Ava C. Carter
Stanford University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ava C. Carter.
Nature | 2016
Luca Giorgetti; Bryan R. Lajoie; Ava C. Carter; Mikael Attia; Ye Zhan; Jin Xu; Chong Jian Chen; Noam Kaplan; Howard Y. Chang; Edith Heard; Job Dekker
X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) involves major reorganization of the X chromosome as it becomes silent and heterochromatic. During female mammalian development, XCI is triggered by upregulation of the non-coding Xist RNA from one of the two X chromosomes. Xist coats the chromosome in cis and induces silencing of almost all genes via its A-repeat region, although some genes (constitutive escapees) avoid silencing in most cell types, and others (facultative escapees) escape XCI only in specific contexts. A role for Xist in organizing the inactive X (Xi) chromosome has been proposed. Recent chromosome conformation capture approaches have revealed global loss of local structure on the Xi chromosome and formation of large mega-domains, separated by a region containing the DXZ4 macrosatellite. However, the molecular architecture of the Xi chromosome, in both the silent and expressed regions, remains unclear. Here we investigate the structure, chromatin accessibility and expression status of the mouse Xi chromosome in highly polymorphic clonal neural progenitors (NPCs) and embryonic stem cells. We demonstrate a crucial role for Xist and the DXZ4-containing boundary in shaping Xi chromosome structure using allele-specific genome-wide chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C) analysis, an assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with high throughput sequencing (ATAC–seq) and RNA sequencing. Deletion of the boundary disrupts mega-domain formation, and induction of Xist RNA initiates formation of the boundary and the loss of DNA accessibility. We also show that in NPCs, the Xi chromosome lacks active/inactive compartments and topologically associating domains (TADs), except around genes that escape XCI. Escapee gene clusters display TAD-like structures and retain DNA accessibility at promoter-proximal and CTCF-binding sites. Furthermore, altered patterns of facultative escape genes in different neural progenitor clones are associated with the presence of different TAD-like structures after XCI. These findings suggest a key role for transcription and CTCF in the formation of TADs in the context of the Xi chromosome in neural progenitors.
Nature Methods | 2017
M. Ryan Corces; Alexandro E. Trevino; Emily G. Hamilton; Peyton Greenside; Nicholas A Sinnott-Armstrong; Sam Vesuna; Ansuman T. Satpathy; Adam J Rubin; Kathleen S. Montine; Beijing Wu; Arwa Kathiria; Seung Woo Cho; Maxwell R. Mumbach; Ava C. Carter; Maya Kasowski; Lisa A. Orloff; Viviana I. Risca; Anshul Kundaje; Paul A. Khavari; Thomas J. Montine; William J. Greenleaf; Howard Y. Chang
We present Omni-ATAC, an improved ATAC-seq protocol for chromatin accessibility profiling that works across multiple applications with substantial improvement of signal-to-background ratio and information content. The Omni-ATAC protocol generates chromatin accessibility profiles from archival frozen tissue samples and 50-μm sections, revealing the activities of disease-associated DNA elements in distinct human brain structures. The Omni-ATAC protocol enables the interrogation of personal regulomes in tissue context and translational studies.
Nature Methods | 2016
Xingqi Chen; Will Draper; Jason D. Buenrostro; Ulrike Litzenburger; Seung Woo Cho; Ansuman T. Satpathy; Ava C. Carter; Rajarshi P Ghosh; Alexandra East-Seletsky; Jennifer A. Doudna; William J. Greenleaf; Jan Liphardt; Howard Y. Chang
Spatial organization of the genome plays a central role in gene expression, DNA replication, and repair. But current epigenomic approaches largely map DNA regulatory elements outside of the native context of the nucleus. Here we report assay of transposase-accessible chromatin with visualization (ATAC-see), a transposase-mediated imaging technology that employs direct imaging of the accessible genome in situ, cell sorting, and deep sequencing to reveal the identity of the imaged elements. ATAC-see revealed the cell-type-specific spatial organization of the accessible genome and the coordinated process of neutrophil chromatin extrusion, termed NETosis. Integration of ATAC-see with flow cytometry enables automated quantitation and prospective cell isolation as a function of chromatin accessibility, and it reveals a cell-cycle dependence of chromatin accessibility that is especially dynamic in G1 phase. The integration of imaging and epigenomics provides a general and scalable approach for deciphering the spatiotemporal architecture of gene control.
