Azita Moayeri

Mild Hypothermia Alters Propofol Pharmacokinetics and Increases the Duration of Action of Atracurium

Mild intraoperative hypothermia is common.We therefore studied the effects of mild hypothermia on propofol pharmacokinetics, hepatic blood flow, and atracurium duration of action in healthy volunteers. Six young volunteers were studied on two randomly assigned days, at either 34 degrees C or 37 degrees C. Anesthesia was induced with thiopental, 3 mg/kg, and maintained with 70% N2 O and 0.6% isoflurane. Core hypothermia was induced by conductive and convective cooling. On the other study day, normothermia was maintained by a Bair Hugger Registered Trademark (Augustine Medical, Inc., Eden Prairie, MN) forced-air warmer. Propofol, 1 mg/kg lean body mass (LBM), then was given, followed by a 4-h infusion at 5 mg centered dot kg-1 centered dot h-1. After 2 h, atracurium 0.5 mg/kg was administered as an intravenous bolus. Indocyanine green was administered for estimation of hepatic blood flow. Arterial blood was assayed for propofol and indocyanine green concentration. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using NONMEM. Results are reported as means +/- SEM. Propofol blood concentrations averaged approximate equals 28% more at 34 degrees C than at 37 degrees C (P < 0.05). Hepatic blood flow decreased 23% +/- 11% in normothermic volunteers during the propofol infusion, and 33% +/- 11% in hypothermic volunteers (P = not significant). A three-compartment mamillary model fitted the data best. Inclusion of hepatic blood flow change from the prepropofol baseline as a covariate for total body clearance significantly improved the fit. The intercompartmental clearances were decreased in the presence of hypothermia. Core hypothermia prolonged the time to recovery of the first twitch in the train-of-four to 10% of its control value (T1 = 10%) after atracurium administration by approximate equals 60% (P < 0.05), from 44 +/- 4 min to 68 +/- 7 min. In contrast, T1 = 25%-75% remained unchanged. We conclude that 3 degrees C of core hypothermia increased propofol blood concentrations and prolonged atracurium duration of action. Hepatic blood flow was decreased during propofol administration, and this change was a significant predictor of propofol clearance, indicating that the effect of propofol on hepatic blood flow impairs the clearance of propofol itself. (Anesth Analg 1995;80:1007-14)

Physiologic Responses to Mild Perianesthetic Hypothermia in Humans

To evaluate physiologic responses to mild perianesthetic hypothermia, we measured tympanic membrane and skin-surface temperatures, peripheral vasoconstriction, thermal comfort, and muscular activity in nine healthy male volunteers. Each volunteer participated on three separate days: 1) normothermic isoflurane anesthesia; 2) hypothermic isoflurane anesthesia (1.5 degrees C decrease in central temperature); and 3) hypothermia alone (1.5 degrees C decrease in central temperature) induced by iced saline infusion. Involuntary postanesthetic muscular activity was considered thermoregulatory when preceded by central hypothermia and peripheral cutaneous vasoconstriction. Tremor was considered normal shivering when electromyographic patterns matched those produced by cold exposure in unanesthetized individuals. During postanesthetic recovery, central temperatures in hypothermic volunteers increased rapidly when residual end-tidal isoflurane concentrations were less than or equal to 0.3% but remained 0.5 degree C less than control values throughout 2 h of recovery. All volunteers were vasodilated during isoflurane administration. Peripheral vasoconstriction occurred only during recovery from hypothermic anesthesia, at end-tidal isoflurane concentrations of less than approximately 0.4%. Spontaneous tremor was always preceded by central hypothermia and peripheral vasoconstriction, indicating that muscular activity was thermoregulatory. Maximum tremor intensity during recovery from hypothermic anesthesia occurred when residual end-tidal isoflurane concentrations were less than or equal to 0.4%. Three patterns of postanesthetic muscular activity were identified. The first was a tonic stiffening that occurred in some normothermic and hypothermic volunteers when end-tidal isoflurane concentrations were approximately 0.4-0.2%. This activity appeared to be largely a direct, non-temperature-dependent effect of isoflurane anesthesia. In conjunction with lower residual anesthetic concentrations, stiffening was followed by a synchronous, tonic waxing-and-waning pattern and spontaneous electromyographic clonus, both of which were thermoregulatory. Tonic waxing-and-waning was by far the most common pattern and resembled that produced by cold-induced shivering in unanesthetized volunteers; it appears to be thermoregulatory shivering triggered by hypothermia. Spontaneous clonus resembled flexion-induced clonus and pathologic clonus and did not occur during hypothermia alone; it may represent abnormal shivering or an anesthetic-induced modification of normal shivering. We conclude that among the three patterns of muscular activity, only the synchronous, tonic waxing-and-waning pattern can be attributed to normal thermoregulatory shivering.

