Colin G. Miller

A phase 3 trial of the efficacy and safety of oral recombinant calcitonin: The oral calcitonin in postmenopausal osteoporosis (ORACAL) trial

The Oral Calcitonin in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis (ORACAL) study was a randomized, double‐blind, double‐dummy, active‐ and placebo‐controlled, multiple‐dose, phase 3 study to assess the efficacy and safety of oral recombinant calcitonin for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. A total of 565 women age 46 to 86 (mean 66.5) years were randomized (4:3:2) to receive oral recombinant salmon calcitonin (rsCT) tablets (0.2 mg/d) plus placebo nasal spray, synthetic salmon calcitonin (ssCT) nasal spray (200 IU/d) plus placebo tablets, or placebo (placebo tablets plus placebo nasal spray), respectively for 48 weeks. All women received calcium (≥1000 mg/d) and vitamin D (800 IU/d). Women randomized to oral rsCT had a mean ± SD percent increase from baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) (1.5% ± 3.2%) that was greater than those randomized to ssCT nasal spray (0.78% ± 2.9%) or placebo (0.5% ± 3.2%). Lumbar spine BMD change in those receiving nasal calcitonin did not differ from placebo. Oral rsCT treatment also resulted in greater improvements in trochanteric and total proximal femur BMD than ssCT nasal spray. Reductions in bone resorption markers with oral rsCT were greater than those observed in ssCT nasal spray or placebo recipients. Approximately 80% of subjects in each treatment group experienced an adverse event, the majority of which were mild or moderate in intensity. Gastrointestinal system adverse events were reported by nearly one‐half of women in all treatment groups and were the principal reason for premature withdrawals. Less than 10% of women experienced a serious adverse event and no deaths occurred. Overall, oral rsCT was superior to nasal ssCT and placebo for increasing BMD and reducing bone turnover. Oral rsCT was safe and as well tolerated as ssCT nasal spray or placebo. Oral calcitonin may provide an additional treatment alternative for women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Rosiglitazone Decreases Bone Mineral Density and Increases Bone Turnover in Postmenopausal Women With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

CONTEXT Postmenopausal status and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are independent risk factors for fractures. An increased fracture risk has been observed with rosiglitazone (RSG), a thiazolidinedione, in patients with T2DM. DESIGN AND SETTING This was a randomized, double-blind study in postmenopausal women with T2DM. A 52-week double-blind phase (RSG or metformin [MET]) was followed by a 24-week open-label phase, during which time all patients received MET. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary endpoint was to assess the mean percentage change in bone mineral density (BMD) at the femoral neck (FN) by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry from baseline to week 52 in the RSG treatment group. Key secondary objectives included assessment of changes in BMD at the total hip, trochanter, and lumbar spine and to evaluate RSG effects on bone turnover markers. RESULTS From baseline to week 52, RSG was associated with a reduction in FN BMD by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (-1.47%). During the open-label phase (weeks 52-76), no further loss in FN BMD was observed. A decrease in BMD occurred at the total hip during RSG or MET treatment at 52 weeks (-1.62 and -0.72%, respectively). Total hip BMD loss by RSG was attenuated after switching to MET and was similar between treatment groups at the end of the open-label phase. From baseline to week 52, bone turnover markers significantly increased with RSG compared with MET, but decreased significantly during the open-label phase. CONCLUSIONS RSG for 52 weeks in postmenopausal women with T2DM was associated with small reductions in FN, total hip, and lumbar spine BMD and increased bone turnover markers. These effects are attenuated after cessation of RSG treatment.

A 2-year randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study of oral selective iNOS inhibitor, cindunistat (SD-6010), in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee

Objective To determine if inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) with cindunistat hydrochloride maleate slows progression of osteoarthritis (OA) Methods This 2-year, multinational, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled patients with symptomatic knee OA (Kellgren and Lawrence Grade (KLG) 2 or 3). Standard OA therapies were permitted throughout. Patients were randomly assigned to cindunistat (50 or 200 mg/day) or placebo. Randomisation was stratified by KLG. Radiographs to assess joint space narrowing (JSN) were acquired using the modified Lyon-schuss protocol at baseline, week 48 and 96. Results Of 1457 patients (50 mg/day, n=485; 200 mg/day, n=486; placebo, n=486), 1048 (71.9%) completed the study. Patients were predominantly women; 56% had KLG3. The primary analysis did not demonstrate superiority of cindunistat versus placebo for rate of change in JSN. In KLG2 patients, JSN after 48 weeks was lower with cindunistat 50 mg/day versus placebo (p=0.032). Least-squares mean±SE JSN with cindunistat 50 mg/day ( −0.048±0.028 mm) and 200 mg/day (−0.062±0.028 mm) were 59.9% (95% CI 6.8% to 106.9%) and 48.7% (95% CI -8.4% to 93.9%) of placebo, improvement was not maintained at 96 weeks. No improvement was observed for KLG3 patients at either time-point. Cindunistat did not improve joint pain or function, but was generally well tolerated. Conclusions Cindunistat (50 or 200 mg/day) did not slow the rate of JSN versus placebo. After 48-weeks, KLG2 patients showed less JSN; however, the improvement was not sustained at 96-weeks. iNOS inhibition did not slow OA progression in KLG3 patients. Clinical trial listing NCT00565812

OARSI Clinical Trials Recommendations: Hand imaging in clinical trials in osteoarthritis

Tremendous advances have occurred in our understanding of the pathogenesis of hand osteoarthritis (OA) and these are beginning to be applied to trials targeted at modification of the disease course. The purpose of this expert opinion, consensus driven exercise is to provide detail on how one might use and apply hand imaging assessments in disease modifying clinical trials. It includes information on acquisition methods/techniques (including guidance on positioning for radiography, sequence/protocol recommendations/hardware for MRI); commonly encountered problems (including positioning, hardware and coil failures, sequences artifacts); quality assurance/control procedures; measurement methods; measurement performance (reliability, responsiveness, validity); recommendations for trials; and research recommendations.

Imaging of cartilage and bone: promises and pitfalls in clinical trials of osteoarthritis

Imaging in clinical trials is used to evaluate subject eligibility, and/or efficacy of intervention, supporting decision making in drug development by ascertaining treatment effects on joint structure. This review focusses on imaging of bone and cartilage in clinical trials of (knee) osteoarthritis. We narratively review the full-text literature on imaging of bone and cartilage, adding primary experience in the implementation of imaging methods in clinical trials. Aims and constraints of applying imaging in clinical trials are outlined. The specific uses of semi-quantitative and quantitative imaging biomarkers of bone and cartilage in osteoarthritis trials are summarized, focusing on radiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Studies having compared both imaging methodologies directly and those having established a relationship between imaging biomarkers and clinical outcomes are highlighted. To make this review of practical use, recommendations are provided as to which imaging protocols are ideal for capturing specific aspects of bone and cartilage tissue, and pitfalls in their usage are highlighted. Further, the longitudinal sensitivity to change, of different imaging methods is reported for various patient strata. From these power calculations can be accomplished, provided the strength of the treatment effect is known. In conclusion, current imaging methodologies provide powerful tools for scoring and measuring morphological and compositional aspects of most articular tissues, capturing longitudinal change with reasonable to excellent sensitivity. When employed properly, imaging has tremendous potential for ascertaining treatment effects on various joint structures, potentially over shorter time scales than required for demonstrating effects on clinical outcomes.

OARSI Clinical Trials Recommendations: Knee imaging in clinical trials inosteoarthritis

Significant advances have occurred in our understanding of the pathogenesis of knee osteoarthritis (OA) and some recent trials have demonstrated the potential for modification of the disease course. The purpose of this expert opinion, consensus driven exercise is to provide detail on how one might use and apply knee imaging in knee OA trials. It includes information on acquisition methods/techniques (including guidance on positioning for radiography, sequence/protocol recommendations/hardware for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)); commonly encountered problems (including positioning, hardware and coil failures, sequences artifacts); quality assurance (QA)/control procedures; measurement methods; measurement performance (reliability, responsiveness, validity); recommendations for trials; and research recommendations.

Development of a Clinical Workflow Tool to Enhance the Detection of Vertebral Fractures: Accuracy and Precision Evaluation

Study Design. Image analysis model development. Objective. The objective of this study was to develop a novel clinical workflow tool that uses model-based shape recognition technology to allow efficient, semiautomated detailed annotation of each vertebra between T4 and L4 on plain lateral radiographs. Summary of Background Data. Identification of prevalent vertebral fractures, especially when not symptomatic, has been problematic despite their importance. There is a recognized need to increase the opportunities to detect vertebral fractures so that clinically beneficial therapeutic interventions can be initiated. Methods. Radiographs obtained from 165 subjects in the Canadian Multicenter Osteoporosis Study (CaMos) were used to construct a vertebral shape model of the vertebral column from T4 to L4 using a statistical learning technique, as well as to estimate the accuracy and precision of this automated software tool for vertebral shape analysis. Radiographs showing scoliosis greater than 15° were excluded. Results. Vertebral contours defined by 95 points per vertebra, represented by 79,895 points in total, were assessed on 841 individual vertebrae. The mean absolute accuracy error calculated over each vertebra in each test image was 1.06 ± 1.2 mm. This value corresponded to an average 3.4% of vertebral height. The mean precision error, reflecting interobserver variability, per vertebra of the resulting annotations was 0.61 ± 0.73 mm. This value corresponded to an average 2.3% of vertebral height. Accuracy and precision error estimates did not differ notably by vertebral level. Conclusion. The results of the current study indicate that statistical modeling can provide a robust tool for the accurate and precise semiautomated annotation of vertebral body shape from T4 to L4 in patients who do not have scoliosis greater than 15°. This method may prove useful as a clinical workflow tool to aid the physician in vertebral fracture assessment and might contribute to decision-making about pharmacologic treatment of osteoporosis.

OARSI Clinical Trials Recommendations for Hip Imaging in Osteoarthritis

Imaging of hip in osteoarthritis (OA) has seen considerable progress in the past decade, with the introduction of new techniques that may be more sensitive to structural disease changes. The purpose of this expert opinion, consensus driven recommendation is to provide detail on how to apply hip imaging in disease modifying clinical trials. It includes information on acquisition methods/techniques (including guidance on positioning for radiography, sequence/protocol recommendations/hardware for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)); commonly encountered problems (including positioning, hardware and coil failures, artifacts associated with various MRI sequences); quality assurance/control procedures; measurement methods; measurement performance (reliability, responsiveness, and validity); recommendations for trials; and research recommendations.

Considerations when designing a disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug (DMOAD) trial using radiography

OBJECTIVE Using placebo data from a recently completed disease-modifying osteoarthritis (OA) drug trial, we seek to inform study design of future radiographic studies. METHODS Eligible patients aged ≥40 years, with body mass index (BMI) 25-40kg/m(2) and symptomatic knee OA diagnosed by modified Kellgren and Lawrence grade (KLG) 2 or 3 and pain/stiffness and/or use of medication for knee pain in the past year, were assessed by radiography using a modified Lyon-schuss (mL/S) protocol for joint space narrowing (JSN) (primary outcome variable) at baseline and weeks 48 and 96. Multifaceted quality control was conducted throughout. Repeat images were requested when the medial tibial plateau (MTP) was not aligned (inter-margin distance [IMD] >1.5mm) or for other quality issues. Data are given mean ± standard deviation. RESULTS Patients (74.9% female; 61.3 ± 9.1 years) had BMI 31.6 ± 4.1kg/m(2) at baseline; 222 (173 females) had KLG2, 264 (191 female) KLG3. A significant loss in joint space width (JSW) from baseline to week 48 (-0.13 ± 0.36mm) and to week 96 (-0.22 ± 0.45mm) was observed for all randomised placebo patients (p < 0.001 for both), and at both time points when stratified by KLG2 or KLG3. Standard deviations were small relative to mean changes, providing standardised response means for all placebo patients of 0.35 (week 48) and 0.48 (week 96). CONCLUSIONS Using a tightly controlled radiographic technique, JSN is a viable outcome variable for determining disease progression in mild-to-moderate knee OA. The mL/S protocol is a sensitive and feasible method for OA studies aiming to assess rate of JSN in the knee.

Medical Imaging in Clinical Trials

Give us 5 minutes and we will show you the best book to read today. This is it, the medical imaging in clinical trials that will be your best choice for better reading book. Your five times will not spend wasted by reading this website. You can take the book as a source to make better concept. Referring the books that can be situated with your needs is sometime difficult. But here, this is so easy. You can find the best thing of book that you can read.