Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Arlindo da Silva is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Arlindo da Silva.


Journal of Climate | 2011

MERRA: NASA’s Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications

Michele M. Rienecker; Max J. Suarez; Ronald Gelaro; Ricardo Todling; Julio T. Bacmeister; Emily Liu; Michael G. Bosilovich; Siegfried D. Schubert; Lawrence L. Takacs; Gi-Kong Kim; Stephen Bloom; Junye Chen; Douglas W. Collins; Austin Conaty; Arlindo da Silva; Wei Gu; Joanna Joiner; Randal D. Koster; Robert Lucchesi; Andrea Molod; Tommy Owens; Steven Pawson; Philip J. Pegion; Christopher R. Redder; Rolf H. Reichle; Franklin R. Robertson; Albert G. Ruddick; Meta Sienkiewicz; John S. Woollen

AbstractThe Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) was undertaken by NASA’s Global Modeling and Assimilation Office with two primary objectives: to place observations from NASA’s Earth Observing System satellites into a climate context and to improve upon the hydrologic cycle represented in earlier generations of reanalyses. Focusing on the satellite era, from 1979 to the present, MERRA has achieved its goals with significant improvements in precipitation and water vapor climatology. Here, a brief overview of the system and some aspects of its performance, including quality assessment diagnostics from innovation and residual statistics, is given.By comparing MERRA with other updated reanalyses [the interim version of the next ECMWF Re-Analysis (ERA-Interim) and the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR)], advances made in this new generation of reanalyses, as well as remaining deficiencies, are identified. Although there is little difference between the new reanalyses i...


Journal of Climate | 2017

The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2)

Ronald Gelaro; Will McCarty; Max J. Suarez; Ricardo Todling; Andrea Molod; Lawrence L. Takacs; C. A. Randles; Anton Darmenov; Michael G. Bosilovich; Rolf H. Reichle; Krzysztof Wargan; L. Coy; Richard I. Cullather; C. Draper; Santha Akella; Virginie Buchard; Austin Conaty; Arlindo da Silva; Wei Gu; Gi-Kong Kim; Randal D. Koster; Robert Lucchesi; Dagmar Merkova; J. E. Nielsen; Gary Partyka; Steven Pawson; William M. Putman; Michele M. Rienecker; Siegfried D. Schubert; Meta Sienkiewicz

The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2) is the latest atmospheric reanalysis of the modern satellite era produced by NASAs Global Modeling and Assimilation Office (GMAO). MERRA-2 assimilates observation types not available to its predecessor, MERRA, and includes updates to the Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) model and analysis scheme so as to provide a viable ongoing climate analysis beyond MERRAs terminus. While addressing known limitations of MERRA, MERRA-2 is also intended to be a development milestone for a future integrated Earth system analysis (IESA) currently under development at GMAO. This paper provides an overview of the MERRA-2 system and various performance metrics. Among the advances in MERRA-2 relevant to IESA are the assimilation of aerosol observations, several improvements to the representation of the stratosphere including ozone, and improved representations of cryospheric processes. Other improvements in the quality of MERRA-2 compared with MERRA include the reduction of some spurious trends and jumps related to changes in the observing system, and reduced biases and imbalances in aspects of the water cycle. Remaining deficiencies are also identified. Production of MERRA-2 began in June 2014 in four processing streams, and converged to a single near-real time stream in mid 2015. MERRA-2 products are accessible online through the NASA Goddard Earth Sciences Data Information Services Center (GES DISC).


Monthly Weather Review | 1998

Assessing the Effects of Data Selection with the DAO Physical-Space Statistical Analysis System*

Stephen E. Cohn; Arlindo da Silva; Jing Guo; Meta Sienkiewicz; David J. Lamich

Conventional optimal interpolation (OI) analysis systems solve the standard statistical analysis equations approximately, by invoking a local approximation and a data selection procedure. Although solution of the analysis equations is essentially exact in the recent generation of global spectral variational analysis systems, these new systems also include substantial changes in error covariance modeling, making it difficult to discern whether improvements in analysis and forecast quality are due to exact, global solution of the analysis equations, or to changes in error covariance modeling. The formulation and implementation of a new type of global analysis system at the Data Assimilation Office, termed the Physical-space Statistical Analysis System (PSAS), is described in this article. Since this system operates directly in physical space, it is capable of employing error covariance models identical to those of the predecessor OI system, as well as more advanced models. To focus strictly on the effect of global versus local solution of the analysis equations, a comparison between PSAS and OI analyses is carried out with both systems using identical error covariance models and identical data. Spectral decomposition of the analysis increments reveals that, relative to the PSAS increments, the OI increments have too little power at large horizontal scales and excessive power at small horizontal scales. The OI increments also display an unrealistically large ratio of divergence to vorticity. Dynamical imbalances in the OI-analyzed state can therefore be attributed in part to the approximate local method of solution, and are not entirely due to the simple geostrophic constraint built into the forecast error covariance model. Root-mean-square observation minus 6-h forecast errors in the zonal wind component are substantially smaller for the PSAS system than for the OI system.


Monthly Weather Review | 1999

Maximum-Likelihood Estimation of Forecast and Observation Error Covariance Parameters. Part I: Methodology

Dick Dee; Arlindo da Silva

Abstract The maximum-likelihood method for estimating observation and forecast error covariance parameters is described. The method is presented in general terms but with particular emphasis on practical aspects of implementation. Issues such as bias estimation and correction, parameter identifiability, estimation accuracy, and robustness of the method, are discussed in detail. The relationship between the maximum-likelihood method and generalized cross-validation is briefly addressed. The method can be regarded as a generalization of the traditional procedure for estimating covariance parameters from station data. It does not involve any restrictions on the covariance models and can be used with data from moving observers, provided the parameters to be estimated are identifiable. Any available a priori information about the observation and forecast error distributions can be incorporated into the estimation procedure. Estimates of parameter accuracy due to sampling error are obtained as a by-product.


ieee international conference on high performance computing data and analytics | 2005

Design and Implementation of Components in the Earth System Modeling Framework

Nancy Collins; Gerhard Theurich; Cecelia DeLuca; Max J. Suarez; Atanas Trayanov; Venkatramani Balaji; Peggy Li; Weiyu Yang; Chris Hill; Arlindo da Silva

The Earth System Modeling Framework is a component-based architecture for developing and assembling climate and related models. A virtual machine underlies the component-level constructs in ESMF, providing both a foundation for performance portability and mechanisms for resource allocation and component sequencing.


Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2001

Improving Global Analysis and Short–Range Forecast Using Rainfall and Moisture Observations Derived from TRMM and SSM/I Passive Microwave Sensors

Arthur Y. Hou; Sara Q. Zhang; Arlindo da Silva; William S. Olson; Christian D. Kummerow; Joanne Simpson

Abstract As a follow–on to the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration in the United States, the National Space Development Agency of Japan, and the European Space Agency are considering a satellite mission to measure the global rainfall. The plan envisions an improved TRMM–like satellite and a constellation of eight satellites carrying passive microwave radiometers to provide global rainfall measurements at 3–h intervals. The success of this concept relies on the merits of rainfall estimates derived from passive microwave radiometers. This article offers a proof–of–concept demonstration of the benefits of using rainfall and total precipitable water (TPW) information derived from such instruments in global data assimilation with observations from the TRMM Microwave Imager (TMI) and two Special Sensor Microwave/Imager (SSM/I) instruments. Global analyses that optimally combine observations from diverse sources with physical models of atmospheric and lan...


Monthly Weather Review | 2003

The Choice of Variable for Atmospheric Moisture Analysis

Dick Dee; Arlindo da Silva

Abstract The implications of using different control variables for the analysis of moisture observations in a global atmospheric data assimilation system are investigated. A moisture analysis based on either mixing ratio or specific humidity is prone to large extrapolation errors, due to the high variability in space and time of these parameters and to the difficulties in modeling their error covariances. Using the logarithm of specific humidity does not alleviate these problems, and has the further disadvantage that very dry background estimates cannot be effectively corrected by observations. Relative humidity is a better choice from a statistical point of view, because this field is spatially and temporally more coherent and error statistics are therefore easier to obtain. If, however, the analysis is designed to preserve relative humidity in the absence of moisture observations, then the analyzed specific humidity field depends entirely on analyzed temperature changes. If the model has a cool bias in ...


Monthly Weather Review | 2000

Assimilation of SSM/I-Derived Surface Rainfall and Total Precipitable Water for Improving the GEOS Analysis for Climate Studies

Arthur Y. H Ou; D Avid V. L Edvina; Arlindo da Silva; S Ara Q. Zhang; Joanna Joiner; Robert Atlas; George J. Huffman; Christian D. Kummerow

This article describes a variational framework for assimilating the SSM/I-derived surface rain rate and total precipitable water (TPW) and examines their impact on the analysis produced by the Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) Data Assimilation System (DAS). The SSM/I observations consist of tropical rain rates retrieved using the Goddard Profiling Algorithm and tropical TPW estimates produced by Wentz. In a series of assimilation experiments for December 1992, results show that the SSM/I-derived rain rate, despite current uncertainty in its intensity, is better than the model-generated precipitation. Assimilating rainfall data improves cloud distributions and the cloudy-sky radiation, while assimilating TPW data reduces a moisture bias in the lower troposphere to improve the clear-sky radiation. Together, the two data types reduce the monthly mean spatial bias by 46% and the error standard deviation by 26% in the outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) averaged over the Tropics, as compared with the NOAA OLR observation product. The improved cloud distribution, in turn, improves the solar radiation at the surface. There is also evidence that the latent heating change associated with the improved precipitation improves the large-scale circulation in the Tropics. This is inferred from a comparison of the clear-sky brightness temperatures for TIROS Operational Vertical Sounder channel 12 computed from the GEOS analyses with the observed values, suggesting that rainfall assimilation reduces a prevailing moist bias in the upper-tropospheric humidity in the GEOS system through enhanced subsidence between the major convective centers. This work shows that assimilation of satellite-derived precipitation and TPW can reduce state-dependent systematic errors in the OLR, clouds, surface radiation, and the large-scale circulation in the assimilated dataset. The improved analysis also leads to better short-range forecasts, but the impact is modest compared with improvements in the time-averaged signals in the analysis. The study shows that, in the presence of biases and other errors of the forecast model, it is possible to improve the time-averaged ‘‘climate content’’ in the data without comparable improvements in forecast. The full impact of these data types on the analysis cannot be measured solely in terms of forecast skills.


Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society | 2001

An adaptive buddy check for observational quality control

Dick P. Dee; Leonid Rukhovets; Ricardo Todling; Arlindo da Silva; Jay Walter Larson

An adaptive buddy-check algorithm is presented that adjusts tolerances for suspect observations, based on the variability of surrounding data. The algorithm derives from a statistical hypothesis test combined with maximum-likelihood covariance estimation. Its stability is shown to depend on the initial identification of outliers by a simple background check. The adaptive feature ensures that the final quality-control decisions are not very sensitive to prescribed statistics of first-guess and observation errors, nor on other approximations introduced into the algorithm. The implementation of the algorithm in a global atmospheric data assimilation is described. Its performance is contrasted with that of a non-adaptive buddy check, for the surface analysis of an extreme storm that took place over Europe on 27 December 1999. The adaptive algorithm allowed the inclusion of many important observations that differed greatly from the first guess and that would have been excluded on the basis of prescribed statistics. The analysis of the storm development was much improved as a result of these additional observations.


Monthly Weather Review | 1999

Maximum-Likelihood Estimation of Forecast and Observation Error Covariance Parameters. Part II: Applications

Dick Dee; Greg Gaspari; Chris Redder; Leonid Rukhovets; Arlindo da Silva

Abstract Three different applications of maximum-likelihood estimation of error covariance parameters for atmospheric data assimilation are described. Height error standard deviations, vertical correlation coefficients, and isotropic decorrelation length scales are estimated from rawinsonde height observed-minus-forecast residuals. Sea level pressure error standard deviations and decorrelation length scales are obtained from ship reports, and wind observation error standard deviations and forecast error stream function and velocity potential decorrelation length scales are estimated from aircraft data. These applications serve to demonstrate the ability of the method to estimate covariance parameters using multivariate data from moving observers. Estimates of the parameter uncertainty due to sampling error can be obtained as a by-product of the maximum-likelihood estimation. By bounding this source of error, it is found that many statistical parameters that are usually presumed constant in operational dat...

Collaboration


Dive into the Arlindo da Silva's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter R. Colarco

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anton Darmenov

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Virginie Buchard

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kyu-Myong Kim

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ricardo Todling

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Steven Pawson

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Teppei J. Yasunari

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge