Aricca D. Van Citters

A Framework For Evaluating The Formation, Implementation, And Performance Of Accountable Care Organizations

The implementation of accountable care organizations (ACOs), a new health care payment and delivery model designed to improve care and lower costs, is proceeding rapidly. We build on our experience tracking early ACOs to identify the major factors-such as contract characteristics; structure, capabilities, and activities; and local context-that would be likely to influence ACO formation, implementation, and performance. We then propose how an ACO evaluation program could be structured to guide policy makers and payers in improving the design of ACO contracts, while providing insights for providers on approaches to care transformation that are most likely to be successful in different contexts. We also propose key activities to support evaluation of ACOs in the near term, including tracking their formation, developing a set of performance measures across all ACOs and payers, aggregating those performance data, conducting qualitative and quantitative research, and coordinating different evaluation activities.

Preferences of Older and Younger Adults With Serious Mental Illness for Involvement in Decision-Making in Medical and Psychiatric Settings

OBJECTIVES There is a growing call for greater consumer participation in health care encounters. Prior research suggests that older age is associated with a greater preference for a more passive role in clinical decision-making, yet little is known about preferences for persons with mental illness. This pilot study compared preferences for involvement in decision-making between older and younger adults with serious mental illness. DESIGN Cross-sectional observational survey. PARTICIPANTS The authors surveyed 33 older adults (>or=50 years) and 32 younger adults (<50 years) with serious mental illness from two mental health center clinics and one residential facility for their preferences on decision-making with their psychiatrists and primary care providers. MEASUREMENTS Measures included the Control Preferences Scale, the Autonomy Preference Index, and the Decision Self-Efficacy Scale. RESULTS Contrary to our primary hypothesis, older adults reported a stronger desire for involvement in decision-making compared with younger adults. However, both age groups were similar in their desire for information to aid in decision-making. The majority in both age groups also preferred a collaborative role with a psychiatrist for medication decisions, an autonomous role for decisions related to psychosocial interventions, and a passive role with their primary care provider. Older and younger adults expressed similar decision self-efficacy. CONCLUSION Our study suggests that older persons with serious mental illness have a stronger desire for involvement in decision-making than younger consumers. Additionally, role preference for involvement in decision-making varies across different clinical decisions and for psychopharmacological versus psychosocial interventions.

Learning what matters for patients: qualitative evaluation of a health promotion program for those with serious mental illness

Sedentary lifestyle, poor dietary behaviors and metabolic alterations associated with psychiatric medications contribute to poor health and high rates of obesity among individuals with serious mental illness (SMI). Interventions that increase engagement in physical exercise, dietary modifications, lifestyle changes and preventive health care can provide health benefits across the lifespan. These interventions have led to substantial physical improvements in some persons with SMI, while others have not improved or have experienced worsening physical health. We set out to identify characteristics of a health promotion program that persons with SMI associated with physical health improvements. Interviews were conducted with eight participants from the In SHAPE health-promotion program who lost at least 10 pounds or diminished their waist circumference by at least 10 cm. Interviews aimed to determine which aspects of the program were perceived to be most helpful in promoting physical health improvement. Among successful participants, three themes emerged, highlighting the importance of: (i) individualized interventions promoting engagement in the program; (ii) relationships with health-promotion program employees and (iii) self-confidence resulting from program participation. Health-promotion programs that target these areas may have better success in achieving health benefits for persons with SMI.

Developing a pathway for high-value, patient-centered total joint arthroplasty.

BackgroundTotal joint arthroplasty (TJA) is one of the most widely performed elective procedures; however, there are wide variations in cost and quality among facilities where the procedure is performed.Questions/purposesThe purposes of this study were to (1) develop a generalizable clinical care pathway for primary TJA using inputs from clinical, academic, and patient stakeholders; and (2) identify system- and patient-level processes to provide safe, effective, efficient, and patient-centered care for patients undergoing TJA.MethodsWe used a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods to design a care pathway that spans 14 months beginning with the presurgical office visit and concluding 12 months after discharge. We derived care suggestions from interviews with 16 hospitals selected based on readmission rates, cost, and quality (n = 10) and author opinion (n = 6). A 32-member multistakeholder panel refined the pathway during a 1-day workshop. Participants were selected based on leadership in orthopaedic (n = 4) and anesthesia (n = 1) specialty societies; involvement in organizations specializing in safety and high reliability care (n = 3), lean production/consumption of care (n = 3), and patient experience of care (n = 3); membership in an interdisciplinary care team of a hospital selected for interviewing (n = 8); recent receipt of a TJA (n = 1); and participation in the pathway development team (n = 9).ResultsThe care pathway includes 40 suggested processes to improve care, 37 techniques to reduce waste, and 55 techniques to improve communication. Central themes include standardization and process improvement, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, and patient/family engagement and education. Selected recommendations include standardizing care protocols and staff roles; aligning information flow with patient and process flow; identifying a role accountable for care delivery and communication; managing patient expectations; and stratifying patients into the most appropriate care level.ConclusionsWe developed a multidisciplinary clinical care pathway for patients undergoing TJA based on principles of high-value care. The pathway is ready for clinical testing and context-specific adaptation.Level of EvidenceLevel V, therapeutic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Psychosocial Rehabilitation in Older Adults with Serious Mental Illness: A Review of the Research Literature and Recommendations for Development of Rehabilitative Approaches

The number of older adults with serious mental illness (SMI) is expected to increase dramatically in the coming decades. This group uses a disproportionate amount of mental health resources and is at high risk of institutionalization. There is an urgent need for effective psychosocial rehabilitation programs specifically designed to meet the special needs of this population. This article summarizes recent research in this area, including three new models of skills training. We also describe several other empirically supported approaches for the general population of people with SMI that may be tailored for use with older adults, including assertive community treatment, family and caregiver support, vocational rehabilitation, and medication adherence interventions. Finally, we consider new directions for research and service development to support the next generation of psychosocial interventions for the growing population of older adults with SMI.

Dual Diagnosis Among Older Adults: Co-Occurring Substance Abuse and Psychiatric Illness

ABSTRACT Objectives: The goal of this article is to provide a comprehensive critical review of studies reporting the prevalence, characteristics, outcomes, and service utilization associated with comorbid substance abuse and mental illness in older age. Methods: We searched the Medline and PsycINFO databases using combinations of the keywords ‘Dual diagnosis,’ ‘Elderly,’ and ‘Older.’ We included English-language reports presenting quantitative data on the prevalence and/or any descriptive information about older adults with dual diagnosis. Findings: The prevalence of older adults with comorbid substance abuse and mental disorders varies by population, and ranges from 7% to 38% of those with psychiatric illness and from 21% to 66% of those with substance abuse. Depression and alcohol use are the most commonly cited co-occurring disorders in older adults. Dual diagnosis in older adults is associated with increased suicidality and greater inpatient and outpatient service utilization. Data on treatment are limited. However, recommendations have been adapted from evidence-based treatment of younger adults with dual diagnosis, older adults with substance abuse, and older adults with mental health problems. Conclusions: Dual diagnosis among older adults is a growing public health problem. Well-designed prevention, early intervention, and treatment studies are needed that specifically address co-occurring disorders in older adult populations.

Patient focused registries can improve health, care, and science.

Eugene Nelson and colleagues call for registries of care data to be transformed into patient centred interactive learning systems

Correlates of co-occurring depressive symptoms and alcohol use in an older primary care clinic population

ABSTRACT Objective: This report describes the prevalence and correlates of co-occurring depressive symptoms and alcohol use in an older Veterans Affairs primary care clinic population. Methods: Participants include 8,782 older primary care patients (age 65 +) who responded to a self-report, mailed survey. Patients were classified into six mutually exclusive groups based upon screening indicators for problem drinking (quantity/frequency questions) and depressive symptoms (General Health Questionnaire). Groups included: (a) neither problem drinking nor depressive symptoms (n = 6,415, 73.0%); (b) at-risk alcohol use (n = 761; 8.7%); (c) heavy alcohol use (n = 201; 2.3%); (d) depressive symptoms (n = 1,234, 14.1%); (e) depressive symptoms and at-risk alcohol use (n = 120; 1.4%); and (f) depressive symptoms and heavy alcohol use (n = 51; 0.6%). Chi-square and ANOVA were used to test for equality of demographic and clinical characteristics across groups. Results: 12.9% of patients reported alcohol use consistent with problem drinking (including 10.0% with at-risk alcohol use and 2.9% with heavy alcohol use) and 16.1% screened positive for possible depressive symptoms (including 2.0% with co-occurring at-risk or heavy alcohol use). The combination of heavy alcohol use and depressive symptoms was associated with the highest rates of death and suicidal ideation; living alone; being divorced, separated, or widowed; and regular cigarette smoking. The presence of depressive symptoms (regardless of amount of alcohol use) was associated with worse perceived health, and perceived lack of social support. Finally, individuals with at-risk alcohol use alone were younger and had better perceived health compared to those with non-problem alcohol use or no alcohol use. However, there were no differences between those with at-risk drinking and depressive symptoms and those with depressive symptoms alone. Conclusions: Self-reported heavy alcohol use combined with depressive symptoms identifies a subgroup of older primary care patients at especially high risk with respect to suicidal ideation and poor mental and physical well-being. In contrast, older adults with depressive symptoms and self-reported “at-risk” alcohol use were not differentiated from older persons with depressive symptoms reporting non-problematic or nonuse of alcohol.