Antonio Bertolotto

Risk stratification for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in patients treated with natalizumab

Natalizumab is a highly effective immunomodulator in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). Treatment with natalizumab has been associated with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), an infection of the central nervous system (CNS) caused by a pathogenic form of the normally benign JC virus (JCV). We searched PubMed and used current data from the natalizumab global safety database to assess risk factors and quantify the risk of PML. Natalizumab treatment duration and prior use of immunosuppressive therapies are established risk factors for development of PML in natalizumab-treated patients. With the development of a reliable and validated assay for detection of antibodies in patients with MS directed against JCV, it is now possible to identify persons who are carriers of JCV. The availability of this assay provides an additional option for risk stratification of PML in patients using or considering natalizumab therapy. Recommendations for clinical management of patients with MS and use of natalizumab are provided based on the presence of these three risk factors. The identification of risk factors that increase the likelihood of PML in natalizumab-treated patients can facilitate benefit–risk discussions between health care professionals and patients. Continued research and data collection will further develop our understanding of PML and the mechanisms by which these risk factors contribute to its development.

Recommendations for clinical use of data on neutralising antibodies to interferon-beta therapy in multiple sclerosis

The identification of factors that can affect the efficacy of immunomodulatory drugs in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) is important. For the available interferon-beta products, neutralising antibodies (NAb) have been shown to affect treatment efficacy. In June, 2009, a panel of experts in MS and NAbs to interferon-beta therapy convened in Amsterdam, Netherlands, under the auspices of the Neutralizing Antibodies on Interferon beta in Multiple Sclerosis consortium, a European-based project of the 6th Framework Programme of the European Commission, to review and discuss data on NAbs and their practical consequences for the treatment of patients with MS on interferon beta. The panel believed that information about NAbs and other markers of biological activity of interferons (ie, myxovirus resistance protein A [MxA]) can be integrated with clinical and imaging indicators to guide individual treatment decisions. In cases of sustained high-titre NAb positivity and/or lack of MxA bioactivity, a switch to a non-interferon-beta therapy should be considered. In patients who are doing poorly clinically, therapy should be switched irrespective of NAb or MxA bioactivity.

Differential effects of three interferon betas on neutralising antibodies in patients with multiple sclerosis: a follow up study in an independent laboratory

Objective: To evaluate the incidence and the prevalence of neutralising antibodies (NABs) to three interferon beta (IFNβ) products in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods: Sera were tested from 125 patients with relapsing-remitting MS. Patients were treated with IFNβ-1b (Betaferon, n = 29) 8 MIU subcutaneously every other day, IFNβ-1a (Avonex, n = 44) 30 μg intramuscularly once weekly, or IFNβ-1a (Rebif, n = 36) 22 μg subcutaneously three times weekly for 6 to 18 months. An additional 16 patients were treated with Rebif 22 μg intramuscularly once or twice weekly. NABs were assessed using the cytopathic effect assay before treatment and every three months during treatment. Patients with two or more consecutive positive samples were considered to be persistent NAB positive (NAB+). Results: At baseline, no patients were NAB+. NABs developed during the first three months of treatment and continued to develop until month 18. Over 18 months of treatment, the risk of being persistent NAB+ was 31% for Betaferon, 15% for Rebif, and 2% for Avonex (Betaferon versus Avonex, p = 0.001; Betaferon versus Rebif, p = 0.19; Rebif versus Avonex, p = 0.04). In all patients with one or more NAB+ samples, the risk of becoming NAB+ was 38% for Betaferon, 18% for Rebif, and 7% for Avonex (Betaferon versus Avonex, p = 0.0007; Betaferon versus Rebif, p = 0.10; Rebif versus Avonex, p = 0.07). At month 18, the prevalence of persistent NAB+ patients was 31.6% for Betaferon, 18.7% for Rebif, and 4% for Avonex. Numbers of NAB+ patients observed were similar with intramuscular Rebif and with subcutaneous Rebif. Conclusion: The three IFNβ preparations have different degrees of immunogenicity, with Betaferon producing the highest incidence of NABs and Avonex the lowest. These differences should be considered by neurologists when selecting treatment for their patients with MS because NABs can reduce both bioavailability and clinical efficacy of IFNβ.

