Aretha Fiebig

Alterations in CER6, a gene identical to CUT1, differentially affect long-chain lipid content on the surface of pollen and stems.

Very long chain lipids contribute to the hydrophobic cuticle on the surface of all land plants and are an essential component of the extracellular pollen coat in the Brassicaceae. Mutations in Arabidopsis CER genes eliminate very long chain lipids from the cuticle surface and, in some cases, from the pollen coat. In Arabidopsis, the loss of pollen coat lipids can disrupt interactions with the stigma, inhibiting pollen hydration and causing sterility. We have positionally cloned CER6 and demonstrate that a wild-type copy complements the cer6-2 defect. In addition, we have identified a fertile, intragenic suppressor, cer6-2R, that partially restores pollen coat lipids but does not rescue the stem wax defect, suggesting an intriguing difference in the requirements for CER6 activity on stems and the pollen coat. Importantly, analysis of this suppressor demonstrates that low amounts of very long chain lipids are sufficient for pollen hydration and germination. The predicted CER6 amino acid sequence resembles that of fatty acid–condensing enzymes, consistent with its role in the production of epicuticular and pollen coat lipids >28 carbons long. DNA sequence analysis revealed the nature of the cer6-1, cer6-2, and cer6-2R mutations, and segregation analysis showed that CER6 is identical to CUT1, a cDNA previously mapped to a different chromosome arm. Instead, we have determined that a new gene, CER60, with a high degree of nucleotide and amino acid similarity to CER6, resides at the original CUT1 locus.

A photosensory two-component system regulates bacterial cell attachment

Flavin-binding LOV domains are blue-light photosensory modules that are conserved in a number of developmental and circadian regulatory proteins in plants, algae, and fungi. LOV domains are also present in bacterial genomes, and are commonly located at the amino termini of sensor histidine kinases. Genes predicted to encode LOV-histidine kinases are conserved across a broad range of bacterial taxa, from aquatic oligotrophs to plant and mammalian pathogens. However, the function of these putative prokaryotic photoreceptors remains largely undefined. The differentiating bacterium, Caulobacter crescentus, contains an operon encoding a two-component signaling system consisting of a LOV-histidine kinase, LovK, and a single-domain response regulator, LovR. LovK binds a flavin cofactor, undergoes a reversible photocycle, and displays increased ATPase and autophosphorylation activity in response to visible light. Deletion of the response regulator gene, lovR, results in severe attenuation of cell attachment to a glass surface under laminar flow, whereas coordinate, low-level overexpression of lovK and lovR results in a light-independent increase in cell–cell attachment, a response that requires both the conserved histidine phosphorylation site in LovK and aspartate phosphorylation site in LovR. Growing C. crescentus in the presence of blue light dramatically enhances cell–cell attachment in the lovK–lovR overexpression background. A conserved cysteine residue in the LOV domain of LovK, which forms a covalent adduct with the flavin cofactor upon absorption of visible light, is necessary for the light-dependent regulation of LovK enzyme activity and is required for the light-dependent enhancement of intercellular attachment.

Interaction specificity, toxicity and regulation of a paralogous set of ParE/RelE-family toxin-antitoxin systems.

Toxin–antitoxin (TA) gene cassettes are widely distributed across bacteria, archaea and bacteriophage. The chromosome of the α‐proteobacterium, Caulobacter crescentus, encodes eight ParE/RelE‐superfamily toxins that are organized into operons with their cognate antitoxins. A systematic genetic analysis of these parDE and relBE TA operons demonstrates that seven encode functional toxins. The one exception highlights an example of a non‐functional toxin pseudogene. Chromosomally encoded ParD and RelB proteins function as antitoxins, inhibiting their adjacently encoded ParE and RelE toxins. However, these antitoxins do not functionally complement each other, even when overexpressed. Transcription of these paralogous TA systems is differentially regulated under distinct environmental conditions. These data support a model in which multiple TA paralogs encoded by a single bacterial chromosome form independent functional units with insulated protein–protein interactions. Further characterization of the parDE1 system at the single‐cell level reveals that ParE1 toxin functions to inhibit cell division but not cell growth; residues at the C‐terminus of ParE1 are critical for its stability and toxicity. While continuous ParE1 overexpression results in a substantial loss in cell viability at the population level, a fraction of cells escape toxicity, providing evidence that ParE1 toxicity is not uniform within clonal cell populations.

