Shumaila Saad

Comparison of biochemical failure definitions for predicting local cancer recurrence following cryoablation of the prostate

Various definitions of biochemical failure (BF) have been used to predict cancer recurrence following prostate cryoablation. However to date, none of these definitions have been validated for this use. We have reviewed several definitions of BF to determine their accuracy in predicting biopsy‐proven local recurrence following prostate cryoablation.

Neurocognitive Deficits after Radiation Therapy for Brain Malignancies

Radiotherapy (RT) has proven to be an effective therapeutic tool in treatment of a wide variety of brain tumors; however, it has a negative impact on quality of life and neurocognitive function. Cognitive dysfunction associated with both the disease and adverse effects of RT is one of the most concerning complication among long-term survivors. The effects of RT to brain can be divided into acute, early delayed, and late delayed. It is, however, the late delayed effects of RT that lead to severe neurological consequences such as minor-to-severe cognitive deficits due to irreversible focal or diffuse necrosis of brain parenchyma. In this review, we discuss current and emerging data regarding the relationship between RT and neurocognitive outcomes, and therapeutic strategies to prevent/treat postradiation neurocognitive deficits.

Does lung cancer mutation status and targeted therapy predict for outcomes and local control in the setting of brain metastases treated with radiation

BACKGROUND We investigated effects of genetic alterations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), and Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) on overall survival (OS) and local control after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS A cohort of 89 out of 262 NSCLC patients (2003-2013) treated with gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastases had genotyping available and were selected as our study population. RESULTS Median follow-up was 12 months. Median OS rates for the EGFR, KRAS, echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4)-ALK mutated, and wild-type cohorts were 17, 7, 27, and 12 months, respectively (P = .019), and for targeted versus nontargeted therapy 21 and 11 months, respectively (P = .071). Targeted therapy was a strong predictor of increased OS on univariate (P = .037) and multivariate (P = .022) analysis. Gender, primary tumor controlled status, recursive partitioning analysis class, and graded prognostic assessment score were associated with OS (P < .05). On multivariate analysis, positive EGFR mutational status was a highly significant predictor for decreased survival (hazard ratio: 8.2; 95% CI: 2.0-33.7; P = .003). However, when we recategorized EGFR-mutant cases based on whether they received tyrosine kinase inhibitor, OS was no longer significantly shorter (hazard ratio: 1.5; P = .471). Median OS for patients with and without local failure was 17 and 12 months, respectively (P = .577). Local failure rates for EGFR, KRAS, EML4-ALK mutated, and wild-type cohorts by lesion were 8.7%, 5.4%, 4.3%, and 5.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that EGFR tyrosine kinase mutation and ALK translocation results in improved survival to targeted therapies and that mutation status itself does not predict survival and local control in patients with brain metastases from NSCLC.

Randomized Phase II Trial of Erlotinib Beyond Progression in Advanced Erlotinib-Responsive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy is clearly beneficial in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, acquired resistance develops uniformly and the benefit of continuation of EGFR TKI therapy beyond progression remains unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a randomized phase II study of chemotherapy (arm A: pemetrexed or docetaxel) versus chemotherapy plus erlotinib (ERL) (arm B) in patients with progressive NSCLC following clinical benefit from erlotinib. In arm B, chemotherapy was given with erlotinib at an oral daily dose of 150 mg on days 2-19 of each cycle to minimize negative pharmacodynamic interactions. The primary endpoint was that continuation of erlotinib in this patient population could extend progression-free survival (PFS) by 50%. RESULTS A total of 46 patients were randomized (arm A: 24; arm B: 22). Patient characteristics were well balanced except there were more female patients in arm A (p = .075). The median PFS of patients in arm A was 5.5 months and for those in arm B, 4.4 months (p = .699). The response rates were 13% and 16% in arms A and B, respectively (p = .79). EGFR status data were available for 39 of the 46 patients and no significant difference in PFS was seen for continuing ERL beyond progression in mutation-positive patients. Substantially more toxicity was seen in arm B than arm A. CONCLUSION There was added toxicity but no benefit with the continuation of ERL beyond progression along with chemotherapy as compared with chemotherapy alone. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The benefits of continuing erlotinib upon progression alongside conventional chemotherapy are unclear. This randomized phase II study, initiated prior to the establishment of routine epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation testing, addressed this clinically relevant issue through randomizing patients with prior clinical benefit from erlotinib (thereby enriching for EGFR-mutated tumors) upon progression in the second- or third-line setting to conventional chemotherapy (single-agent pemetrexed or docetaxel) with or without continued erlotinib. The results showed no benefit to continuing erlotinib beyond progression, while significantly more side effects were noted in the combination arm. Along with other recently presented study findings, these results argue against the routine practice of continuing erlotinib in this setting.

Timing of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Glioblastoma Patients: A Single-Institution Experience With More Than 400 Patients.