Skin-surface warming : heat flux and central temperature

The authors determined the efficacy of four postoperative warming devices by measuring cutaneous and tympanic membrane temperatures, and heat loss/gain using 11 thermocouples and ten thermal flux transducers in five healthy, unanesthetized volunteers. Overall thermal comfort was evaluated at 5–10-mi

The effects of preinduction warming on temperature and blood pressure during propofol/nitrous oxide anesthesia

Background:Core temperature decreases rapidly after induction of anesthesia, largely because heat is redistributed to peripheral tissues. The hypothesis that warming peripheral tissues before induction of general anesthesia (prewarming) minimizes hypothermia was tested. Because circulating blood volume may be greater during exposure to heat compared to cold, the hypothesis that prewarming decreases the amount of hypotension associated with induction of anesthesia was tested also. Finally, the hypothesis that the difference between direct radial arterial blood pressure and blood pressure measured oscillometrically at the brachial artery depends on thermoregulatory and anesthetic conditions was tested. Methods:Each of six volunteers underwent general anesthesia (propofol and nitrous oxide) twice on the same day. Each anesthetic lasted 1 h and was preceded by either 2 h of active warming with forced air or 2 h of passive cooling by exposure to a typical operating room environment. After induction of each anesthetic, volunteers were fully exposed to the ambient environment. Volunteers recovered for 2 h before starting the second preinduction treatment. Results:Initial tympanic membrane temperatures were similar before each preinduction treatment: 36.7 ± 0.4° C when volunteers were not warmed and 36.7 ± 0.6° C when volunteers were warmed. Tympanic membrane temperature did not change during the preinduction period without warming but increased slightly (ΔT = 0.4 ± 0.2° C) during warming. After induction of anesthesia, core temperatures decreased to 36.1 ± 0.4° C over 1 h when volunteers were prewarmed but decreased to 34.9 ± 0.4° C when they were not. Radial arterial systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressures were lower before induction of anesthesia when volunteers were warmed compared to when no warming was given. Oscillometric diastolic and mean pressures also were lower during prewarming; however, oscillometric systolic pressure did not differ significantly. Prewarming did not result in less hypotension after induction. Without warming, the difference (radial arterial minus oscillometric) in systolic blood pressure measurements was ≈17 mmHg. Warming was associated with a reversal of the systolic pressure difference to ≈−6 mmHg. After induction of anesthesia, the differences in systolic and mean pressure measurements became more negative with respect to the preinduction values regardless of preinduction warming treatment. Conclusions:These data confirm our hypothesis that redistribution hypothermia can be minimized by preinduction warming of peripheral tissues. Prewarming decreases blood pressure but does not prevent subsequent hypotension after induction. The difference between radial arterial blood pressure and oscillometric blood pressure depends on thermoregulatory vasomotor changes but also may be influenced by vasodilation associated with administration of propofol and nitrous oxide.

Thermoregulatory thresholds during epidural and spinal anesthesia.

BackgroundThere are significant physiologic differences between spinal and epidural anesthesia. Consequently, these two types of regional anesthesia may influence thermoregulatory processing differently. Accordingly, in volunteers and in patients, we tested the null hypothesis that the core-temperature thresholds triggering thermoregulatory sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering are similar during epidural and spinal anesthesia. MethodsSix male volunteers participated on three consecutive study days: epidural or spinal anesthesia were randomly assigned on the 1st and 3rd days (± T10 level); no anesthesia was given on the 2nd day. On each day, the volunteers were initially warmed until they started to sweat, and subsequently cooled by central venous infusion of cold fluid until they shivered. Mean skin temperature was kept constant near 36°C throughout each study. The tympanic membrane temperatures triggering a sweating rate of 40 g · m−2 · h−1, a finger flow less than 0.1 ml/min, and a marked and sustained increase in oxygen consumption (± 30%) were considered the thermoregulatory thresholds for sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering, respectively. Twenty-one patients were randomly assigned to receive epidural (n = 10) or spinal (n = 11) anesthesia for knee and calf surgery (± T10 level). As in the volunteers, the shivering threshold was defined as the tympanic membrane temperature triggering a sustained increase in oxygen consumption. ResultsThe thresholds and ranges were similar during epidural and spinal anesthesia in the volunteers. However, the sweating-to-vasoconstriction (interthreshold) range, the vasoconstriction-to-shivering range, and the sweating-to-shivering range all were significantly increased by regional anesthesia. The shivering thresholds in patients assigned to epidural and spinal anesthesia were virtually identical. ConclusionsComparable sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering thresholds during epidural and spinal anesthesia suggest that thermoregulatory processing is similar during each type of regional anesthesia. However, thermoregulatory control was impaired during regional anesthesia, as indicated by the significantly enlarged interthreshold and sweating-to-shivering ranges.

Isoflurane-induced Vasodilation Minimally Increases Cutaneous Heat Loss

Central body temperature, which usually is well controlled, typically decreases more than 1 degree C during the 1st h of general anesthesia. This hypothermia has been attributed partially to an anesthetic-induced peripheral vasodilation, which increases cutaneous heat loss to the environment. Based on the specific heat of humans, heat loss would have to increase more than 70 W for 1 h (in a 70-kg person) to explain hypothermia after induction of general anesthesia. However, during epidural anesthesia, sympathetic blockade increases heat loss only slightly. Furthermore, thermoregulatory vasoconstriction in unanesthetized humans decreases heat loss to the environment only 15 W. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that the hypothermia that follows induction of general anesthesia does not result from increased cutaneous heat loss. Heat loss and skin-surface and tympanic membrane temperatures, before and after induction of isoflurane anesthesia, were measured in five minimally clothed volunteers. Peripheral skin blood flow was evaluated with venous-occlusion volume plethysmography and skin-surface temperature gradients. Cutaneous heat losses in watts were summed from ten area-weighted thermal flux transducers. Tympanic membrane temperature, which was stable during the 30-min control period preceding induction, decreased 1.2 +/- 0.2 degrees C in the 50 min after induction. Isoflurane anesthesia decreased mean arterial blood pressure approximately 20%. Average skin-surface temperature increased over 15 min to 0.5 degree C above control. Heat loss from the trunk, head, arms, and legs decreased slightly, whereas loss from the hands and feet (10.5% of the body surface area) doubled (P less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Thermoregulatory vasoconstriction decreases cutaneous heat loss

To determine the extent to which thermoregulatory vasoconstriction decreases heat loss to the environment, we measured regional heat flux, average skin temperature, and tympanic membrane temperature before and after thermoregulatory vasoconstriction in five minimally clothed volunteers maintained in a 30.8 +/- 0.1 degrees C environment. Thermoregulatory vasoconstriction was induced by central venous infusion of cooled fluid. Peripheral cutaneous blood flow was evaluated with venous-occlusion volume plethysmography and skin-surface temperature gradients. Laser Doppler flowmetry was used to measure vasoconstriction in centrally located skin. This model mimics the common clinical situation in which patients in a warm environment are centrally cooled by administration of cold intravenous fluids or by lavage of internal cavities with cold fluids. Tympanic membrane temperature decreased 1.5 +/- 0.3 degrees C in the first 15 min after the cold fluid infusion was started and remained approximately 1 degrees C below control values during the rest of the study. Average skin-surface temperature decreased slowly to approximately 0.7 degrees C below control. Flow in capillaries of centrally distributed skin, determined with laser Doppler flowmetry, decreased only approximately 40%. Total heat flux, and flux from the arms and legs decreased approximately 25% (15.5 +/- 0.3 W). Heat loss from the trunk and head decreased only 17%, whereas, loss from the hands and feet (10.5% of the body surface area) decreased approximately 50%. All measured values decreased significantly following vasoconstriction (P less than 0.01). Therefore, thermoregulatory vasoconstriction in a thermoneutral environment appears to decrease cutaneous loss of metabolic heat approximately 25%.

Centrally and locally mediated thermoregulatory responses alter subcutaneous oxygen tension

Mild perianesthetic hypothermia decreases resistance to infections. Decreased resistance likely results in part from direct immune inhibition. However, decreased tissue oxygen partial pressure also decreases resistance to infection by impairing oxidative killing by neutrophils and collagen deposition. Thermoregulatory vasoconstriction decreases skin blood flow and may also decrease subcutaneous tissue oxygen tension. Accordingly, we determined the influence of centrally and locally mediated thermoregulatory vasomotion on subcutaneous oxygen tension. We also compared subcutaneous oxygen tension to other potential markers of tissue perfusion: laser Doppler flowmetry and transcutaneous oxygen tension. Arterial oxygen tension was maintained near 325 mm Hg in five volunteers. Control subcutaneous oxygen tension values were recorded after 1 hour of euthermia (no sweating or vasoconstriction). Volunteers were then cooled with a circulating‐water mattress positioned under the trunk and legs. After 1.5 hours of cooling sufficient to produce shivering, the right upper arm was covered for 1 hour with a small circulating water blanket set to 40° C while systemic cooling continued. The volunteers were then systematically warmed to produce sweating, and the right arm was locally cooled. There was no correlation among laser Doppler flowmetry, transcutaneous oxygen tension, and subcutaneous oxygen tension. Systemic cooling significantly decreased subcutaneous oxygen tension, but subcutaneous oxygen tension in the right arm returned to control values during local heating. Systemic warming significantly increased subcutaneous oxygen tension, and 1 hour of local cooling failed to fully reverse the increase. These data indicate that thermoregulatory vasoconstriction significantly decreases tissue oxygen availability. Decreased subcutaneous oxygen tension may be one mechanism by which mild perianesthetic hypothermia facilitates development of surgical wound infections.

Leg Heat Content Continues to Decrease during the Core Temperature Plateau in Humans Anesthetized with Isoflurane

Background:Sufficient hypothermia during anesthesia provokes thermoregulatory responses, but the clinical significance of these responses remains unknown. Nonshivering thermogenesis does not increase metabolic heat production in anesthetized adults. Vasoconstriction reduces cutaneous heat loss, but the initial decrease appears insufficient to cause a thermal steady state (heat production equaling heat loss). Accordingly, the authors tested the hypotheses that: 1) thermoregulatory vasoconstriction prevents further core hypothermia; and 2) the resulting stable core temperature is not a thermal steady state, but, instead, is accompanied for several hours by a continued reduction in body heat content. Methods:Six healthy volunteers were anesthetized with isoflurane (0.8%) and paralyzed with vecuronium. Core hypothermia was induced by fan cooling, and continued for 3 h after vasoconstriction in the legs was detected. Leg heat content was calculated from six needle thermocouples and skin temperature, by integrating the resulting parabolic regression over volume Results:Core temperature decreased 1.0 ± 0.2°C in the 1 h before vasoconstriction, but only 0.4 ± 0.3° C in the subsequent 3 h. This temperature decrease, evenly distributed throughout the body, would reduce leg heat content 10 kcal. However, measured leg heat content decreased 49 ± 18 kcal in the 3 h after vasoconstriction Conclusions:These data thus indicate that thermoregulatory vasoconstriction produces a clinically important reduction in the rate of core cooling. This core temperature plateau resulted, at least in part, from sequestration of metabolic heat to the core which allowed core temperature to remain nearly constant, despite a continually decreasing body heat content.

Epidural anesthesia impairs both central and peripheral thermoregulatory control during general anesthesia.

BackgroundThe authors tested the hypotheses that: (1) the vasoconstriction threshold during combined epidural/general anesthesia is less than that during general anesthesia alone; and (2) after vasoconstriction, core cooling rates during combined epidural/general anesthesia are greater than those during general anesthesia alone. Vasoconstriction thresholds and heat balance were evaluated under controlled circumstances in volunteers, whereas the clinical importance of intraoperative thermoregulatory vasoconstriction was evaluated in patients. MethodsFive volunteers were each evaluated twice. On one of the randomly ordered days, epidural anesthesia (&OV0312;T9 dermatomal level) was induced and maintained with 2-chloroprocaine. On both study days, general anesthesia was induced and maintained with isoflurane (0.7% end-tidal concentration), and core hypothermia was induced by surface cooling and continued for at least 1 h after fingertip vasoconstriction was observed. Patients undergoing colorectal surgery were randomly assigned to combined epidural/enflurane anesthesia (n = 13) or enflurane alone (n = 13). In appropriate patients, epidural anesthesia was maintained by an infusion of bupivacaine. The core temperature that triggered fingertip vasoconstriction identified the threshold. ResultsIn the volunteers, the vasoconstriction threshold was 36.0 ± 0.2° C during isoflurane anesthesia alone, but significantly less, 35.1 ± 0.7° C, during combined epidural/isoflurane anesthesia. Cutaneous heat loss and the rates of core cooling were similar 30 min before vasoconstriction with and without epidural anesthesia. In the 30 min after vasoconstriction, heat loss decreased 33 ± 13 W when the volunteers were given isoflurane alone, but only 8 ± 16 W during combined epidural/isoflurane anesthesia. Similarly, the core cooling rates in the 30 min after vasoconstriction were significantly greater during combined epidural/isoflurane anesthesia (0.8 ± 0.2° C/h) than during isoflurane alone (0.2 ± 0.1° C/h). In the patients, end-tidal enflurane concentrations were slightly, but significantly, less in the patients given combined epidural/enflurane anesthesia (0.6 ± 0.2% vs. 0.8 ± 0.2%). Nonetheless, the vasoconstriction threshold was 34.5 ± 0.6° C in the epidural/enflurane group, which was significantly less than that in the other patients, 35.6 ± 0.8° C. When the study ended after 3 h of anesthesia, patients given combined epidural/enflurane anesthesia were 1.2° C more hypothermic than those given general anesthesia alone. The rate of core cooling during the last hour of the study was 0.4 ± 0.2° C/h during combined epidural/enflurane anesthesia, but only 0.1 ± 0.3° C/h during enflurane alone. ConclusionsThese data indicate that epidural anesthesia reduces the vasoconstriction threshold during general anesthesia. Furthermore, the markedly reduced rate of core cooling during general anesthesia alone illustrates the importance of leg vasoconstriction in maintaining core temperature.