Nature Genetics | 2017
Jin Xu; Ava C. Carter; Anne-Valerie Gendrel; Mikael Attia; Joshua Loftus; William J. Greenleaf; Robert Tibshirani; Edith Heard; Howard Y. Chang
We developed an allele-specific assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with high-throughput sequencing (ATAC–seq) to genotype and profile active regulatory DNA across the genome. Using a mouse hybrid F1 system, we found that monoallelic DNA accessibility across autosomes was pervasive, developmentally programmed and composed of several patterns. Genetically determined accessibility was enriched at distal enhancers, but random monoallelically accessible (RAMA) elements were enriched at promoters and may act as gatekeepers of monoallelic mRNA expression. Allelic choice at RAMA elements was stable across cell generations and bookmarked through mitosis. RAMA elements in neural progenitor cells were biallelically accessible in embryonic stem cells but premarked with bivalent histone modifications; one allele was silenced during differentiation. Quantitative analysis indicated that allelic choice at the majority of RAMA elements is consistent with a stochastic process; however, up to 30% of RAMA elements may deviate from the expected pattern, suggesting a regulated or counting mechanism.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B | 2017
Zhipeng Lu; Ava C. Carter; Howard Y. Chang
X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) is a critical epigenetic mechanism for balancing gene dosage between XY males and XX females in eutherian mammals. A long non-coding RNA (lncRNA), XIST, and its associated proteins orchestrate this multi-step process, resulting in the inheritable silencing of one of the two X-chromosomes in females. The XIST RNA is large and complex, exemplifying the unique challenges associated with the structural and functional analysis of lncRNAs. Recent technological advances in the analysis of macromolecular structure and interactions have enabled us to systematically dissect the XIST ribonucleoprotein complex, which is larger than the ribosome, and its place of action, the inactive X-chromosome. These studies shed light on key mechanisms of XCI, such as XIST coating of the X-chromosome, recruitment of DNA, RNA and histone modification enzymes, and compaction and compartmentalization of the inactive X. Here, we summarize recent studies on XCI, highlight the critical contributions of new technologies and propose a unifying model for XIST function in XCI where modular domains serve as the structural and functional units in both lncRNA–protein complexes and DNA–protein complexes in chromatin. This article is part of the themed issue ‘X-chromosome inactivation: a tribute to Mary Lyon’.
eLife | 2017
Jin Xu; Xinxin Peng; Yuxin Chen; Yuezheng Zhang; Qing Ma; Liang Liang; Ava C. Carter; Xuemie Lu; Chung-I Wu
Cells of multi-cellular organisms evolve toward uni-cellularity in the form of cancer and, if humans intervene, continue to evolve in cell culture. During this process, gene dosage relationships may evolve in novel ways to cope with the new environment and may regress back to the ancestral uni-cellular state. In this context, the evolution of sex chromosomes vis-a-vis autosomes is of particular interest. Here, we report the chromosomal evolution in ~ 600 cancer cell lines. Many of them jettisoned either Y or the inactive X; thus, free-living male and female cells converge by becoming ‘de-sexualized’. Surprisingly, the active X often doubled, accompanied by the addition of one haploid complement of autosomes, leading to an X:A ratio of 2:3 from the extant ratio of 1:2. Theoretical modeling of the frequency distribution of X:A karyotypes suggests that the 2:3 ratio confers a higher fitness and may reflect aspects of sex chromosome evolution.
Nature Genetics | 2017
Jin Xu; Ava C. Carter; Anne-Valerie Gendrel; Mikael Attia; Joshua Loftus; William J. Greenleaf; Robert Tibshirani; Edith Heard; Howard Y. Chang
Nat. Genet.; 10.1038/ng.3769; corrected online 13 February 2017 In the version of this article initially published online, there were two errors. In the section “Three classes of monoallelic elements” in the main text, “We classified all monoallelically accessible elements (1,966 elements)” should have read “1,964 elements.
Nature Biotechnology | 2017
Ava C. Carter; Howard Y. Chang; George M. Church; Ashley Dombkowski; Joseph R. Ecker; Elad Gil; Paul G. Giresi; Henry T. Greely; William J. Greenleaf; Nir Hacohen; Chuan He; David E. Hill; Justin M. Ko; Isaac S. Kohane; Anshul Kundaje; Megan Palmer; Michael Snyder; Joyce Tung; Alexander E. Urban; Marc Vidal; Wing Hung Wong
VOLUME 35 NUMBER 12 DECEMBER 2017 NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY 13. Di Tommaso, P. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 316–319 (2017). 14. Ioannidis, J.P.A. et al. PLoS Med. 2, 0696–0701 (2005). 15. Micheel, C.M. et al. Evolution of Translational Omics; Lessons Learned and the Path Forward. (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2012). 16. Ioannidis, J.P.A. et al. Nat. Genet. 41, 149–155 (2009). 17. Wilkinson, M.D. et al. Sci. Data. 3, 160018 (2016). http://www.nature.com/news/ reproducibility-1.17552; https:// f1000research.com/gateways/PRR). The newly launched International MAQC Society will strive to work with various scientific communities to develop consensus on best practices for enhanced reproducibility in generation, analysis, and interpretation of massive data from increasingly innovative biomedical fields. More information about the MAQC Society can be found at http://www.maqcsociety.org.
Cell Stem Cell | 2014
Pedro J. Batista; Benoit Molinie; Jinkai Wang; Kun Qu; Jiajing Zhang; Lingjie Li; Donna M. Bouley; Ernesto Lujan; Bahareh Haddad; Kaveh Daneshvar; Ava C. Carter; Ryan A. Flynn; Chan Zhou; Kok-Seong Lim; Peter C. Dedon; Marius Wernig; Alan C. Mullen; Yi Xing; Cosmas Giallourakis; Howard Y. Chang
Cell | 2018
Seung Woo Cho; Jin Xu; Ruping Sun; Maxwell R. Mumbach; Ava C. Carter; Y. Grace Chen; Kathryn E. Yost; Jeewon Kim; Jing He; Stephanie Nevins; Suet-Feung Chin; Carlos Caldas; S. John Liu; Max A. Horlbeck; Daniel A. Lim; Jonathan S. Weissman; Christina Curtis; Howard Y. Chang