Asa J. Nixon

Outcome at 8 Years After Breast-Conserving Surgery and Radiation Therapy for Invasive Breast Cancer: Influence of Margin Status and Systemic Therapy on Local Recurrence

PURPOSE To examine the relationship between pathologic margin status and outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study population comprised 533 patients with International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical stage I or II breast cancer who had assessable margins, who received at least 60 Gy to the primary tumor bed, and who had more than 8 years of potential follow-up. Each margin was scored (according to the presence of invasive or in situ disease that touched the inked surgical margin) as one of the following: negative, close, focally positive, or extensively positive. Outcome at 8 years was calculated using crude rates of first site of failure. A polychotomous logistic regression analysis was performed. Median follow-up time was 127 months. RESULTS At 8 years, patients with close margins and those with negative margins both had a rate of local recurrence (LR) of 7%. Patients with extensively positive margins had an LR rate of 27%, whereas patients with focally positive margins had an intermediate rate of LR of 14%. In the polychotomous logistic regression model, margin status and the use of systemic therapy were the only two variables that had significant effects on the risk ratio of LR to remaining alive and free of disease. Among the 45 patients with focally positive margins who received systemic therapy, the crude LR rate was 7% at 8 years (95% confidence interval, 1% to 20%). CONCLUSION Pathologic margin status and the use of adjuvant systemic therapy are the most important factors associated with LR among patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy.

Relationship of patient age to pathologic features of the tumor and prognosis for patients with stage I or II breast cancer.

PURPOSE This analysis was performed to clarify the relationship of young age at diagnosis to the pathologic features of the tumor and prognosis in patients with early-stage breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data from 1,398 patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging stage I or II breast cancer treated by breast-conserving therapy between 1968 and 1985. One hundred seven patients were younger than 35 years at the time of diagnosis. The median follow-up duration for the 1,032 survivors was 99 months. RESULTS Patients younger than 35 years had a significantly higher overall recurrence rate (P = .002), as well as a greater risk for developing distant metastases (P = .03), when compared with older patients. The cancers in younger patients more commonly showed factors associated with a worse prognosis (including grade 3 histology, lymphatic vessel invasion [LVI], necrosis, and estrogen receptor [ER] negativity) as compared with older patients. In a proportional hazards model that included clinical and treatment-related variables, as well as these pathologic features, age younger than 35 years remained a significant predictor for time to recurrence (relative risk [RR], 1.70), time to distant failure (RR, 1.60), and overall mortality (RR, 1.50). CONCLUSION Breast cancer patients younger than 35 years have a worse prognosis than older patients. This difference is only partially explained by a higher frequency of adverse pathologic factors seen in younger patients.

Effect of Radiotherapy After Breast-Conserving Treatment in Women With Breast Cancer and Germline BRCA1/2 Mutations

PURPOSE Recent laboratory data suggest a role for BRCA1/2 in the cellular response to DNA damage. There is a paucity of clinical data, however, examining the effect of radiotherapy (RT), which causes double-strand breaks, on breast tissue from BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Thus the goals of this study were to compare rates of radiation-associated complications, in-breast tumor recurrence, and distant relapse in women with BRCA1/2 mutations treated with breast-conserving therapy (BCT) using RT with rates observed in sporadic disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS Seventy-one women with a BRCA1/2 mutation and stage I or II breast cancer treated with BCT were matched 1:3 with 213 women with sporadic breast cancer. Conditional logistic regression models were used to compare matched cohorts for rates of complications and recurrence. RESULTS Tumors from women in the genetic cohort were associated with high histologic (P =.0004) and nuclear (P =.009) grade and negative estrogen (P=.0001) and progesterone (P=.002) receptors compared with tumors from the sporadic cohort. Using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer toxicity scoring, there were no significant differences in acute or chronic morbidity in skin, subcutaneous tissue, lung, or bone. The 5-year actuarial overall survival, relapse-free survival, and rates of tumor control in the treated breast for the patients in the genetic cohort were 86%, 78%, and 98%, respectively, compared with 91%, 80%, and 96%, respectively, for the sporadic cohort (P = not significant). CONCLUSION There was no evidence of increased radiation sensitivity or sequelae in breast tissue heterozygous for a BRCA1/2 germline mutation compared with controls, and rates of tumor control in the breast and survival were comparable between BRCA1/2 carriers and controls at 5 years. Although additional follow-up is needed, these data may help in discussing treatment options in the management of early-stage hereditary breast cancer and should provide reassurance regarding the safety of administering RT to carriers of a germline BRCA1/2 mutation.

