Ashish Jani

Does lung cancer mutation status and targeted therapy predict for outcomes and local control in the setting of brain metastases treated with radiation

BACKGROUND We investigated effects of genetic alterations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), and Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) on overall survival (OS) and local control after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS A cohort of 89 out of 262 NSCLC patients (2003-2013) treated with gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastases had genotyping available and were selected as our study population. RESULTS Median follow-up was 12 months. Median OS rates for the EGFR, KRAS, echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4)-ALK mutated, and wild-type cohorts were 17, 7, 27, and 12 months, respectively (P = .019), and for targeted versus nontargeted therapy 21 and 11 months, respectively (P = .071). Targeted therapy was a strong predictor of increased OS on univariate (P = .037) and multivariate (P = .022) analysis. Gender, primary tumor controlled status, recursive partitioning analysis class, and graded prognostic assessment score were associated with OS (P < .05). On multivariate analysis, positive EGFR mutational status was a highly significant predictor for decreased survival (hazard ratio: 8.2; 95% CI: 2.0-33.7; P = .003). However, when we recategorized EGFR-mutant cases based on whether they received tyrosine kinase inhibitor, OS was no longer significantly shorter (hazard ratio: 1.5; P = .471). Median OS for patients with and without local failure was 17 and 12 months, respectively (P = .577). Local failure rates for EGFR, KRAS, EML4-ALK mutated, and wild-type cohorts by lesion were 8.7%, 5.4%, 4.3%, and 5.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that EGFR tyrosine kinase mutation and ALK translocation results in improved survival to targeted therapies and that mutation status itself does not predict survival and local control in patients with brain metastases from NSCLC.

Lanthanide complexes on Ag nanoparticles: designing contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging.

This paper describes colloidal particles that are designed to induce hyper-intensity contrast (T(1) relaxation) in MRI. The contrast agents consist of discrete gadolinium complexes tethered to 10 nm diameter silver nanoparticles. The gadolinium complexes (1) [Gd(DTPA-bisamido cysteine)](2-) and (2) [Gd(cystine-NTA)(2)](3-), undergo chemisorption to particle surfaces through thiol or disulfide groups, respectively, to form two new contrast agents. The resulting nanoparticulate constructs are characterized on the basis of their syntheses, composition, spectra and contrast enhancing power. The average r(1) relaxivities of the of the surface bound complexes (obtained at 9.4 T and 25 degrees C) are 10.7 and 9.7 s(-1) mM(-1), respectively, as compared to 4.7 s(-1) mM(-1) for the clinical agent Magnevist. Correspondingly, the respective whole particle relaxivities are 27927 and 13153 s(-1) mM(-1).

Radiation Therapy for the Management of Brain Metastases.

Brain metastases are the most common malignant intracranial tumors and carry a poor prognosis. The management of brain metastases may include a variety of treatment modalities including surgical resection, radiation therapy, and/or systemic therapy. The traditional treatment for brain metastasis involved whole brain irradiation. However, improved systemic control of primary cancers has led to longer survival for some groups of patients and there is increasing need to consider the late effects of radiation to the entire brain. With advances in imaging and radiation treatment planning and delivery stereotactic radiosurgery has become more frequently utilized and may be delivered through Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery or linear accelerator-based systems. Furthermore, experience in treating thousands of patients on clinical trials has led to diagnosis-specific prognostic assessment systems that help guide our approach to the management of this common clinical scenario. This review provides an overview of the literature supporting radiotherapy for brain metastasis and an update on current radiotherapeutic options that is tailored for the nonradiation oncologist.

Timing of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Glioblastoma Patients: A Single-Institution Experience With More Than 400 Patients.

BACKGROUND The standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) is maximal safe resection followed by adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ). OBJECTIVE To investigate whether the timing of adjuvant RT after surgery affected outcome in patients with GBM. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed all patients with a diagnosis of GBM at our institution. A total of 447 patients were included in our analysis. Patients were divided into 3 equal groups based on the interval between surgery and RT. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). RESULTS Patients who began RT less than 21 days after surgery tended to be older, have a lower a Karnofsky Performance Status score, and higher recursive partitioning analysis class. These patients were more likely to have undergone biopsy only and received 3-dimensional conformal RT or 2-dimensional RT. The median OS for patients who started RT less than 21 days after surgery, between 21 and 32 days after surgery, and more than 32 days after surgery was 374, 465, and 478 days, respectively (P = .004). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, Karnofsky Performance Status score lower than 70, undergoing biopsy only, recursive partitioning analysis classes IV and V/VI, use of less than 36 Gy RT, and lack of TMZ chemotherapy were predictors of worse OS. The interval between surgery and RT was not significantly associated with OS on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION Patients who begin RT less than 21 days after surgery tend to have worse prognostic factors than those who begin RT later. When accounting for significant covariates, the effect of timing between surgery and RT is not significant.

High-Dose, Single-Fraction Irradiation Rapidly Reduces Tumor Vasculature and Perfusion in a Xenograft Model of Neuroblastoma

PURPOSE To characterize the effects of high-dose radiation therapy (HDRT) on neuroblastoma tumor vasculature, including the endothelial cell (EC)-pericyte interaction as a potential target for combined treatment with antiangiogenic agents. METHODS AND MATERIALS The vascular effects of radiation therapy were examined in a xenograft model of high-risk neuroblastoma. In vivo 3-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (3D-CEUS) imaging and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were performed. RESULTS HDRT significantly reduced tumor blood volume 6 hours after irradiation compared with the lower doses used in conventionally fractionated radiation. There was a 63% decrease in tumor blood volume after 12-Gy radiation compared with a 24% decrease after 2 Gy. Analysis of tumor vasculature by lectin angiography showed a significant loss of small vessel ends at 6 hours. IHC revealed a significant loss of ECs at 6 and 72 hours after HDRT, with an accompanying loss of immature and mature pericytes at 72 hours. CONCLUSIONS HDRT affects tumor vasculature in a manner not observed at lower doses. The main observation was an early reduction in tumor perfusion resulting from a reduction of small vessel ends with a corresponding loss of endothelial cells and pericytes.

Hypofractionated radiation therapy versus standard fractionated radiation therapy with concurrent temozolomide in elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

PURPOSE Adjuvant hypofractionated radiation therapy (HRT) for elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) is a reasonable option compared with standard fractionation radiation therapy (SFRT). Outcomes in patients receiving HRT in the presence of temozolomide (TMZ) compared with SFRT with TMZ are unclear. We examined HRT for GBM with TMZ in comparison to SFRT with TMZ. METHODS AND MATERIALS We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients ≥60 years of age with newly diagnosed GBM who received SFRT or HRT from 1994 to 2014 in the postoperative setting. Inclusion criteria included SFRT (60 Gy/30 fractions or 59.4 Gy/33 fractions) versus HRT (40 Gy/15 fractions). RESULTS In this cohort, 158 patients were treated with SFRT versus 26 with HRT. Median survival in patients receiving SFRT compared with HRT was 430 and 475 days (P = .550), respectively. Ninety-five percent of the SFRT patients received TMZ versus 100% of those treated with HRT. Patients receiving HRT were older (median, 72 vs 66 years). All HRT patients were treated with the intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) technique versus SFRT, in which 57% had IMRT. Multivariate Cox regression showed decreased overall survival (OS) associated with patient age >70 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.84), lower Karnofsky performance status (HR, 5.25), biopsy versus surgical resection (HR, 4.18), radiation therapy planning technique 3- or 2-dimensional planning versus IMRT (HR, 1.91; HR, 3.40, respectively). Analysis restricted to patients receiving IMRT-based planning showed no difference in OS between HRT and SFRT. For patients receiving TMZ, there was no survival difference between those treated with HRT and those treated with SFRT. CONCLUSIONS Elderly GBM patients receiving HRT and those receiving SFRT had similar OS. Subset analysis patients receiving concurrent TMZ showed no difference in OS between the HRT and SFRT groups.

Breast cancer subtype and stage are prognostic of time from breast cancer diagnosis to brain metastasis development

Breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Patients with breast cancer risk factors associated with rapid development of BCBM could potentially benefit from early brain metastasis screening. We retrospectively reviewed all BCBM patients treated with brain radiotherapy at our institution from 1997 to 2015. Interval time to BCBM was defined as date of pathologic breast cancer diagnosis to date of radiographic evidence of brain metastasis. Patients were stratified by breast cancer molecular subtype and stage at diagnosis. Kaplan Meier analysis was conducted on time to development of BCBM. Breast cancer risk factors were correlated with time to BCBM on Cox proportion hazard analysis. The study cohort comprised 121 BCBM patients, with median interval time to BCBM of 46 months. Times to BCBM for Her2+/2HR+, Her2+, Her2−/HR+, and triple-negative (TNBC) subtypes were 70, 44, 42, and 28 months respectively (p = 0.002). Time to BCBM for stages I, II, III, and IV were 70, 54, 29, and 24 months, respectively (p = 0.000). BCBM patients were further stratified by both molecular subtype (TNBC vs. non-TNBC) and stage (I, II vs. III, IV). Median times to BCBM for non-TNBC/stage I–II, TNBC/stage I–II, non-TNBC stage III–IV, and TNBC/stage III–IV were 68, 47, 29, and 6 months respectively (p = 0.000). Subtype and stage were associated with shorter time to BCBM on multivariate analysis. Subtype and initial stage are independently correlated with decreased time to development of BCBM. Patients with advanced high stage and triple negative breast cancer develop brain metastases significantly earlier.

A Modern Radiotherapy Series of Survival in Hispanic Patients with Glioblastoma

BACKGROUND Studies have shown racial differences in cancer outcomes. We investigate whether survival differences existed in Hispanic patients with glioblastoma (GBM) compared with other ethnicities from our modern radiotherapy series, because no study to date has focused on outcomes in this group after radiation therapy. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 428 patients diagnosed with GBM from 1996 to 2014 at our institution, divided into 4 groups based on self-report: white, black, Hispanic, and Asian/Indian. The primary outcome was overall survival. We analyzed differences in prognostic factors among the whole cohort compared with the Hispanic cohort alone. RESULTS Baseline characteristics of the 4 racial groups were comparable. With a median follow-up of 387 days, no survival differences were seen by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Median overall survival for Hispanic patients was 355 days versus 450 days for the entire cohort. Factors significant for patient outcomes in the entire cohort differed slightly from those specific to Hispanic patients. Low Karnofsky Performance Status was significant on multivariate analysis in the whole population, but not in Hispanic patients. Extent of resection, recursive partitioning analysis class, and radiation therapy total dose were significant on multivariate analysis in both the whole population and Hispanic patients. CONCLUSIONS We found that Hispanic patients with GBM had no difference in survival compared with other ethnicities in our cohort. Differences exist in factors associated with outcomes on single and multivariate analysis for Hispanic patients with GBM compared with the entire cohort. Additional studies focusing on Hispanic patients will aid in more personalized treatment approaches in this group.

Radiation Therapy Deviations in Trial of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Radiation Therapy Deviations in Trial of Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer To the Editor The LAP07 trial found no significant difference in overall survival with chemoradiotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.1 Radiation therapy quality assessment was included in the study because this has been demonstrated to significantly affect outcomes in pancreatic cancer.2 The authors found that only 32% of patients received radiation per protocol with violations “mainly due to dose distribution heterogeneities.” In their results, they commented that “deviations from the planned schedule did not significantly influence overall survival,” but later in the discussion that “deviations from the planned protocol ... did not affect significantly the overall survival.” Radiation quality assessment includes many other factors (target volume delineation, coverage limitations, etc) in addition to adherence to the radiation schedule. Was adherence to these factors studied for its influence on outcome? If not, we encourage the authors to report on those patients who were treated with radiation “per protocol” against those with anything “less than per protocol,” as was done in the study by Abrams and colleagues.2 The radiation target volumes used in the study differ significantly from those required in the ongoing NRG Oncology Cooperative Group study of the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 1201 (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01921751). The RTOG 1201 protocol specifies targeting of the tumor and involved lymph nodes rather than treating multiple echelons of uninvolved lymph nodes with large radiation fields. Results from the ongoing study may help clarify whether different approaches to radiation target delineation will affect outcomes.

Single institution validation of a modified graded prognostic assessment of patients with breast cancer brain metastases

Aim: The number of breast cancer brain metastases is a prognostic clinical variable in the modified graded prognostic assessment (GPA) Index for breast cancer. Patients & methods: We retrospectively gathered data from 127 breast cancer patients who underwent radiation therapy for brain metastasis. Patients were stratified by both breast GPA and modified breast GPA scores, and survival was determined using the Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards model. Results & Conclusion: The Kaplan–Meier curve for patients under the breast GPA classification were not significant, but were significant under the modified breast GPA classification. The inclusion of number of brain metastases into the modified breast GPA index improved prognosis, thus validating the use of the modified breast GPA in prognosticating patient outcome.