Barbara A. Cornblatt

Schizotypy and sustained attention

We examined sustained attention in 32 schizotypic and 43 normal control subjects from a large, randomly ascertained nonclinical university population. Schizotypy status was determined with the Perceptual Aberration Scale. Sustained attention was measured with the Continuous Performance Test-Identical Pairs. Schizotypic subjects displayed significantly poorer sustained-attention performance than did control subjects, as measured by d and overall hit rate. Although schizotypic subjects evidenced greater levels of anxiety and depression, sustained-attention performance was not significantly associated with these mental state factors. Our results provide evidence for a subtle sustained-attention deficit among schizotypes and are interpreted in light of previous attention research with actual schizophrenic patients as well as children at risk for schizophrenia. Utility of the psychometric high-risk strategy in psychopathology research is discussed.

A summary of attentional findings in the New York high-risk project

We summarize here our findings with respect to attentional impairment among offspring of schizophrenic, affectively ill, and normal parents followed from childhood to adulthood during the two decades of the New York High-Risk Project (NYHRP). We review our data first, on childhood attentional performance in each of our two independent samples of such subjects and, second, on the relationship of early dysfunctions observed in this domain to psychopathological outcomes in adolescence and adulthood. Our cumulative results contribute strong support to the contention that global attentional dysfunctions may be viewed as a biobehavioral marker for the genetic liability to schizophrenic disorders.

A taxometric analysis of cognitive and neuromotor variables in children at risk for schizophrenia.

A taxometric model was applied to detect a subgroup or taxon of children conjectured to be at highest risk for developing schizophrenia or related disorders in a sample of offspring of schizophrenic, depressed, and normal parents. Measures of cognitive and neuromotor performance in childhood were used as indicator tests in the analyses. A taxon consisting chiefly of children of schizophrenic parents was detected. Forty-seven percent of those children were assigned to the taxon, compared with 16% of the children of depressed parents and 4% of the children of normal parents. Assignment to the taxon is assessed in relation to the current functional status of the subjects in young adulthood.

Sustained attention in children at risk for schizophrenia: findings with two visual continuous performance tests in a new sample

In partial replication of an earlier study, 35 children at high risk for schizophrenia, 25 children at high risk for affective disorder, and 53 normal control children from a new sample of 7- to 12-year-old subjects were tested with two new visual continuous performance tests. Response levels and intrasubject variability were analyzed separately. Multivariate analyses on factor scores derived from response levels indicate that “groups” is a significant predictor for a factor reflecting discriminability (or sensitivity) for the more difficult of these tests but not for the less difficult one, and that high risk for schizophrenia is associated with lower performance. Factor scores and multiple regresion analyses were used to dichotomize subjects as to whether or not they are low performance outliers. A significantly larger proportion of subjects from the high risk for schizophrenia group than from the control groups were low performance outliers. Among subjects that developed psychopathology in adolescence, subjects at high risk for schizophrenia were more likely to have contributed low performance outliers early during childhood.

Event-related potentials in children at risk for schizophrenia during two versions of the continuous performance test

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded from children of schizophrenic parents, children of parents with affective disorders, and children of parents without a history of psychiatric illness. ERPs were elicited during two versions of the continuous performance test (CPT), which differed in their level of processing complexity. The data were recorded from electrodes located at midline frontal, central, parietal, and occipital scalp sites. Diagnostic assessments of the parents were performed using the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Lifetime Version and Research Diagnostic Criteria. Clinical assessments of the children were made with a modified version of the Global Assessment Scale. ERP amplitudes for six electrophysiological events were compared among groups for target and nontarget stimuli using analyses of variance of both factor score and baseline to peak measures. There was one isolated between-group finding: frontal negative slow wave recorded at FZ was of greater magnitude in the high risk (HR) than in either the psychiatric (PC) or normal control (NC) groups. Since only a small percentage of children at risk will eventually develop schizophrenia, ERP amplitude deviance and frequency distribution analyses were also performed and compared among groups. ERP component amplitudes did not distinguish the groups when each component was considered separately. Deviance analyses, using a combination of the amplitudes of the six ERP components, also did not provide evidence of a deviant subgroup within any of the three groups. There appeared to be no relationship between ERP component amplitudes and behavioral adjustment in adolescence. Some evidence of a relationship between deviant attentional functioning and ERP component amplitude was found, but the pattern of findings within the attentionally deviant HR subgroup was opposite to that found for the HR group as a whole and more consistent with the pattern found for the NC group.

Psychometric deviance in offspring at risk for schizophrenia: I. Initial delineation of a distinct subgroup

Psychometric signs from the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), which measure substantive disturbances in thinking, social relatedness, volition, and affective expressivity, were evaluated as possible indicators of transmissible liability specific to schizophrenia. Children of three criterion groups in the New York High-Risk Project--offspring at high risk (HR) for schizophrenia, psychiatric comparison (PC) offspring at risk for affective disorders, and normal comparison (NC) offspring not at augmented risk for psychiatric morbidity--were tested before the expression of schizophrenic psychopathology, when the subjects ranged in age from 13 to 26 years. The rate of psychometric deviance in the HR group (23%) was significantly higher than that in either the PC (7%) or NC (2%) groups, and profile analyses showed that the HR subgroup could be delineated by qualitative distinctions in personality functioning. Our results support the utility of MMPI indicators in etiologic investigations of schizophrenia.

Electrodermal recovery data on children of schizophrenic parents

Half-amplitude recovery of electodermal responses is compared in children of schizophrenic parents (high-risk subjects) and children of depressed or normal parents. The results are dissimilar to those reported by Mednick and colleagues on a Danish high-risk sample. No significant differences emerged among the three groups in our study. Recovery did not differ according to sex or severity of illness of the schizophrenic parent. Recoveries of high-risk subjects separated from their homes were not shorter than recoveries of subjects who remained home. Recovery time recorded in childhood was unrelated to global adjustment in adolescence.

PERSONALITY FEATURES AND DISORDER IN THE SUBJECTS IN THE NEW YORK HIGH-RISK PROJECT.

One hundred and seventy-five offspring of parents in two psychiatrically ill groups and of normal controls in the New York High-Risk Project (NYHRP) were assessed for Axis II personality traits and disorders as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition, Revised (DSM-III-R). These offspring include: subjects at high risk for schizophrenia (HRSz, n = 48), all of whom have a parent with schizophrenic disorder; subjects at high risk for affective disorder (HRAff, n = 40), all of whom have a parent with affective disorder; and subjects at no increased risk for psychiatric illness (NC, n = 87), whose parents are psychiatrically normal. The trained interviewers, who administered a standardized direct interview, were blind to parental clinical status and to previous clinical status of the offspring.The rates for any personality disorder (PD) ranged from 7% to 20%. Comorbidity between Axis I and Axis II disorders was high for all groups.