Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Barbara Phillips-Bute is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Barbara Phillips-Bute.


Anesthesiology | 2000

Cost-effectiveness of Prophylactic Antiemetic Therapy with Ondansetron, Droperidol, or Placebo

Robert P. Hill; David A. Lubarsky; Barbara Phillips-Bute; Jennifer T. Fortney; Mary R. Creed; Peter S. A. Glass; Tong J. Gan

Background: In an era of growing economic constraints on healthcare delivery, anesthesiologists are increasingly expected to understand cost analysis and evaluate clinical practices. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are distressing for patients and may increase costs in an ambulatory surgical unit. The authors compared the cost-effectiveness of four prophylactic intravenous regimens for PONV:—4 mg ondansetron, 0.625 mg droperidol, 1.25 mg droperidol, and placebo. Methods: Adult surgical outpatients at high risk for PONV were studied. Study drugs were administered intravenously within 20 min of induction of nitrous oxide–isoflurane or enflurane anesthesia. A decision-tree analysis was used to group patients into 12 mutually exclusive subgroups based on treatment and outcome. Costs were calculated for the prevention and treatment of PONV. Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed for each group. Results: Two thousand sixty-one patients were enrolled. Efficacy data for study drugs have been previously reported, and the database from that study was used for pharmacoeconomic analysis. The mean–median total cost per patient who received prophylactic treatment with 4 mg ondansetron, 0.625 mg droperidol, 1.25 mg droperidol, and placebo were


The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 2003

The association of lowest hematocrit during cardiopulmonary bypass with acute renal injury after coronary artery bypass surgery

Madhav Swaminathan; Barbara Phillips-Bute; Peter J. Conlon; Peter K. Smith; Mark F. Newman; Mark Stafford-Smith

112 or


Anesthesia & Analgesia | 1999

The use of a postoperative morbidity survey to evaluate patients with prolonged hospitalization after routine, moderate-risk, elective surgery

Elliott Bennett-Guerrero; Ian J. Welsby; Dunn Tj; Young Lr; Wahl Ta; Diers Tl; Barbara Phillips-Bute; Mark F. Newman; Mg Mythen

16.44,


Anesthesia & Analgesia | 2002

The rewarming rate and increased peak temperature alter neurocognitive outcome after cardiac Surgery

Alina M. Grigore; Hilary P. Grocott; Joseph P. Mathew; Barbara Phillips-Bute; Timothy O. Stanley; Aimee Butler; Kevin P. Landolfo; J. G. Reves; James A. Blumenthal; Mark F. Newman

109 or


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2008

The effect of aprotinin on outcome after coronary-artery bypass grafting.

Andrew D. Shaw; Mark Stafford-Smith; William D. White; Barbara Phillips-Bute; Madhav Swaminathan; Carmelo A. Milano; Ian J. Welsby; Solomon Aronson; Joseph P. Mathew; Eric D. Peterson; Mark F. Newman

0.63,


Psychosomatic Medicine | 2006

Association of neurocognitive function and quality of life 1 year after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.

Barbara Phillips-Bute; Joseph P. Mathew; James A. Blumenthal; Hilary P. Grocott; Daniel T. Laskowitz; Roger Jones; Daniel B. Mark; Mark F. Newman

104 or


Anesthesiology | 2010

Cognitive Function after Major Noncardiac Surgery, Apolipoprotein E4 Genotype, and Biomarkers of Brain Injury

David L. McDonagh; Joseph P. Mathew; Willam D. White; Barbara Phillips-Bute; Daniel T. Laskowitz; Mihai V. Podgoreanu; Mark F. Newman

0.51, and


Gastroenterology | 1997

Health-Related Quality of Life After Ileoanal Pull-Through: Evaluation and Assessment of New Health Status Measures

Dawn Provenzale; Mary Shearin; Barbara Phillips-Bute; Douglas A. Drossman; Zhiming Li; Wolfgang Tillinger; Colleen M. Schmitt; R. Randall Bollinger; Mark J. Koruda

164 or


Critical Care Medicine | 2005

Analysis of the brain bioavailability of peripherally administered magnesium sulfate: A study in humans with acute brain injury undergoing prolonged induced hypermagnesemia

J. Andrew McKee; Randall P. Brewer; Gary E. Macy; Barbara Phillips-Bute; Kurt A. Campbell; Cecil O. Borel; James D. Reynolds; David S. Warner

51.20, respectively (P = 0.001, active treatment groups vs. placebo). The use of a prophylactic antiemetic agent significantly increased patient satisfaction (P < 0.05). Personnel costs in managing PONV and unexpected hospital admission constitute major cost components in our analysis. Exclusion of nursing labor costs from the calculation did not alter the overall conclusions regarding the relative costs of antiemetic therapy. Conclusion: The use of prophylactic antiemetic therapy in high-risk ambulatory surgical patients was more effective in preventing PONV and achieved greater patient satisfaction at a lower cost compared with placebo. The use of 1.25 mg droperidol intravenously was associated with greater effectiveness, lower costs, and similar patient satisfaction compared with 0.625 mg droperidol intravenously and 4 mg ondansetron intravenously.


Anesthesia & Analgesia | 2000

Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery and postoperative renal dysfunction.

Maribel G. Gamoso; Barbara Phillips-Bute; Kevin P. Landolfo; Mark F. Newman; Mark Stafford-Smith

BACKGROUND Acute renal injury is a common serious complication of cardiac surgery. Moderate hemodilution is thought to reduce the risk of kidney injury but the current practice of extreme hemodilution (target hematocrit 22% to 24%) during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has been linked to adverse outcomes after cardiac surgery. Therefore we tested the hypothesis that lowest hematocrit during CPB is independently associated with acute renal injury after cardiac surgery. METHODS Demographic, perioperative, and laboratory data were gathered for 1,404 primary elective coronary bypass surgery patients. Preoperative and daily postoperative creatinine values were measured until hospital discharge per institutional protocol. Stepwise multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to determine whether lowest hematocrit during CPB was independently associated with peak fractional change in creatinine (defined as the difference between the preoperative and peak postoperative creatinine represented as a percentage of the preoperative value). A p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS Multivariable analyses including preoperative hematocrit and other perioperative variables revealed that lowest hematocrit during CPB demonstrated a significant interaction with body weight and was highly associated with peak fractional change in serum creatinine (parameter estimate [PE] = 4.5; p = 0.008) and also with highest postoperative creatinine value (PE = 0.06; p = 0.004). Although other renal risk factors were significant covariates in both models, TM50 (an index of hypotension during CPB) was notably absent. CONCLUSIONS These results add to concerns that current CPB management guidelines accepting extreme hemodilution may contribute to postoperative acute renal and other organ injury after cardiac surgery.

Collaboration


Dive into the Barbara Phillips-Bute's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew D. Shaw

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge