Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where B. Schilter is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by B. Schilter.


Food and Chemical Toxicology | 2002

Cafestol and kahweol, two coffee specific diterpenes with anticarcinogenic activity.

Christophe Cavin; D Holzhaeuser; Gerlinde Scharf; Anne Constable; Wolfgang W. Huber; B. Schilter

Epidemiological studies have found an inverse association between coffee consumption and the risk of certain types of cancers such as colorectal cancers. Animal data support such a chemopreventive effect of coffee. Substantial research has been devoted to the identification of coffee components that may be responsible for these beneficial effects. In animal models and cell culture systems, the coffee diterpenes cafestol and kahweol (C+K) were shown to produce a broad range of biochemical effects resulting in a reduction of the genotoxicity of several carcinogens including 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA), aflatoxin B(1) (AFB(1)), benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) and 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP). Different mechanisms appear to be involved in these chemoprotective effects: an induction of conjugating enzymes (e.g. glutathione S-transferases, glucuronosyl S-transferases), an increased expression of proteins involved in cellular antioxidant defense (e.g. gamma-glutamyl cysteine synthetase and heme oxygenase-1) and an inhibition of the expression and/or activity of cytochromes P450 involved in carcinogen activation (e.g. CYP2C11, CYP3A2). In animal models, the C+K-mediated induction of conjugating and antioxidant enzymes has been observed in hepatic, intestinal and kidney tissues. In the small intestine, these inductions were shown to be mediated by Nrf2-dependent transcriptional activation. In vitro investigations obtained in cell cultures of human origin indicate that the effects and mechanisms observed in animal test systems with C+K are likely to be of relevance for humans. In human liver epithelial cell lines transfected to express AFB(1)-activating P450s, C+K treatment resulted in a reduction of AFB(1)-DNA binding. This protection was correlated with an induction of GST-mu, an enzyme known to be involved in AFB(1) detoxification. In addition, C+K was found to inhibit P450 2B6, one of the human enzymes responsible for AFB(1) activation. Altogether, the data on the biological effects of C+K provide a plausible hypothesis to explain some of the anticarcinogenic effects of coffee observed in human epidemiological studies and in animal experiments.


Toxicological Sciences | 2009

Use of physiologically based biokinetic (PBBK) modeling to study estragole bioactivation and detoxification in humans as compared with male rats.

Ans Punt; Alicia Paini; Marelle G. Boersma; Andreas P. Freidig; Thierry Delatour; Gabriele Scholz; B. Schilter; Peter J. van Bladeren; Ivonne M. C. M. Rietjens

The extent of bioactivation of the herbal constituent estragole to its ultimate carcinogenic metabolite 1′-sulfooxyestragole depends on the relative levels of bioactivation and detoxification pathways. The present study investigated the kinetics of the metabolic reactions of both estragole and its proximate carcinogenic metabolite 1′-hydroxyestragole in humans in incubations with relevant tissue fractions. Based on the kinetic data obtained a physiologically based biokinetic (PBBK) model for estragole in human was defined to predict the relative extent of bioactivation and detoxification at different dose levels of estragole. The outcomes of the model were subsequently compared with those previously predicted by a PBBK model for estragole in male rat to evaluate the occurrence of species differences in metabolic activation. The results obtained reveal that formation of 1′-oxoestragole, which represents a minor metabolic route for 1′-hydroxyestragole in rat, is the main detoxification pathway of 1′-hydroxyestragole in humans. Due to a high level of this 1′-hydroxyestragole oxidation pathway in human liver, the predicted species differences in formation of 1′-sulfooxyestragole remain relatively low, with the predicted formation of 1′-sulfooxyestragole being twofold higher in human compared with male rat, even though the formation of its precursor 1′-hydroxyestragole was predicted to be fourfold higher in human. Overall, it is concluded that in spite of significant differences in the relative extent of different metabolic pathways between human and male rat there is a minor influence of species differences on the ultimate overall bioactivation of estragole to 1′-sulfooxyestragole.


Toxicology Letters | 2002

Regulatory control of genetically modified (GM) foods: likely developments

B. Schilter; Anne Constable

The placing of genetically modified (GM) crops on the European market requires a regulatory approval supported by a thorough safety evaluation. This approach has been applied to all GM crops presently on the market. Despite this stringent process there has been an increasing public concern about the impact of GM foods on human health and the environment. In this context, regulatory control may develop in several directions. One response to the public concern is to strengthen the data requirements for the risk assessment process. Several avenues have been proposed. They include the application of technologies such as proteomics and metabolomics to assess unintended changes, and the development of predictive methods to evaluate allergenicity. Obligations for post-launch surveillance have appeared in regulations. Criteria are required to define when and why such approaches are necessary. Significant challenges including feasibility and validation of the methods, and safety relevance of the data generated will have to be addressed before any general application of these new approaches. Effective monitoring requires the ability to identify the presence of GM products and trace their origin. Traceability and labeling are therefore important developments in the GM food regulatory arena. Both require the development of reliable analytical detection tools.


Mutagenesis | 2011

Quantitative comparison between in vivo DNA adduct formation from exposure to selected DNA-reactive carcinogens, natural background levels of DNA adduct formation and tumour incidence in rodent bioassays

Alicia Paini; Gabriele Scholz; Maricel Marin-Kuan; B. Schilter; John O’Brien; Peter J. van Bladeren; Ivonne M. C. M. Rietjens

This study aimed at quantitatively comparing the occurrence/formation of DNA adducts with the carcinogenicity induced by a selection of DNA-reactive genotoxic carcinogens. Contrary to previous efforts, we used a very uniform set of data, limited to in vivo rat liver studies in order to investigate whether a correlation can be obtained, using a benchmark dose (BMD) approach. Dose-response data on both carcinogenicity and in vivo DNA adduct formation were available for six compounds, i.e. 2-acetylaminofluorene, aflatoxin B1, methyleugenol, safrole, 2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline and tamoxifen. BMD(10) values for liver carcinogenicity were calculated using the US Environmental Protection Agency BMD software. DNA adduct levels at this dose were extrapolated assuming linearity of the DNA adduct dose response. In addition, the levels of DNA adducts at the BMD(10) were compared to available data on endogenous background DNA damage in the target organ. Although for an individual carcinogen the tumour response increases when adduct levels increase, our results demonstrate that when comparing different carcinogens, no quantitative correlation exists between the level of DNA adduct formation and carcinogenicity. These data confirm that the quantity of DNA adducts formed by a DNA-reactive compound is not a carcinogenicity predictor but that other factors such as type of adduct and mutagenic potential may be equally relevant. Moreover, comparison to background DNA damage supports the notion that the mere occurrence of DNA adducts above or below the level of endogenous DNA damage is neither correlated to development of cancer. These data strongly emphasise the need to apply the mode of action framework to understand the contribution of other biological effect markers playing a role in carcinogenicity.


Food and Chemical Toxicology | 2003

Guidance for the safety assessment of botanicals and botanical preparations for use in food and food supplements

B. Schilter; C Andersson; R Anton; Anne Constable; J Kleiner; J O'Brien; A.G. Renwick; O Korver; F Smit; R. Walker


Free Radical Biology and Medicine | 2001

Oxidative damage and stress response from ochratoxin A exposure in rats

Jean-Charles Gautier; Daisy Holzhaeuser; Jovanka Markovic; Eric Gremaud; B. Schilter; Robert J. Turesky


Toxicological Sciences | 2006

A Toxicogenomics Approach to Identify New Plausible Epigenetic Mechanisms of Ochratoxin A Carcinogenicity in Rat

Maricel Marin-Kuan; Sandra Nestler; C. Verguet; Claudine Bezençon; Dominique Piguet; R. Mansourian; J. Holzwarth; M. Grigorov; Thierry Delatour; Peter G. Mantle; Christophe Cavin; B. Schilter


Carcinogenesis | 1998

The coffee-specific diterpenes cafestol and kahweol protect against aflatoxin B1-induced genotoxicity through a dual mechanism.

Christophe Cavin; Daisy Holzhäuser; Anne Constable; Anthony C. Huggett; B. Schilter


Food and Chemical Toxicology | 2008

Induction of Nrf2-mediated cellular defenses and alteration of phase I activities as mechanisms of chemoprotective effects of coffee in the liver

Christophe Cavin; Maricel Marin-Kuan; S. Langouët; Claudine Bezençon; G. Guignard; Clotilde Verguet; Dominique Piguet; Daisy Holzhäuser; R. Cornaz; B. Schilter


Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology | 2004

Involvement of glial cells in the neurotoxicity of parathion and chlorpyrifos

Marie-Gabrielle Zurich; Paul Honegger; B. Schilter; L. G. Costa; Florianne Monnet-Tschudi

Collaboration


Dive into the B. Schilter's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ivonne M. C. M. Rietjens

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ans Punt

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

P.J. van Bladeren

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alicia Paini

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Wasma Alhusainy

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter J. van Bladeren

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge