias

59,197.60 vs.


Journal of Neurosurgery | 2015

Selective versus nonselective thoracic fusion in Lenke 1C curves: a meta-analysis of baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes

Anthony J. Boniello; Saqib Hasan; Sun Yang; Cyrus M. Jalai; Nancy Worley; Peter G. Passias

56,601.44, P < 0.001) and courses (5.77 vs. 4.28 days, P < 0.001) compared to those in the age group 65 to 75 years. These same patients presented with increased Deyo scores (0.83 vs. 0.77, P < 0.001), had increased total complications rate (13.87% vs. 10.20%, P < 0.001), and displayed increased risk for postoperative shock (6.34 [11.16–3.60], P < 0.001), digestive system (1.92 [2.40–1.54], P < 0.001), and wound dehiscence (1.71 [2.56–1.15], P < 0.001). Conclusion. Patients aged 65+ years undergoing CSM surgical management have a higher mortality risk, more procedure-related complications, higher comorbidity burden, longer hospital course, and higher charges. This study provides clinically useful data for surgeons to educate patients and to improve outcomes.


The International Journal of Spine Surgery | 2014

Effectiveness of Postoperative Wound Drains in One- and Two-Level Cervical Spine Fusions

Caroline E. Poorman; Peter G. Passias; Kristina Bianco; Anthony J. Boniello; Sun Yang; Michael C. Gerling

BACKGROUND The surgical procedure to treat adult spinal deformity is challenging, with high rates of complications, including revision procedures performed to repair instrumentation failure or unplanned surgical complications. This study quantifies the incidence of, identifies predictors for, and determines health-related quality-of-life changes associated with revision procedures to treat adult spinal deformity. METHODS We analyzed a multicenter database of patients who underwent a surgical procedure for adult spinal deformity, which was defined as having an age of eighteen years or older and scoliosis of ≥20°, sagittal vertical axis of ≥5 cm, pelvic tilt of ≥25°, and/or thoracic kyphosis of >60°. We focused on demographic, radiographic, health-related quality-of-life, and operative data at the two-year follow-up. Patients with primary infections were excluded. Predictive and confounding variables for revisions were identified using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression modeling. RESULTS Two hundred and forty-three patients were included in this study; of these patients, forty (16.5%) underwent a revision surgical procedure (15% of these at six weeks, 38% between six weeks and one year, and 48% between one and two years). Screw or cage-related implant complications were the most common indications for revision, followed by proximal junctional kyphosis and rod failure. Positive predictors for a revision surgical procedure included total body mass, with an odds ratio of 1.33 (95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 1.70) per 10-kg increase, and preoperative sagittal vertical axis, with an odds ratio of 1.15 (95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 1.28) per 2-cm increase. Factors associated with lower risk of revision included use of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) (odds ratio, 0.16 [95% confidence interval, 0.05 to 0.47]) and greater diameter rods (odds ratio, 0.51 [95% confidence interval, 0.29 to 0.89]). Body mass index, although initially considered a potential predictor for a revision surgical procedure, was not significantly different between primary and revision cohorts on univariate analysis and was therefore not input into the multivariate model. All patients improved in two-year health-related quality-of-life scores; revision subjects had lower overall improvement (Scoliosis Research Society [SRS] score; p = 0.016) from baseline. Revision status did not predict two-year patient satisfaction (p = 0.726), as measured by the SRS Satisfaction domain (SRS-22r). CONCLUSIONS Patients with greater preoperative sagittal vertical axis and high total body mass are at a higher risk for a revision surgical procedure following procedures to treat adult spinal deformity. Larger diameter rods and BMP-2 were associated with decreased revision odds. Revisions did not impact patient satisfaction at two years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Journal of Clinical Neuroscience | 2017

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: National trends in the treatment and peri-operative outcomes over 10 years

Peter G. Passias; Bryan Marascalchi; Anthony J. Boniello; Sun Yang; Kristina Bianco; Cyrus M. Jalai; Nancy Worley; Samantha R. Horn; Virginie Lafage; John A. Bendo

Background HGS is a severe deformity most commonly affecting L5-S1 vertebral segment. Treatment available for HGS includes a range of different surgical options: full or partial reduction of translation and/or abnormal alignment and in situ fusion with or without decompression. Various instrumented or non-instrumented constructs are available, and surgical approach varies from anterior/posterior to combined depending on surgeon preference and experience. The aim of this systematic review was to review the literature on lumbosacral high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS), identify patients at risk for progression to higher-grade slip and evaluate various surgical strategies to report on complications and radiographic and clinical outcomes. Methods Systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane and Google Scholar for papers relevant to HGS was performed. 19 articles were included after title, abstract, and full-text review and grouped to analyze baseline radiographic parameters and the effect of surgical approach, instrumentation, reduction and decompression on patient radiographic and clinical outcomes. Results There is a lack of high-quality studies pertaining to surgical treatment for HGS, and a majority of included papers were Level III or IV based on the JBJS Levels of Evidence Criteria. Conclusions Surgical treatment for HGS can vary depending on patient age. There is strong evidence of an association between increased pelvic incidence (PI) and presence of HGS and moderately strong evidence that patients with unbalanced pelvis can benefit from correction of lumbopelvic parameters with partial reduction. Surgeons need to weigh the benefits of fixing the deformity with the risks of potential complications, assessing patient satisfaction as well as their understanding of the possible complications. However, further research is necessary to make more definitive conclusions on surgical treatment guidelines for HGS. Level of Evidence II

Collaboration


Dive into the Anthony J. Boniello's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Virginie Lafage

Hospital for Special Surgery

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Frank J. Schwab

Hospital for Special Surgery

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Munish C. Gupta

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge