Ashita Waterston

Antiretroviral Treatment Regimens and Immune Parameters in the Prevention of Systemic AIDS-Related Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

PURPOSE Immunosuppression induced by HIV-1 increases the risk of developing non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL). We measured the influence of immunologic factors and highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) on this risk. As there are no data demonstrating that specific antiretroviral regimens are effective at protecting from NHL, we compared different HAART regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS The protective effect of HAART regimens, containing protease inhibitors (PI) and/or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) on the development of NHL was examined in a prospectively recorded cohort of 9,621 HIV-infected individuals. Lymphocyte and natural killer subset data were also entered in univariate and multivariate analyses to establish and stratify the risk of NHL. RESULTS From this cohort of 9,621 patients, 102 have been diagnosed with systemic AIDS-related NHL since 1996, when HAART became freely available here. By univariate analysis, increased age, higher nadir CD4 and CD8 T-cell counts, CD19 B-cell count, CD16/56 natural killer count and exposure to NNRTI or PI containing HAART conferred significant protection against NHL (P <.05). In a multivariate analysis, age, nadir CD4 and CD8 T-cell counts, and exposure to HAART were independent predictors of risk of NHL (P <.02). NNRTI-based HAART (adjusted rate ratio, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.3 to 0.5) was as protective as PI-based HAART, and these were significantly more protective than nucleoside analogues alone (rate ratio, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.4 to 0.7) or no antiretrovirals (P <.001). CONCLUSION Effective HAART-induced maintenance of CD4 and CD8 counts protects from systemic AIDS-related NHL.

Adjuvant bevacizumab in patients with melanoma at high risk of recurrence (AVAST-M): Preplanned interim results from a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled phase 3 study

BACKGROUND Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets VEGF, has shown restricted activity in patients with advanced melanoma. We aimed to assess the role of bevacizumab as adjuvant treatment for patients with resected melanoma at high risk of recurrence. We report results from the preplanned interim analysis. METHODS We did a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled phase 3 trial at 48 centres in the UK between July 18, 2007, and March 29, 2012. Patients aged 16 years or older with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage (AJCC) stage IIB, IIC, and III cutaneous melanoma were randomly allocated (1:1), via a central, computer-based minimisation procedure, to receive intravenous bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg, every 3 weeks for 1 year, or to observation. Randomisation was stratified by Breslow thickness of the primary tumour, N stage according to AJCC staging criteria, ulceration of the primary tumour, and patient sex. The primary endpoint was overall survival; secondary endpoints included disease-free interval, distant-metastases interval and quality of life. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. This trial is registered as an International Standardised Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN81261306. FINDINGS 1343 patients were randomised to either the bevacizumab group (n=671) or the observation group (n=672). Median follow-up was 25 months (IQR 16-37) in the bevacizumab group and 25 months (17-37) in the observation group. At the time of interim analysis, 286 (21%) of 1343 enrolled patients had died: 140 (21%) of 671 patients in the bevacizumab group, and 146 (22%) of 672 patients in the observation group. 134 (96%) of patients in the bevacizumab group died because of melanoma versus 139 (95%) in the observation group. We noted no significant difference in overall survival between treatment groups (hazard ratio [HR] 0.97, 95% CI 0.78-1.22; p=0.76); this finding persisted after adjustment for stratification variables (HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.81-1.29; p=0.83). Median duration of treatment with bevacizumab was 51 weeks (IQR 21-52) and dose intensity was 86% (41-96), showing good tolerability. 180 grade 3 or 4 adverse events were recorded in 101 (15%) of 671 patients in the bevacizumab group, and 36 (5%) of 672 patients in the observation group. Bevacizumab resulted in a higher incidence of grade 3 hypertension than did observation (41 [6%] vs one [<1%]). There was an improvement in disease-free interval for patients in the bevacizumab group compared with those in the observation group (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.98, p=0.03), but no significant difference between groups for distant-metastasis-free interval (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.73-1.06, p=0.18). No significant differences were noted between treatment groups in the standardised area under the curve for any of the quality-of-life scales over 36 months. Three adverse drug reactions were regarded as both serious and unexpected: one patient had optic neuritis after the first bevacizumab infusion, a second patient had persistent erectile dysfunction, and a third patient died of a haemopericardium after receiving two bevacizumab infusions and was later identified to have had significant predisposing cardiovascular risk factors. INTERPRETATION Bevacizumab has promising tolerability. Longer follow-up is needed to identify an effect on the primary endpoint of overall survival at 5 years.

Adjuvant bevacizumab as treatment for melanoma patients at high risk of recurrence: Preplanned interim results for the AVAST-M trial.

