Barbro Werelius

Common variants on chromosomes 2q35 and 16q12 confer susceptibility to estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Familial clustering studies indicate that breast cancer risk has a substantial genetic component. To identify new breast cancer risk variants, we genotyped approximately 300,000 SNPs in 1,600 Icelandic individuals with breast cancer and 11,563 controls using the Illumina Hap300 platform. We then tested selected SNPs in five replication sample sets. Overall, we studied 4,554 affected individuals and 17,577 controls. Two SNPs consistently associated with breast cancer: ∼25% of individuals of European descent are homozygous for allele A of rs13387042 on chromosome 2q35 and have an estimated 1.44-fold greater risk than noncarriers, and for allele T of rs3803662 on 16q12, about 7% are homozygous and have a 1.64-fold greater risk. Risk from both alleles was confined to estrogen receptor–positive tumors. At present, no genes have been identified in the linkage disequilibrium block containing rs13387042. rs3803662 is near the 5′ end of TNRC9 , a high mobility group chromatin–associated protein whose expression is implicated in breast cancer metastasis to bone.

CDH1 mutations are present in both ductal and lobular breast cancer, but promoter allelic variants show no detectable breast cancer risk

Mutations and diminished expression of the E‐cadherin gene (CDH1) have been identified in a number of epithelial malignancies. Although somatic CDH1 mutations were detected in lobular breast cancer with a frequency ranging from 10–56%, CDH1 alterations in more frequent ductal tumors appear to be rare. Here we have analyzed the coding region of CDH1 for mutations using denaturing high performance liquid chromatography and found 4 mutations in 83 ductal carcinomas (5%) and 3 mutations in 25 lobular carcinomas (12%). The germline of 13 patients with familial lobular tumors was also analyzed for mutations, but none were detected. In a case‐control study, we also tested whether a variant adenine allele in the promoter polymorphism −161C→A with a putative influence on the transcriptional activity of CDH1 in vitro confers any detectable risk of breast cancer. No significant difference in the allelic frequency between patients with breast cancer (326/1,152, 28.3%) and controls (190/696, 27.3%, p > 0.05; relative risk 1.05, 95% confidence interval 0.85–1.30) was found. A novel promoter polymorphism was identified at position −152, but the frequency of the variant cytosine allele was also similar in patients with breast cancer and controls (0.71% vs. 0.21%, p = 0.23). Transient transfection experiments using reporter constructs containing the nucleotide substitutions −161C/−152C and −161A/−152T showed only a slight decrease in the transcription activity compared to the wild‐type construct. These results do not support CDH1 as a prominent low‐penetrance cancer susceptibility gene, but indicate that CDH1 mutations contribute to the progression of both lobular and ductal tumors.

Definition of candidate low risk APC alleles in a Swedish population

Many families experience an apparently inherited increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) similar to the known syndromes familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). Besides these high‐risk syndromes, approximately 10% of all CRC cases come from families with 2 affected 1st‐degree relatives, and even 1st‐degree relatives to a single case of CRC are at increased risk. Risk subjects from these families frequently show polyps at colonoscopy, which suggests the APC gene as a good candidate susceptibility gene for these attenuated polypotic syndromes. We used the sensitive DHPLC technique to search for possible predisposing germline mutations in the entire APC gene in 91 risk subjects from these high‐ and low‐risk syndromes with unknown predisposing genes. Most exons were also screened for mutations in 96 normal controls and 96 colorectal cancer cases. In our study we probably have identified the most common APC variants in a Swedish population. Among 30 germline variants identified, 1 clearly pathogenic nonsense mutation and 11 putative pathogenic variants (10 missense and one 3′ UTR) were found in 20 index patients (22%). Twelve silent as well as 5 intronic variants were considered nonpathogenic. Two of the missense variants found here, E1317Q and D1822V, have previously been related to a difference in risk of colorectal cancer. One variant, 8636C>A, located within the 3′ UTR region of the APC gene, was suggested to constitute an additional low risk allele with a similar relative risk as the Jewish I1307K mutation (OR = 1.8; 95% CI, 0.96–3.40). The question of whether all the other variants confer an increased colorectal cancer risk warrants future large association studies.

Germline BRCA1 and HMLH1 mutations in a family with male and female breast carcinoma

Hereditary non‐polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is an autosomal dominant disease, predisposing to the development of colorectal cancer and other tumor types such as endometrial, small bowel, stomach, ovary and urinary tract carcinoma, while most investigators find no association between HNPCC and cancer of the breast. We have identified hMLH1 mutations in 2 Amsterdam‐criteria HNPCC families where both male and female gene carriers were affected with breast cancer. To investigate whether these breast cancers were caused by other genetic factors, we analyzed the 2 breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. In one family we did not find any mutation in the breast cancer genes, while in the other, a BRCA1 mutation segregated in the breast cancer cases. Hereditary breast cancer, and in particular BRCA1 tumors, display discrete histo‐pathological and immunohistological characteristics. The tumor from a woman with both hMLH1 mutations and a BRCA1 mutation exhibited typical BRCA1 histology, e.g., grade 3 invasive ductal carcinoma with dense lymphocytic infiltration, and immunohistology, estrogen receptor (ER) negative, progesterone receptor (PgR) negative, strongly p53 positive, c‐erbB‐2 negative and highly Ki67 positive (>50% stained cells). The histology of the breast tumor from the man with both one hMLH1 mutation and a BRCA1 mutation was a grade 2 invasive ductal carcinoma without any special BRCA1 features. Immunohistology was also different. This might merely reflect a true difference in male breast tumor progression vs. female. We cannot exclude that the combined effect of BRCA1 and hMLH1 dysfunction has a bearing on tumor progression. Int. J. Cancer 85:796–800, 2000.