Interferon β neutralizing antibodies in multiple sclerosis : neutralizing activity and cross-reactivity with three different preparations

The presence and titer of neutralizing antibodies (NABs) was evaluated by an antiviral biological assay in 387 samples of 111 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients treated with one of the three commercial preparations of interferon beta (IFNbeta). Fifty NAB positive samples were found in 19 patients: 11 treated with IFNbeta-1b (Betaferon(R)) and eight with IFNbeta-1a (five with Avonex(R) and three with Rebif(R)). All the 38 NABs+ samples of patients treated with IFNbeta-1b cross-reacted with IFNbeta-1a of both commercial types. The median level of neutralizing units (NUs) of the sera was higher when tested against IFNbeta-1a than against IFNbeta-1b (p=0.000 vs. Avonexr(R) and p=0.003 vs. Rebif(R)). In line with these data, the NABs+ sera of patients treated with IFNbeta-1a cross-reacted with IFNbeta-1b and the level of NUs were lower when tested against IFNbeta-1b than against IFNbeta-1a (p=0.003). The different amount of NUs against IFNbeta types 1a and 1b could be due to the presence of aggregates in the IFNbeta-1b preparation. The different levels of cross-reactivity of NABs could reduce the bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy of IFNbeta in NABs+ patients switching from IFNbeta-1b to IFNbeta-1a.

Short-term accrual of gray matter pathology in patients with progressive multiple sclerosis: an in vivo study using diffusion tensor MRI

The mechanisms underlying the progressive course of multiple sclerosis (MS) are not fully understood yet. Since diffusion tensor (DT) MRI can provide quantitative estimates of both MRI-visible and MRI-occult brain damage related to MS, the present study investigated the value of DT MRI-derived measures for the assessment of the short-term accumulation of white and gray matter (GM) pathology in patients with primary progressive (PP) and secondary progressive (SP) MS. Fifty-four patients with PPMS and 22 with SPMS were studied at baseline and after a mean follow-up of 15 months. Dual-echo, T1-weighted, and DT MRI scans of the brain were acquired on both occasions. Total lesion volumes (TLV) and percentage brain volume changes (PBVC) were computed. Mean diffusivity (MD) and fractional anisotropy (FA) maps of the normal-appearing white (NAWM) and gray matter (NAGM) were produced, and histogram analysis was performed. In both patient groups, a significant increase of average lesion MD (P = 0.01) and of average NAGM MD (P = 0.007) was found at follow-up. No significant differences between PPMS and SPMS patient groups were found for the on-study changes of any MRI-derived measure. No significant correlations were found between the percentage changes of DT MRI-derived measures and those of TLV and PBVC. No significant changes of DT MRI-derived measures were observed in age-matched healthy controls over the same study period. Over a 1-year period of follow-up, DT MRI can detect tissue changes beyond the resolution of conventional MRI in the NAGM of patients with progressive MS. The accumulation of DT MRI-detectable gray matter damage does not seem to merely depend upon the concomitant increase of T2-visible lesion load and the reduction of brain volume. These observations suggest that progressive NAGM damage might yet be an additional factor leading to the accumulation of disability in progressive MS.

Immunogenicity of interferon beta: differences among products.

Abstract.Protein-based therapies are useful in a variety of diseases; however, their potential for immunogenicity is a disadvantage. Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) that develop to interferon beta (IFNβ) products (IFNβ-1b, IFNβ-1a-Avonex®, or IFNβ-1a-Rebif®), which are first-line therapies for the treatment of multiple sclerosis, are reported to reduce the clinical efficacy of these agents. In individual clinical studies of each commercially available IFNβ product, 28% to 47% of patients develop NAbs to IFNβ-1b, 12% to 28 % to IFNβ-1a-Rebif, and 2% to 6% to IFNβ-1a-Avonex. Problems exist in comparing the incidence of NAbs among IFNβ products across studies because of differences in study methodology, including assay methods, treatment duration, and the definition of NAb positive. Results from studies that have directly compared these products are consistent with results from the respective clinical trials of IFNβs. Both the clinical trials and the independent studies have shown that NAbs develop more frequently with IFNβ-1b treatment than with IFNβ-1a treatment and that, among IFNβ-1a products, NAbs develop more frequently with IFNβ-1a-Rebif treatment than with IFNβ-1a-Avonex treatment. Factors that may affect the immunogenicity of IFNβs, including the dosing regimens and the biochemical properties of the products, are discussed.

Biological markers of interferon-beta therapy: comparison among interferon-stimulated genes MxA, TRAIL and XAF-1.

Biological activity of interferon-beta (IFNβ) can be assessed by measuring IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs). Among them, myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) appears to have the highest specificity, but it has no role in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS). To investigate the reliability of MxA as a biomarker, we compared its expression to that of two other ISGs: TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis factor-1 (XAF-1). Both were shown to be involved in immunoregulatory mechanisms and might play a role in MS. Quantitative-PCR measurements were performed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 73 MS patients after short-term and long-term treatment with IFNβ. A time-dependent response for multiple ISGs was observed in all patients after short-term treatment. In contrast, long-term treatment induced concurrent inhibition of ISGs in 12.3% (9/73) of patients, in whom neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) were detectable. Besides, 22% (16/73) of chronically treated patients showed a non-NAbs-related abrogation of TRAIL expression. In summary, 1) MxA expression was significantly higher than both TRAIL and XAF-1, and 2) MxA was the most sensitive gene to detect decreased bioavailability due to NAbs. These findings identify MxA as an appropriate biomarker for IFNβ, although there is no evidence for a functional role of it in MS.

Evaluation of bioavailability of three types of IFNβ in multiple sclerosis patients by a new quantitative-competitive-PCR method for MxA quantification

Intracellular expression of human myxovirus protein A (MxA) is exclusively induced by type I IFNs (IFNalpha,beta,omega) or by some viruses and it is strongly increased under IFN treatment. We set up an internally controlled quantitative-competitive polymerase chain reaction (qc-PCR) that quantifies MxA mRNA expressed in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Our qc-PCR is accurate because the mean ratio of copy number estimated by qc-PCR to that quantified spectrophotometrically is 1.08+/-0.03, moreover it is repeatable with high sensitivity (1 fg MxA/pg GAPDH). MxA mRNA was tested in 47 Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RR-MS) untreated patients and in 48 patients treated with one of the 3 IFNbeta licensed for MS (24 with Rebif, 14 with Avonex and 10 with Betaferon). All the 48 treated patients were negative to IFNbeta neutralising antibodies (NABs) as tested in our laboratory using a cytopathic assay (CPE). MxA mRNA levels were detectable in all untreated patients (mean 24+/-18 fg MxA/pg GAPDH) and significantly higher levels were found in all the treated patients 12 h after IFNbeta administration (mean 499+/-325 fg MxA/pg GAPDH); furthermore, the three types of IFNbeta showed comparable bioavailability. Our data indicate that the bioavailability of the three available types of IFNbeta can be evaluated by MxA qc-PCR.

Corpus callosum damage and cognitive dysfunction in benign MS

Corpus callosum (CC), the largest compact white matter fiber bundle of the human brain involved in interhemispheric transfer, is frequently damaged in the course of multiple sclerosis (MS). Cognitive impairment is one of the factors affecting quality of life of patients with benign MS (BMS). The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the cognitive profile of BMS patients and the extent of tissue damage in the CC. Brain conventional and DT MRI scans were acquired from 54 BMS patients and 21 healthy controls. Neuropsychological tests (NPT) exploring memory, attention, and frontal lobe cognitive domains were administered to the patients. DT tractography was used to calculate the mean diffusivity (MD) and fractional anisotropy (FA) of the CC normal appearing white matter (NAWM). An index of CC atrophy was also estimated. Nine (17%) BMS patients fulfilled criteria for cognitive impairment. Compared with controls, BMS had significantly different CC diffusivity and volumetry (P < 0.001). Compared with cognitively preserved patients, those with CI had significantly higher CC lesion volume (LV) (P = 0.02) and NAWM MD (P = 0.02). The scores obtained at PASAT were significantly correlated with CC T2 LV, and NAWM FA and MD (r values ranging from −0.31 to 0.66, P values ranging from 0.04 to <0.001). Cognitive impairment in BMS is associated with the extent of CC damage in terms of both focal lesions and diffuse fiber bundle injury. MRI assessment of topographical distribution of tissue damage may represent a rewarding strategy for understanding the subtle clinical deficits of patients with BMS. Hum Brian Mapp 2009.

Consensus definitions and application guidelines for control groups in cerebrospinal fluid biomarker studies in multiple sclerosis.

The choice of appropriate control group(s) is critical in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker research in multiple sclerosis (MS). There is a lack of definitions and nomenclature of different control groups and a rationalized application of different control groups. We here propose consensus definitions and nomenclature for the following groups: healthy controls (HCs), spinal anesthesia subjects (SASs), inflammatory neurological disease controls (INDCs), peripheral inflammatory neurological disease controls (PINDCs), non-inflammatory neurological controls (NINDCs), symptomatic controls (SCs). Furthermore, we discuss the application of these control groups in specific study designs, such as for diagnostic biomarker studies, prognostic biomarker studies and therapeutic response studies. Application of these uniform definitions will lead to better comparability of biomarker studies and optimal use of available resources. This will lead to improved quality of CSF biomarker research in MS and related disorders.