BACKGROUND The standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) is maximal safe resection followed by adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ). OBJECTIVE To investigate whether the timing of adjuvant RT after surgery affected outcome in patients with GBM. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed all patients with a diagnosis of GBM at our institution. A total of 447 patients were included in our analysis. Patients were divided into 3 equal groups based on the interval between surgery and RT. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). RESULTS Patients who began RT less than 21 days after surgery tended to be older, have a lower a Karnofsky Performance Status score, and higher recursive partitioning analysis class. These patients were more likely to have undergone biopsy only and received 3-dimensional conformal RT or 2-dimensional RT. The median OS for patients who started RT less than 21 days after surgery, between 21 and 32 days after surgery, and more than 32 days after surgery was 374, 465, and 478 days, respectively (P = .004). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, Karnofsky Performance Status score lower than 70, undergoing biopsy only, recursive partitioning analysis classes IV and V/VI, use of less than 36 Gy RT, and lack of TMZ chemotherapy were predictors of worse OS. The interval between surgery and RT was not significantly associated with OS on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION Patients who begin RT less than 21 days after surgery tend to have worse prognostic factors than those who begin RT later. When accounting for significant covariates, the effect of timing between surgery and RT is not significant.

Hypofractionated radiation therapy versus standard fractionated radiation therapy with concurrent temozolomide in elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

PURPOSE Adjuvant hypofractionated radiation therapy (HRT) for elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) is a reasonable option compared with standard fractionation radiation therapy (SFRT). Outcomes in patients receiving HRT in the presence of temozolomide (TMZ) compared with SFRT with TMZ are unclear. We examined HRT for GBM with TMZ in comparison to SFRT with TMZ. METHODS AND MATERIALS We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients ≥60 years of age with newly diagnosed GBM who received SFRT or HRT from 1994 to 2014 in the postoperative setting. Inclusion criteria included SFRT (60 Gy/30 fractions or 59.4 Gy/33 fractions) versus HRT (40 Gy/15 fractions). RESULTS In this cohort, 158 patients were treated with SFRT versus 26 with HRT. Median survival in patients receiving SFRT compared with HRT was 430 and 475 days (P = .550), respectively. Ninety-five percent of the SFRT patients received TMZ versus 100% of those treated with HRT. Patients receiving HRT were older (median, 72 vs 66 years). All HRT patients were treated with the intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) technique versus SFRT, in which 57% had IMRT. Multivariate Cox regression showed decreased overall survival (OS) associated with patient age >70 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.84), lower Karnofsky performance status (HR, 5.25), biopsy versus surgical resection (HR, 4.18), radiation therapy planning technique 3- or 2-dimensional planning versus IMRT (HR, 1.91; HR, 3.40, respectively). Analysis restricted to patients receiving IMRT-based planning showed no difference in OS between HRT and SFRT. For patients receiving TMZ, there was no survival difference between those treated with HRT and those treated with SFRT. CONCLUSIONS Elderly GBM patients receiving HRT and those receiving SFRT had similar OS. Subset analysis patients receiving concurrent TMZ showed no difference in OS between the HRT and SFRT groups.

Successful treatment of a patient with Li-Fraumeni syndrome and metastatic lung adenocarcinoma harboring synchronous EGFR L858R and ERBB2 extracellular domain S310F mutations with the pan-HER inhibitor afatinib.

We report the case of a young, never-smoker woman with Li–Fraumeni syndrome and advanced lung adenocarcinoma refractory to multiple lines of conventional chemotherapy and negative for actionable alterations by routine testing. Comprehensive genomic profiling by clinical-grade next generation sequencing was performed on 3320 exons of 184 cancer-related genes and 37 introns of 14 genes frequently rearranged in cancer. The tumor was found to harbor both EGFR L858R and ERBB2 S310F alterations and also tested positive for a known TP53 germline mutation. The presence of the EGFR mutation was further validated by direct sequencing. Based on these results, a dual EGFR/ERBB2 inhibitor, afatinib, was chosen for treatment. The patient achieved a rapid, complete, and durable response to afatinib monotherapy, both clinically and radiographically. The treatment was very well tolerated. This unique case raises practical questions as to the challenges of molecular testing and highlights the potential association of p53 mutations with concurrent EGFR and ERBB2 aberrations. As this case powerfully illustrates, the combination of broad genomic profiling and targeted therapy guided by mutational analysis offers the possibility of precision management of refractory advanced adenocarcinoma in the background of neoplastic syndromes.

A Modern Radiotherapy Series of Survival in Hispanic Patients with Glioblastoma

BACKGROUND Studies have shown racial differences in cancer outcomes. We investigate whether survival differences existed in Hispanic patients with glioblastoma (GBM) compared with other ethnicities from our modern radiotherapy series, because no study to date has focused on outcomes in this group after radiation therapy. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 428 patients diagnosed with GBM from 1996 to 2014 at our institution, divided into 4 groups based on self-report: white, black, Hispanic, and Asian/Indian. The primary outcome was overall survival. We analyzed differences in prognostic factors among the whole cohort compared with the Hispanic cohort alone. RESULTS Baseline characteristics of the 4 racial groups were comparable. With a median follow-up of 387 days, no survival differences were seen by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Median overall survival for Hispanic patients was 355 days versus 450 days for the entire cohort. Factors significant for patient outcomes in the entire cohort differed slightly from those specific to Hispanic patients. Low Karnofsky Performance Status was significant on multivariate analysis in the whole population, but not in Hispanic patients. Extent of resection, recursive partitioning analysis class, and radiation therapy total dose were significant on multivariate analysis in both the whole population and Hispanic patients. CONCLUSIONS We found that Hispanic patients with GBM had no difference in survival compared with other ethnicities in our cohort. Differences exist in factors associated with outcomes on single and multivariate analysis for Hispanic patients with GBM compared with the entire cohort. Additional studies focusing on Hispanic patients will aid in more personalized treatment approaches in this group.