Barbara Miziak

Clinical approaches to treatment of Internet addiction.

BACKGROUND Internet appearance was one of the main breakthroughs for the mankind in the latest decades. It revolutionized our lives in many aspects and brought about many undeniably positive changes. However, at the same time caused negative consequences. It has led to the emergence of the Internet addiction (IA). The paper is concerned with the issue of treatment of IA. METHOD The paper reviews the current findings on the approaches to IA treatment and evaluates their effectiveness. The main focus of the article concentrates on cognitive and pharmacologic treatment. RESULTS The individual approach to IA treatment is advisable. Among drugs for the management of IA, antidepressants, antipsychotics, opioid receptor antagonists, glutamate receptor antagonists, and psychostimulants may be recommended. Some antiepileptics, and especially valproate, are considered as potential drugs for the treatment of IA. CONCLUSION Effective therapy may require an individual approach and best results are expected when psychological and pharmacological treatments are combined.

The problem of osteoporosis in epileptic patients taking antiepileptic drugs.

Introduction: Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder associated with recurrent seizures. Therapy with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) helps achieve seizure remission in approximately 70% of epileptic patients. Treatment with AEDs is frequently lifelong and there are reports suggesting its negative influence on bone health. This is especially important in terms of general occurrence of osteoporosis, affecting over 50 million people worldwide. Areas covered: This study refers to two main groups of AEDs: hepatic enzyme inducers (carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone and topiramate) and non-inducers (clobazam, clonazepam, ethosuximide, gabapentin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, pregabalin, tiagabine, valproate, vigabatrin and zonisamide). Some reports indicate that enzyme inducers may exert a more negative influence on bone mineral density (BMD) compared to non-inducers. Bone problems may appear in both sexes during AED therapy, although women are additionally burdened with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Supplementation of vitamin D and calcium in patients on AEDs is recommended. Expert opinion: Apart from enzyme inducers, valproate (an even enzyme inhibitor) may also negatively affect BMD. However, the untoward effects of AEDs may depend upon their doses and duration of treatment. Although the problem of supplementation of vitamin D and calcium in epileptic patients on AEDs is controversial, there are recommendations to do so.

Prospects of epileptogenesis prevention

Epilepsy is a common neurologic disease, affecting about 1-2% of the population. In around 30% of patients with epilepsy, their seizures are not satisfactorily controlled and drug-resistant epilepsy constitutes a real therapeutic challenge. Consequently, there are efforts aimed at the inhibition of epileptogenesis, a process of converting a normal into an epileptic brain. Data on this problem have been mainly obtained in post-status epilepticus rodent models in which spontaneous seizure activity and behavioral disturbances develop over time. Among antiepileptic drugs, diazepam at high dose of 20mg/kg given during status epilepticus, significantly inhibited the development of spontaneous seizures and also, a strong neuroprotective effect was evident. Also gabapentin and valproate (over a period of 40 days) proved effective in the inhibition of spontaneous seizure activity and reduction of behavioral deficit. However, there are also data that valproate (over 28 days) significantly improved the behavioral performance without affecting the occurrence of spontaneous seizures. A number of antiepileptic drugs, carbamazepine, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, phenobarbital, and topiramate were completely ineffective. Among non-antiepileptic drugs, some promise show rapamycin, losartan and combinations of anti-inflammatory drugs, targeting different inflammatory pathways. Inhibition of epileptogenesis may become a valuable therapeutic approach provided that there are reliable markers of this process. Actually, such markers begin to emerge.

Safety issues around misuse of antiepileptics

Introduction: Drug misuse is a deliberate or accidental (by omission) nonadherence to medical recommendations, which may range from inappropriate use (missed, increased, or lowered doses or even complete discontinuation of therapy) to compulsive overdosing. Currently, this phenomenon affects as many as 20 – 80% of epileptic patients. Areas covered: Long-standing research has enabled the identification and understanding of factors behind the phenomenon of nonadherence to medical recommendations. An inappropriate use of antiepileptic drugs usually has serious health implications for both children and adults. These involve increased frequency of seizures in patients who lower their doses or discontinue therapy, which may often lead to pathologies. On the other hand, patients who increase or take extra doses expose themselves to toxic effects of antiepileptic drugs. In both cases, there is an increased need for hospitalization, which further implies extra healthcare costs. The most misused antiepileptic drug is gabapentin (53%), whereas the least misused are lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and phenytoin (all drugs at 32%). Expert opinion: The prevalence of misuse of antiepileptic drugs among epileptic patients is comparable to that observed in other chronically ill individuals. Preventive strategies have to be based on the reasons leading to nonadherence.

Synergistic Interaction of Retigabine with Levetiracetam in the Mouse Maximal Electroshock-Induced Seizure Model: A Type II Isobolographic Analysis.

Background/Aims: To assess interactions between retigabine and levetiracetam in suppressing maximal electroshock-induced tonic seizures in Albino Swiss mice, type II isobolographic analysis was used. Total brain antiepileptic drug concentrations were measured with high pressure liquid chromatography. Results: The combinations of retigabine with levetiracetam at the fixed-ratios of 1:5 and 1:10 were supra-additive (synergistic; p < 0.05) in terms of seizure suppression, while the combinations at the fixed-ratios of 1:1 and 1:2 were additive. No pharmacokinetic changes in total brain concentrations of levetiracetam and retigabine were documented, indicating the pharmacodynamic nature of interaction between these antiepileptic drugs in the mouse maximal electroshock-induced tonic seizure model. Conclusion: The combination of retigabine with levetiracetam at the fixed-ratios of 1:5 and 1:10 appears to be particularly beneficial combination exerting supra-additive interaction in suppressing maximal electroshock-induced tonic seizures.

