Astrid Gillich

Epigenetic reversion of post-implantation epiblast to pluripotent embryonic stem cells

The pluripotent state, which is first established in the primitive ectoderm cells of blastocysts, is lost progressively and irreversibly during subsequent development. For example, development of post-implantation epiblast cells from primitive ectoderm involves significant transcriptional and epigenetic changes, including DNA methylation and X chromosome inactivation, which create a robust epigenetic barrier and prevent their reversion to a primitive-ectoderm-like state. Epiblast cells are refractory to leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF)–STAT3 signalling, but they respond to activin/basic fibroblast growth factor to form self-renewing epiblast stem cells (EpiSCs), which exhibit essential properties of epiblast cells and that differ from embryonic stem (ES) cells derived from primitive ectoderm. Here we show reprogramming of advanced epiblast cells from embryonic day 5.5–7.5 mouse embryos with uniform expression of N-cadherin and inactive X chromosome to ES-cell-like cells (rESCs) in response to LIF–STAT3 signalling. Cultured epiblast cells overcome the epigenetic barrier progressively as they proceed with the erasure of key properties of epiblast cells, resulting in DNA demethylation, X reactivation and expression of E-cadherin. The accompanying changes in the transcriptome result in a loss of phenotypic and epigenetic memory of epiblast cells. Using this approach, we report reversion of established EpiSCs to rESCs. Moreover, unlike epiblast and EpiSCs, rESCs contribute to somatic tissues and germ cells in chimaeras. Further studies may reveal how signalling-induced epigenetic reprogramming may promote reacquisition of pluripotency.

Histone variant macroH2A confers resistance to nuclear reprogramming

How various layers of epigenetic repression restrict somatic cell nuclear reprogramming is poorly understood. The transfer of mammalian somatic cell nuclei into Xenopus oocytes induces transcriptional reprogramming of previously repressed genes. Here, we address the mechanisms that restrict reprogramming following nuclear transfer by assessing the stability of the inactive X chromosome (Xi) in different stages of inactivation. We find that the Xi of mouse post‐implantation‐derived epiblast stem cells (EpiSCs) can be reversed by nuclear transfer, while the Xi of differentiated or extraembryonic cells is irreversible by nuclear transfer to oocytes. After nuclear transfer, Xist RNA is lost from chromatin of the Xi. Most epigenetic marks such as DNA methylation and Polycomb‐deposited H3K27me3 do not explain the differences between reversible and irreversible Xi. Resistance to reprogramming is associated with incorporation of the histone variant macroH2A, which is retained on the Xi of differentiated cells, but absent from the Xi of EpiSCs. Our results uncover the decreased stability of the Xi in EpiSCs, and highlight the importance of combinatorial epigenetic repression involving macroH2A in restricting transcriptional reprogramming by oocytes.

Epiblast Stem Cell-Based System Reveals Reprogramming Synergy of Germline Factors

Summary Epigenetic reprogramming in early germ cells is critical toward the establishment of totipotency, but investigations of the germline events are intractable. An objective cell culture-based system could provide mechanistic insight on how the key determinants of primordial germ cells (PGCs), including Prdm14, induce reprogramming in germ cells to an epigenetic ground state. Here we show a Prdm14-Klf2 synergistic effect that can accelerate and enhance reversion of mouse epiblast stem cells (epiSCs) to a naive pluripotent state, including X reactivation and DNA demethylation. Notably, Prdm14 alone has little effect on epiSC reversion, but it enhances the competence for reprogramming and potentially PGC specification. Reprogramming of epiSCs by the combinatorial effect of Prdm14-Klf2 involves key epigenetic changes, which might have an analogous role in PGCs. Our study provides a paradigm toward a systematic analysis of how other key genes contribute to complex and dynamic events of reprogramming in the germline.

Combinatorial control of cell fate and reprogramming in the mammalian germline.

Development of mammalian primordial germ cells (PGCs) presents a unique example of a cell fate specification event that is intimately linked with epigenetic reprogramming. Cell fate commitment is governed by transcription factors which, together with epigenetic regulators, instruct lineage choice in response to signalling cues. Similarly, the reversal of epigenetic silencing is driven by the combinatorial action of transcriptional regulators, resulting in an increase in cellular plasticity. PGCs constitute a paradox, since their development as a unipotent specialised lineage is coupled with extensive reprogramming, which eventually leads to an increase in cellular potency. In this review we discuss the role of key factors in the specification of the germ cell lineage that are also important for the comprehensive erasure of epigenetic modifications, which provides the foundation for regeneration of totipotency. We further discuss current concepts of transcriptional and epigenetic control of cell fate decisions, with a particular focus on emerging principles of enhancer activity and their potential implications for the transcriptional control of PGC specification.

Epigenetic stability of repressed states involving the histone variant macroH2A revealed by nuclear transfer to Xenopus oocytes.

How various epigenetic mechanisms restrict chromatin plasticity to determine the stability of repressed genes is poorly understood. Nuclear transfer to Xenopus oocytes induces the transcriptional reactivation of previously silenced genes. Recent work suggests that it can be used to analyze the epigenetic stability of repressed states. The notion that the epigenetic state of genes is an important determinant of the efficiency of nuclear reprogramming is supported by the differential reprogramming of given genes from different starting epigenetic configurations. After nuclear transfer, transcription from the inactive X chromosome of post-implantation-derived epiblast stem cells is reactivated. However, the same chromosome is resistant to reactivation when embryonic fibroblasts are used. Here, we discuss different kinds of evidence that link the histone variant macroH2A to the increased stability of repressed states. We focus on developmentally regulated X chromosome inactivation and repression of autosomal pluripotency genes, where macroH2A may help maintain the long-term stability of the differentiated state of somatic cells.

The germ cell determinant Blimp1 is not required for derivation of pluripotent stem cells.

Summary Blimp1 (Prdm1), the key determinant of primordial germ cells (PGCs), plays a combinatorial role with Prdm14 during PGC specification from postimplantation epiblast cells. They together initiate epigenetic reprogramming in early germ cells toward an underlying pluripotent state, which is equivalent to embryonic stem cells (ESCs). Whereas Prdm14 alone can promote reprogramming and is important for the propagation of the pluripotent state, it is not known whether Blimp1 is similarly involved. By using a genetic approach, we demonstrate that Blimp1 is dispensable for the derivation and maintenance of ESCs and postimplantation epiblast stem cells (epiSCs). Notably, Blimp1 is also dispensable for reprogramming epiSCs to ESCs. Thus, although Blimp1 is obligatory for PGC specification, it is not required for the reversion of epiSCs to ESCs and for their maintenance thereafter. This study suggests that reprogramming, including that of somatic cells to ESCs, may not entail an obligatory route through a Blimp1-positive PGC-like state.

Switching stem cell state through programmed germ cell reprogramming

Depending on their origin, embryo-derived stem cells have distinct properties that largely correspond to their counterpart in vivo. Mouse epiblast stem cells derived from post-implantation embryos differ from embryonic stem cells derived from blastocysts in their transcriptional and epigenetic profile, their morphology and culture requirements. When maintained in appropriate conditions, the cells keep self-renewing and do not adopt a different state. Recent studies, however, show that it is possible to convert between stem cell states. Here we review recent advances to induce stem cell state changes and we consider the potential of germ cell-mediated reprogramming for the conversion. Since the properties of mouse epiblast stem cells are similar to human embryonic stem cells, we discuss the significance of stem cell conversion and germ cell-mediated reprogramming in humans.

Reversion of Mouse Postimplantation Epiblast Stem Cells to a Naïve Pluripotent State by Modulation of Signalling Pathways

Mouse postimplantation epiblast cultured in activin and basic fibroblast growth factor gives rise to continuously growing epiblast stem cells (EpiSCs) that share key properties with postimplantation epiblast, such as DNA methylation and an inactive X-chromosome. EpiSCs also show a distinct gene expression profile compared to embryonic stem cells (ESCs) derived from preimplantation blastocysts, and do not contribute efficiently to chimeras. EpiSCs can, however, revert to pluripotent ESC-like cells upon exposure to leukemia inhibitory factor-Stat3 signalling on feeder cells. Here we describe a protocol for the establishment of EpiSCs and their reversion to ESCs.