Astrid A.M. van der Veldt

Rapid Decrease in Delivery of Chemotherapy to Tumors after Anti-VEGF Therapy: Implications for Scheduling of Anti-Angiogenic Drugs

Current strategies combining anti-angiogenic drugs with chemotherapy provide clinical benefit in cancer patients. It is assumed that anti-angiogenic drugs, such as bevacizumab, transiently normalize abnormal tumor vasculature and contribute to improved delivery of subsequent chemotherapy. To investigate this concept, a study was performed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients using positron emission tomography (PET) and radiolabeled docetaxel ([(11)C]docetaxel). In NSCLC, bevacizumab reduced both perfusion and net influx rate of [(11)C]docetaxel within 5 hr. These effects persisted after 4 days. The clinical relevance of these findings is notable, as there was no evidence for a substantial improvement in drug delivery to tumors. These findings highlight the importance of drug scheduling and advocate further studies to optimize scheduling of anti-angiogenic drugs.

Pharmacogenetic Pathway Analysis for Determination of Sunitinib-Induced Toxicity

PURPOSE To identify genetic markers in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic pathways of sunitinib that predispose for development of toxicities: thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, mucosal inflammation, hand-foot syndrome, and any toxicity according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria higher than grade 2. PATIENTS AND METHODS A multicenter pharmacogenetic association study was performed in 219 patients treated with single-agent sunitinib. A total of 31 single nucleotide polymorphisms in 12 candidate genes, together with several nongenetic variants, were analyzed for a possible association with toxicity. In addition, genetic haplotypes were developed and related to toxicity. RESULTS The risk for leukopenia was increased when the G allele in CYP1A1 2455A/G (odds ratio [OR], 6.24; P = .029) or the T allele in FLT3 738T/C (OR, 2.8; P = .008) were present or CAG in the NR1I3 (5719C/T, 7738A/C, 7837T/G) haplotype (OR, 1.74; P = .041) was absent. Any toxicity higher than grade 2 prevalence was increased when the T allele of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 1191C/T (OR, 2.39; P = .046) or a copy of TT in the ABCG2 (-15622C/T, 1143C/T) haplotype (OR, 2.63; P = .016) were present. The risk for mucosal inflammation was increased in the presence of the G allele in CYP1A1 2455A/G (OR, 4.03; P = .021) and the prevalence of hand-foot syndrome was increased when a copy of TTT in the ABCB1 (3435C/T, 1236C/T, 2677G/T) haplotype (OR, 2.56; P = .035) was present. CONCLUSION This exploratory study suggests that polymorphisms in specific genes encoding for metabolizing enzymes, efflux transporters, and drug targets are associated with sunitinib-related toxicities. A better understanding of genetic and nongenetic determinants of sunitinib toxicity should help to optimize drug treatment in individual patients.

Sunitinib for Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Cancer: Primary Tumor Response

Purpose: Nephrectomy before immunotherapy in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (RCC) will improve patient outcome. In addition, the primary tumor is known to be refractory to cytokines. Sunitinib is now approved for treatment of advanced RCC, but its effect on the primary tumor has yet to be reported. Experimental Design: All patients treated with sunitinib for advanced RCC without prior nephrectomy were reviewed and sequential computed tomography scans were evaluated for response in the primary tumor as well as metastases according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Volumes of primary tumors and central necrotic areas were measured with the perimeter method. Results: Computed tomography scans were available for evaluation of response in 17 of 22 patients with a primary tumor in situ (1 patient with two primaries). According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, 4 patients had a partial response, 12 had stable disease, and 1 had progressive disease. The one-dimensional longest diameter of the primary tumor correlated with the volumetric measurements both at baseline and at the time of evaluation of response. Excluding the patient with progressive disease, the median volume reduction was 31% associated with a median increase in the volume of necrosis of 39%. Three patients underwent nephrectomy and tumors showed extensive necrotic areas next to small fields of vital tumor cells. Conclusions: Sunitinib can induce a significant reduction in volume of primary renal cell tumors. Further trials need to address the role of nephrectomy in advanced RCC patients on sunitinib treatment.