Safety considerations for patients with epilepsy taking antiepileptic drugs alongside caffeine or other methylxanthine derivatives

Introduction: Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are widely used for the treatment of epilepsy. However, ∼ 30% of patients do not remain seizure free. It is possible that methylxanthine derivatives (e.g., caffeine and theophylline) may partially account for this outcome. Areas covered: Data on the convulsive activity of methylxanthines are reviewed. The negative impact of caffeine and theophylline (or aminophylline) on the protective activity of classic and newer AEDs is also considered. Case report studies indicate that ingestion of caffeine may increase seizure frequency, which returns to baseline when the consumption of coffee or caffeine-rich drinks is terminated. However, the existing data also provide clinical evidence that caffeine may not be a trigger for precipitation of seizure activity and this discrepancy is evaluated. Expert opinion: Experimental data indicate that caffeine and aminophylline both significantly reduce the anticonvulsant activity of a number of AEDs. Clinical data are controversial. Patients with epilepsy should be advised not to take methylxanthine-containing medications. Caffeine consumption, especially accidental and in huge quantities, should be avoided in patients with epilepsy.

Beneficial Combination of Lacosamide with Retigabine in Experimental Animals: An Isobolographic Analysis

Background/Aim: To isobolographically determine the types of interactions that occur between retigabine and lacosamide (LCM; two third-generation antiepileptic drugs) with respect to their anticonvulsant activity and acute adverse effects (sedation) in the maximal electroshock-induced seizures (MES) and chimney test (motor performance) in adult male Swiss mice. Methods: Type I isobolographic analysis for nonparallel dose-response effects for the combination of retigabine with LCM (at the fixed-ratio of 1:1) in both the MES and chimney test in mice was performed. Brain concentrations of retigabine and LCM were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) to characterize any pharmacokinetic interactions occurring when combining these drugs. Results: Linear regression analysis revealed that retigabine had its dose-response effect line nonparallel to that of LCM in both the MES and chimney tests. The type I isobolographic analysis illustrated that retigabine combined with LCM (fixed-ratio of 1:1) exerted an additive interaction in the mouse MES model and sub-additivity (antagonism) in the chimney test. With HPLC, retigabine and LCM did not mutually change their total brain concentrations, thereby confirming the pharmacodynamic nature of the interaction. Conclusion: LCM combined with retigabine possesses a beneficial preclinical profile (benefit index ranged from 2.07 to 2.50) and this 2-drug combination is worth recommending as treatment plan to patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy.

A viewpoint on rational and irrational fixed-drug combinations

ABSTRACT Introduction: Considering that there are around 30% of patients with epilepsy resistant to monotherapy, the use of synergistic combinations of antiepileptic drugs is of particular importance. This review shows most beneficial as well as irrational combined treatments both from an experimental and clinical point of view. Areas covered: Preferably, experimental data derived from studies evaluating synergy, additivity, or antagonism by relevant methods, in terms of anticonvulsant or neurotoxic effects and pharmacokinetic data have been considered. Although there have been no randomized clinical trials on this issue, the clinical data have been analyzed from studies on considerable numbers of patients. Case-report studies have been not considered. Expert commentary: The experimental data provide a strong support that co-administration of lamotrigine with carbamazepine is negative, considering the anticonvulsant and neurotoxic effects. Clinical reports do not entirely support this conclusion. Other experimentally documented negative combinations comprise lamotrigine+ oxcarbazepine and oxcarbazepine+ phenytoin. From the experimental and clinical point of view, a combination of lamotrigine+ valproate may deserve recommendation. Other most positive experimental and clinical combinations include carbamazepine+valproate, phenytoin+phenobarbital, carbamazepine+gabapentin, carbamazepine+topiramate, levetiracetam+valproate, levetiracetam+carbamazepine. Certainly, experimental data have some limitations (non-epileptic animals, acute administration of antiepileptic drugs) so all experimental recommendations need a careful clinical evaluation.

The Prophylactic Use of Antiepileptic Drugs in Patients Scheduled for Neurosurgery

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) possess diverse mechanisms of action - enhancement of GABA-mediated events, inhibition of glutamate-mediated excitation, blockade of voltage-dependent sodium or calcium channels being the most frequently shared. They are not only used for the symptomatic management of epilepsy but in the treatment of psychiatric or neurologic disorders (e.g. bipolar disorder, neuropathic pain, prophylaxis of migraine). Generally, this group of drugs is also widely used in neurosurgery patients for the prevention of seizure activity and their effectiveness in this regard has been evaluated in this review. There is no controversy as to whether continue AEDs in patients with epilepsy scheduled for neurosurgery. A question arises on whether AEDs may be recommended to non-epileptic neurosurgical patients for the prevention of post-surgery early or late seizures. There are some positive examples indicating that AEDs may reduce the occurrence of preferably early seizures, some results also being positive in the case of late seizure activity. However, there are also many negative data in this regard. The existence of serious adverse effects and a possibility of pharmacokinetic interactions with the concomitant therapy may further complicate the decision on whether to start the prophylactic use of AEDs. In general, the existing evidence does not support the prophylactic use of AEDs, especially in patients who underwent craniotomy/craniectomy for the inhibition of late seizure activity.