Benjamin Merrifield

Propofol Linearly Reduces the Vasoconstriction and Shivering Thresholds

BackgroundSkin temperature is best kept constant when determining response thresholds because both skin and core temperatures contribute to thermoregulatory control. In practice, however, it is difficult to evaluate both warm and cold thresholds while maintaining constant cutaneous temperature. A re

Increasing mean skin temperature linearly reduces the core-temperature thresholds for vasoconstriction and shivering in humans

Background The contribution of mean skin temperature to the thresholds for sweating and active precapillary vasodilation has been evaluated in numerous human studies. In contrast, the contribution of skin temperature to the control of cold responses such as arteriovenous shunt vasoconstriction and shivering is less well established. Accordingly, the authors tested the hypothesis that mean skin and core temperatures are linearly related at the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds in men. Because the relation between skin and core temperatures might vary by gender, the cutaneous contribution to thermoregulatory control also was determined in women. Methods In the first portion of the study, six men participated on 5 randomly ordered days, during which mean skin temperatures were maintained near 31, 34, 35, 36, and 37 degrees Celsius. Core hypothermia was induced by central venous infusion of cold lactated Ringers solution sufficient to induce peripheral vasoconstriction and shivering. The core‐temperature thresholds were then plotted against skin temperature and a linear regression fit to the values. The relative skin and core contributions to the control of each response were calculated from the slopes of the regression equations. In the second portion of the study, six women participated on three randomly ordered days, during which mean skin temperatures were maintained near 31, 35, and 37 degrees Celsius. At each designated skin temperature, core hypothermia sufficient to induce peripheral vasoconstriction and/or shivering was again induced by central venous infusion of cold lactated Ringers solution. The cutaneous contributions to control of each response were then calculated from the skin‐ and core‐temperature pairs at the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds. Results There was a linear relation between mean skin and core temperatures at the response thresholds in the men: r = 0.90 plus/minus 0.06 for vasoconstriction and r = 0.94 plus/minus 0.07 for shivering. Skin temperature contributed 20 plus/minus 6% to vasoconstriction and 19 plus/minus 8% to shivering. Skin temperature in the women contributed to 18 plus/minus 4% to vasoconstriction and 18 plus/minus 7% to shivering, values not differing significantly from those in men. There was no apparent correlation between the cutaneous contributions to vasoconstriction and shivering in individual volunteers. Conclusions These data indicate that skin and core temperatures contribute linearly to the control of vasoconstriction and shivering in men and that the cutaneous contributions average [nearly equal] 20% in both men and women. The same coefficients thus can be used to compensate for experimental skin temperature manipulations in men and women. However, the cutaneous contributions to each response vary among volunteers; furthermore, the contributions to the two responses vary within volunteers.

optimal Duration and Temperature of Prewarming

Background Core hypothermia developing immediately after induction of anesthesia results largely from an internal core‐to‐peripheral redistribution of body heat. Although difficult to treat, redistribution can be prevented by prewarming. The benefits of prewarming may be limited by sweating, thermal discomfort, and efficacy of the warming device. Accordingly, the optimal heater temperature and minimum warming duration likely to substantially reduce redistribution hypothermia were evaluated. Methods Sweating, thermal comfort, and extremity heat content were evaluated in seven volunteers. They participated on two study days, each consisting of a 2‐h control period followed by 2 h of forced‐air warming with the heater set on “medium” ([nearly equal] 40 degrees Celsius) or “high” ([nearly equal] 43 degrees Celsius). Arm and leg tissue heat contents were determined from 19 intramuscular needle thermocouples, ten skin temperatures, and “deep” foot temperature. Results Half the volunteers started sweating during the second hour of warming. None of the volunteers felt uncomfortably warm during the first hour of heating, but many subsequently did. With the heater set on “high,” arm and leg heat content increased 69 kcal during the first 30 min of warming and 136 kcal during the first hour of warming, representing 38% and 75%, respectively, of the values observed after 2 h of warming. The increase was only slightly less when the heater was set to “medium.” Conclusions Neither sweating nor thermal discomfort limited heat transfer during the first hour of warming. Thirty minutes of forced‐air warming increased peripheral tissue heat content by more than the amount normally redistributed during the first hour of anesthesia. The large increase in arm and leg heat content during prewarming thus explains the observed efficacy of prewarming.

Leg Heat Content Continues to Decrease during the Core Temperature Plateau in Humans Anesthetized with Isoflurane

Background:Sufficient hypothermia during anesthesia provokes thermoregulatory responses, but the clinical significance of these responses remains unknown. Nonshivering thermogenesis does not increase metabolic heat production in anesthetized adults. Vasoconstriction reduces cutaneous heat loss, but the initial decrease appears insufficient to cause a thermal steady state (heat production equaling heat loss). Accordingly, the authors tested the hypotheses that: 1) thermoregulatory vasoconstriction prevents further core hypothermia; and 2) the resulting stable core temperature is not a thermal steady state, but, instead, is accompanied for several hours by a continued reduction in body heat content. Methods:Six healthy volunteers were anesthetized with isoflurane (0.8%) and paralyzed with vecuronium. Core hypothermia was induced by fan cooling, and continued for 3 h after vasoconstriction in the legs was detected. Leg heat content was calculated from six needle thermocouples and skin temperature, by integrating the resulting parabolic regression over volume Results:Core temperature decreased 1.0 ± 0.2°C in the 1 h before vasoconstriction, but only 0.4 ± 0.3° C in the subsequent 3 h. This temperature decrease, evenly distributed throughout the body, would reduce leg heat content 10 kcal. However, measured leg heat content decreased 49 ± 18 kcal in the 3 h after vasoconstriction Conclusions:These data thus indicate that thermoregulatory vasoconstriction produces a clinically important reduction in the rate of core cooling. This core temperature plateau resulted, at least in part, from sequestration of metabolic heat to the core which allowed core temperature to remain nearly constant, despite a continually decreasing body heat content.

Pupillary response to noxious stimulation during isoflurane and propofol anesthesia

We studied the effects of noxious stimuli on arterial blood pressure, heart rate, pupil size, and the pupillary light reflex in 13 volunteers anesthetized with either isoflurane or propofol. Those given isoflurane (n = 8) were anesthetized twice, in a randomly selected order, once at an end-tidal concentration of 0.8% and once at 1.2%. An intense noxious stimulus was provided by electrical stimulation applied to skin of the abdominal wall (65–70 mA, 100 Hz). Hemodynamic values and pupillary responses were recorded immediately before stimulation and at 15–60-s intervals during 8 subsequent min. In the volunteers given isoflurane (both concentrations), stimulation significantly increased pupil size (265 ± 244%) and the amplitude of the light reflex (233 ± 23%). In contrast, mean heart rate and systolic blood pressure increased only 19 ± 7% and 13 ± 7% after stimulation. Five additional volunteers were anesthetized twice with propofol (≈ 3 μg/mL plasma concentration) and 60% nitrous oxide. The same electrical stimulus was applied, and hemodynamic and pupillary measurements were obtained. During one propofol anesthetic, an esmolol infusion (100 μg·kg−1·min−1) was started 10 min before stimulation to determine whether this agent would blunt the pupillary response. The pupillary light reflex increased more than 200% during both propofol anesthetics with or without esmolol; once again, heart rate and blood pressure changed little. We conclude that with these experimental conditions, the pupil is a more sensitive measure of noxious stimulation than the commonly used variables of arterial blood pressure and heart rate.

The Pupillary Light Reflex Effects of Anesthetics and Hyperthermia

BackgroundThe pupillary light reflex often is evaluated in the perianesthetic period to assess drug effects and brainstem function. Mild hypothermia alone or combined with isoflurane does not impair pupillary responses. Although perioperative hyperthermia is less common than hypothermia, abnormal increases in core temperature remain an important thermal disturbance. Accordingly, the pupillary effects of hyperthermia alone and hyperthermia combined with isoflurane and enflurane were evaluated. Additionally, the effects of nitrous oxide on pupillary responses were determined. MethodsThe pupillary light reflex was evaluated in 31 non-surgical volunteers participating in concurrent thermoregulatory studies. Pupillary reflexes were quantified using a portable infrared pupillometer during (1) hyperthermia alone (n = 9), (2) hyperthermia with 0.8% and 1.2% end-tidal isoflurane (n = 8), (3) hyperthermia with 1.7% end-tidal enflurane (n = 5), and (4) inhalation of 60% N2O (n = 9). ResultsMild hyperthermia alone (core temperature 38.5 ± 0.3° C) produced no clinically significant change in the pupillary light reflex. Pupillary responses were decreased markedly with 0.8% isoflurane, 1.2% isoflurane, and 1.7% enflurane when the volunteers were normothermic. Mild hyperthermia combined with isoflurane or enflurane dilated the pupil and increased the amplitude of the light reflex. Sixty-percent nitrous oxide decreased the pupillary reflex only 26 ± 4%. ConclusionsAnesthetic-induced inhibition of the pupillary response to light is reversed partially by core hyperthermia. In contrast to enflurane and isoflurane, 60% N2O has little effect on the pupil.

Thermoregulatory vasoconstriction during propofol/nitrous oxide anesthesia in humans: threshold and oxyhemoglobin saturation.

To determine the thermoregulatory effects of propofol and nitrous oxide, we measured the threshold for peripheral vasoconstriction in seven volunteers over a total of 13 study days. We also evaluated the effect of vasoconstriction on oxyhemoglobin saturation (Spo2). Anesthesia was induced with an intravenous bolus dose of propofol (2 mg/kg), followed by an infusion of 180 μg.kg−1.min−1 for 15 min, and maintained with 60% nitrous oxide and propofol (80–160 μg.kg−1.min−1). Central and skin surface temperatures and Spo2 (using two different pulse oximeters) were measured continuously; plasma propofol concentrations and arterial Po2 were measured at 15-min intervals. Volunteers were cooled with a circulating water blanket until definitive peripheral vasoconstriction was detected. The tympanic membrane temperature triggering vasoconstriction was considered the thermoregulatory threshold. Vasoconstriction developed on seven study days during propofol/nitrous oxide anesthesia at a central temperature of 33.3 ± 1.0°C (mean ± SD) and plasma propofol concentration of 3.9 ± 1.1 μg/mL. The thresholds during anesthesia were significantly lower than those during the control period (36.7 ± 0.3°C), but the correlation between plasma propofol concentrations and vasoconstriction thresholds was poor. On the remaining six study days, vasoconstriction did not develop despite central temperatures ranging from 32.1 to 32.7°C. Corresponding propofol concentrations were 4.1–10.9 μg/mL. These data suggest that anesthesia with propofol, in typical clinical concentrations, and 60% nitrous oxide substantially inhibits thermoregulatory vasoconstriction. Vasoconstriction increased Spo2by approximately 2% without a significant concomitant change in Po2. The observed increase in Spo2 probably reflects decreased transmission of arterial pulsations to venous blood in the finger.