B. K. Jain
University of Mumbai
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by B. K. Jain.
Reports on Progress in Physics | 2013
N G Kelkar; K P Khemchandani; N J Upadhyay; B. K. Jain
Back in the mid-1980s, a new branch of investigation related to the interaction of eta mesons with nuclei came into existence. It started with the theoretical prediction of possible exotic states of eta mesons and nuclei bound by the strong interaction and later developed into an extensive experimental program to search for such unstable states as well as understand the underlying interaction via eta-meson producing reactions. The vast literature of experimental as well as theoretical works that studied various aspects of eta-producing reactions such as the π(+)n → ηp, pd → (3)Heη, p (6)Li → (7)Be η and γ (3)He → η X, to name a few, had but one objective in mind: to understand the eta-nucleon (ηN) and hence the η-nucleus interaction which could explain the production data and confirm the existence of some η-mesic nuclei. In spite of these efforts, there remain uncertainties in the knowledge of the ηN and hence the η-nucleus interaction. Therefore, this review is an attempt to bind together the findings in these works and draw some global and specific conclusions which can be useful for future explorations.The ηN scattering length (which represents the strength of the η-nucleon interaction) using different theoretical models and analyzing the data on η production in pion, photon and proton induced reactions was found to be spread out in a wide range, namely, 0.18 ≤ Re aηN ≤ 1.03 fm and 0.16 ≤ Rm aηN ≤ 0.49 fm. Theoretical searches of heavy η-mesic nuclei based on η-nucleus optical potentials and lighter ones based on Faddeev type few-body approaches predict the existence of several quasibound and resonant states. Although some hints of η-mesic states such as (3)(η)He and (25)(η)Mg do exist from previous experiments, the promise of clearer signals for the existence of η-mesic nuclei lies in the experiments to be performed at the J-PARC, MAMI and COSY facilities in the near future. This review is aimed at giving an overall status of these efforts.
Physical Review C | 2009
A. Budzanowski; A. Chatterjee; P. Hawranek; R. Jahn; B. K. Jain; V. Jha; S. Kailas; K. Kilian; S. Kliczewski; D. A. Kirillov; Di. Kirillov; D. Kolev; M. Kravcikova; M. Lesiak; J. Lieb; L. C. Liu; H. Machner; A. Magiera; R. Maier; G. Martinska; S. Nedev; N. Piskunov; D. Protic; J. Ritman; P. von Rossen; B. J. Roy; P. Shukla; I. Sitnik; R. Siudak; R. Tsenov
We have studied the reaction p+{sup 27}Al {yields} {sup 3}He+p+{pi}{sup -}+X at recoil-free kinematics. An {eta} meson possibly produced in this reaction would be thus almost at rest in the laboratory system and could therefore be bound with high probability, if nuclear {eta} states exist. The decay of such a state through the N*(1535) resonance would lead to a proton-{pi}{sup -} pair emitted in opposite directions. For these conditions we find some indication of such a bound state. An upper limit of {approx_equal}0.5 nb is found.
Journal of Physics G | 2006
N. G. Kelkar; K. P. Khemchandani; B. K. Jain
We extend the method of time delay proposed by Eisenbud and Wigner, to search for unstable states formed by η mesons and the 3He nucleus. Using few-body equations to describe η3He elastic scattering, we predict resonances and unstable bound states within different models of the η–N interaction. The η3He states predicted within this novel approach are in agreement with the recent claim of the evidence of η-mesic 3He made by the TAPS Collaboration.
Physical Review C | 2003
K. P. Khemchandani; N. G. Kelkar; B. K. Jain
The usefulness of the three-body mechanism of
Journal of Physics G | 2006
N. G. Kelkar; K. P. Khemchandani; B. K. Jain
eta
Physical Review C | 2010
Grishma Mehta Pandejee; N. J. Upadhyay; B. K. Jain
-meson production is tested by extending to high energies a recently developed two step model of the
Nuclear Physics | 2009
N.J. Upadhyay; N. G. Kelkar; B. K. Jain
p d to ^3
International Journal of Modern Physics E-nuclear Physics | 2009
V. Jha; A. Budzanowski; A. Chatterjee; P. Hawranek; R. Jahn; B. K. Jain; S. Kailas; K. Kilian; S. Kliczewski; D. A. Kirillov; Di. Kirillov; D. Kolev; M. Kravcikova; M. Lesiak; J. Lieb; L. C. Liu; H. Machner; A. Magiera; R. Maier; G. Martinska; S. Nedev; N. Piskunov; D. Protic; J. Ritman; P. von Rossen; B. J. Roy; P. Shukla; I. Sitnik; R. Siudak; R. Tsenov
He
International Journal of Modern Physics A | 2009
J. Urban; A. Budzanowski; A. Chatterjee; P. Hawranek; S. Kailas; B. K. Jain; V. Jha; K. Kilian; S. Kliczewski; D. A. Kirillov; Di. Kirillov; D. Kolev; M. Kravcikova; M. Lesiak; J. Lieb; L. C. Liu; H. Machner; A. Magiera; R. Maier; G. Martinska; S. Nedev; N. Piskunov; D. Protic; J. Ritman; P. von Rossen; B. J. Roy; P. Shukla; I. Sitnik; R. Siudak; R. Tsenov
eta
Pramana | 2006
K. P. Khemchandani; N. G. Kelkar; M. Nowakowski; B. K. Jain
reaction by us, which was successful in reproducing the energy dependence of the data near threshold. The