Genetic Polymorphisms Associated with a Prolonged Progression-Free Survival in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer Treated with Sunitinib

Purpose: The objective of this study was to identify genetic polymorphisms related to the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sunitinib that are associated with a prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and/or overall survival (OS) in patients with clear-cell metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) treated with sunitinib. Experimental design: A retrospective multicenter pharmacogenetic association study was performed in 136 clear-cell mRCC patients treated with sunitinib. A total of 30 polymorphisms in 11 candidate genes, together with clinical characteristics were tested univariately for association with PFS as primary and OS as secondary outcome. Candidate variables with P < 0.1 were analyzed in a multivariate Cox regression model. Results: Multivariate analysis showed that PFS was significantly improved when an A-allele was present in CYP3A5 6986A/G [hazard ratio (HR), 0.27; P = 0.032], a CAT copy was absent in the NR1I3 haplotype (5719C/T, 7738A/C, 7837T/G; HR, 1.76; P = 0.017) and a TCG copy was present in the ABCB1 haplotype (3435C/T, 1236C/T, 2677G/T; HR, 0.52; P = 0.033). Carriers with a favorable genetic profile (n = 95) had an improved PFS and OS as compared with noncarriers (median PFS and OS: 13.1 versus 7.5 months and 19.9 versus 12.3 months). Next to the genetic variants, the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center prognostic criteria were associated with PFS and OS (HR, 1.99 and 2.27; P < 0.001). Conclusions: This exploratory study shows that genetic polymorphisms in three genes involved in sunitinib pharmacokinetics are associated with PFS in mRCC patients treated with this drug. These findings advocate prospective validation and further elucidation of these genetic determinants in relation to sunitinib exposure and efficacy. Clin Cancer Res; 17(3); 620–9. ©2010 AACR.

Sunitinib-Induced Myeloid Lineage Redistribution in Renal Cell Cancer Patients: CD1c+ Dendritic Cell Frequency Predicts Progression-Free Survival

Purpose: A disturbed myeloid lineage development with abnormally abundant neutrophils and impaired dendritic cell (DC) differentiation may contribute to tumor immune escape. We investigated the effect of sunitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of fms-like tyrosine kinase-3, KIT, and vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, on myeloid differentiation in renal cell cancer (RCC) patients. Experimental Design: Twenty-six advanced RCC patients were treated with sunitinib in a 4-week on/2-week off schedule. Enumeration and extensive phenotyping of myeloid subsets in the blood was done at baseline and at weeks 4 and 6 of the first treatment cycle. Baseline patient data were compared with sex- and age-matched healthy donor data. Results: Baseline frequencies of DC subsets were lower in RCC patients than in healthy donors. After 4 weeks of sunitinib treatment, a generalized decrease in myeloid frequencies was observed. Whereas neutrophils and monocytes, which were both abnormally high at baseline, remained low during the 2-week off period, DC rates recovered, resulting in a normalized myeloid lineage distribution. Subsequent to sunitinib treatment, an increase to high levels of myeloid DC (MDC) subset frequencies relative to other myeloid subsets, was specifically observed in patients experiencing tumor regression. Moreover, high CD1c/BDCA-1+ MDC frequencies were predictive for tumor regression and improved progression-free survival. Conclusion: The sunitinib-induced myeloid lineage redistribution observed in advanced RCC patients is consistent with an improved immune status. Immunologic recovery may contribute to clinical efficacy as suggested by the finding of highly increased MDC frequencies relative to other myeloid subsets in patients with tumor regression.

Development of [11C]erlotinib Positron Emission Tomography for In Vivo Evaluation of EGF Receptor Mutational Status

Purpose: To evaluate whether, in patients with non–small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), tumor uptake of [11C]erlotinib can be quantified and imaged using positron emission tomography and to assess whether the level of tracer uptake corresponds with the presence of activating tumor EGF receptor (EGFR) mutations. Experimental Design: Ten patients with NSCLCs, five with an EGFR exon 19 deletion, and five without were scanned twice (test retest) on the same day with an interval of at least 4 hours. Each scanning procedure included a low-dose computed tomographic scan, a 10-minute dynamic [15O]H2O scan, and a 1-hour dynamic [11C]erlotinib scan. Data were analyzed using full tracer kinetic modeling. EGFR expression was evaluated using immunohistochemistry. Results: The quantitative measure of [11C]erlotinib uptake, that is, volume of distribution (VT), was significantly higher in tumors with activating mutations, that is, all with exon 19 deletions (median VT, 1.76; range, 1.25–2.93), than in those without activating mutations (median VT, 1.06; range, 0.67–1.22) for both test and retest data (P = 0.014 and P = 0.009, respectively). Good reproducibility of [11C]erlotinib VT was seen (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.88). Intergroup differences in [11C]erlotinib uptake were not correlated with EGFR expression levels, nor tumor blood flow. Conclusion: [11C]erlotinib VT was significantly higher in NSCLCs tumors with EGFR exon 19 deletions. Clin Cancer Res; 19(1); 183–93. ©2012 AACR.

Reduction in skin microvascular density and changes in vessel morphology in patients treated with sunitinib.

Hypertension is a common side effect in cancer patients treated with inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 signaling and may represent a marker of clinical benefit. Functional rarefaction (a decrease in perfused microvessels) or structural rarefaction (a reduction in anatomic capillary density) may play an important role in the development of hypertension. We investigated whether sunitinib caused impairment of microvascular function and/or reduction of capillary density in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC). Sixteen mRCC patients were treated with sunitinib (50 mg/day). Assessments of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure, microvascular endothelial function by laser Doppler fluxmetry, and capillary density by capillary microscopy were performed at baseline and days 14 and 28. Median blood pressure had increased on day 14 (systolic 10 mmHg, P<0.01 and diastolic blood pressure 8 mmHg, P<0.01). Capillary density had decreased from 69 to 61 capillaries/mm2 (P<0.01). This decrease was related to the increase in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (r=−0.57, P<0.05 and r=−0.68, P<0.01, respectively). A more pronounced decrease in capillary density was associated with increased visibility of the subpapillary plexus (P=0.041). Preliminary findings indicated that median progression-free survival was significantly prolonged in patients with a greater than 6 capillaries/mm2 decrease in density as compared with patients with a less pronounced decrease (P=0.044). In conclusion, reduction in skin capillary density is associated with a rise in blood pressure during sunitinib therapy and, by itself, might be useful as a predictive marker of clinical outcome.

Targeted therapies in renal cell cancer: recent developments in imaging

Targeted therapy has significantly improved the perspectives of patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC). Frequently, these new molecules cause disease stabilization rather than substantial tumor regression. As treatment options expand with the growing number of targeted agents, there is an increasing need for surrogate markers to early assess tumor response. Here, we review the currently available imaging techniques and response evaluation criteria for the assessment of tumor response in mRCC patients. For computed tomography (CT), different criteria are discussed including the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), the Choi criteria, the modified Choi criteria, and the size and attenuation CT (SACT) criteria. Functional imaging modalities are discussed, such as dynamic contrast-enhanced CT (DCE-CT), dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCE-US), and positron emission tomography (PET).

Progression of a caval vein thrombus in two patients with primary renal cell carcinoma on pretreatment with sunitinib

1Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 3Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands and 4Department of Radiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Quantitative Parametric Perfusion Images Using 15O-Labeled Water and a Clinical PET/CT Scanner: Test–Retest Variability in Lung Cancer

Quantification of tumor perfusion using radioactive water (H215O) and PET is a promising method for monitoring treatment with antiangiogenic agents. However, use of dynamic H215O scans together with a fully 3-dimensional clinical PET/CT scanner needs to be validated. The purpose of the present study was to assess validity and reproducibility of dynamic H215O PET/CT scans for measuring tumor perfusion and validate the quantitative accuracy of parametric perfusion images. Methods: Eleven patients with non–small cell lung cancer were included in this study. Patients underwent 2 dynamic H215O (370 MBq) PET scans on the same day. During the first scan, arterial blood was withdrawn continuously. Input functions were derived from blood sampler data and the ascending aorta as seen in the images themselves (image-derived input function [IDIF]). Parametric perfusion images were computed using a basis function implementation of the standard single-tissue-compartment model. Volumes of interest (VOIs) were delineated on low-dose CT (LD-CT) and parametric perfusion images. Results: VOIs could be accurately delineated on both LD-CT and parametric perfusion images. These parametric perfusion images had excellent image quality and quantitative accuracy when compared with perfusion values determined by nonlinear regression. Good correlation between perfusion values derived from the blood sampler input function and IDIF was found (Pearson correlation coefficient, r = 0.964; P < 0.001). Test–retest variability of tumor perfusion was 16% and 20% when delineated on LD-CT and parametric perfusion images, respectively. Conclusion: The use of ascending aorta IDIFs is an accurate alternative to arterial blood sampling for quantification of tumor perfusion. Image quality obtained with a clinical PET/CT scanner enables generation of accurate parametric perfusion images. VOIs delineated on LD-CT have the highest reproducibility, and changes of more than 16% in tumor perfusion are likely to represent treatment effects.