Anthony Malandra
Siemens Energy Sector
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Anthony Malandra.
ASME Turbo Expo 2012: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition | 2012
Santosh Abraham; Kapil Panchal; Srinath V. Ekkad; Wing F. Ng; Andrew S. Lohaus; Anthony Malandra
The paper presents a detailed experimental and numerical study on the effect of endwall contouring in a quasi 2D cascade, operating at transonic conditions. Aerodynamic performance of two contoured endwalls are studied and compared with a baseline (planar) endwall. The first contoured endwall was generated with the goal of reducing secondary losses (Aero-Optimized contoured endwall) and the second endwall was generated with the objective of reduced overall heat transfer to the endwall (HT-optimized contoured endwall). Midspan total pressure loss, secondary flow field and static pressure measurements on the airfoil surface were measured. The cascade exit Mach numbers range from 0.71 to 0.95 and the turning angle of the airfoil is ∼127°. The inlet span of the airfoils was reduced with respect to the outlet span with the intention of obtaining a realistic inlet/exit Mach number that is observed in a real engine. 3D viscous compressible CFD analysis was carried out to study the detailed behavior of the complex flow structures that develop as a result of endwall contouring. A 3% reduction in area averaged losses was achieved at 0.1 Cax downstream of the trailing edge and a 17% reduction in mixed out losses was achieved at 1.0 Cax downstream location with the Aero-Optimized contoured endwall.Copyright
Journal of Turbomachinery-transactions of The Asme | 2016
Timothy R. Palmer; C. S. Tan; Humberto A. Zuniga; David A. Little; Matthew Montgomery; Anthony Malandra
Numerical calculations, steady as well as unsteady, of flow in a turbine stage with a tip shroud cavity elucidate that the loss-generating flow features consist of tip seal leakage jet, the interaction of cavity exit flow with main flow, the partially recirculating cavity inlet flow interaction with vane wakes, and injection of leakage flow into the shroud cavity. The first two flow features, namely, the tip seal leakage flow and mixing of cavity exit flow with main flow, dominate while the injection of leakage flow plays an indirect role in affecting the loss generation associated with cavity exit flow. The tip shroud cavity flow essentially consists of a system of toroidal vortices, the configuration of which is set by the cavity geometry and changes when subject to unsteady vane–rotor interaction. The role which the toroidal vortices play in setting the cavity inlet recirculating flow pattern and loss generation is delineated. It is suggested that there exists a link between the inlet cavity sizing and the toroidal vortical structure. The computed results appear to indicate that the main flow path approximately perceives the presence of the tip shroud cavity as a sink–source pair; as such a flow model based on this approximation is formulated. Loss variations with tip gap height and leakage flow injection are assessed. Results show that the expected loss due to mixing has a functional dependence on the square of the difference in their velocity magnitude and swirl. The tip seal leakage jet loss scales approximately linearly with the corrected mass flow rate per unit area over the range of tip gaps investigated.
ASME Turbo Expo 2012: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition | 2012
Santosh Abraham; Kapil Panchal; Srinath V. Ekkad; Wing F. Ng; Andrew S. Lohaus; Anthony Malandra
The paper presents detailed experimental results of the midspan total pressure losses, secondary flow field, and static pressure measurements on two linear, high-turning turbine cascades at transonic conditions. The airfoils in the two cascades being studied are identical and their aerodynamic loading levels are varied by increasing the pitch of one cascade by 25% with respect to the other. The turbine cascades are referred to as B1-SP and B1-IP. Cascade B1-IP, with its increased pitch, has a Zweifel coefficient increased by 25%. The airfoils have a turning angle of ∼127°. Measurements are made at design and off-design conditions, at exit Mach numbers ranging from 0.71 to 0.95. The exit span of the airfoils are increased relative to the inlet span with the intention of obtaining a ratio of inlet Mach number to exit Mach number that is representative to that encountered in a real engine. This results in one end wall diverging from inlet to exit at a 13 degree angle, which simulates the required leading edge loading as seen in an engine. The objective of this study is to investigate the variation in airfoil loading distribution and the effect it has on aerodynamic performance in terms of pressure losses. Detailed loss measurements, both in the pitchwise as well as spanwise directions, are conducted at 0.1 Cax and 1.0 Cax locations downstream of the trailing edge. Results from 3D viscous numerical simulations have been used to assist the interpretation of experimental results.Copyright
ASME Turbo Expo 2015: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition | 2015
Timothy R. Palmer; C. S. Tan; Matthew Montgomery; Anthony Malandra; David A. Little; Humberto A. Zuniga; Kunyuan Zhou
The effects of shroud asymmetry (known as a scalloped shroud) on loss generation and stage performance are assessed by numerical computations, steady as well as unsteady, in a turbine stage with tip shroud cavity. Introducing shroud asymmetry leads to cavity mixing at higher flow velocities with larger velocity difference, hence higher loss relative to a baseline axisymmetric shroud. Shroud asymmetry alters the system of toroidal vortices which characterizes tip shroud cavity flow. Specifically, the asymmetry downstream of the tip seal prevents the formation of two large, continuous toroidal vortex cores. Instead, several small, discrete cores are formed immediately downstream of the tip seal due to the onset of mixing with the main flow. Unsteady vane-rotor-shroud interaction results in a redistribution of vorticity in the cavity inlet. Compatibility requirement between main flow and cavity flow provides quantitative limits on the existence of the cavity inlet vortex as well as explains why the cavity inlet flow field looks the way it does and not otherwise.Copyright
ASME Turbo Expo 2015: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition | 2015
Timothy R. Palmer; C. S. Tan; Matthew Montgomery; Anthony Malandra; David A. Little; Humberto A. Zuniga; Kunyuan Zhou
A potential means of significantly reducing the cavity exit mixing loss, a dominant primary loss mechanism in turbine tip shroud cavity flow, is assessed. The operational constraints on the turbine stage dictate that losses may only be mitigated through configuration changes within the cavity. A configuration, known herein as the Hybrid Blade, features a shrouded main blade with a row of high aspect ratio bladelets affixed to the rotating shroud is formulated and shown to nearly eliminate the cavity exit mixing loss. However the Hybrid Blade configuration incurs a penalty associated with bladelet low Reynolds number effects, cavity inlet flow asymmetry introduced by the scalloped shroud, and a resulting mismatch with the upstream vane as well as downstream diffuser. This penalty offsets the efficiency gain from mitigating cavity exit mixing loss. For the Hybrid Blade system, it can thus be inferred that the turbine stage and the diffuser need to be reconfigured to accommodate the modified tip shroud, and the bladelets redesigned for low Reynolds number operation and cavity inlet flow asymmetry to achieve an overall benefit.Copyright
Archive | 2007
George Liang; Anthony Malandra
Archive | 2012
Anthony Malandra; Ching-Pang Lee; Barry J. Brown; Eric Munoz
Journal of Turbomachinery-transactions of The Asme | 2017
Penghao Duan; C. S. Tan; Andrew Scribner; Anthony Malandra
Archive | 2015
Andrew S. Lohaus; Anthony Malandra; Carmen Andrew Scribner; Farzad Taremi; Horia Flitan; Ching-Pang Lee; Gm Salam Azad; Tobias Buchal