April W. Simon

Trends in utilization and complications of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in Medicare beneficiaries

BACKGROUND Utilization of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasing. Data regarding the safety of RFA for AF outside of selected centers of excellence and in older patients are limited. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to quantify utilization of RFA for treatment of AF and rates of adverse events over time in unselected U.S. Medicare patients. METHODS Using Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MedPAR) files for fiscal years 2001-2006, we developed a coding algorithm to identify AF patients treated with RFA. The number of hospitals performing the procedure, the number of procedures performed, and the frequency of eight RFA complications were determined. The impact of patient characteristics on complication rates was assessed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS For fiscal years 2001 to 2006, the number of hospitals performing RFA for AF in Medicare patients increased from 100 to 162, and the annual total procedure volume increased from 315 to 1975 cases. The overall complication rate was 9.1%. Annual complication rates increased from 6.7% in 2001 to 10.1% in 2006 (P for trend = .01), mainly due to an increase in rates of vascular access complications. Increasing patient age was not associated with a higher complication rate. Hospital procedural volume was not associated with the overall risk of complications but was associated with the probability of in-hospital death. CONCLUSION For fiscal years 2001-2006, use of RFA for treatment of AF increased markedly in the Medicare population. Overall complication rates rose during this time, with perforation/tamponade and vascular access complications accounting for the majority of events.

On-Pump Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in a Matched Sample of Women A Comparison of Outcomes

Background—Women have consistently higher mortality and morbidity than men after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Whether elimination of cardiopulmonary bypass and performance of coronary artery bypass grafting off-pump (OPCAB) have a beneficial effect specifically in women has not been defined. Methods and Results—From January 1998 through March 2002, 21 902 consecutive female patients at 82 hospitals underwent isolated CABG, as reported in an administrative database. Propensity score computer matching was performed based on 13 variables representing patient characteristics and preoperative risk factors to correct for and minimize selection bias. A total of 7376 (3688 pairs) women undergoing CABG surgery were able to be successfully matched. In a propensity score computer-matched cohort, multivariate logistic regression (odds ratio) revealed that women undergoing on-pump surgery had a 73.3% higher mortality (P=0.002) and a 47.2% higher risk of bleeding complications (P=0.019). Conclusions—In a retrospective analysis of women undergoing CABG, computer-matched to minimize selection bias, off-pump surgery led to decreased mortality and morbidity including bleeding complications.

Outcomes experience with off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in women.

BACKGROUND It has been well documented that women have higher morbidity and mortality rates than men following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. In view of this evidence, we investigated the following question: compared with on-pump CABG surgery, is there benefit to off-pump CABG surgery in women? METHODS Our investigation analyzes patient mortality and 13 procedure complications controlling for 35 variables representing patient characteristics and comorbid conditions, and for procedure characteristics for a population of 16,871 consecutive women undergoing off-pump and on-pump CABG surgery at 78 hospitals for the period January 1998 to June 2001. RESULTS Mean comparisons reveal that the mortality rate for women undergoing off-pump CABG surgery is nearly a percentage point lower than for women undergoing on-pump surgery (3.12 vs 3.90; p = 0.052). The complication rates for all complications analyzed (shock/hemorrhage, neurologic, cardiac, respiratory, renal, acute renal failure, adult respiratory distress syndrome, implant infection, postoperative infection, septicemia, pneumonia, and peripheral vascular) were lower for women off-pump than women on-pump with the exception of mechanical complications. Logistic regression results reveal, after controlling for 35 relevant patient characteristics, comorbid conditions and procedure characteristics, that women undergoing on-pump CABG surgery experience a 42% higher mortality rate (p = 0.0239) than women undergoing off-pump CABG surgery. CONCLUSIONS Evidence suggests that off-pump CABG surgery may be better for women than on-pump CABG surgery because it appears to reduce mortality and respiratory complications, shorten lengths-of-stay, and increases discharges directly home. None of the 12 other complications investigated demonstrated an advantage for women undergoing on-pump surgery relative to those receiving off-pump surgery.

Comparing clinical outcomes in high-volume and low-volume off-pump coronary bypass operation programs

UNLABELLED sites and then analyzed the patient and hospital characteristics that had an impact on clinical outcomes. RESULTS The mortality rates for the high- and low-volume OPCAB facilities both averaged 2.9% (p = NS). Patients at the high-volume OPCAB facilities had significantly lower rates of major complications (shock/hemorrhage, neurologic, renal, and cardiac) than those at the low-volume OPCAB facilities. Of the seven minor complications, rates for six were lower in the high-volume OPCAB facilities, but none of the differences reached statistical significance. High-volume OPCAB sites were significantly more likely to discharge their patients directly home than were low-volume OPCAB sites (80% versus 66%; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The results suggested that surgical team experience and choice of approaches to performing CABG had an impact on patient outcomes.

Trends in Coronary Revascularization Procedures Among Medicare Beneficiaries Between 2008 and 2012

Background— This study reports on the trends in the volume and outcomes of coronary revascularization procedures performed on Medicare beneficiaries between 2008 and 2012. Methods and Results— This retrospective study identifies all Medicare beneficiaries undergoing a coronary revascularization procedure: coronary artery bypass graft surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) performed in either the nonadmission or inpatient setting. International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes (inpatient setting) and Current Procedural Terminology and Ambulatory Payment Classification codes (nonadmission) were used to identify revascularizations. The study population consists of 2 768 007 records. This study finds that the rapid growth in nonadmission PCIs performed on Medicare beneficiaries (60 405–106 495) has been more than offset by the decrease in PCI admissions (363 384–295 434) during the study period. There also were >18 000 fewer coronary artery bypass graft admissions in 2012 than in 2008. This study finds lower observed mortality rates (3.7%–3.2%) among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing any coronary artery bypass graft surgery and higher observed mortality rates (1.7%–1.9%) for Medicare beneficiaries undergoing any PCI encounter. This study also finds a growth in the number of facilities performing revascularization procedures during the study period: 268 (20.2%) more sites were performing nonadmission PCIs; 136 (8.2%) more sites were performing inpatient PCIs; and 19 (1.6%) more sites were performing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Conclusions— The total number of revascularization procedures performed on Medicare beneficiaries peaked in 2010 and declined by >4% per year in 2011 and 2012. Observed mortality rates among all Medicare beneficiaries undergoing any coronary revascularization remained between 2.1% and 2.2% annually during the study period.

Impact of patient characteristics, complications, and facility volume on the costs and time of cardiac catheterization and coronary angioplasty in 70 catheterization laboratories

Although over 1 million procedures are performed in cardiac catheterization laboratories (CCLs) annually, little comparative data exist on costs or resource use in these settings. In this study, data from 70 CCLs were used to profile CCL times and total direct costs for 2 high-volume procedures: left heart catheterization (LHC) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with or without stent placement. In total, 70,677 consecutive patient examinations for a 12-month period from January 1, 1998 to December 31, 1998 were analyzed. For LHC mean total direct costs averaged

The Incremental Hospital Cost and Length-of-Stay Associated With Treating Adverse Events Among Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing TKA

306, whereas for PTCA catheterization laboratory costs averaged

The Incremental Hospital Cost and Length-of-Stay Associated With Treating Adverse Events Among Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing THA During Fiscal Year 2013

3,172. The average total times for these procedures were 63 and 108 minutes, respectively. Seventy-two percent of the PTCA patients underwent coronary stenting with an associated incremental cost of

Sex differences in hospital risk-adjusted mortality rates for Medicare beneficiaries undergoing CABG surgery.

1,244. By multivariate linear regression, baseline patient characteristics such as age, gender, and clinical factors had little impact on total time and total costs. The major determinants of CCL time and cost were procedural factors (e.g., number and type of interventions) and in-lab complications, including profound hypotension, abrupt vessel closure, and emergency bypass surgery. Using facility procedure volume as a proxy for potential economies of scale, we found no relation between CCL volume and total direct CCL costs. There did appear to be a significant inverse relation between facility volume and total procedural time with CCLs that performed the highest volumes of LHC and PTCA procedures saving an average of 5 to 9 minutes per procedure. These findings may be useful in defining specific time and cost benchmarks for these commonly performed procedures and serve to underscore the critical role of reducing complications in both quality improvement and cost-saving efforts.

Incremental Hospital Cost and Length-of-Stay Associated With Treating Adverse Events Among Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Fusion During Fiscal Year 2013.

This paper estimates the incremental hospital resource consumption associated with treating selected adverse events experienced by Medicare beneficiaries undergoing TKA. This retrospective study, using the Medicare Provider Analysis and Review file, identified 353,650 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent a primary TKA during 2011. Overall, 11.82% of Medicare beneficiaries (MBs) undergoing TKA experienced at least one of the studys adverse events. MBs experiencing any adverse event consumed significantly more unadjusted hospital resources (