Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Anuradha Gopalan is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Anuradha Gopalan.


Cancer Cell | 2010

Integrative Genomic Profiling of Human Prostate Cancer

Barry S. Taylor; Nikolaus Schultz; Haley Hieronymus; Anuradha Gopalan; Yonghong Xiao; Brett S. Carver; Vivek K. Arora; Poorvi Kaushik; Ethan Cerami; Boris Reva; Yevgeniy Antipin; Nicholas Mitsiades; Thomas Landers; Igor Dolgalev; John Major; Manda Wilson; Nicholas D. Socci; Alex E. Lash; Adriana Heguy; James A. Eastham; Howard I. Scher; Victor E. Reuter; Peter T. Scardino; Chris Sander; Charles L. Sawyers; William L. Gerald

Annotation of prostate cancer genomes provides a foundation for discoveries that can impact disease understanding and treatment. Concordant assessment of DNA copy number, mRNA expression, and focused exon resequencing in 218 prostate cancer tumors identified the nuclear receptor coactivator NCOA2 as an oncogene in approximately 11% of tumors. Additionally, the androgen-driven TMPRSS2-ERG fusion was associated with a previously unrecognized, prostate-specific deletion at chromosome 3p14 that implicates FOXP1, RYBP, and SHQ1 as potential cooperative tumor suppressors. DNA copy-number data from primary tumors revealed that copy-number alterations robustly define clusters of low- and high-risk disease beyond that achieved by Gleason score. The genomic and clinical outcome data from these patients are now made available as a public resource.


Cell | 2015

Integrative clinical genomics of advanced prostate cancer

Dan R. Robinson; Eliezer M. Van Allen; Yi Mi Wu; Nikolaus Schultz; Robert J. Lonigro; Juan Miguel Mosquera; Bruce Montgomery; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Colin C. Pritchard; Gerhardt Attard; Himisha Beltran; Wassim Abida; Robert K. Bradley; Jake Vinson; Xuhong Cao; Pankaj Vats; Lakshmi P. Kunju; Maha Hussain; Felix Y. Feng; Scott A. Tomlins; Kathleen A. Cooney; David C. Smith; Christine Brennan; Javed Siddiqui; Rohit Mehra; Yu Chen; Dana E. Rathkopf; Michael J. Morris; Stephen B. Solomon; Jeremy C. Durack

Toward development of a precision medicine framework for metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), we established a multi-institutional clinical sequencing infrastructure to conduct prospective whole-exome and transcriptome sequencing of bone or soft tissue tumor biopsies from a cohort of 150 mCRPC affected individuals. Aberrations of AR, ETS genes, TP53, and PTEN were frequent (40%-60% of cases), with TP53 and AR alterations enriched in mCRPC compared to primary prostate cancer. We identified new genomic alterations in PIK3CA/B, R-spondin, BRAF/RAF1, APC, β-catenin, and ZBTB16/PLZF. Moreover, aberrations of BRCA2, BRCA1, and ATM were observed at substantially higher frequencies (19.3% overall) compared to those in primary prostate cancers. 89% of affected individuals harbored a clinically actionable aberration, including 62.7% with aberrations in AR, 65% in other cancer-related genes, and 8% with actionable pathogenic germline alterations. This cohort study provides clinically actionable information that could impact treatment decisions for these affected individuals.


Nature Genetics | 2009

Aberrant ERG expression cooperates with loss of PTEN to promote cancer progression in the prostate

Brett S. Carver; Jennifer Tran; Anuradha Gopalan; Zhenbang Chen; Safa Shaikh; Arkaitz Carracedo; Andrea Alimonti; Caterina Nardella; Shohreh Varmeh; Peter T. Scardino; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; William L. Gerald; Pier Paolo Pandolfi

Chromosomal translocations involving the ERG locus are frequent events in human prostate cancer pathogenesis; however, the biological role of aberrant ERG expression is controversial. Here we show that aberrant expression of ERG is a progression event in prostate tumorigenesis. We find that prostate cancer specimens containing the TMPRSS2-ERG rearrangement are significantly enriched for loss of the tumor suppressor PTEN. In concordance with these findings, transgenic overexpression of ERG in mouse prostate tissue promotes marked acceleration and progression of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) to prostatic adenocarcinoma in a Pten heterozygous background. In vitro overexpression of ERG promotes cell migration, a property necessary for tumorigenesis, without affecting proliferation. ADAMTS1 and CXCR4, two candidate genes strongly associated with cell migration, were upregulated in the presence of ERG overexpression. Thus, ERG has a distinct role in prostate cancer progression and cooperates with PTEN haploinsufficiency to promote progression of HGPIN to invasive adenocarcinoma.


Cancer Research | 2009

TMPRSS2-ERG Gene Fusion Is Not Associated with Outcome in Patients Treated by Prostatectomy

Anuradha Gopalan; Margaret Leversha; Jaya M. Satagopan; Qin Zhou; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Samson W. Fine; James A. Eastham; Peter T. Scardino; Howard I. Scher; Satish K. Tickoo; Victor E. Reuter; William L. Gerald

A significant number of prostate cancers have been shown to have recurrent chromosomal rearrangements resulting in the fusion of the androgen-regulated TMPRSS2 promoter to a member of the ETS transcription factor family, most commonly ERG. This results in ERG overexpression, which may have a direct causal role in prostate tumorigenesis or progression. However, the clinical significance of the rearrangement is unclear, and in particular, relationship to outcome has been inconsistent in recent reports. We analyzed TMPRSS2-ERG gene rearrangement status by fluorescence in situ hybridization in 521 cases of clinically localized surgically treated prostate cancer with 95 months of median follow-up and also in 40 unmatched metastases. Forty-two percent of primary tumors and 40% of metastases had rearrangements. Eleven percent had copy number increase (CNI) of the TMPRRS2-ERG region. Rearrangement alone was associated with lower grade, but not with stage, biochemical recurrence, metastases, or death. CNI with and without rearrangement was associated with high grade and advanced stage. Further, a subgroup of cancers with CNI and rearrangement by deletion, with two or more copies of the deleted locus, tended to be more clinically aggressive. DNA index assessment revealed that the majority of tumors with CNI of TMPRSS2-ERG had generalized aneuploidy/tetraploidy in contrast to tumors without TMPRSS2-ERG CNI, which were predominantly diploid. We therefore conclude that translocation of TMPRSS2-ERG is not associated with outcome, and the aggressive clinical features associated with CNI of chromosome 21 reflect generalized aneuploidy and are not due to CNI specifically of rearranged TMPRSS2-ERG.


Cancer Discovery | 2013

Androgen Receptor Signaling Regulates DNA Repair in Prostate Cancers

William R. Polkinghorn; Joel S. Parker; Man X. Lee; Elizabeth M. Kass; Daniel E. Spratt; Phillip J. Iaquinta; Vivek K. Arora; Wei Feng Yen; Ling Cai; Deyou Zheng; Brett S. Carver; Yu Chen; Philip A. Watson; Neel Shah; Sho Fujisawa; Alexander G. Goglia; Anuradha Gopalan; Haley Hieronymus; John Wongvipat; Peter T. Scardino; Michael J. Zelefsky; Maria Jasin; Jayanta Chaudhuri; Simon N. Powell; Charles L. Sawyers

UNLABELLED We demonstrate that the androgen receptor (AR) regulates a transcriptional program of DNA repair genes that promotes prostate cancer radioresistance, providing a potential mechanism by which androgen deprivation therapy synergizes with ionizing radiation. Using a model of castration-resistant prostate cancer, we show that second-generation antiandrogen therapy results in downregulation of DNA repair genes. Next, we demonstrate that primary prostate cancers display a significant spectrum of AR transcriptional output, which correlates with expression of a set of DNA repair genes. Using RNA-seq and ChIP-seq, we define which of these DNA repair genes are both induced by androgen and represent direct AR targets. We establish that prostate cancer cells treated with ionizing radiation plus androgen demonstrate enhanced DNA repair and decreased DNA damage and furthermore that antiandrogen treatment causes increased DNA damage and decreased clonogenic survival. Finally, we demonstrate that antiandrogen treatment results in decreased classical nonhomologous end-joining. SIGNIFICANCE We demonstrate that the AR regulates a network of DNA repair genes, providing a potential mechanism by which androgen deprivation synergizes with radiotherapy for prostate cancer.


Cancer Cell | 2014

Cross-Species Regulatory Network Analysis Identifies a Synergistic Interaction between FOXM1 and CENPF that Drives Prostate Cancer Malignancy

Alvaro Aytes; Antonina Mitrofanova; Celine Lefebvre; Mariano J. Alvarez; Mireia Castillo-Martin; Tian Zheng; James A. Eastham; Anuradha Gopalan; Kenneth J. Pienta; Michael M. Shen; Cory Abate-Shen

To identify regulatory drivers of prostate cancer malignancy, we have assembled genome-wide regulatory networks (interactomes) for human and mouse prostate cancer from expression profiles of human tumors and of genetically engineered mouse models, respectively. Cross-species computational analysis of these interactomes has identified FOXM1 and CENPF as synergistic master regulators of prostate cancer malignancy. Experimental validation shows that FOXM1 and CENPF function synergistically to promote tumor growth by coordinated regulation of target gene expression and activation of key signaling pathways associated with prostate cancer malignancy. Furthermore, co-expression of FOXM1 and CENPF is a robust prognostic indicator of poor survival and metastasis. Thus, genome-wide cross-species interrogation of regulatory networks represents a valuable strategy to identify causal mechanisms of human cancer.


The American Journal of Surgical Pathology | 2009

Urachal carcinoma: a clinicopathologic analysis of 24 cases with outcome correlation.

Anuradha Gopalan; David S. Sharp; Samson W. Fine; Satish K. Tickoo; Harry W. Herr; Victor E. Reuter; Semra Olgac

Background Urachal carcinomas occur mostly in the bladder dome, comprising 22% to 35% of vesical adenocarcinomas, and are generally treated by partial cystectomy with en bloc resection of the median umbilical ligament and umbilicus. Detailed pathologic studies with clinical outcome correlation are few. Design We reviewed histologic material and clinical data from 24 cases selected from a database of 67 dome-based tumors diagnosed and treated at our institution from 1984 to 2005. Follow-up information was available for all 24 patients. Result The mean age at diagnosis was 52 years (range: 26 to 68 y). Fifteen patients were male and 9 were female. Location was the dome in 23 and dome and anterior wall in 1. Thirteen cases were pure adenocarcinoma, not otherwise specified, 9 were enteric type adenocarcinoma, and 2 were adenocarcinoma with focal components of lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma with cytoplasmic clearing. Signet ring cell features were focally seen in 2 cases. Cystitis cystica and cystitis glandularis were seen in 4 and 2 cases, respectively. In all instances but 1, cystitis cystica/glandularis was focal and predominantly in the bladder overlying the urachal neoplasm. Urachal remnants were identified in 15 cases: the urachal epithelium was benign urothelial-type in 6 cases and showed adenomatous changes in 9. The overlying bladder urothelium was colonized by adenocarcinoma in 3 cases. In all 3, urachal remnants were identified and showed transition from benign to adenomatous epithelium. On immunohistochemistry, these tumors were positive for CK20 and variably positive for CK7 and 34BE12. The majority showed a cytoplasmic membranous staining pattern for β-catenin, although in 1 case, focal nuclear immunoreactivity was identified. The Sheldon pathologic stage was pT1 in 0, pT2 in 2, pT3a in 8, pT3b in 11, pT3c in 1, pT4a in 1, and pT4b in 1 patient. One patient had a positive soft tissue margin. The mean follow-up period was 40 months (range: 0.3 to 157.6 mo). Seven of 24 (29%) cases recurred locally. The incidence of local recurrence was higher in patients who underwent a partial cystectomy alone (37.5%) versus those who had a more radical surgery (27%). Distant metastases occurred in 9 (37.5%) patients, 4 of whom had no prior local recurrence. Seven patients (29%) died of the disease. All cases with locally recurrent and metastatic disease belonged to stage pT3 or higher. Conclusions Pathologic stage is an important prognostic factor in urachal carcinoma. Surface urothelial involvement by carcinoma and presence of cystitis cystica/glandularis do not necessarily exclude the diagnosis of urachal carcinoma. Immunostains do not unequivocally discriminate a urachal from a colorectal carcinoma, but diffuse positivity for 34BE12 would support, and diffuse nuclear immunoreactivity for β-catenin would militate against, a diagnosis of urachal carcinoma. Local recurrence may be owing to seeding within the distal urothelial tract, particularly in tumors with a configuration that is polypoid and which open into the bladder cavity. The type of surgery performed may have an effect on local recurrence despite negative margins of resection.


Modern Pathology | 2011

Clear-cell papillary renal cell carcinoma: molecular and immunohistochemical analysis with emphasis on the von Hippel-Lindau gene and hypoxia-inducible factor pathway-related proteins.

Stephen Rohan; Yonghong Xiao; Yupu Liang; Maria E. Dudas; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Samson W. Fine; Anuradha Gopalan; Victor E. Reuter; Marc K. Rosenblum; Paul Russo; Satish K. Tickoo

Over the past few years several investigators have independently described unique low-grade renal epithelial neoplasms with clear cytoplasm, focal to diffuse papillary architecture, and occasional leiomyomatous stromal metaplasia that are not currently recognized in the World Health Organization classification of renal tumors. These tumors have been referred to by a variety of names including clear-cell papillary renal cell carcinoma and recently “clear-cell tubulopapillary renal cell carcinoma”. On the basis of the available data, such tumors are positive for cytokeratin 7 (CK7) and carbonic anhydrase IX (CA9), while being negative for CD10, α-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR), and TFE3. These tumors reportedly lack trisomies of chromosomes 7 and 17, deletions of 3p25, von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) gene mutations, and VHL promoter hypermethylation. Herein, we report on nine cases of this tumor emphasizing detailed studies of the VHL gene and hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) pathway. Molecular studies performed included VHL mutational analysis, copy number changes assessed using single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays, and qRT-PCR for VHL mRNA expression. Immunohistochemical stains for markers of HIF pathway activation (HIF-1α, CA9, and glucose transporter-1 (GLUT-1)) as well as other relevant markers (CK7, CD10, AMACR, and TFE3) were performed. None of our tumors harbored VHL gene mutations, losses of chromosomal region 3p25, or trisomies of chromosomes 7 or 17. VHL mRNA was overexpressed in our tumors relative to normal renal tissue and clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. All cases showed strong co-expression of CK7, HIF-1α, GLUT-1, and CA9. No expression of TFE3, CD10, or AMACR was seen. The morphological, immunophenotypic, and molecular features of these unique low-grade tumors are sufficiently distinct to allow separation from other renal cell carcinoma subtypes. The co-expression of CA9, HIF-1α, and GLUT-1 in the absence of VHL gene alterations in clear-cell papillary renal cell carcinoma suggests activation of the HIF pathway by non-VHL-dependent mechanisms.


The American Journal of Surgical Pathology | 2008

Anterior-predominant prostatic tumors: zone of origin and pathologic outcomes at radical prostatectomy.

Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Satish K. Tickoo; Semra Olgac; Anuradha Gopalan; Peter T. Scardino; Victor E. Reuter; Samson W. Fine

Aggressive screening and prostate needle biopsy protocols have been successful in early detection of low-volume posterior tumors. Consequently, we have observed an increased incidence of anterior-predominant prostate cancers. However, the zones of origin, patterns of spread, and patterns of extraprostatic extension of this group of tumors have not been well studied. Of 1312 radical prostatectomies performed at our institution over a span of 4.5 years, 197 had predominant (largest) tumors anterior to the urethra in whole-mounted radical prostatectomy specimens. Detailed histopathologic analysis of this cohort was undertaken emphasizing the variability in anterior prostatic anatomy from apex through base to determine zone of origin and pathologic staging. Using this approach, 97/197 (49.2%) anterior-predominant tumors (ATs) were assigned to the anterior peripheral zone (APZ), 70 (35.5%) to the transition zone (TZ), 16 (8.1%) were of indeterminate zone, and 14 (7.1%) were of both zones. Comparing APZ and TZ tumors, there were no significant differences in Gleason scores, incidence of extraprostatic extension, overall surgical margin positivity rate, or laterality. Involvement of the anterior fibromuscular stroma was significantly more likely in tumors of TZ origin (P≤0.01), yet was observed in 50.5% of APZ tumors. Conversely, APZ tumors were more commonly localized within the apical one third of the prostate. Most of the prostates (91.4%) also showed additional PZ tumors, which were occasionally stage determining (7/197; 3.9%). In conclusion, ATs of APZ origin are more prevalent than those arising from the TZ. Contrary to previous reports comparing TZ tumors to all PZ tumors, ATs of both zones exhibit similar grading and staging parameters in this series. Given these similarities, long-term clinical outcomes and future molecular analyses will be necessary to assess whether true differences in biology and behavior exist between tumors of TZ and APZ origin.


Nature | 2009

ETS rearrangements and prostate cancer initiation

Brett S. Carver; Jennifer Tran; Zhenbang Chen; Arkaitz Carracedo-Perez; Andrea Alimonti; Caterina Nardella; Anuradha Gopalan; Peter T. Scardino; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; William L. Gerald; Pier Paolo Pandolfi

Arising from: Tomlins et al.10.1038/nature06024; Tomlins et al.reply The first recurrent translocation event in prostate cancer has been recently described1; it results in the translocation of an ETS (E26 transformation specific) transcription factor (ERG or ETV1) to the TMPRSS2 promoter region, which contains androgen responsive elements1. The TMPRSS2:ERG genetic rearrangement has been reported to occur in approximately 40% of primary prostate tumours (ETV1 genetic rearrangements occur at a much lower frequency), and it results in the aberrant androgen-regulated expression of ERG1,2,3. Tomlins et al.4 concluded that ETS genetic rearrangements are sufficient to initiate prostate neoplasia. However, here we show that ETS genetic rearrangements may in fact represent progression events rather than initiation events in prostate tumorigenesis. To this end, we demonstrate that the prostate-specific overexpression of ERG does not initiate prostate tumorigenesis.Arising from: Tomlins et al. 448, 595–599 (2007)10.1038/nature06024; Tomlins et al. replyThe first recurrent translocation event in prostate cancer has been recently described; it results in the translocation of an ETS (E26 transformation specific) transcription factor (ERG or ETV1) to the TMPRSS2 promoter region, which contains androgen responsive elements. The TMPRSS2:ERG genetic rearrangement has been reported to occur in approximately 40% of primary prostate tumours (ETV1 genetic rearrangements occur at a much lower frequency), and it results in the aberrant androgen-regulated expression of ERG. Tomlins et al. concluded that ETS genetic rearrangements are sufficient to initiate prostate neoplasia. However, here we show that ETS genetic rearrangements may in fact represent progression events rather than initiation events in prostate tumorigenesis. To this end, we demonstrate that the prostate-specific overexpression of ERG does not initiate prostate tumorigenesis.

Collaboration


Dive into the Anuradha Gopalan's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Victor E. Reuter

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Satish K. Tickoo

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Samson W. Fine

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hikmat Al-Ahmadie

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter T. Scardino

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ying-Bei Chen

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brett S. Carver

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David B. Solit

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Howard I. Scher

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James A. Eastham

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge