Baris Onol
Istanbul Technical University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Baris Onol.
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2016
Paolo Michele Ruti; Samuel Somot; Filippo Giorgi; Clotilde Dubois; Emmanouil Flaounas; Anika Obermann; A. Dell’aquila; G. Pisacane; Ali Harzallah; E. Lombardi; Bodo Ahrens; Naveed Akhtar; Antoinette Alias; Thomas Arsouze; R. Aznar; Sophie Bastin; Judit Bartholy; Karine Béranger; Jonathan Beuvier; Sophie Bouffies-Cloché; J. Brauch; William Cabos; Sandro Calmanti; Jean-Christophe Calvet; Adriana Carillo; Dario Conte; Erika Coppola; V. Djurdjevic; Philippe Drobinski; A. Elizalde-Arellano
The Mediterranean is expected to be one of the most prominent and vulnerable climate change “hot spots” of the 21st century, and the physical mechanisms underlying this finding are still not clear. Furthermore complex interactions and feedbacks involving ocean-atmosphere-land-biogeochemical processes play a prominent role in modulating the climate and environment of the Mediterranean region on a range of spatial and temporal scales. Therefore it is critical to provide robust climate change information for use in Vulnerability/Impact/Adaptation assessment studies considering the Mediterranean as a fully coupled environmental system. The Med-CORDEX initiative aims at coordinating the Mediterranean climate modeling community towards the development of fully coupled regional climate simulations, improving all relevant components of the system, from atmosphere and ocean dynamics to land surface, hydrology and biogeochemical processes. The primary goals of Med-CORDEX are to improve understanding of past climate variability and trends, and to provide more accurate and reliable future projections, assessing in a quantitative and robust way the added value of using high resolution and coupled regional climate models. The coordination activities and the scientific outcomes of Med-CORDEX can produce an important framework to foster the development of regional earth system models in several key regions worldwide.
ieee international conference on renewable energy research and applications | 2012
Bahtiyar Efe; Sibel Mentes; Yurdanur Sezginer Unal; Elcin Tan; Emel Unal; Tuncay Ozdemir; Burak Barutçu; Baris Onol; Sema Topcu
Wind power forecasting has recently become important to fulfill the increasing demand on energy usage. Two main approaches are applied to the wind power forecasting which can vary from 6 hours to 48 hours. One way is to model the atmosphere dynamically and the other method is to analyze wind speed and direction statistically. Although dynamical models forecast better than statistical models, since the former solves the problem physically, statistical models can be preferable when short term forecasting is needed due to their quick response time. Most of the currently available wind power forecasting systems analyzes the effect of wind field on wind power based on numerical weather prediction models. However, the resolution of these models is not sufficient enough when the scale of the turbines on the wind farms is considered. It is possible to overcome this problem by using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models, which can provide both linear and nonlinear solutions on the turbine scale in terms of both wind speed and wind power forecasting. In this study, the WRF model is used for 72-hour wind speed and direction forecasting. The initial and boundary conditions of the model are provided by ECMWF operational forecasting data with the resolution of 0.25 degree. The WRF model is downscaled to 1 km resolution over Manisa Soma wind farm and 72-hour forecasts for each day of 2010 are accomplished. WindSim uses wind speed and direction values, which are solved on the nearest grid point of the WRF model to the location of a wind turbine, to simulate high-resolution wind speed values for 72hours. These WRF to WindSim coupled model results are compared to the wind power observations. As a result, we found that daily wind power generation errors per turbine vary between 90kW and 200kW for the seasons of spring, summer, and fall, whereas the error is about 150-350kW for winter. We also compared the errors of 24 hourly model outputs and we found that there is no significant difference among the first, the second, and the third 24 hourly forecasts. We finally applied model output statistics to the WRF to WindSim coupled model results in order to minimize their errors.
Climate Dynamics | 2018
Philippe Drobinski; Nicolas Da Silva; Gérémy Panthou; Sophie Bastin; Caroline Muller; Bodo Ahrens; Marco Borga; Dario Conte; Giorgia Fosser; Filippo Giorgi; Ivan Güttler; Vassiliki Kotroni; Laurent Li; Efrat Morin; Baris Onol; Pere Quintana-Seguí; Raquel Romera; Csaba Torma
Climate Dynamics | 2014
Baris Onol; Deniz Bozkurt; Ufuk Utku Turuncoglu; Omer Lutfi Sen; H. Nüzhet Dalfes
Regional Environmental Change | 2014
Baris Onol; Yurdanur Sezginer Unal
İTÜDERGİSİ/d | 2011
Baris Onol; Yurdanur Sezginer Unal; H. Nüzhet Dalfes
Archive | 2010
Deniz Bozkurt; Omer Lutfi Sen; Ufuk Utku Turuncoglu; Baris Onol; Tayfun Kindap; Hasan Nuzhet Dalfes; Mehmet Karaca
9th HyMex Workshop | 2015
Philippe Drobinski; N. Da Silva; Gérémy Panthou; Sophie Bastin; Caroline Muller; Bodo Ahrens; Marco Borga; Dario Conte; Giorgia Fosser; F. Giorgi; Ivan Güttler; Vassiliki Kotroni; Laurent Li; Efrat Morin; Baris Onol; Pere Quintana-Seguí; Raquel Romera; Torma Csaba Zsolt
Archive | 2010
Baris Onol
Archive | 2010
Gokay Biyik; Yurdanur Sezginer Unal; Baris Onol