Janet A. Dunn

Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND The role of adjuvant treatment in pancreatic cancer remains uncertain. The European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer (ESPAC) assessed the roles of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in a randomised study. METHODS After resection, patients were randomly assigned to adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (20 Gy in ten daily fractions over 2 weeks with 500 mg/m(2) fluorouracil intravenously on days 1-3, repeated after 2 weeks) or chemotherapy (intravenous fluorouracil 425 mg/m(2) and folinic acid 20 mg/m(2) daily for 5 days, monthly for 6 months). Clinicians could randomise patients into a two-by-two factorial design (observation, chemoradiotherapy alone, chemotherapy alone, or both) or into one of the main treatment comparisons (chemoradiotherapy versus no chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy). The primary endpoint was death, and all analyses were by intention to treat. Findings 541 eligible patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were randomised: 285 in the two-by-two factorial design (70 chemoradiotherapy, 74 chemotherapy, 72 both, 69 observation); a further 68 patients were randomly assigned chemoradiotherapy or no chemoradiotherapy and 188 chemotherapy or no chemotherapy. Median follow-up of the 227 (42%) patients still alive was 10 months (range 0-62). Overall results showed no benefit for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (median survival 15.5 months in 175 patients with chemoradiotherapy vs 16.1 months in 178 patients without; hazard ratio 1.18 [95% CI 0.90-1.55], p=0.24). There was evidence of a survival benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy (median survival 19.7 months in 238 patients with chemotherapy vs 14.0 months in 235 patients without; hazard ratio 0.66 [0.52-0.83], p=0.0005). Interpretation This study showed no survival benefit for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy but revealed a potential benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy, justifying further randomised controlled trials of adjuvant chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer.

Phase III Randomized Comparison of Gemcitabine Versus Gemcitabine Plus Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

PURPOSE Both gemcitabine (GEM) and fluoropyrimidines are valuable treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer. This open-label study was designed to compare the overall survival (OS) of patients randomly assigned to GEM alone or GEM plus capecitabine (GEM-CAP). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with previously untreated histologically or cytologically proven locally advanced or metastatic carcinoma of the pancreas with a performance status <or= 2 were recruited. Patients were randomly assigned to GEM or GEM-CAP. The primary outcome measure was survival. Meta-analysis of published studies was also conducted. RESULTS Between May 2002 and January 2005, 533 patients were randomly assigned to GEM (n = 266) and GEM-CAP (n = 267) arms. GEM-CAP significantly improved objective response rate (19.1% v 12.4%; P = .034) and progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.93; P = .004) and was associated with a trend toward improved OS (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.02; P = .08) compared with GEM alone. This trend for OS benefit for GEM-CAP was consistent across different prognostic subgroups according to baseline stratification factors (stage and performance status) and remained after adjusting for these stratification factors (P = .077). Moreover, the meta-analysis of two additional studies involving 935 patients showed a significant survival benefit in favor of GEM-CAP (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.98; P = .02) with no intertrial heterogeneity. CONCLUSION On the basis of our trial and the meta-analysis, GEM-CAP should be considered as one of the standard first-line options in locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Influence of resection margins on survival for patients with pancreatic cancer treated by adjuvant chemoradiation and/or chemotherapy in the ESPAC-1 randomized controlled trial

ObjectiveTo assess the influence of resection margins on survival for patients with resected pancreatic cancer treated within the context of the adjuvant European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer-1 (ESPAC-1) study. Summary Background DataPancreatic cancer is associated with a poor long-term survival rate of only 10% to 15% after resection. Patients with positive microscopic resection margins (R1) have a worse survival, but it is not known how they fare in adjuvant studies. MethodsESPAC-1, the largest randomized adjuvant study of resectable pancreatic cancer ever performed, set out to look at the roles of chemoradiation and chemotherapy. Randomization was stratified prospectively by resection margin status. ResultsOf 541 patients with a median follow-up of 10 months, 101 (19%) had R1 resections. Resection margin status was confirmed as an influential prognostic factor, with a median survival of 10.9 months for R1 versus 16.9 months months for patients with R0 margins. Resection margin status remained an independent factor in a Cox proportional hazards model only in the absence of tumor grade and nodal status. There was a survival benefit for chemotherapy but not chemoradiation, irrespective of R0/R1 status. The median survival was 19.7 months with chemotherapy versus 14.0 months without. For patients with R0 margins, chemotherapy produced longer survival compared with to no chemotherapy. This difference was less apparent for the smaller subgroup of R1 patients, but there was no significant heterogeneity between the R0 and R1 groups. ConclusionsResection margin-positive pancreatic tumors represent a biologically more aggressive cancer; these patients benefit from resection and adjuvant chemotherapy but not chemoradiation. The magnitude of benefit for chemotherapy treatment is reduced for patients with R1 margins versus those with R0 margins. Patients with R1 tumors should be included in future trials of adjuvant treatments and randomization and analysis should be stratified by this significant prognostic factor.

Early Mortality After Diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma: Analysis of Patients Entered Onto the United Kingdom Medical Research Council Trials Between 1980 and 2002—Medical Research Council Adult Leukaemia Working Party

PURPOSE Early mortality in multiple myeloma (MM) is usually attributed to combined effects of active disease and comorbid factors. We have studied early deaths in a series of large multicenter trials to assess direct causes of death, their predictability, and whether current management strategies have reduced their frequency. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 3,107 newly diagnosed patients entered onto United Kingdom Medical Research Council MM trials from 1980 to 2002 were studied. Trial files, final clinical summaries, and postmortem reports were analyzed. RESULTS Death within 60 days of trial entry occurred in 299 patients (10%). Logistic regression modeling identified beta 2-microglobulin, performance status, and age as the most important predictors of early death, but only with 61% sensitivity and 73% specificity. Forty-five percent of deaths were attributable to infection, which was often associated with bone pain (particularly thoracic pain) and delay in presenting to medical care. Neutropenia was present at diagnosis in only 11 of the 135 deaths from infection. Renal failure was present in 28% of early deaths and was linked to light-chain MM, hypercalcemia, dehydration, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. There was no time related reduction in the percentage or nature of early deaths in 1,550 patients older than 65 years receiving similar therapy between 1982 and 2002. CONCLUSION A tenth of patients die within 60 days of diagnosis of MM. Infection and renal failure are the main direct causes of early mortality, which cannot be accurately predicted by presenting prognostic features. All patients should be considered at high risk of death during induction therapy.

The second British Stomach Cancer Group trial of adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy in resectable gastric cancer: five-year follow-up

The overall survival in patients with gastric cancer is low, even among those undergoing resection. It has been hoped that the development of adjuvant therapy might improve survival in patients following surgery when tumour burden was minimal and both chemotherapy and radiotherapy have been proposed as suitable for use in gastric cancer. Their value has been evaluated by the British Stomach Cancer Group Second adjuvant therapy trial. 436 patients entered a prospective, randomised, controlled trial of adjuvant radiotherapy or cytotoxic chemotherapy with mitomycin, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil after gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma. After at least 5 years, there have been 372 deaths of which 7 were due to surgical complications and 327 from recurrent cancer. Following stratified randomisation, 145 patients were allocated to surgery alone, 153 to receive adjuvant radiotherapy, and 138 to adjuvant combination chemotherapy. The overall 2-year and 5-year survival were 33% (95% confidence interval 31-35%) and 17% (13-21%). No survival advantage has been shown for those patients receiving either adjuvant therapy compared to those undergoing surgery alone. The 5-year survival for surgery alone was 20%, for surgery plus radiotherapy 12%, and for surgery plus chemotherapy 19%. Surgery, therefore, remains the standard treatment for this condition and the use of adjuvant treatments should be restricted to controlled trials.

Docetaxel versus active symptom control for refractory oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma (COUGAR-02): an open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND Second-line chemotherapy for patients with oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma refractory to platinum and fluoropyrimidines has not shown benefits in health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We assessed whether the addition of docetaxel to active symptom control alone can improve survival and HRQoL for patients. METHODS For this open-labelled, multicentre trial, we recruited patients aged 18 years or older from 30 UK centres. Patients were eligible if they had an advanced, histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus, oesophagogastric junction, or stomach that had progressed on or within 6 months of treatment with a platinum-fluoropyrimidine combination. Patients could have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. We randomly assigned patients using a central, computerised minimisation procedure to receive docetaxel plus active symptom control, or active symptom control alone (1:1; stratified by disease status, disease site, duration of response to previous chemotherapy, and performance status). Docetaxel was given at a dose of 75 mg/m(2) by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival, analysed by intention to treat. This is the report of the planned final analysis. This study is an International Standardised Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN13366390. FINDINGS Between April 21, 2008, and April 26, 2012, we recruited 168 patients, allocating 84 to each treatment group. After a median follow-up of 12 months [IQR 10-21]) and 161 (96%) deaths (80 in the docetaxel group, 81 in the active symptom control group), median overall survival in the docetaxel group was 5.2 months (95% CI 4.1-5.9) versus 3.6 months (3.3-4.4) in the active symptom control group (hazard ratio 0.67, 95% CI 0.49-0.92; p=0.01). Docetaxel was associated with higher incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia (12 [15%] patients vs no patients), infection (15 [19%] patients vs two [3%] patients), and febrile neutropenia (six [7%] patients vs no patients). Patients receiving docetaxel reported less pain (p=0.0008) and less nausea and vomiting (p=0.02) and constipation (p=0.02). Global HRQoL was similar between the groups (p=0.53). Disease specific HRQoL measures also showed benefits for docetaxel in reducing dysphagia (p=0.02) and abdominal pain (p=0.01). INTERPRETATION Our findings suggest that docetaxel can be recommended as an appropriate second-line treatment for patients with oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma that is refractory to treatment with platinum and fluoropyrimidine. FUNDING Cancer Research UK.

Association between CD8+ T-cell infiltration and breast cancer survival in 12 439 patients

BACKGROUND T-cell infiltration in estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast tumours has been associated with longer survival. To investigate this association and the potential of tumour T-cell infiltration as a prognostic and predictive marker, we have conducted the largest study of T cells in breast cancer to date. PATIENTS AND METHODS Four studies totalling 12 439 patients were used for this work. Cytotoxic (CD8+) and regulatory (forkhead box protein 3, FOXP3+) T cells were quantified using immunohistochemistry (IHC). IHC for CD8 was conducted using available material from all four studies (8978 samples) and for FOXP3 from three studies (5239 samples)-multiple imputation was used to resolve missing data from the remaining patients. Cox regression was used to test for associations with breast cancer-specific survival. RESULTS In ER-negative tumours [triple-negative breast cancer and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive)], presence of CD8+ T cells within the tumour was associated with a 28% [95% confidence interval (CI) 16% to 38%] reduction in the hazard of breast cancer-specific mortality, and CD8+ T cells within the stroma with a 21% (95% CI 7% to 33%) reduction in hazard. In ER-positive HER2-positive tumours, CD8+ T cells within the tumour were associated with a 27% (95% CI 4% to 44%) reduction in hazard. In ER-negative disease, there was evidence for greater benefit from anthracyclines in the National Epirubicin Adjuvant Trial in patients with CD8+ tumours [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.54; 95% CI 0.37-0.79] versus CD8-negative tumours (HR = 0.87; 95% CI 0.55-1.38). The difference in effect between these subgroups was significant when limited to cases with complete data (P heterogeneity = 0.04) and approached significance in imputed data (P heterogeneity = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS The presence of CD8+ T cells in breast cancer is associated with a significant reduction in the relative risk of death from disease in both the ER-negative [supplementary Figure S1, available at Annals of Oncology online] and the ER-positive HER2-positive subtypes. Tumour lymphocytic infiltration may improve risk stratification in breast cancer patients classified into these subtypes. NEAT ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00003577.

Long-term follow-up of a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial of clodronate in multiple myeloma

Oral clodronate (1600 mg/d) has been shown to significantly reduce the incidence of skeletal complications in multiple myeloma. Preliminary analysis of a double‐blind placebo‐controlled trial of this treatment indicated that clodronate might prolong survival in patients without vertebral fractures at presentation. This issue was re‐examined after further follow‐up of the patients recruited into the Medical Research Council (MRC) VIth Myeloma Study. The trial examined the effects of clodronate on the natural history of skeletal disease in multiple myeloma; 619 patients were randomized between June 1986 and May 1992 commencing 15 d after the start of ABCM [adriamycin, BCNU (carmustine), cyclophosphamide, melphalan] chemotherapy or 43 d after ABCMP (ABCM + prenisolone); 535 patients who received clodronate or placebo were included in the analysis. The presence or absence of spinal fractures was assessed centrally from spinal X‐rays; long‐bone fractures were assessed locally. With a median follow‐up of 8·6 years, there was no overall significant difference in survival between the two treatment groups (O/E, χ2 = 0·78, P = 0·38). Among the subgroup of 153 patients with no skeletal fractures at presentation there was a significant survival advantage (O/E, χ2 = 7·52, P = 0·006) in favour of the 73 patients receiving clodronate, with median survivals being, respectively, 59 months (95% CI 43–71 months) and 37 months (95% CI 31–52 months), and 5‐year survivals being 46% and 35%. The original analysis of this study shows that there is a benefit in taking 1600 mg clodronate daily for patients with myelomatosis to prevent the development of new skeletal disease. Bearing in mind the limitations of subgroup analysis, the present study indicates that treatment may prolong survival in patients without overt skeletal disease at diagnosis. These observations, however, require confirmation in prospective clinical trials.

Final results of the Royal College of Radiologists' trial comparing two different radiotherapy schedules in the treatment of cerebral metastases

Between February 1990 and February 1993, 25 centres in the UK recruited 544 patients into a prospective randomized trial comparing two whole-brain radiotherapy regimens (30 Gy in ten fractions over 2 weeks versus 12 Gy in two fractions on consecutive days) for the treatment of patients with symptomatic cerebral metastases. Of these patients 533 were eligible for analysis: 270 assigned to the two-fraction arm and 263 to the ten-fraction arm. The two groups were well balanced with respect to patient characteristics. Median survival was 77 days with two fractions (95% CI 68-89) and 84 days for the longer schedule (95% CI 67-102). Analysis of the survival curves showed a marginal advantage for ten fractions (P = 0.04). Performance status (P = 0.0001), site of primary tumour (P = 0.006), dose of dexamethasone (P = 0.004), age (P = 0.04) and randomization treatment (P = 0.03) were independant factors associated with survival. The classification of patients into good or poor risk groups based on these factors, excluding treatment, showed highly significant differences in survival (P < 0.0001). Predictive models suggested that any benefit attributable to the longer radiotherapy schedule was confined to those in a good prognostic group (these patients formed 22% of the study population). Radiation related side effects, other than alopecia, were seen in 12% of patients receiving two fractions and 8% of those given ten fractions. The short survival of many patients hampered the assessment of response, but overall responses were seen in 39% of those given two fractions and 44% of patients receiving ten fractions. These results suggest that any increase in survival due to longer radiotherapy treatment is confined to good prognosis patients, but, for the majority, there is no advantage and the value of radiotherapy for these patients relates purely to the possibility of control or relief of distressing symptoms.

Combined chemotherapy with ABCM versus melphalan for treatment of myelomatosis

Both melphalan and cyclophosphamide increase life expectancy in patients with myelomatosis, but few large randomised studies have compared combination chemotherapy regimens with these single agents. In the Vth MRC myelomatosis trial, the survival of 314 patients randomised to receive ABCM (adriamycin, BCNU, cyclophosphamide, and melphalan) as first-line treatment was significantly longer than that of 316 patients given intermittent melphalan (M7) (p = 0.0003). The 75%, median, and 25% survivals were 7, 24, and 42 months, respectively, with M7 and 10, 32, and 56 months, respectively, with ABCM. Stable disease with few symptoms (plateau) was achieved by 61% of patients given ABCM and 49% of those given M7 (p = 0.004). Myelotoxicity was comparable between regimens. Cross-trial analysis suggests that M7 is comparable to melphalan and prednisone or melphalan, prednisone, and vincristine; that the efficacy of ABCM in the Vth trial and VIth MRC trials is comparable; and that ABCM gave better survival than intermittent melphalan regimens in the prognostic groups analysed. The results indicate that ABCM is an acceptable regimen that is more effective than melphalan, with or without prednisone, for first-line treatment of myelomatosis.