Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Anthony R. Stone is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Anthony R. Stone.


The Journal of Urology | 1986

Radical Prostatectomy: Anatomical Predictors of Success or Failure

David F. Paulson; Anthony R. Stone; Philip J. Walther; J. Allan Tucker; Edwin B. Cox

A total of 143 patients underwent radical prostatectomy. Surgical specimens were evaluated with respect to local extent of disease, Gleason grade of the primary and relative nuclear roundness of the surgical specimen. The probability of disease control in the total population was 88 per cent at 5 years. Only 8 per cent of the patients who had disease confined to the specimen failed compared to 14 per cent of those who demonstrated extension outside of the surgical margins. The incidence of failure increased as a function of seminal vesicle involvement. Seminal vesicle involvement was greatest among patients with a Gleason grade greater than 7. Postoperative radiation did not offer any apparent advantage in patients with positive margins.


The Journal of Urology | 1999

LONG-TERM FOLLOWUP OF THE NORTH AMERICAN MULTICENTER UROLUME* TRIAL FOR THE TREATMENT OF EXTERNAL DETRUSOR-SPHINCTER DYSSYNERGIA

Michael B. Chancellor; Jerzy B. Gajewski; C. F Douglas Ackman; Rodney A. Appell; James Bennett; Joseph Binard; Timothy B. Boone; Michael Chetner; Julie Ann Crewalk; Alfred J. Defalco; Jenelle Foote; Bruce G. Green; Saad Juma; Suk Young Jung; Todd A. Linsenmeyer; Robert MacMillan; Michael E. Mayo; Hideo Ozawa; Claus G. Roehrborn; Patrick J. Shenot; Anthony R. Stone; Albert Vazquez; Wylly Killorin; David A. Rivas

PURPOSEnWe determine the long-term efficacy and safety of the UroLume stent as minimally invasive treatment for external detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia in spinal cord injured men.nnnMATERIALS AND METHODSnA total of 160 spinal cord injured men with a mean age plus or minus standard deviation of 36.3 +/- 12.1 years (range 16 to 74) were prospectively treated with an endoprosthesis at 15 centers as part of the North American UroLume trial for external detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia. Urodynamic parameters, including voiding pressure, residual urine volume and bladder capacity, were compared before treatment and at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment.nnnRESULTSnMean voiding pressure was 75.1 +/- 28.2 cm. water before treatment in the 160 patients, and 37.4 +/- 23.9 at year 1 in 97, 39.5 +/- 22.2 at year 2 in 84, 42.6 +/- 27.3 at year 3 in 61, 46.3 +/- 33.2 at year 4 in 57 and 44.2 +/- 28.9 cm. at year 5 in 41 after stent insertion (p <0.001). Residual urine volume decreased after stent placement and was maintained throughout the 5-year followup (p <0.001). Mean cystometric capacity remained constant from 269 +/- 155 before insertion to 337 +/- 182 ml. 5 years later (p = 0.17). Hydronephrosis and autonomic dysreflexia improved or stabilized in most patients with functioning stents. Stent explant was necessary in 24 patients (15%), of whom 4 (16.7%) had another stent implanted.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe UroLume stent demonstrates long-term safety and efficacy for the treatment of external detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia. The outcome was similar in men with and without previous sphincterotomy.


The Journal of Urology | 1994

Multicenter trial in North America of UroLume urinary sphincter prosthesis.

Michael B. Chancellor; David A. Rivas; Todd A. Linsenmeyer; Caryn A. Abdill; C. F Douglas Ackman; Rodney A. Appell; James Bennett; Joseph Binard; Timothy B. Boone; Michael Chetner; Alfred Defalco; Janelle Foote; Jerzy B. Gajewski; Bruce G. Green; Saad Juma; Robert MacMillan; Michael E. Mayo; Claus G. Roehrborn; Anthony R. Stone; W.C. Thorndyke; Albert Vazquez

We investigated the effectiveness and associated complications of treatment with an endoluminal urethral sphincter prosthesis in 153 spinal cord injury men (mean age 36 years, range 16 to 74 years) with urodynamically diagnosed detrusor-external sphincter dyssynergia. These patients were prospectively treated with a urethral sphincter stent at 15 centers in North America. Followup ranged from 2 to 33 months. Voiding pressures averaged 76 +/- 28, 42 +/- 21, 44 +/- 38, 35 +/- 18 and 32 +/- 20 cm. water, respectively, before prosthesis insertion in 153 patients and at 3 months in 123, 6 months in 114, 12 months in 98 and 24 months in 22. A significant decrease in voiding pressure was noted in the 22 patients at 24 months compared with matched preoperative data (80 +/- 25 cm. water, p = 0.03). The residual urine decreased from 181 +/- 154 ml. before insertion to 82 +/- 93 ml. at 24 months (p = 0.01). Maximum cystometric capacity remained constant, with a mean of 195 +/- 158 ml. before insertion to 248 +/- 122 ml. at 24 months (p = 0.17). No significant differences were apparent after 24 months of followup in any of the urodynamic parameters between 44 patients with and 109 without previous external sphincterotomy. Hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion, obstructive hyperplastic epithelial overgrowth and soft tissue erosion did not occur. No deleterious effects were observed on renal or erectile function. Of the patients 43 (28.1%) required 2 prostheses to bridge the external sphincter completely. Stent removal was required in 10 patients. Seven explantations were required for prosthesis migration, 1 for pain and urethral edema, 1 for inability to maintain a condom catheter, and 1 for nonepithelialization and secondary bladder neck obstruction. A total of 13 patients (8.5%) required a subsequent operation for bladder neck obstruction. Therefore, the sphincter prosthesis is an attractive modality for the treatment of external sphincter dyssynergia in patients with and without previous external sphincterotomy because of its ease of deployment and minimal associated morbidity.


The Journal of Urology | 2000

REMOVAL OF UROLUME ENDOPROSTHESIS: EXPERIENCE OF THE NORTH AMERICAN STUDY GROUP FOR DETRUSOR-SPHINCTER DYSSYNERGIA APPLICATION

Jerzy B. Gajewski; Michael B. Chancellor; C. F Douglas Ackman; Rodney A. Appell; James Bennett; Joseph Binard; Timothy B. Boone; Michael Chetner; Julie Ann Crewalk; Alfredo Defalco; Jenelle Foote; Bruce G. Green; Saad Juma; Suk Young Jung; Todd A. Linsenmeyer; Joseph N. Macaluso; Robert MacMillan; Michael E. Mayo; Hideo Ozawa; Claus G. Roehrborn; Joseph D. Schmidt; Patrick J. Shenot; Anthony R. Stone; Albert Vazquez; Wylly Killorin; David A. Rivas

PURPOSEnWe present the experience of the North American UroLume Multicenter Study Group with removal of the UroLume endoprosthesis.nnnMATERIALS AND METHODSnA total of 160 neurologically impaired patients were enrolled in the North American UroLume Multicenter Study Group for detrusor external sphincter dyssynergia application. Analysis was performed in 2 groups of patients in which the device was removed during insertion and after implantation, respectively.nnnRESULTSnDevice retrieval was required during insertion in 21 patients (13%) mainly due to misplacement or migration in 17. Extraction was done with minimal complications and in all but 2 cases subsequent UroLume implantation was successful. Of 158 men with the device in place 31 (19.6%) required removal. In 34 procedures 44 devices were removed, mainly due to migration. Time from implantation to removal ranged from 4 days to 66 months (mean 22 months). The UroLume was removed en bloc in 20 cases and in parts or wire by wire in 19. The majority of patients had no or minimal complications after extraction. Only 2 patients had serious temporary complications, including bleeding and urethral injury, with no lasting consequences. No malignancy developed as a result of UroLume insertion.nnnCONCLUSIONSnWhile there is a potential for urethral injury and bleeding, UroLume endoprosthesis removal is largely a simple procedure with minimal complications and consequences.


The Journal of Urology | 1984

Urethrovaginal fistula: a review of the surgical management.

George D. Webster; Stephen A. Sihelnik; Anthony R. Stone

Urethrovaginal fistulas may occur after external or surgical trauma and result commonly in urinary incontinence. Various repair procedures have been suggested. However, it appears that the Martius operation with labial fat pad interposition between the repaired urethra and vagina is as satisfactory as any.


The Scientific World Journal | 2004

Evaluation and Management of Male Urinary Incontinence

Anthony R. Stone; Roscoe S. Nelson

The male lower urinary tract is well adapted to the rigors of everyday life in providing an effective lowpressure storage organ and a sophisticated, relatively trouble-free sphincter mechanism. The majority of male incontinence cases encountered presently are related to prostate pathology, many being due to sphincteric weakness following radical surgery. This review article will discuss the anatomy and neurophysiology of the lower urinary tract in the male and the causes, evaluation, and management of incontinence.


Neurourology and Urodynamics | 1984

Female urinary incontinence: The incidence, identification, and characteristics of detrusor instabiiity

George D. Webster; Stephen A. Sihelnik; Anthony R. Stone


Archive | 1987

Bladder reconstruction and continent urinary diversion

Lowell R. King; Anthony R. Stone; George D. Webster


BJUI | 1986

The Urological Evaluation and Management of Patients with Myelodysplasia

George D. Webster; A. El-Mahrouky; Anthony R. Stone; Zakrzewski Cb


BJUI | 1986

Ileocaecocystoplasty in urinary tract reconstruction in children.

E. Wespes; Anthony R. Stone; L. R. King

Collaboration


Dive into the Anthony R. Stone's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rodney A. Appell

Baylor College of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bruce G. Green

University of Southern California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Claus G. Roehrborn

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David A. Rivas

Thomas Jefferson University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James Bennett

New York State Department of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge