Arathi Ramani

Solving difficult SAT instances in the presence of symmetry

Research in algorithms for Boolean satisfiability and their implementations [23, 6] has recently outpaced benchmarking efforts. Most of the classic DIMACS benchmarks [10] can be solved in seconds on commodity PCs. More recent benchmarks take longer to solve because of their large size, but are still solved in minutes [25]. Yet, small and difficult SAT instances must exist because Boolean satisfiability is NP-complete.We propose an improved construction of symmetry-breaking clauses [9] and apply it to achieve significant speed-ups over current state-of-the-art in Boolean satisfiability. Our techniques are formulated as pre-processing and can be applied to any SAT solver without changing its source code. We also show that considerations of symmetry may lead to more efficient reductions to SAT in the routing domain.Our work articulates SAT instances that are unusually difficult for their size, including satisfiable instances derived from routing problems. Using an efficient implementation to solve the graph automorphism problem [18, 20, 22], we show that in structured SAT instances difficulty may be associated with large numbers of symmetries.

Automatically exploiting symmetries in constraint programming

We introduce a framework for studying and solving a class of CSP formulations. The framework allows constraints to be expressed as linear and non-linear equations, then compiles them into SAT instances via Boolean logic circuits. While in general reduction to SAT may lead to the loss of structure, we specifically detect several types of structure in high-level input and use them in compilation. Linearity is preserved by the use of pseudo-Boolean (PB) constraints in conjunction with a 0-1 ILP solver that extends common SAT-solving techniques. Symmetries are detected in high-level constraints by solving the graph automorphism problem on parse trees. Symmetry-breaking predicates are added during compilation. Our system generalizes earlier work on symmetries in SAT and 0-1 ILP problems. Empirical evaluation is performed on instances of the social golfers and Hamming code generation problems. We show substantial speedups with symmetry-breaking, especially on unsatisfiable instances. In general, our runtimes with the specialized 0-1 ILP solver Pueblo are competitive with results recently reported for ILOG Solver.

Breaking instance-independent symmetries in exact graph coloring

Code optimization and high level synthesis can be posed as constraint satisfaction and optimization problems, such as graph coloring used in register allocation. Naturally-occurring instances of such problems are often small and can be solved optimally. A recent wave of improvements in algorithms for Boolean satisfiability (SAT) and 0-1 ILP suggests generic problem-reduction methods, rather than problem-specific heuristics, because: (1) heuristics are easily upset by new constraints; (2) heuristics tend to ignore structure; and (3) many relevant problems are provably inapproximable. The NP-spec project offers a language to specify NP-problems and automatic reductions to SAT. Problem reductions often lead to highly symmetric SAT instances, and symmetries are known to slow down SAT solvers. In this work, we compare several avenues for symmetry-breaking, in particular when certain kinds of symmetry are present in all generated instances. Our surprising conclusion is that instance-independent symmetries should often be processed together with instance-specific symmetries rather than earlier, at the specification level.

ShatterPB: symmetry-breaking for pseudo-Boolean formulas

Many important tasks in circuit design and verification can be performed in practice via reductions to Boolean Satisfiability (SAT), making SAT a fundamental EDA problem. However such reductions often leave out application-specific structure, thus handicapping EDA tools in their competition with creative engineers. Successful attempts to represent and utilize additional structure on Boolean variables include recent work on 0--1 Integer Linear Programming (ILP) and on symmetries in SAT. Those extensions gracefully accommodate well-known advances in SAT-solving, but their combined use has not been attempted previously. Our work shows (i) how one can detect and use symmetries in instances of 0--1 ILP, and (ii) what benefits this may bring.

Symmetry breaking for pseudo-Boolean formulas

Many important tasks in design automation and artificial intelligence can be performed in practice via reductions to Boolean satisfiability (SAT). However, such reductions often omit application-specific structure, thus handicapping tools in their competition with creative engineers. Successful attempts to represent and utilize additional structure on Boolean variables include recent work on 0-1 integer linear programming (ILP) and symmetries in SAT. Those extensions gracefully accommodate well-known advances in SAT solving, however, no previous work has attempted to combine both extensions. Our work shows (i) how one can detect and use symmetries in instances of 0-1 ILP, and (ii) what benefits this may bring.

Dynamic symmetry-breaking for Boolean satisfiability

With impressive progress in Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) solving and several extensions to pseudo-Boolean (PB) constraints, many applications that use SAT, such as high-performance formal verification techniques are still restricted to checking satisfiability of certain conditions. However, there is also frequently a need to express a preference for certain solutions. Extending SAT-solving to Boolean optimization allows the use of objective functions to describe a desirable solution. Although recent work in 0–1 Integer Linear Programming (ILP) offers extensions that can optimize a linear objective function, this is often achieved by solving a series of SAT or ILP decision problems. Our work articulates some pitfalls of this approach. An objective function may complicate the use of any symmetry that might be present in the given constraints, even when the constraints are unsatisfiable and the objective function is irrelevant. We propose several new techniques that treat objective functions differently from CNF/PB constraints and accelerate Boolean optimization in many practical cases. We also develop an adaptive flow that analyzes a given Boolean optimization problem and picks the symmetry-breaking technique that is best suited to the problem characteristics. Empirically, we show that for non-trivial objective functions that destroy constraint symmetries, the benefit of static symmetry-breaking is lost but dynamic symmetry-breaking accelerates problem-solving in many cases. We also introduce a new objective function, Localized Bit Selection (LBS), that can be used to specify a preference for bit values in formal verification applications.

Dynamic symmetry-breaking for improved Boolean optimization

With impressive progress in Boolean satisfiability (SAT) solving and several extensions to pseudo-Boolean (PB) constraints, many applications that use SAT, such as high-performance formal verification techniques are still restricted to checking satisfiability of certain conditions. However, there is also frequently a need to express a preference for certain solutions. Extending SAT-solving to Boolean optimization allows the use of objective functions to describe a desirable solution. Although recent work in 0-1 integer linear programming (ILP) offers extensions that can optimize a linear objective function, this is often achieved by solving a series of SAT or ILP decision problems. Our work articulates some pitfalls of this approach. An objective function may complicate the use of any symmetry that might be present in the given constraints, even when the constraints are unsatisfiable and the objective function is irrelevant. We propose several new techniques that treat objective functions differently from CNF/PB constraints and accelerate Boolean optimization in many practical cases. We also develop an adaptive flow that analyzes a given Boolean optimization problem and picks the symmetry-breaking technique that is best suited to the problem characteristics. Empirically, we show that for non-trivial objective functions that destroy constraint symmetries, the benefit of static symmetry-breaking is lost but dynamic symmetry-breaking accelerates problem-solving in many cases. We also introduce a new objective function, localized bit selection (LBS), that can be used to specify a preference for bit values in formal verification applications.