Antonio Nino

Rosiglitazone Decreases Bone Mineral Density and Increases Bone Turnover in Postmenopausal Women With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

CONTEXT Postmenopausal status and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are independent risk factors for fractures. An increased fracture risk has been observed with rosiglitazone (RSG), a thiazolidinedione, in patients with T2DM. DESIGN AND SETTING This was a randomized, double-blind study in postmenopausal women with T2DM. A 52-week double-blind phase (RSG or metformin [MET]) was followed by a 24-week open-label phase, during which time all patients received MET. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary endpoint was to assess the mean percentage change in bone mineral density (BMD) at the femoral neck (FN) by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry from baseline to week 52 in the RSG treatment group. Key secondary objectives included assessment of changes in BMD at the total hip, trochanter, and lumbar spine and to evaluate RSG effects on bone turnover markers. RESULTS From baseline to week 52, RSG was associated with a reduction in FN BMD by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (-1.47%). During the open-label phase (weeks 52-76), no further loss in FN BMD was observed. A decrease in BMD occurred at the total hip during RSG or MET treatment at 52 weeks (-1.62 and -0.72%, respectively). Total hip BMD loss by RSG was attenuated after switching to MET and was similar between treatment groups at the end of the open-label phase. From baseline to week 52, bone turnover markers significantly increased with RSG compared with MET, but decreased significantly during the open-label phase. CONCLUSIONS RSG for 52 weeks in postmenopausal women with T2DM was associated with small reductions in FN, total hip, and lumbar spine BMD and increased bone turnover markers. These effects are attenuated after cessation of RSG treatment.

A randomized, parallel group, double-blind, multicentre study comparing the efficacy and safety of Avandamet (rosiglitazone/metformin) and metformin on long-term glycaemic control and bone mineral density after 80 weeks of treatment in drug-naïve type 2 diabetes mellitus patients

Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate if superior glycaemic control could be achieved with Avandamet® (rosiglitazone/metformin/AVM) compared with metformin (MET) monotherapy, and if glycaemic effects attained with AVM are durable over 18 months of treatment. Bone mineral density (BMD) and bone biomarkers were evaluated in a subgroup of patients.

A randomized placebo-controlled trial of the efficacy of denosumab in Indian postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

Introduction: Osteoporosis is a serious condition affecting up to 50% of Indian postmenopausal women. Denosumab reduces bone resorption by targeting the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of denosumab in Indian postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Materials and Methods: In this double-blind, multicenter, phase 3 study, 250 Indian postmenopausal women aged 55 to 75 years (T-score <-2.5 and >-4.0 at the lumbar spine or total hip; serum 25(OH) D levels ≥20 ng/mL) were randomized to receive one subcutaneous dose of denosumab 60 mg or placebo. All subjects received oral calcium ≥1000 mg and vitamin D3 ≥ 400 IU daily. The primary end point was mean percent change in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine from baseline to Month 6. Secondary end points included mean percent change from baseline in BMD at total hip, femoral neck, and trochanter at Month 6 and median percent change from baseline in bone turnover markers at Months 1, 3, and 6. Results: Total 225 subjects (denosumab = 111, placebo = 114) completed the six-month study. Baseline demographics were similar between groups. A 3.1% (95% confidence interval, 1.9%, 4.2%) increase favoring denosumab versus placebo was seen for the primary end point (P < 0.0001). Denosumab demonstrated a significant treatment benefit over placebo for the secondary end points. There were no fractures or withdrawals due to adverse events. Conclusions: Consistent with results from studies conducted in other parts of the world, denosumab was well tolerated and effective in increasing BMD and decreasing bone turnover markers over a six-month period in Indian postmenopausal women.

Effects of Rosiglitazone vs Metformin on Circulating Osteoclast and Osteogenic Precursor Cells in Postmenopausal Women with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

CONTEXT Thiazolidinediones are associated with increased fractures in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). One explanation is that activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ expression alters bone remodeling cells. OBJECTIVE To investigate whether osteoclast and osteogenic precursor cells are altered by rosiglitazone (RSG) treatment in T2D as compared to metformin (MET) treatment. DESIGN A randomized controlled trial of RSG or MET for 52 weeks, followed by 24 weeks of MET. SETTING Data were generated at a tertiary care center. PATIENTS Seventy-three T2D postmenopausal women participated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated and cultured with receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand and stained for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase to measure circulating osteoclast precursors. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were also characterized for osteogenic, endothelial, and calcification markers by flow cytometry with the ligands osteocalcin (OCN), CD34, and CD 146. RESULTS Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-positive cells increased between weeks 0 and 52 (RSG, 2.9 ± 2 to 14.0 ± 3 U/L, P = .001; MET, 3.3 ± 2 to 16.7 ± 2 U/L, P = .001), increasing further in the RSG group after changing to MET (to 26.5 ± 5 U/L, P = .05 vs wk 52). With RSG, OCN+ cells with CD34 but without CD146 fell from weeks 0 to 52 (20.1 ± 1% to 15.5 ± 2%; P = .03), remaining stable through week 76. The OCN+ cells lacking both CD34 and CD146 increased from weeks 0 to 52 (67.3 ± 2 to 74.4 ± 2%; P = .02), but returned to baseline after switching to MET. CONCLUSION In postmenopausal women with T2D, circulating osteoclast precursor cells increase with both RSG and MET, and increase further when switching from RSG to MET. Subpopulations of cells that may be involved in the osteogenic lineage pathway are also altered with RSG. Further work is necessary to elucidate how these changes may relate to fracture risk.

Mechanism of action study to evaluate the effect of rosiglitazone on bone in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus: rationale, study design and baseline characteristics

Abstract Objectives: Post-hoc analyses have shown an increase incidence of fractures among type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients treated with thiazolidinediones (TZDs). The mechanisms by which TZDs may be associated with increased fracture risk is not well understood. This article describes the study design and baseline characteristics for a prospective, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial to evaluate the effects of rosiglitazone on changes in measures of skeletal structure, surrogates of bone strength and metabolism. Methods: Postmenopausal women without osteoporosis and diagnosed with T2DM were randomized in a double-blind design to either rosiglitazone or metformin for 52 weeks, then all subjects received open-label metformin for 24 weeks. Study endpoints included changes in bone mineral density (BMD), quantitative computed tomography (QCT), digitized hip radiography (HXR) and high resolution magnetic resonance imaging (hrMRI). Serum markers of bone metabolism and indices of glycemic control were assessed within and between treatment groups. Results: A total of 226 subjects were randomized. Baseline characteristics included: age 63.8 ± 6.5 years; years postmenopausal 16.9 ± 8.4; duration of diabetes 3.5 (1.8–7.8) years; body mass index (BMI) 31.4 ± 5.9 kg/m2; and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) 6.4 ± 0.65%. At baseline, mean T-scores were −0.95 ± 0.91 at the femoral neck, −0.02 ± 0.97 at the total hip and −0.55 ± 1.25 at the total spine. Since there are no well recognized techniques to determine bone mass and structure at the distal limbs (cortical bone sites where fractures were reported in RSG subjects), using the femoral neck as a surrogate for these areas may be a potential limitation of the study. Conclusion: This is the first randomized trial utilizing multiple techniques to evaluate bone mass, structure, serum markers of bone remodeling, and potential reversibility of changes after discontinuation of rosiglitazone. This study will provide information about RSG bone effects in a population of postmenopausal women at risk for bone loss and subsequent fracture. ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00679939

Vitamin D Repletion in Korean Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis

Purpose Up to 71% of South Korean postmenopausal women have vitamin D deficiency {serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH) D] level <50 nmol/L}. Data on vitamin D supplementation was collected during the screening phase of an efficacy/safety study of denosumab in Korean postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. This report describes the effect of vitamin D supplementation on repletion to 25(OH)D levels ≥50 nmol/L in Korean postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Materials and Methods Vitamin D levels of Korean postmenopausal women (60–90 years old) were measured by extracting 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3 from serum samples via protein precipitation and using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry detection. Calibration curves were constructed from the mass chromatograms to obtain total vitamin D levels. Subjects with serum 25(OH)D levels <50 nmol/L were supplemented with 1000 IU of vitamin D tablets during the 2.5-month-long screening period. Dose, frequency, and duration were determined by the investigator. If repletion was achieved (≥50 nmol/L) on retest, subjects were eligible to be rescreened for study entry. Results Of 371 subjects screened, 191 (52%) required vitamin D supplementation, and 88% (168 of 191) were successfully repleted. More than half of the subjects (58%) who were successfully repleted received doses of 2000 IU daily. The mean time to successful repletion was 31 days (standard deviation 8.4 days; range 11–48 days). Conclusion Supplementation with daily median doses of 2000 IU vitamin D successfully repleted 88% of Korean postmenopausal women with osteoporosis within 48 days to a serum vitamin D level of 50 nmol/L.

Assessment of Denosumab in Korean Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis: Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial with Open-Label Extension

Purpose The efficacy and safety of denosumab was compared with placebo in Korean postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in this phase III study. Materials and Methods Women aged 60 to 90 years with a T-score of <-2.5 and ≥-4.0 at the lumbar spine or total hip were randomized to a single 60 mg subcutaneous dose of denosumab or placebo for the 6-month double-blind phase. Eligible subjects entered the 6-month open-label extension phase and received a single dose of denosumab 60 mg. Results Baseline demographics were similar in the 62 denosumab- and 64 placebo-treated subjects who completed the double-blind phase. Treatment favored denosumab over placebo for the primary endpoint {mean percent change from baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) at Month 6 [3.2% (95% confidence interval 2.1%, 4.4%; p<0.0001)]}; and secondary endpoints (mean percent change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD at Month 1, total hip, femoral neck, and trochanter BMD at Months 1 and 6, and median percent change from baseline in bone turnover markers at Months 1, 3, and 6). Endpoint improvements were sustained over 12 months in the open-label extension (n=119). There were no new or unexpected safety signals. Conclusion Denosumab was well tolerated and effective in increasing BMD and decreasing bone turnover markers over a 12-month period in Korean postmenopausal women. The findings of this study demonstrate that denosumab has beneficial effects on the measures of osteoporosis in Korean postmenopausal women.

Effect of Albiglutide on Cholecystokinin‐Induced Gallbladder Emptying in Healthy Individuals: A Randomized Crossover Study

The glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) receptor agonists (RAs) exenatide and lixisenatide reduce cholecystokinin (CCK)‐induced gallbladder emptying in healthy subjects. It is unknown if all GLP‐1 RAs share this effect; therefore, the effect of the GLP‐1 RA albiglutide on gallbladder function was assessed. In this randomized, double‐blind, 2‐way crossover study, a single dose of subcutaneous albiglutide 50 mg or placebo was administered to 17 healthy subjects, and CCK‐induced gallbladder contractility was measured by ultrasonography. CCK (0.003 μg/kg) was infused intravenously over 50 minutes on study day 4 (3 days after dosing, to coincide with albiglutides expected time to maximum concentration). Gallbladder volume, ejection fraction, and the main pancreatic and common bile‐duct diameters were measured before, during, and following CCK infusion. Gallbladder volume was significantly greater in the albiglutide vs placebo groups before, during, and after CCK infusion, and the mean difference from placebo increased numerically during CCK infusion. The area under the volume‐effect curve was significantly greater with albiglutide (P = .029). Starting at the 30‐minute CCK infusion time point, the gallbladder ejection fraction was significantly lower with albiglutide than placebo. Changes in pancreatic duct diameter and common bile‐duct diameter were not significantly different between albiglutide and placebo. Similar incidences of adverse events were observed between the albiglutide and placebo treatment periods. No new albiglutide safety signals were detected, and no serious adverse events were reported. In conclusion, similar to other GLP‐1 RAs, albiglutide decreased CCK‐induced gallbladder emptying compared with placebo in healthy individuals. Clinical implications of the gallbladder effects are unclear at this time.

Albiglutide, a weekly GLP-1 receptor agonist, improves glycemic parameters in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes over 1 year when added to single oral antidiabetic drugs

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of once weekly albiglutide added to a single oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) in Japanese patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Research design and methods: In this phase 3, 1 year study (NCT01777282), patients (N = 374) received albiglutide 30 mg plus a single OAD (sulfonylurea [n = 120], biguanide [n = 67)], glinide [n = 65], thiazolidinedione [n = 61], or α-glucosidase inhibitor [n = 61]). Albiglutide could be increased to 50 mg after Week 4, based on glycemic criteria. Primary endpoints were the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and hypoglycemia; secondary endpoints were changes from baseline at Week 52 in HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose (FPG), proportion of patients achieving HbA1c ≤7.0%, and withdrawals due to hyperglycemia. Results: On-therapy AEs occurred in 78.6% of patients and serious AEs in 2.1%. Common AEs were nasopharyngitis (32.6%), constipation (7.2%), and diabetic retinopathy (5.3%). No serious AEs occurred more than once or were reported in >1 patient. Hypoglycemia occurred in 6.4% of patients, mostly in the albiglutide + sulfonylurea (14.2%) and the albiglutide + glinide (6.2%) groups. Albiglutide was uptitrated in 53.2% of patients. Mean baseline HbA1c was 8.1%. Mean decreases from baseline in HbA1c were observed with the addition of albiglutide to thiazolidinediones (−1.42%), α-glucosidase inhibitors (−1.39%), sulfonylureas (−1.04%), glinides (−0.95%), and biguanides (−0.94%). HbA1c of <7% in >50% of patients and mean reductions in FPG were achieved in all groups. Mean changes from baseline in body weight ranged from +0.52 kg (albiglutide + thiazolidinedione) to −0.33 kg (albiglutide + biguanide). Limitations of the study included open label treatment that was not randomized. Conclusions: When combined with a single OAD in Japanese patients with inadequately controlled T2DM, albiglutide led to favorable changes in all glycemic parameters, with minor changes in body weight depending on the background OAD. No new safety concerns were noted.

Evaluation of Quantitative Computed Tomography Cortical Hip Quadrant in a Clinical Trial With Rosiglitazone: A Potential New Study Endpoint.

Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) measurements have been used extensively to ascertain information about bone quality and density due to the 3-dimensional information provided and the ability to segment out trabecular and cortical bones. QCT imaging helps to improve our understanding of the role that each bone compartment plays in the pathogenesis and prognosis of fracture. This study was conducted to explore longitudinal changes in femoral neck (FN) cortical bone structure using both volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and cortical shell thickness assessments via QCT in a double-blind, randomized, multicenter clinical trial in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus. This study also examined whether treatment-associated changes in the cortical bone vBMD and thickness in femoral neck quadrants could be evaluated. Subjects were randomized to rosiglitazone (RSG) or metformin (MET) for 52 wk followed by 24 wk of open-label MET. A subset of 87 subjects underwent QCT scans of the hip at baseline, after 52 wk of double-blind treatment, and after 24 wk of treatment with MET using standard full-body computed tomography scanners. All scans were evaluated and analyzed centrally. Cortical vBMD at the FN was precisely segmented from trabecular bone and used to assess a possible therapeutic effect on this bone compartment. QCT analysis showed reductions in adjusted mean percentage change in vBMD and in absolute cortical thickness occurred with RSG treatment from baseline to week 52, whereas changes with MET were generally minimal. The reductions observed during RSG treatment for 1 yr appeared to partially reverse during the open-label MET phase from weeks 52 to 76. The femoral neck quadrant may provide utility as a potential endpoint in clinical trials for the understanding of the therapeutic effect of new entities on cortical bone vs trabecular bone; however, further clinical validation is needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION The protocol (GSK study number AVD111179) was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00679939.