Aya Fukuda

FACT relieves DSIF/NELF-mediated inhibition of transcriptional elongation and reveals functional differences between P-TEFb and TFIIH

We report that the chromatin-specific transcription elongation factor FACT functions in conjunction with the RNA polymerase II CTD kinase P-TEFb to alleviate transcription inhibition by DSIF (DRB sensitivity-inducing factor) and NELF (negative elongation factor). We find that the kinase activity of TFIIH is dispensable for this activity, demonstrating that TFIIH-mediated CTD phosphorylation is not involved in the regulation of FACT and DSIF/NELF activities. Thus, we propose a novel transcriptional regulatory network in which DSIF/NELF inhibition of transcription is prevented by P-TEFb in cooperation with FACT. This study uncovers a novel role for FACT in the regulation of transcription on naked DNA that is independent of its activities on chromatin templates. In addition, this study reveals functional differences between P-TEFb and TFIIH in the regulation of transcription.

Transcriptional Coactivator PC4 Stimulates Promoter Escape and Facilitates Transcriptional Synergy by GAL4-VP16

ABSTRACT Positive cofactor 4 (PC4) is a coactivator that strongly augments transcription by various activators, presumably by facilitating the assembly of the preinitiation complex (PIC). However, our previous observation of stimulation of promoter escape in GAL4-VP16-dependent transcription in the presence of PC4 suggested a possible role for PC4 in this step. Here, we performed quantitative analyses of the stimulatory effects of PC4 on initiation, promoter escape, and elongation in GAL4-VP16-dependent transcription and found that PC4 possesses the ability to stimulate promoter escape in response to GAL4-VP16 in addition to its previously demonstrated effect on PIC assembly. This stimulatory effect of PC4 on promoter escape required TFIIA and the TATA box binding protein-associated factor subunits of TFIID. Furthermore, PC4 displayed physical interactions with both TFIIH and GAL4-VP16 through its coactivator domain, and these interactions were regulated distinctly by PC4 phosphorylation. Finally, GAL4-VP16 and PC4 stimulated both initiation and promoter escape to similar extents on the promoters with three and five GAL4 sites; however, they stimulated promoter escape preferentially on the promoter with a single GAL4 site. These results provide insight into the mechanism by which PC4 permits multiply bound GAL4-VP16 to attain synergy to achieve robust transcriptional activation.

cAMP-response Element-binding Protein (CREB) Controls MSK1-mediated Phosphorylation of Histone H3 at the c-fos Promoter in Vitro

The rapid induction of the c-fos gene correlates with phosphorylations of histone H3 and HMGN1 by mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinases. We have used a cell-free system to dissect the mechanism by which MSK1 phosphorylates histone H3 within the c-fos chromatin. Here, we show that the reconstituted c-fos chromatin presents a strong barrier to histone H3 phosphorylation by MSK1; however, the activators (serum response factor, Elk-1, cAMP-response element-binding protein (CREB), and ATF1) bound on their cognate sites recruit MSK1 to phosphorylate histone H3 at Ser-10 within the chromatin. This activator-dependent phosphorylation of histone H3 is enhanced by HMGN1 and occurs preferentially near the promoter region. Among the four activators, CREB plays a predominant role in MSK1-mediated phosphorylation of histone H3, and the phosphorylation of Ser-133 in CREB is essential for this process. Mutational analyses of MSK1 show that its N-terminal inhibition domain is critical for the kinase to phosphorylate chromatin-embedded histone H3 in a CREB-dependent manner, indicating the presence of an intricate regulatory network for MSK1-mediated phosphorylation of histone H3.

Reconstitution of recombinant TFIIH that can mediate activator-dependent transcription

Background TFIIH is one of the general transcription factors required for accurate transcription of protein‐coding genes by RNA polymerase II. TFIIH has helicase and kinase activities, plays a role in promoter opening and promoter escape, and is also implicated in efficient activator‐dependent transcription.

The regulatory role for the ERCC3 helicase of general transcription factor TFIIH during promoter escape in transcriptional activation

Eukaryotic transcriptional activators have been proposed to function, for the most part, by promoting the assembly of preinitiation complex through the recruitment of the RNA polymerase II transcriptional machinery to the promoter. Previous studies have shown that transcriptional activation is critically dependent on transcription factor IIH (TFIIH), which functions during promoter opening and promoter escape, the steps following preinitiation complex assembly. Here we have analyzed the role of TFIIH in transcriptional activation and show that the excision repair cross-complementing (ERCC) 3 helicase activity of TFIIH plays a regulatory role to stimulate promoter escape in activated transcription. The stimulatory effect of the ERCC3 helicase is observed until ≈10-nt RNA is synthesized, and the helicase seems to act throughout the entire course of promoter escape. Analyses of the early phase of transcription show that a majority of the initiated complexes abort transcription and fail to escape the promoter; however, the proportion of productive complexes that escape the promoter apparently increases in response to activation. Our results establish that promoter escape is an important regulatory step stimulated by the ERCC3 helicase activity in response to activation and reveal a possible mechanism of transcriptional synergy.

Heterogeneous Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein R Enhances Transcription from the Naturally Configured c-fos Promoter in Vitro

Transcription of a proto-oncogene c-fos is induced rapidly to high levels by various extracellular stimuli. To explore the molecular mechanism of c-fos gene induction, we established a defined in vitro transcription system for the c-fos promoter that consists of purified activators (SRF, Elk-1, cAMP-responsive element-binding protein, and ATF1), general transcription factors, and RNA polymerase II. In this reconstituted transcription system, activation of c-fos transcription was highly dependent upon coactivators such as PC4 and Mediator, indicating a very weak activation potential of the activators in the context of an unaltered promoter structure. This heightened coactivator dependence, however, allowed us to identify from HeLa nuclear extract a coactivator-like activity termed transcriptional regulator of c-fos (TREF) that enhanced c-fos transcription but not GAL4-VP16-dependent transcription. TREF cooperated with Mediator to enhance c-fos transcription by ∼60-fold over its basal level and, like Mediator, stimulated activator-independent (basal) transcription as well. Further purification of TREF revealed that it consists of at least three distinct components, one of which was purified to near homogeneity and identified as heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein R. Recombinant heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein R enhanced transcription from the c-fos promoter and displayed cooperativity with PC4 and Mediator, thus demonstrating its direct transcriptional activity.

ABT1-associated protein (ABTAP), a novel nuclear protein conserved from yeast to mammals, represses transcriptional activation by ABT1.

Various TATA‐binding protein (TBP)‐associated proteins are involved in the regulation of gene expression through control of basal transcription directed by RNA polymerase (Pol) II. We recently identified a novel nuclear protein, activator of basal transcription 1 (ABT1), which binds TBP and DNA, and enhances Pol II‐directed basal transcription. To better understand regulatory mechanisms for ABT1, we searched for ABT1‐binding proteins using a yeast two‐hybrid screening and isolated a cDNA clone encoding a novel protein termed ABT1‐associated protein (ABTAP). ABTAP formed a complex with ABT1 and suppressed the ABT1‐induced activation of Pol II‐directed transcription in mammalian cells. Furthermore, ABTAP directly bound to ABT1, disrupted the interaction between ABT1 and TBP, and suppressed the ABT1‐induced activation of Pol II‐directed basal transcription in vitro. These two proteins colocalized in the nucleolus and nucleoplasm and were concomitantly relocalized into discrete nuclear bodies at higher expression of ABTAP. Taken together, these results suggest that ABTAP binds and negatively regulates ABT1. The ABT1/ABTAP complex is evolutionarily conserved and may constitute a novel regulatory system for basal transcription.