Arnaud Calmus

Verbal irony processing: How do contrast and humour correlate?

Verbal irony relies on contrast, that is, incongruity between the situational context and the ironic assertion. But is the degree of contrast related to the perceived humorousness of ironic comments? We answered this question by conducting two experiments. In the first experiment, participants were asked to read a list of sentence pairs (ironic or control) and judge the extent to which the meaning of the first sentence contrasted with that of the second. In the second experiment, participants were invited to rate the humorousness of ironic comments compared with their literal counterparts. Results showed that ironic remarks were rated as more contrasting and more humorous than their literal counterparts, but that humour only emerged from a moderate contrast.

Differential bilateral involvement of the parietal gyrus during predicative metaphor processing: an auditory fMRI study.

Despite the growing literature on figurative language processing, there is still debate as to which cognitive processes and neural bases are involved. Furthermore, most studies have focused on nominal metaphor processing without any context, and very few have used auditory presentation. We therefore investigated the neural bases of the comprehension of predicative metaphors presented in a brief context, in an auditory, ecological way. The comprehension of their literal counterparts served as a control condition. We also investigated the link between working memory and verbal skills and regional activation. Comparisons of metaphorical and literal conditions revealed bilateral activation of parietal areas including the left angular (lAG) and right inferior parietal gyri (rIPG) and right precuneus. Only verbal skills were associated with lAG (but not rIPG) activation. These results indicated that predicative metaphor comprehension share common activations with other metaphors. Furthermore, individual verbal skills could have an impact on figurative language processing.

Neural Correlates of Contrast and Humor: Processing Common Features of Verbal Irony

Irony is a kind of figurative language used by a speaker to say something that contrasts with the context and, to some extent, lends humor to a situation. However, little is known about the brain regions that specifically support the processing of these two common features of irony. The present study had two main aims: (i) investigate the neural basis of irony processing, by delivering short ironic spoken sentences (and their literal counterparts) to participants undergoing fMRI; and (ii) assess the neural effect of two irony parameters, obtained from normative studies: degree of contrast and humor appreciation. Results revealed activation of the bilateral inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), posterior part of the left superior temporal gyrus, medial frontal cortex, and left caudate during irony processing, suggesting the involvement of both semantic and theory-of-mind networks. Parametric models showed that contrast was specifically associated with the activation of bilateral frontal and subcortical areas, and that these regions were also sensitive to humor, as shown by a conjunction analysis. Activation of the bilateral IFG is consistent with the literature on humor processing, and reflects incongruity detection/resolution processes. Moreover, the activation of subcortical structures can be related to the reward processing of social events.

Exploring quality of life in people with slowly-progressive neuromuscular disease

Abstract Purpose: A qualitative work is conducted to enable later the construction of a health-related quality of life (HRQL) questionnaire for patients with slowly-progressive neuromuscular disease (NMD) such as myopathies and muscular dystrophies. Methods: The formation of focus groups is an efficient method to perform an in-depth exploration of the aspects of HRQL potentially impaired by NMD. Patients were recruited in France by 4 NMD reference centers. To ensure adequate representativeness in terms of severity, three types of focus groups were formed: (1) Patients able to walk (WP). (2) Patients using a wheelchair (WCP). (3) Patients using a wheelchair and requiring continuous mechanical ventilation (WCMVP). All verbal interactions among group participants were recorded. A qualitative analysis of the verbatim was performed using the framework of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health model (ICF). Results: A total of 41 patients distributed across five focus groups were interviewed. The verbatim provided 2424 ICF categories. The percentages of mentions of the different ICF categories were calculated and graphically displayed. Conclusion: The results enabled to identify and quantify the aspects of life that are altered by NMD according to patients. This qualitative work was the first phase of a more ambitious project to develop a new NMD-specific HRQL questionnaire. Implication of rehabilitation Patients with NMD have more to say about the quality of their environment, their social relationships and their psychological state than about their physical symptoms. This observation should be compared to clinician perceptions which often focus mainly on the physical symptoms, overlooking those elements that they cannot assess directly. Many patients reported relationship issues with various people from their surrounding (e.g., health professionals, acquaintances, colleagues, and strangers). In particular, it is essential that health professionals are careful not to make adult patients with NMD feel infantilized. This issue can be addressed by making all relevant medical information available and asking for the patients opinion on any important change in their medical care.