The LovK-LovR Two-Component System Is a Regulator of the General Stress Pathway in Caulobacter crescentus

A conserved set of regulators control the general stress response in Caulobacter crescentus, including σ(T), its anti-σ factor NepR, the anti-anti-σ factor PhyR, and the transmembrane sensor kinase PhyK. We report that the soluble histidine kinase LovK and the single-domain response regulator LovR also function within the C. crescentus general stress pathway. Our genetic data support a model in which LovK-LovR functions upstream of σ(T) by controlling the phosphorylation state and thus anti-anti-σ activity of PhyR. Transcription of lovK and lovR is independently activated by stress through a mechanism that requires sigT and phyR. Conversely, lovK and lovR function together to repress transcription of the general stress regulon. Concordant with a functional role of the LovK-LovR two-component system as a negative regulator of the general stress pathway, lovK-lovR-null mutants exhibit increased cell survival after osmotic stress, while coordinate overexpression of lovK and lovR attenuates cell survival relative to that of the wild type. Notably, lovK can complement the transcriptional and cell survival defects of a phyK-null mutant when lovR is deleted. Moreover, in this same genetic background, σ(T)-dependent transcription is activated in response to osmotic stress. This result suggests that flavin-binding LOV (light, oxygen, or voltage) histidine kinases are competent to perceive cytoplasmic signals in addition to the environmental signal blue light. We conclude that the PhyK-PhyR and LovK-LovR two-component signaling systems coordinately regulate stress physiology in C. crescentus.

A structural model of anti-anti-σ inhibition by a two-component receiver domain: the PhyR stress response regulator

PhyR is a hybrid stress regulator conserved in α‐proteobacteria that contains an N‐terminal σ‐like (SL) domain and a C‐terminal receiver domain. Phosphorylation of the receiver domain is known to promote binding of the SL domain to an anti‐σ factor. PhyR thus functions as an anti‐anti‐σ factor in its phosphorylated state. We present genetic evidence that Caulobacter crescentus PhyR is a phosphorylation‐dependent stress regulator that functions in the same pathway as σT and its anti‐σ factor, NepR. Additionally, we report the X‐ray crystal structure of PhyR at 1.25 Å resolution, which provides insight into the mechanism of anti‐anti‐σ regulation. Direct intramolecular contact between the PhyR receiver and SL domains spans regions σ2 and σ4, likely serving to stabilize the SL domain in a closed conformation. The molecular surface of the receiver domain contacting the SL domain is the structural equivalent of α4‐β5‐α5, which is known to undergo dynamic conformational change upon phosphorylation in a diverse range of receiver proteins. We propose a structural model of PhyR regulation in which receiver phosphorylation destabilizes the intramolecular interaction between SL and receiver domains, thereby permitting regions σ2 and σ4 in the SL domain to open about a flexible connector loop and bind anti‐σ factor.

A Cell Cycle and Nutritional Checkpoint Controlling Bacterial Surface Adhesion

In natural environments, bacteria often adhere to surfaces where they form complex multicellular communities. Surface adherence is determined by the biochemical composition of the cell envelope. We describe a novel regulatory mechanism by which the bacterium, Caulobacter crescentus, integrates cell cycle and nutritional signals to control development of an adhesive envelope structure known as the holdfast. Specifically, we have discovered a 68-residue protein inhibitor of holdfast development (HfiA) that directly targets a conserved glycolipid glycosyltransferase required for holdfast production (HfsJ). Multiple cell cycle regulators associate with the hfiA and hfsJ promoters and control their expression, temporally constraining holdfast development to the late stages of G1. HfiA further functions as part of a ‘nutritional override’ system that decouples holdfast development from the cell cycle in response to nutritional cues. This control mechanism can limit surface adhesion in nutritionally sub-optimal environments without affecting cell cycle progression. We conclude that post-translational regulation of cell envelope enzymes by small proteins like HfiA may provide a general means to modulate the surface properties of bacterial cells.

The Brucella abortus virulence regulator, LovhK, is a sensor kinase in the general stress response signalling pathway.

In the intracellular pathogen Brucella abortus, the general stress response (GSR) signalling system determines survival under acute stress conditions in vitro, and is required for long‐term residence in a mammalian host. To date, the identity of the Brucella sensor kinase(s) that function to perceive stress and directly activate GSR signalling have remained undefined. We demonstrate that the flavin‐binding sensor histidine kinase, LovhK (bab2_0652), functions as a primary B. abortus GSR sensor. LovhK rapidly and specifically phosphorylates the central GSR regulator, PhyR, and activates transcription of a set of genes that closely overlaps the known B. abortus GSR regulon. Deletion of lovhK severely compromises cell survival under defined oxidative and acid stress conditions. We further show that lovhK is required for cell survival during the early phase of mammalian cell infection and for establishment of long‐term residence in a mouse infection model. Finally, we present evidence that particular regions of primary structure within the two N‐terminal PAS domains of LovhK have distinct sensory roles under specific environmental conditions. This study elucidates new molecular components of a conserved signalling pathway that regulates B. abortus stress physiology and infection biology.

General Stress Signaling in the Alphaproteobacteria.

The Alphaproteobacteria uniquely integrate features of two-component signal transduction and alternative σ factor regulation to control transcription of genes that ensure growth and survival across a range of stress conditions. Research over the past decade has led to the discovery of the key molecular players of this general stress response (GSR) system, including the sigma factor σ(EcfG), its anti-σ factor NepR, and the anti-anti-σ factor PhyR. The central molecular event of GSR activation entails aspartyl phosphorylation of PhyR, which promotes its binding to NepR and thereby releases σ(EcfG) to associate with RNAP and direct transcription. Recent studies are providing a new understanding of complex, multilayered sensory networks that activate and repress this central protein partner switch. This review synthesizes our structural and functional understanding of the core GSR regulatory proteins and highlights emerging data that are defining the systems that regulate GSR transcription in a variety of species.

Identification of the PhoB Regulon and Role of PhoU in the Phosphate Starvation Response of Caulobacter crescentus

UNLABELLED An ability to sense and respond to changes in extracellular phosphate is critical for the survival of most bacteria. For Caulobacter crescentus, which typically lives in phosphate-limited environments, this process is especially crucial. Like many bacteria, Caulobacter responds to phosphate limitation through a conserved two-component signaling pathway called PhoR-PhoB, but the direct regulon of PhoB in this organism is unknown. Here we used chromatin immunoprecipitation-DNA sequencing (ChIP-Seq) to map the global binding patterns of the phosphate-responsive transcriptional regulator PhoB under phosphate-limited and -replete conditions. Combined with genome-wide expression profiling, our work demonstrates that PhoB is induced to regulate nearly 50 genes under phosphate-starved conditions. The PhoB regulon is comprised primarily of genes known or predicted to help Caulobacter scavenge for and import inorganic phosphate, including 15 different membrane transporters. We also investigated the regulatory role of PhoU, a widely conserved protein proposed to coordinate phosphate import with expression of the PhoB regulon by directly modulating the histidine kinase PhoR. However, our studies show that it likely does not play such a role in Caulobacter, as PhoU depletion has no significant effect on PhoB-dependent gene expression. Instead, cells lacking PhoU exhibit striking accumulation of large polyphosphate granules, suggesting that PhoU participates in controlling intracellular phosphate metabolism. IMPORTANCE The transcription factor PhoB is widely conserved throughout the bacterial kingdom, where it helps organisms respond to phosphate limitation by driving the expression of a battery of genes. Most of what is known about PhoB and its target genes is derived from studies of Escherichia coli. Our work documents the PhoB regulon in Caulobacter crescentus, and comparison to the regulon in E. coli reveals significant differences, highlighting the evolutionary plasticity of transcriptional responses driven by highly conserved transcription factors. We also demonstrated that the conserved protein PhoU, which is implicated in bacterial persistence, does not regulate PhoB activity, as previously suggested. Instead, our results favor a model in which PhoU affects intracellular phosphate accumulation, possibly through the high-affinity phosphate transporter.

Structure and function of HWE/HisKA2-family sensor histidine kinases

Sensor histidine kinases regulate adaptive cellular responses to changes in the chemical or physical state of the environment. HWE/HisKA2-family kinases comprise a subset of histidine kinases that is defined by unique sequence motifs in both the catalytic and non-catalytic regions. Recent crystal structures have defined conserved intramolecular interactions that inform models of kinase regulation that are unique to the HWE/HisKA2 superfamily. Emerging genetic, biochemical and genomic data indicate that, unlike typical histidine kinases, HWE/HisKA2 kinases do not generally signal via classical DNA-binding response regulators. Rather, these unusual kinases are often part of atypical regulatory pathways that control changes in gene expression via modulation of protein-protein interactions or transcription anti-termination.