Archana Jalligampala

To what extent can retinal prostheses restore vision

After a general consideration of the various approaches to electrical stimulation of the retina, a thorough in vitro investigation of retinal responses to voltage-controlled stimuli is discussed within the context of the Alpha IMS subretinal implant (Retina Implant AG, Reutlingen, Germany). This is supplemented by a clinical trial interim report describing results obtained in 29 patients blind from retinitis pigmentosa who have received the Alpha IMS implant. It is concluded that the surgical procedure is safe and blind patients can benefit in visual tasks of daily life with this device that has meanwhile received approval for commercial use in Europe.

Optimal voltage stimulation parameters for network-mediated responses in wild type and rd10 mouse retinal ganglion cells

To further improve the quality of visual percepts elicited by microelectronic retinal prosthetics, substantial efforts have been made to understand how retinal neurons respond to electrical stimulation. It is generally assumed that a sufficiently strong stimulus will recruit most retinal neurons. However, recent evidence has shown that the responses of some retinal neurons decrease with excessively strong stimuli (a non-monotonic response function). Therefore, it is necessary to identify stimuli that can be used to activate the majority of retinal neurons even when such non-monotonic cells are part of the neuronal population. Taking these non-monotonic responses into consideration, we establish the optimal voltage stimulation parameters (amplitude, duration, and polarity) for epiretinal stimulation of network-mediated (indirect) ganglion cell responses. We recorded responses from 3958 mouse retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in both healthy (wild type, WT) and a degenerating (rd10) mouse model of retinitis pigmentosa-using flat-mounted retina on a microelectrode array. Rectangular monophasic voltage-controlled pulses were presented with varying voltage, duration, and polarity. We found that in 4-5 weeks old rd10 mice the RGC thresholds were comparable to those of WT. There was a marked response variability among mouse RGCs. To account for this variability, we interpolated the percentage of RGCs activated at each point in the voltage-polarity-duration stimulus space, thus identifying the optimal voltage-controlled pulse (-2.4 V, 0.88 ms). The identified optimal voltage pulse can activate at least 65% of potentially responsive RGCs in both mouse strains. Furthermore, this pulse is well within the range of stimuli demonstrated to be safe and effective for retinal implant patients. Such optimized stimuli and the underlying method used to identify them support a high yield of responsive RGCs and will serve as an effective guideline for future in vitro investigations of retinal electrostimulation by establishing standard stimuli for each unique experimental condition.

Correspondence between visual and electrical input filters of ON and OFF mouse retinal ganglion cells

OBJECTIVE Over the past two decades retinal prostheses have made major strides in restoring functional vision to patients blinded by diseases such as retinitis pigmentosa. Presently, implants use single pulses to activate the retina. Though this stimulation paradigm has proved beneficial to patients, an unresolved problem is the inability to selectively stimulate the on and off visual pathways. To this end our goal was to test, using white noise, voltage-controlled, cathodic, monophasic pulse stimulation, whether different retinal ganglion cell (RGC) types in the wild type retina have different electrical input filters. This is an important precursor to addressing pathway-selective stimulation. APPROACH Using full-field visual flash and electrical and visual Gaussian noise stimulation, combined with the technique of spike-triggered averaging (STA), we calculate the electrical and visual input filters for different types of RGCs (classified as on, off or on-off based on their response to the flash stimuli). MAIN RESULTS Examining the STAs, we found that the spiking activity of on cells during electrical stimulation correlates with a decrease in the voltage magnitude preceding a spike, while the spiking activity of off cells correlates with an increase in the voltage preceding a spike. No electrical preference was found for on-off cells. Comparing STAs of wild type and rd10 mice revealed narrower electrical STA deflections with shorter latencies in rd10. SIGNIFICANCE This study is the first comparison of visual cell types and their corresponding temporal electrical input filters in the retina. The altered input filters in degenerated rd10 retinas are consistent with photoreceptor stimulation underlying visual type-specific electrical STA shapes in wild type retina. It is therefore conceivable that existing implants could target partially degenerated photoreceptors that have only lost their outer segments, but not somas, to selectively activate the on and off visual pathways.

Phosphene perception and pupillary responses to sinusoidal electrostimulation - For an objective measurement of retinal function

&NA; The purpose was to evaluate retinal function by measuring pupillary responses to sinusoidal transcorneal electrostimulation in healthy young human subjects. This work also translates data from analogous in vitro experiments and connects it to the pupillary responses obtained in human experiments. 14 healthy human subjects participated (4 males, 10 females); for the in vitro experiments, two male healthy mouse retinas (adult wild‐type C57B/6J) were used. Pupillary responses to sinusoidal transcorneal electrostimulation of varying stimulus carrier frequencies (10, 20 Hz; envelope frequency constantly kept at 1.2 Hz) and intensities (10, 20, 50 &mgr;A) were recorded and compared with those obtained with light stimulation (1.2 Hz sinusoidal blue, red light). A strong correlation between the sinusoidal stimulation (electrical as well as light) and the pupillary sinusoidal response was found. The difference between the lag of electrical and light stimulation allowed the estimation of an intensity threshold for pupillary responses to transcorneal electrostimulation (mean ± SD: 30 ± 10 &mgr;A (10 Hz); 38 ± 10 &mgr;A (20 Hz)). A comparison between the results of the two stimulation frequencies showed a not statistically significant smaller lag for 10 Hz (10 Hz: 633 ± 90 ms; 20 Hz: 725 ± 178 ms; 50 &mgr;A intensity). Analogous in vitro experiments on murine retinas indicated a selective stimulation of photoreceptors and bipolar cells (lower frequencies) and retinal ganglion cells (higher frequencies) and lower stimulation thresholds for the retinal network with sinusoidal compared to pulsatile stimulation – emphasizing that sinusoidal waveforms are well‐suited to our purposes. We demonstrate that pupillary responses to sinusoidal transcorneal electrostimulation are measurable as an objective marker in healthy young subjects, even at very low stimulus intensities. By using this unique approach, we unveil the potential for an estimation of the individual intensity threshold and a selective activation of different retinal cell types in humans by varying the stimulation frequency. This technique may have broad clinical utility as well as specific relevance in the monitoring of patients with hereditary retinal disorders, especially as implemented in study protocols for novel therapies, e.g. retinal prostheses or gene therapies. HighlightsFunctional evaluation of the retina in humans based on pupillary responses.New paradigm for transcorneal sinusoidal electrical stimulation.Method for an easy estimation of individual thresholds for pupillary responses.Possibility for a selective activation of different retinal cell types.Verification of sinusoidal stimulation in animal in vitro model.

The Spatial Extent of Epiretinal Electrical Stimulation in the Healthy Mouse Retina

Background/Aims: Retinal prostheses use electrical stimulation to restore functional vision to patients blinded by retinitis pigmentosa. A key detail is the spatial pattern of ganglion cells activated by stimulation. Therefore, we characterized the spatial extent of network-mediated electrical activation of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in the epiretinal monopolar electrode configuration. Methods: Healthy mouse RGC activities were recorded with a micro-electrode array (MEA). The stimuli consisted of monophasic rectangular cathodic voltage pulses and cycling full-field light flashes. Results: Voltage tuning curves exhibited significant hysteresis, reflecting adaptation to electrical stimulation on the time scale of seconds. Responses decreased from 0 to 300 µm, and were also dependent on the strength of stimulation. Applying the Rayleigh criterion to the half-width at half-maximum of the electrical point spread function suggests a visual acuity limit of no better than 20/946. Threshold voltage showed only a modest increase across these distances. Conclusion: The existence of significant hysteresis requires that future investigations of electrical retinal stimulation control for such long-memory adaptation. The spread of electrical activation beyond 200 µm suggests that neighbouring electrodes in epiretinal implants based on indirect stimulation of RGCs may be indiscriminable at interelectrode spacings as large as 400 µm.

Linear Input Filters in Retinal Prosthetics

Introduction: Retinal prosthetics have made major progress over the past decade despite an incomplete understanding of how electrical stimulation activates the retina. A useful expansion of our understanding would be characterization of the linear input filter applied by the retinal circuit to extracellular[for full text, please go to the a.m. URL]

Electrical stimulation alters light responses of mouse retinal ganglion cells

Despite considerable advances in the field of retinal prosthetics during recent years, significant variability remains in the quality of vision restoration for patients. One target for refinement of prosthetic vision is to selectively activate one or more of the ~20 parallel channels of visual information that are established in the retina and subsequently travel to different visual networks in the brain. These different channels result in different spike train response patterns in the retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) which constitute the sole output neuron population of the retina. Here we demonstrate, however, that the genuine visual response patterns of retinal ganglion cells can be altered by electrical stimulation, suggesting that the encoding of visual stimuli by retinal prosthesis devices may require consideration of stimulation-induced changes in the retina. Specifically, we demonstrate that ON and OFF response amplitudes increase significantly after stimulation. This leads to changes in the relative weighting of ON and OFF response types on a cell by cell basis - fundamentally altering the visual stimulus encoded by some RGCs.