Barry C. Dorn
Harvard University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Barry C. Dorn.
Public Health Reports | 2007
Barry C. Dorn; Elena Savoia; Marcia A. Testa; Michael A. Stoto; Leonard J. Marcus
Objective. Survey instruments for evaluating public health preparedness have focused on measuring the structure and capacity of local, state, and federal agencies, rather than linkages among structure, process, and outcomes. To focus evaluation on the latter, we evaluated the linkages among individuals, organizations, and systems using the construct of “connectivity” and developed a measurement instrument. Methods. Results from focus groups of emergency preparedness first responders generated 62 items used in the development sample of 187 respondents. Item reduction and factors analyses were conducted to confirm the scales components. Results. The 62 items were reduced to 28. Five scales explained 70% of the total variance (number of items, percent variance explained, Cronbachs alpha) including connectivity with the system (8, 45%, 0.94), coworkers (7, 7%, 0.91), organization (7, 12%, 0.93), and perceptions (6, 6%, 0.90). Discriminant validity was found to be consistent with the factor structure. Conclusion. We developed a Connectivity Measurement Tool for the public health workforce consisting of a 34-item questionnaire found to be a reliable measure of connectivity with preliminary evidence of construct validity.
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness | 2015
Eric Goralnick; Pinchas Halpern; Stephanie Loo; Jonathan D. Gates; Paul D. Biddinger; John Fisher; George C. Velmahos; Sarita Chung; David P. Mooney; Calvin A. Brown; Brien Barnewolt; Peter A. Burke; Alok Gupta; Andrew Ulrich; Horacio Hojman; Eric McNulty; Barry C. Dorn; Leonard J. Marcus; Kobi Peleg
OBJECTIVE On April 15, 2013, two improvised explosive devices (IEDs) exploded at the Boston Marathon and 264 patients were treated at 26 hospitals in the aftermath. Despite the extent of injuries sustained by victims, there was no subsequent mortality for those treated in hospitals. Leadership decisions and actions in major trauma centers were a critical factor in this response. METHODS The objective of this investigation was to describe and characterize organizational dynamics and leadership themes immediately after the bombings by utilizing a novel structured sequential qualitative approach consisting of a focus group followed by subsequent detailed interviews and combined expert analysis. RESULTS Across physician leaders representing 7 hospitals, several leadership and management themes emerged from our analysis: communications and volunteer surges, flexibility, the challenge of technology, and command versus collaboration. CONCLUSIONS Disasters provide a distinctive context in which to study the robustness and resilience of response systems. Therefore, in the aftermath of a large-scale crisis, every effort should be invested in forming a coalition and collecting critical lessons so they can be shared and incorporated into best practices and preparations. Novel communication strategies, flexible leadership structures, and improved information systems will be necessary to reduce morbidity and mortality during future events.
Disasters | 2014
Leesa Lin; Isaac Ashkenazi; Barry C. Dorn; Elena Savoia
This paper describes and analyses the public health system response to the deadly earthquake in Sichuan province, China, in May 2008. Drawing on an experiential learning project consisting of a literature review and field research, including a series of interviews with medical and public health professionals, policy-makers and first responders, a conceptual framework was developed to describe the response. This approach emphasises the pre-existing preparedness level of the medical and public health systems, as well as social, economic and geo-political factors that had an impact on mitigation efforts. This framework was used to conduct post-disaster analyses addressing major response issues and examining methods employed during the public health response to the disaster. This framework could be used to describe and analyse the emergency response to other disasters.
Biosecurity and Bioterrorism-biodefense Strategy Practice and Science | 2006
Leonard J. Marcus; Barry C. Dorn; Joseph M. Henderson
Archive | 2011
Leonard J. Marcus; Barry C. Dorn
Negotiation Journal | 2012
Leonard J. Marcus; Barry C. Dorn; Eric McNulty
Archive | 2008
Leonard J. Marcus; Isaac Ashkenazi; Barry C. Dorn; Joseph M. Henderson
Biosecurity and Bioterrorism-biodefense Strategy Practice and Science | 2013
Robyn K. Sobelson; Andrea C. Young; Leonard J. Marcus; Barry C. Dorn; Verla S. Neslund; Eric McNulty
Journal of The American Academy of Dermatology | 2012
Melissa Shive; Barry C. Dorn
The Journal of Leadership Education | 2018
Eric McNulty; Barry C. Dorn; Eric Goralnick; Richard Serino; Jennifer O. Grimes; Lisa Borelli Flynn; Melani Cheers; Leonard J. Marcus