Xiao-Lei Zhou

A large-scale meta-analysis to refine colorectal cancer risk estimates associated with MUTYH variants

Background:Defective DNA repair has a causal role in hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC). Defects in the base excision repair gene MUTYH are responsible for MUTYH-associated polyposis and CRC predisposition as an autosomal recessive trait. Numerous reports have suggested MUTYH mono-allelic variants to be low penetrance risk alleles. We report a large collaborative meta-analysis to assess and refine CRC risk estimates associated with bi-allelic and mono-allelic MUTYH variants and investigate age and sex influence on risk.Methods:MUTYH genotype data were included from 20 565 cases and 15 524 controls. Three logistic regression models were tested: a crude model; adjusted for age and sex; adjusted for age, sex and study.Results:All three models produced very similar results. MUTYH bi-allelic carriers demonstrated a 28-fold increase in risk (95% confidence interval (CI): 6.95–115). Significant bi-allelic effects were also observed for G396D and Y179C/G396D compound heterozygotes and a marginal mono-allelic effect for variant Y179C (odds ratio (OR)=1.34; 95% CI: 1.00–1.80). A pooled meta-analysis of all published and unpublished datasets submitted showed bi-allelic effects for MUTYH, G396D and Y179C (OR=10.8, 95% CI: 5.02–23.2; OR=6.47, 95% CI: 2.33–18.0; OR=3.35, 95% CI: 1.14–9.89) and marginal mono-allelic effect for variants MUTYH (OR=1.16, 95% CI: 1.00–1.34) and Y179C alone (OR=1.34, 95% CI: 1.01–1.77).Conclusions:Overall, this large study refines estimates of disease risk associated with mono-allelic and bi-allelic MUTYH carriers.

A genome wide linkage analysis in Swedish families with hereditary non-familial adenomatous polyposis/non-hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer

Background and aim: Known colorectal cancer syndromes, such as familial adenomatous polyposis and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, have been identified in only a small proportion of cases with a family history of disease. In an attempt to identify loci harbouring novel predisposing genes, we have performed a genome wide linkage analysis in 18 colorectal cancer families recruited from the Department of Clinical Genetics at Karolinska Hospital, Sweden. Methods: Multipoint parametric and non-parametric linkage analyses were performed using two affected status criteria, stringent and less stringent. Parametric analysis was performed under the assumption of locus homogeneity and locus heterogeneity. Results: The initial scan performed using the less stringent affected status criteria revealed regions of interest on chromosome 11 (marker D11S1314: heterogeneity logarithm of odds (HLOD) score 1.96, non-parametric LOD (NPL) score 1.28; and marker D11S908: HLOD score 2.10, NPL score 2.16) and chromosome 14 (marker D14S258: HLOD score 2.61, NPL score 2.88). Using the stringent affected status criteria, a locus on chromosome 22 was suggested in the parametric analysis (marker D22S315: HLOD score 1.26). After finemapping of the regions on chromosomes 11 and 14, HLOD and NPL scores were reduced but still within the range of suggestive linkage. Haplotype analysis revealed overlapping regions between D11S987 and D11S4207 (proximal region), D11S4120 and D11S4090 (distal region), on chromosome 11, and between D14S1038 and D14S1069 on chromosome 14. Conclusion: Our study provides evidence of genetic heterogeneity among Swedish colorectal cancer families. Three novel regions were suggested to be of interest in a proportion of families analysed. Further studies are needed to confirm this result.

Definition of candidate low risk APC alleles in a Swedish population

Many families experience an apparently inherited increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) similar to the known syndromes familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). Besides these high‐risk syndromes, approximately 10% of all CRC cases come from families with 2 affected 1st‐degree relatives, and even 1st‐degree relatives to a single case of CRC are at increased risk. Risk subjects from these families frequently show polyps at colonoscopy, which suggests the APC gene as a good candidate susceptibility gene for these attenuated polypotic syndromes. We used the sensitive DHPLC technique to search for possible predisposing germline mutations in the entire APC gene in 91 risk subjects from these high‐ and low‐risk syndromes with unknown predisposing genes. Most exons were also screened for mutations in 96 normal controls and 96 colorectal cancer cases. In our study we probably have identified the most common APC variants in a Swedish population. Among 30 germline variants identified, 1 clearly pathogenic nonsense mutation and 11 putative pathogenic variants (10 missense and one 3′ UTR) were found in 20 index patients (22%). Twelve silent as well as 5 intronic variants were considered nonpathogenic. Two of the missense variants found here, E1317Q and D1822V, have previously been related to a difference in risk of colorectal cancer. One variant, 8636C>A, located within the 3′ UTR region of the APC gene, was suggested to constitute an additional low risk allele with a similar relative risk as the Jewish I1307K mutation (OR = 1.8; 95% CI, 0.96–3.40). The question of whether all the other variants confer an increased colorectal cancer risk warrants future large association studies.

Cancer-initiating cells derived from human rectal adenocarcinoma tissues carry mesenchymal phenotypes and resist drug therapies

Accumulating evidence indicates that cancer-initiating cells (CICs) are responsible for cancer initiation, relapse, and metastasis. Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is typically classified into proximal colon, distal colon, and rectal cancer. The gradual changes in CRC molecular features within the bowel may have considerable implications in colon and rectal CICs. Unfortunately, limited information is available on CICs derived from rectal cancer, although colon CICs have been described. Here we identified rectal CICs (R-CICs) that possess differentiation potential in tumors derived from patients with rectal adenocarcinoma. The R-CICs carried both CD44 and CD54 surface markers, while R-CICs and their immediate progenies carried potential epithelial–mesenchymal transition characteristics. These R-CICs generated tumors similar to their tumor of origin when injected into immunodeficient mice, differentiated into rectal epithelial cells in vitro, and were capable of self-renewal both in vitro and in vivo. More importantly, subpopulations of R-CICs resisted both 5-fluorouracil/calcium folinate/oxaliplatin (FolFox) and cetuximab treatment, which are the most common therapeutic regimens used for patients with advanced or metastatic rectal cancer. Thus, the identification, expansion, and properties of R-CICs provide an ideal cellular model to further investigate tumor progression and determine therapeutic resistance in these patients.

TGFBR1(*)6A and Int7G24A variants of transforming growth factor-beta receptor 1 in Swedish familial and sporadic breast cancer.

Two common variants in transforming growth factor-β receptor 1 (TGFBR1), TGFBR1*6A and Int7G24A, A allele, have been shown to act as low-penetrance tumour susceptibility alleles in several common cancers, including breast cancer. We evaluated the TGFBR1 9A/6A and Int7G24A variant frequencies in two breast cancer cohorts; a population-based cohort of breast cancer with defined family history (n=459) and in breast cancer patients from a familial cancer clinic (n=340) and in 856 controls from the Stockholm region. The familial patients from both cohorts were further divided into high- and low-risk familial breast cancer based on pedigree analysis. There was no overall association with either variant and breast cancer risk. The TGFBR1*6A allelic frequency was, however, higher in low-risk familial breast cancer (0.138), compared to controls (0.106; P=0.04). No significant difference was found in the high-risk familial (0.102) or sporadic cases (0.109; P=0.83 and 0.83, respectively). TGFBR1*6A carrier status was further associated with a high-grade sporadic breast cancer (odds ratio: 2.27; 95% confidence interval: 1.01–5.11; P=0.049). These results indicate that the TGFBR1*6A variant may be associated with an increased risk of low-risk familial breast cancer and might be a marker for poorly differentiated breast cancer. The Int7G24A variant was not associated with breast cancer risk or clinical presentation of the disease including prognosis in our material.

TGFBR1 variants TGFBR1*6A and Int7G24A are not associated with an increased familial colorectal cancer risk

Variants of the transforming growth factor-beta receptor type 1 (TGFBR1) gene, TGFBR1*6A and Int7G24A, have been suggested to act as low-penetrance tumour susceptibility alleles with TGFBR1*6A being causally responsible for some cases of familial colorectal cancer (CRC). We performed a case–control study of 262 unrelated familial CRC cases; 83 hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) and 179 non-HNPCC. Patients were genotyped for TGFBR1*6A and Int7G24A and compared with 856 controls. Further, we screened the coding region of TGFBR1 in affected members of a large family with CRC linked to 9q22.32-31.1. TGFBR1*6A allelic frequency was not significantly different in all of the familial cases compared with controls (0.107 and 0.106, respectively; P=0.915). In a subgroup analysis allele frequencies were, however, different between HNPCC and non-HNPCC familial cases (0.157 and 0.084, respectively; P=0.013). TGFBR1*6A genotype did not influence age of onset. Int7G24A allele frequencies were similar in cases and controls. No germ-line mutation was identified in the family with CRC linked to this chromosomal region. Our study provides no substantial support for the hypothesis that the polymorphic variants TGFBR1*6A or Int7G24A contribute to familial CRC risk. We cannot, however, exclude the possibility that TGFBR1 variants have a modifying effect on inherited risk per se.

Colorectal cancer as a complex disease: defining at-risk subjects in the general population – a preventive strategy

Over the last few decades it has become clear that highly penetrant disease genes are responsible for a minor proportion of colorectal cancer cases. Families with hereditary syndromes are today recognized and included in surveillance programs known to reduce morbidity and mortality in colorectal cancer. Colorectal cancer is preventable and screening strategies in whole populations are currently under debate. Colorectal cancer can be considered a complex disease, with a combination of predisposing genetic variants and environmental factors that contribute to the illness as a whole. The progress made in the genome project provides an opportunity to determine such genetic variants and environmental factors. This knowledge can be used to define a subpopulation at increased risk for colorectal cancer. It will be more feasible to design preventive strategies for this subgroup than for a whole population.