LBA9000 Background: Bevacizumab (Bev) is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) shown to improve survival in several advanced solid tumors. Multiple adjuvant trials are underway, but trials that have reported in colon and triple-negative breast cancer did not meet their primary end points. Since VEGF is a relevant target in melanoma, AVAST-M aimed to evaluate the role of Bev in patients (pts) with resected melanoma at high risk of recurrence. METHODS AVAST-M is a randomized phase III trial evaluating single agent Bev (7.5mg/kg IV 3 weekly for 1 year) as adjuvant therapy following resection of AJCC stage IIB, IIC, and III cutaneous melanoma compared to standard observation (Obs). 1,320 pts were required to detect 8% differences in 5-year overall survival (OS) rate from 40% to 48%; 85% power, 5% alpha level. Primary endpoint is OS; secondary endpoints are disease free interval (DFI), distant-metastasis free interval (DMFI), safety, and quality of life (QoL). An associated translational study is ongoing. Results of the first pre-planned interim analysis (agreed by the IDSMC) are reported here. RESULTS Between July 2007 and March 2012, 1,343 pts were recruited. 56% were male; median age 56 years (range 18-88 years), 16% were stage IIB, 11% IIC, 15% IIIA, 36% IIIB, 20% IIIC, and 2% unknown stage. Ulceration status of the primary melanoma was: 38% present, 45% absent, 17% unknown. At the time of the interim analysis, 286 (21%) patients had died. Median follow-up for survival was 25 months. Median duration of Bev treatment in 671 treated pts was 51 weeks (dose intensity 86%). Main outcomes are shown in the table. Grade 3/4 adverse events were experienced in 101 (15%) Bev pts and 36 (5%) Obs pts. CONCLUSIONS Interim analysis of this large, multicenter trial of melanoma patients at high risk of recurrence has shown that adjuvant Bev monotherapy is well tolerated and improved DFI. Longer follow-up is required to determine an impact on the primary endpoint of 5-year OS. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION 81261306. [Table: see text].

Adjuvant Treatment Strategies for Early Colon Cancer

Colon cancer remains a major cause of death; however, in the last 3 years a number of trials have been published that have led to changes in the treatment of patients with this disease. Initially, the adjuvant treatment of patients following curative resection was based on their Dukes staging; this is now being refined by consideration of other pathological factors, as well as the investigation of newer prognostic markers such as p53, Ki67 and a number of genes on chromosome 18. Tumours generally develop from the progressive accumulation of genetic events, although some develop through mutation or inactivation of DNA mismatch repair proteins leading to microsatellite instability; this is particularly important in Lynch’s syndrome. The loss of gene expression can occur by deletion or mutation of genes or by aberrant methylation of CpG islands.In patients with Dukes C colon cancer the standard of care for adjuvant chemotherapy was previously based on bolus fluorouracil (5-fluorouracil) and folinic acid (leucovorin) administered 5 days per month or weekly for 6 months. Recent studies with a combination of infusional fluorouracil, folinic acid and oxaliplatin have been found to be superior. A further study replacing fluorouracil with oral capecitabine has also demonstrated equivalent disease-free survival. Although some debate remains regarding the benefit of adjuvant treatment for patients with Dukes B colon cancer, the emerging consensus is that, for those patients who are younger and have high-risk features, chemotherapy should be discussed. A number of large vaccine trials have also been conducted in the adjuvant setting and, overall, these have been disappointing.This is a rapidly advancing area of therapy and the results of new trials are awaited to determine whether additional benefits can be achieved with biological therapies such as anti-vascular endothelial growth factor and anti-epithelial growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies, which have already been shown to be effective in setting of metastatic colon cancer.

Blinded by the light: why the treatment of metastatic melanoma has created a new paradigm for the management of cancer.

Until recently, treatment for metastatic melanoma was characterised by a limited availability of treatment options that offer objective survival benefit. Cytotoxic agents fundamentally lack the ability to achieve disease control and cytokine therapy with interleukin-2 has an unacceptably high – for the use across all patient cohorts – rate of toxicities. The validation of braf as an oncogene driving melanoma tumorigenesis, as well as the discovery of the role of CTLA-4 receptor in the evasion of anticancer immune response by melanoma, has revolutionised our treatment options against a disease with dismal prognosis. Quick implementation of translational discoveries brought about BRAF/MEK inhibition in clinic, while at the same time, wider experience with CTLA-4 blockade enabled clinicians to manage previously fatal immune-related toxicities with greater confidence. The suitability for clinical use of other oncogenic drivers such as NRAS and c-kit is currently being tested whilst the PD-1/PD-L1/PD-L2 axis has emerged as a new immunotherapy target with exciting early phase results. The recent exponential progress in treatment of melanoma has set an example of translational medicine and the current review aims to explain why, as well as suggesting new goals for the future.

3 versus 6 months of adjuvant oxaliplatin-fluoropyrimidine combination therapy for colorectal cancer (SCOT): an international, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.