Long-term outcome following breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy

PURPOSE To examine the long-term pattern and frequency of recurrences after breast-conserving therapy and whether the outcome was influenced by the era of treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS From 1968 to 1986, 1870 patients with unilateral Stage I or II breast cancer were treated at the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy. Of these, 1628 underwent gross tumor excision and received a dose of > 60 Gy to the tumor bed and constituted the study population. Patients were classified as without evidence of disease, dead from other causes (DOC), or by their first site of recurrence. First sites of recurrent disease were categorized as distant/regional (DF/RNF) or local (LR). Local recurrence was defined as the detection of any invasive or in situ carcinoma occurring in the ipsilateral breast and was further categorized as: true recurrence (TR), marginal miss (MM), skin recurrence (S), or elsewhere in the breast (E). Median follow-up in survivors was 116 months. Eighty patients (4.9%) were lost to follow-up at 3-175 months. The population was divided into two time cohorts: 1968-1982 (n = 810), with a median follow-up time of 143 months, and 1983-1986 (n = 792), with a median follow-up time of 95 months. RESULTS The overall crude rates of ipsilateral breast recurrence were 7.4 and 13.3% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Crude rates at 5 and 10 years were 5.7 and 9.3% for TR/MM and were 0.9 and 2.8% for E recurrences, respectively. The annual incidence rates for all LR ranged from 0.5-2.4% and was relatively constant after the first year. The annual incidence rates for TR/MM ranged from 0.4 to 1.9%, whereas for E recurrences the range was 0.1-0.7%. The crude rates of DF/RNF were 16.6 and 23.1% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. The annual incidence rates for DF/RNF ranged from 1-5% over all years. Although the magnitude of the incidence was different, DF/RNF recurrence predominated in years 1-3 for both node-positive and node-negative patients. For the 1968-1982 and 1983-1986 cohorts, the 5-year crude rates of ipsilateral breast recurrence were 8.8 and 5.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Distant and regional nodal failures were the predominant form of recurrence. The annual incidence rate of LR was relatively constant over the first decade. True recurrence/marginal miss was the most frequent type of ipsilateral breast recurrence and was highest during years 2 through 7. The risk of a recurrence elsewhere in the breast increased with longer follow-up and was highest during years 8 through 10. The 5-year crude rate of ipsilateral breast recurrence appeared lower in the 1983-1986 patient cohort compared to the 1968-1982 patient cohort (8.8% vs. 5.9%), but the distributions of site of first failure did not differ significantly (p = 0.13). Any decrease in ipsilateral breast recurrence likely reflects improvements in mammographic and pathologic evaluation, patient selection, and the increased use of reexcision.

Phase II Trial of Docetaxel, Cisplatin, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin as Induction for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

PURPOSE To evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of a 4-day regimen of docetaxel, cisplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (TPFL4) in patients with locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty previously untreated patients with stage III or IV SCCHN and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group functional status of 2 or less were treated with TPFL4. Postchemotherapy support included prophylactic growth factors and antibiotics. Patients who achieved a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to three cycles of TPFL4 received definitive twice-daily radiation therapy. The primary end points were toxicity and response to TPFL4. RESULTS Eighty-five cycles were administered to 30 patients. The major acute toxicities to TPFL4 were mucositis and nausea. One patient died of neutropenic sepsis during therapy. Additional major toxicities were neutropenia, anorexia, nephropathy, neuropathy, and diarrhea. Fourteen percent of all cycles were associated with hospitalization for toxicity. The overall clinical response rate to TPFL4 was 93%, with 63% CRs and 30% PRs. Primary tumor site clinical and pathologic response rates were 93% and 68%, respectively. CONCLUSION TPFL4 has an acceptable toxicity profile in good-performance-status patients. Modification of the 5-day TPFL regimen (TPFL5: shorter chemotherapy infusion time, earlier intervention with growth factors and antibiotics) led to fewer episodes of febrile neutropenia and hospitalization. Response rates to TPFL justify further evaluation of combinations of these agents in the context of formal clinical trials.

The relation between the surgery-radiotherapy interval and treatment outcome in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy without systemic therapy☆

PURPOSE This analysis was performed to clarify the relationship between the surgery-radiotherapy interval and the risk of recurrence in patients treated with breast-conserving therapy for early stage invasive cancers. METHODS AND MATERIALS We retrospectively analyzed data from 653 patients with American Joint Commission on Cancer Stage I or II, pathologically node-negative breast cancer treated by breast-conserving therapy without adjuvant systemic therapy between 1968 and 1985. All patients received a dose of at least 60 Gy to the tumor bed. Two hundred and eighty-three patients started radiotherapy within 4 weeks of surgery, 308 started 5-8 weeks after surgery, and 54 started 9-12 weeks after surgery. Median follow-up in the 531 survivors was 100 months. RESULTS Pathologic features and treatment characteristics were well balanced between the groups with surgery-radiotherapy intervals of 0-4 weeks and 5-8 weeks. There was no statistically difference in the risk of overall recurrence among patients starting radiotherapy 5-8 weeks after surgery compared with those treated within 4 weeks. Analysis of the 5-year crude rates of failure further demonstrated no difference in the distribution of sites of failure in the 5-8 week group compared with the 0-4 week group. A multivariate model controlling for known risk factors, as well as potential treatment-related confounders, also failed to demonstrate an increased risk of recurrence with the longer surgery-radiotherapy interval (risk ratio = 0.89, p = 0.44). CONCLUSION This retrospective analysis suggests that a delay of up to 8 weeks in the interval between the last breast surgery and the start of radiotherapy is not associated with an increased risk of recurrence in patients with early stage breast cancer treated with breast irradiation to at least 60 Gy without systemic therapy.

The relation between the presence and extent of lobular carcinoma in situ and the risk of local recurrence for patients with infiltrating carcinoma of the breast treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy.

When found in an otherwise benign biopsy, lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) has been associated with an increased risk of development of a subsequent invasive breast carcinoma. However, the association between LCIS and the risk of subsequent local recurrence in patients with infiltrating carcinoma treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy has received relatively little attention.

The influence of infiltrating lobular carcinoma on the outcome of patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy

AbstractBackground: The role of conservative surgery and radiation therapy (CS and RT) in the treatment of patients with infiltrating ductal carcinoma is well established. However, the efficacy of CS and RT for patients with infiltrating lobular carcinoma is less well documented. The goal of this study was to examine treatment outcome after CS and RT for patients with infiltrating lobular carcinoma and to compare the results to those of patients with infiltrating ductal carcinoma and patients with mixed ductal–lobular histology. Methods: Between 1970 and 1986, 1624 patients with Stage I or II invasive breast cancer were treated with CS and RT consisting of a complete gross excision of the tumor and ≥6000 cGy to the primary site. Slides were available for review for 1337 of these patients (82%). Of these, 93 had infiltrating lobular carcinoma, 1089 had infiltrating ductal carcinoma, and 59 had tumors with mixed ductal and lobular feature these patients constitute the study population. The median follow-up time for surviving patients was 133 months. A comprehensive list of clinical and pathologic features was evaluated for all patients. Additional histologic features assessed for patients with infiltrating lobular carcinoma included histologic subtype, multifocal invasion, stromal desmoplasia, and the presence of signet ring cells. Results: Five and 10-year crude results by site of first failure were similar for patients with infiltrating lobular, infiltrating ductal, and mixed histology. In particular, the 10-year crude local recurrence rates were 15%, 13%, and l3% for patients with infiltrating lobular, infiltrating ductal, and mixed histology, respectively. Ten-year distant/regional recurrence rates were 22%, 23%, and 20% for the three groups, respectively. In addition, the 10-year crude contralateral breast cancer rates were 4%, 13% and 6% for patients with infiltrating lobular, infiltrating ductal and mixed histology, respectively. In a multiple regression analysis which included established prognostic factors, histologic type was not significantly associated with either survival or time to recurrence. Conclusions: Patients with infiltrating lobular carcinoma have a similar outcome following CS and RT to patients with infiltrating ductal carcinoma and to patients with tumors that have mixed ductal and lobular features. We conclude that the presence of infiltrating lobular histology should not influence decisions regarding local therapy in patients with Stage I and II breast cancer.

Family history and treatment outcome in young women after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer.

PURPOSE To evaluate the safety and efficacy of breast-conserving therapy for young women with a family history (FH) suggestive of inherited breast cancer susceptibility. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 201 patients aged 36 or younger at diagnosis treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy (> or = 60 Gy) for early-stage breast cancer were categorized by FH. FH was considered positive in 29 patients who, at the time of diagnosis, had a mother or sister previously diagnosed with breast cancer before age 50 or ovarian cancer at any age. Clinical, pathologic, and demographic variables; sites of first failure; disease-free survival; and overall survival (OS) were compared between FH-positive and -negative groups. Median follow-up time was 11 years. RESULTS Patient and tumor features were similar between those with and without an FH. Regression analysis of sites of first failure at 5 years demonstrated a risk ratio (RR) of 5.7 for opposite breast cancer for FH-positive patients. Rates of local, regional, and distant failure and disease-free survival or OS did not differ between FH-positive and -negative patients. Age at diagnosis and Ashkenazi heritage were not significantly predictors of patterns of failure. CONCLUSION Breast-conserving surgery combined with radiation therapy is not associated with a higher rate of local recurrence, distant failure, or second (non-breast) cancers in young women with an FH suggestive of inherited breast cancer susceptibility compared with young women without an FH. However, their increased risk of opposite breast cancer should be taken into account when considering breast conservation as a treatment option.

Correlation of tumor size and axillary lymph node involvement with prognosis in patients with T1 breast carcinoma

The prognosis of patients with T1 breast carcinoma remains controversial. Some studies have shown a low risk of lymph node metastasis and distant failure whereas others have not, possibly due to differences in the definition of tumor size. In this study, the authors assessed the relation between macroscopic tumor size, microscopic invasive tumor size, axillary lymph node involvement, and prognosis in a group of patients with clinically lymph node negative disease.