Summary Background 6 months of oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy is usually given as adjuvant treatment for stage 3 colorectal cancer. We investigated whether 3 months of oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy would be non-inferior to the usual 6 months of treatment. Methods The SCOT study was an international, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial done at 244 centres. Patients aged 18 years or older with high-risk stage II and stage III colorectal cancer underwent central randomisation with minimisation for centre, choice of regimen, sex, disease site, N stage, T stage, and the starting dose of capecitabine. Patients were assigned (1:1) to receive 3 months or 6 months of adjuvant oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy. The chemotherapy regimens could consist of CAPOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) or FOLFOX (bolus and infused fluorouracil with oxaliplatin). The regimen was selected before randomisation in accordance with choices of the patient and treating physician. The primary study endpoint was disease-free survival and the non-inferiority margin was a hazard ratio of 1·13. The primary analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population and safety was assessed in patients who started study treatment. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN59757862, and follow-up is continuing. Findings 6088 patients underwent randomisation between March 27, 2008, and Nov 29, 2013. The intended treatment was FOLFOX in 1981 patients and CAPOX in 4107 patients. 3044 patients were assigned to 3 month group and 3044 were assigned to 6 month group. Nine patients in the 3 month group and 14 patients in the 6 month group did not consent for their data to be used, leaving 3035 patients in the 3 month group and 3030 patients in the 6 month group for the intention-to-treat analyses. At the cutoff date for analysis, there had been 1482 disease-free survival events, with 740 in the 3 month group and 742 in the 6 month group. 3 year disease-free survival was 76·7% (95% CI 75·1–78·2) for the 3 month group and 77·1% (75·6–78·6) for the 6 month group, giving a hazard ratio of 1·006 (0·909–1·114, test for non-inferiority p=0·012), significantly below the non-inferiority margin. Peripheral neuropathy of grade 2 or worse was more common in the 6 month group (237 [58%] of 409 patients for the subset with safety data) than in the 3 month group (103 [25%] of 420) and was long-lasting and associated with worse quality of life. 1098 serious adverse events were reported (492 reports in the 3 month group and 606 reports in the 6 month group) and 32 treatment-related deaths occurred (16 in each group). Interpretation In the whole study population, 3 months of oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy was non-inferior to 6 months of the same therapy for patients with high-risk stage II and stage III colorectal cancer and was associated with reduced toxicity and improved quality of life. Despite the fact the study was underpowered, these data suggest that a shorter duration leads to similar survival outcomes with better quality of life and thus might represent a new standard of care. Funding Medical Research Council, Swedish Cancer Society, NETSCC, and Cancer Research UK.

Abstract LB-220: Translational research with RG7160 (GA201) leads to a phase II clinical study in combination with FOLFIRI in 2nd line metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

GA201 is a novel dual-acting humanized, engineered IgG1 anti-EGFR mAb designed to enhance ADCC in combination with signaling inhibition. Superior efficacy was demonstrated versus cetuximab in orthotopic CRC xenograft models. Preclinical data indicated an increase in macrophages (4-5 fold) and NK cells (2-3 fold) infiltration in tumors treated with GA201 compared to cetuximab. In a phase I clinical study objective responses and long lasting disease stabilizations were observed. A marked reduction in circulating NK cells and an increased infiltration of immune cells into skin rash was seen. Preliminary evidence of the enhanced ADCC capacity of GA201 was investigated in 25 third line patients with KRAS-mutant mCRC. Best overall response was SD in 40% of patients and median OS was 9.4 months. Reduction in peripheral NK cells and regulatory T-cells was observed. Comparison of pre- and post-treatment tumour biopsies revealed that tumour-infiltrating immune cells, in particular CD68+ and CD3+ cells increased overall. EGFR-membrane staining in baseline tumour biopsies was markedly higher than in the corresponding archival tumour specimens (median H-score 52 vs 3, respectively), which might reflect technical, but most importantly, biological variability. Based on these results and the commitment to investigate the tumor immune infiltration profile as a potential predictive biomarker, a fresh tumor biopsy at baseline was mandated in the ongoing randomized phase II trial (GAIN-C). This compares GA201 plus irinotecan, infusional fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) with FOLFIRI alone in KRAS-mutant 2nd line mCRC patients and with cetuximab plus FOLFIRI in KRAS-wild type patients (n=160). Primary objective is PFS. The fresh tumor biopsy will be centrally analyzed for EGFR and KRAS. A comprehensive biomarker program was implemented to investigate potential predictive biomarkers, with an emphasis on the real time tumor immune-infiltration status. The safety run-in phase with 36 patients was completed. Most common treatment related AEs on GA201 arms vs cetuximab vs. chemotherapy included (≥ grade 3): rash (33 vs. 17 vs. 0%), IRR (10 vs. 0 vs. 0%), diarrhea (17 vs. 0 vs. 11%), fatigue/asthenia (0 vs. 17 vs. 0%), hypomagnesaemia (17 vs. 0 vs. 0%), stomatitis (17 vs. 0 vs. 0%) and vomiting/nausea (6 vs. 0 vs. 0%). So far, no patient discontinued due to EGFR-related skin toxicity. Immunological profiling is ongoing. Extensive research efforts, including a fresh tumor biopsy in second line mCRC patients, are taken to understand the immunological mechanism of action of GA201 and to select and test (ph. II) and validate (ph. III) potential predictive biomarkers. To guide personalized cancer immunotherapies there is a clear need for reliable biomarkers which would necessitate a tumor assessment directly prior to the therapy and immune monitoring throughout treatment. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-220. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-LB-220