Bashir A. Zikria

Extremity cone-beam CT for evaluation of medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis: Initial experience in imaging of the weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing knee

PURPOSE To investigate differences in joint space width (JSW) and meniscal extrusion (ME) between non-weight bearing (NWB) and weight bearing (WB) examinations of knee joints with medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA) using a cone-beam CT (CBCT) extremity imaging system. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this IRB approved prospective study, informed consent was obtained for 17 patients symptomatic for OA (11 F,6 M; 31-78 years, mean 56 years) and 18 asymptomatic controls (0 F,18 M; 29-48 years, mean 38.5 years) enrolled for CBCT exams in NWB and WB positions. Three independent observers measured medial tibiofemoral JSW and ME. Measurements were compared between NWB and WB images using paired Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test. RESULTS OA subjects exhibited a statistically significant reduction in JSW between NWB and WB scans (average JSW(NWB)(OA)=2.1 mm and JSW(WB)(OA)=1.5 mm, p=0.016) and increase in ME (average ME(NWB)(OA)=6.9 mm and ME(WB)(OA)=8.2 mm, p=0.018)). For non-OA subjects, the change in JSW and ME between NWB and WB exams was reduced (average JSW(NWB)(nonOA)=3.7 mm and JSW(WB)(nonOA)=3.4 mm; average ME(NWB)(nonOA)=2.6 mm and ME(WB)(nonOA)=2.7 mm) and was not statistically significant. Inter-observer agreement was evaluated using Bland-Altman limits of agreement, with good agreement for all measurements (correlation coefficient 0.89-0.98). CONCLUSION The ability to conduct NWB and WB exams in CBCT with a dose profile that is favorable in comparison to multidetector CT (MDCT) and with image quality sufficient for morphological analysis of joint space narrowing and meniscal extrusion could provide a valuable tool for OA diagnosis and treatment assessment.

Reliability and Validity of 3 Methods of Assessing Orthopedic Resident Skill in Shoulder Surgery.

OBJECTIVE Traditional measures for evaluating resident surgical technical skills (e.g., case logs) assess operative volume but not level of surgical proficiency. Our goal was to compare the reliability and validity of 3 tools for measuring surgical skill among orthopedic residents when performing 3 open surgical approaches to the shoulder. METHODS A total of 23 residents at different stages of their surgical training were tested for technical skill pertaining to 3 shoulder surgical approaches using the following measures: Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) checklists, the Global Rating Scale (GRS), and a final pass/fail assessment determined by 3 upper extremity surgeons. Adverse events were recorded. The Cronbach α coefficient was used to assess reliability of the OSATS checklists and GRS scores. Interrater reliability was calculated with intraclass correlation coefficients. Correlations among OSATS checklist scores, GRS scores, and pass/fail assessment were calculated with Spearman ρ. Validity of OSATS checklists was determined using analysis of variance with postgraduate year (PGY) as a between-subjects factor. Significance was set at p < 0.05 for all tests. RESULTS Criterion validity was shown between the OSATS checklists and GRS for the 3 open shoulder approaches. Checklist scores showed superior interrater reliability compared with GRS and subjective pass/fail measurements. GRS scores were positively correlated across training years. The incidence of adverse events was significantly higher among PGY-1 and PGY-2 residents compared with more experienced residents. CONCLUSION OSATS checklists are a valid and reliable assessment of technical skills across 3 surgical shoulder approaches. However, checklist scores do not measure quality of technique. Documenting adverse events is necessary to assess quality of technique and ultimate pass/fail status. Multiple methods of assessing surgical skill should be considered when evaluating orthopedic resident surgical performance.

Techniques for Suture Anchor Removal in Shoulder Surgery

Although suture anchor complications after arthroscopic shoulder surgery are uncommon, they can be devastating, such as articular cartilage or bone loss secondary to a dislodged or prominent suture anchor. Proper insertion of the anchor is the most important factor in the prevention of this complication, but if a complication occurs, prompt recognition and treatment are important to prevent damage to the shoulder. The goals were to (1) discuss strategies for preventing or dealing with dislodged or prominent suture anchors and (2) introduce techniques for removal of these implants.

Meniscal Surgery: Risk of Radiographic Joint Space Narrowing Progression and Subsequent Knee Replacement—Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative

Purpose To investigate the risk of radiographic joint space narrowing (JSN) progression evaluated in subjects with and those without underlying osteoarthritis at baseline and knee replacement (KR) associated with meniscal surgery in subjects with and those without a reported history of preceding knee trauma. Materials and Methods The HIPAA-compliant protocol was approved by the institutional review boards of the participating centers. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Subjects who underwent meniscal surgery with a preceding knee trauma at baseline (n = 564) and those without (n = 147) were drawn from the Osteoarthritis Initiative cohort (n = 4796). Radiographic JSN progression was evaluated by using Osteoarthritis Research Society International grading (progression in 1st-, 2nd-, 3rd-, 4th-, 6th-, or 8th-year radiographic findings compared with baseline). KR was assessed up to the 9th year of study (days passed from inclusion to KR or last follow-up). Cox hazard analysis was used to extract the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with adjustments for baseline age, sex, body mass index, physical activity, symptoms, and radiographic osteoarthritis features (Kellgren and Lawrence [KL] grade). Results Meniscal surgery with a history of preceding knee trauma was not associated with radiographic progression of JSN (adjusted HR, 0.91 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.78, 1.07]) or KR (adjusted HR, 1.02 [95% CI: 0.79, 1.34]; P = .854). However, meniscal surgery without a history of preceding knee trauma was associated with radiographic progression of JSN (adjusted HR, 1.27 [95% CI: 1.00, 1.63]) and KR (adjusted HR, 2.09 [95% CI: 1.52, 2.89]; P < .001). Additionally, there was a higher risk of KR in subjects with radiographic KL grade of less than 2 (adjusted HR, 6.97 [95% CI: 3.56, 13.64]; P < .001) at baseline in comparison with KL grade of at least 2 (adjusted HR, 1.76 [95% CI: 1.22, 2.54]; P < .05). Conclusion In contrast to subjects without a reported preceding trauma, meniscal surgery is not independently associated with increased risk of radiographic JSN progression and KR in patients with a reported preceding trauma.

Association of Mucoid Degeneration of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament at MR Imaging with Medial Tibiofemoral Osteoarthritis Progression at Radiography: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative

Purpose To determine whether anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) mucoid degeneration in participants with or at risk for osteoarthritis is associated with longitudinal risk of radiographic progression of medial tibiofemoral compartment joint space loss (JSL). Materials and Methods Baseline demographic, clinical, radiographic, and Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) data were evaluated in 600 participants from the Osteoarthritis Initiative database. Two blinded musculoskeletal radiologists independently evaluated baseline MR images for ACL mucoid degeneration. Multiple logistic regression was used to investigate the association between ACL mucoid degeneration at MR imaging and JSL progression at radiography, defined as a minimum joint space width decrease greater than 0.7 mm (48 months; cutoff according to mean and standard deviation of 1-year minimum joint space width changes in 90 knees of reference group). Stratified analysis was performed based on baseline cartilage surface damage. Results Knees with ACL mucoid degeneration showed a greater proportion of JSL progression compared with knees with a normal ACL (64% vs 47%; P = .004). After adjustment for all demographic, clinical, radiographic, and MOAKS variables, ACL mucoid degeneration was not statistically significantly associated with JSL progression in the entire cohort (adjusted odds ratio, 1.66; 95% confidence interval: 1.00, 2.77; P = .051). In subgroup analysis, ACL mucoid degeneration was statistically significantly associated with JSL progression in participants with less baseline cartilage surface damage (maximum cartilage surface loss of ≤75% in all subregions [P = .015] and ≤4 of involved subregions with cartilage surface loss [P = .028]). Conclusion ACL mucoid degeneration in participants with or at risk for osteoarthritis is associated with progression of medial tibiofemoral compartment JSL in knees with less baseline cartilage surface area damage.

Knee dislocation with popliteal artery disruption: A nationwide analysis from 2005 to 2013

Objective Few have compared short-term outcomes following knee dislocations with or without concomitant popliteal artery disruption (PAD). Methods The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify 2175 patients admitted for knee dislocation from 2005 to 2013 (concomitant PAD: n = 210/9.7%; without: n = 1965/90.3%). Results Patients with PAD were younger, more often male, Black and Hispanic, and with Medicaid (all p ≤ 0.013). PADs were associated with 11.0-times higher odds of increased LOS (95%CI, 6.6-18.4) and 2.8-times higher odds of experiencing any complication (95%CI, 2.03-3.92). Female sex was a protective factor against increased LOS, (OR = 0.65; 95%CI, 0.48-0.88). Conclusion High suspicion index should be maintained for concomitant vascular injuries following knee dislocations.

Superolateral Hoffa’s fat pad (SHFP) oedema and patellar cartilage volume loss: quantitative analysis using longitudinal data from the Foundation for the National Institute of Health (FNIH) Osteoarthritis Biomarkers Consortium

ObjectivesTo determine the association of superolateral Hoffa’s fat pad (SHFP) oedema and patellofemoral joint structural damage in participants of Foundation for the National Institute of Health Osteoarthritis Biomarkers Consortium study.MethodsBaseline and 24-month MRIs of 600 subjects were assessed. The presence of SHFP oedema (using 0–3 grading scale) and patellar morphology metrics were determined using baseline MRI. Quantitative patellar cartilage volume and semi-quantitative MRI osteoarthritis knee score (MOAKS) variables were extracted. The associations between SHFP oedema and patellar cartilage damage, bone marrow lesion (BML), osteophyte and morphology were evaluated in cross-sectional model. In longitudinal analysis, the associations between oedema and cartilage volume loss (defined using reliable change index) and MOAKS worsening were evaluated.ResultsIn cross-sectional evaluations, the presence of SHFP oedema was associated with simultaneous lateral patellar cartilage/BML defects and inferior-medial patellar osteophyte size. A significant positive correlation between the degree of patella alta and SHFP oedema was detected (r = 0.259, p < 0.001). The presence of oedema was associated with 24-month cartilage volume loss (odds ratio (OR) 2.11, 95% confidence interval 1.46–3.06) and medial patellar BML size (OR 1.92 (1.15–3.21)) and number (OR 2.50 (1.29–4.88)) worsening. The optimal cut-off value for the grade of baseline SHFP oedema regarding both presence and worsening of patellar structural damage was ≥ 1 (presence of any SHFP hyperintensity).ConclusionsThe presence of SHFP oedema could be considered as a predictor of future patellar cartilage loss and BML worsening, and an indicator of simultaneous cartilage, BML and osteophyte defects.Key Points• SHFP oedema was associated with simultaneous lateral patellar OA-related structural damage.• SHFP oedema was associated with longitudinal patellar cartilage loss over 24 months.• SHFP oedema could be considered as indicator and predictor of patellar OA.

A biomechanical analysis of tibial ACL reconstruction with graft length mismatch

Introduction: The incidence of graft length mismatch (GLM) during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is reported to be up to 13%, with a rate of 20% when using bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) allografts. Multiple techniques have been described to accommodate for the longer BPTB graft. As no study has compared the biomechanical properties of these methods (with cyclic loading), we evaluated the strength of four different surgical techniques used to accommodate for GLM during ACL reconstruction. Methods: A total of 32 fresh-frozen bovine tibiae and patellar tendons were divided into four groups based on the method of tibial graft fixation: (1) sutures tied over a post, (2) bone staples, (3) screws and washers, and (4) soft-tissue conversion with interference screw. Biomechanical testing was performed comparing the tensile properties of graft fixation techniques under cyclic loading. Ability to withstand 1500 cycles of load, the maximum tensile strength at load-to-failure, and the mode-of-failure were evaluated. Results: Only group 4 had all grafts intact after 1500 loading cycles, while the other groups had one graft failure at 338 (group 1), 240 (group 2), and 309 (group 3) cycles. The highest mean load-to-failure was observed in group 3 at 762 ± 173 N, which was found to be significantly higher than the other groups. The mean loads to failure in groups 1–4 were 453 ± 86 N, 485 ± 246 N, 762 ± 173 N, and 458 ± 128 N. Conclusion: While there are multiple viable techniques for fixation of a BPTB graft in the case of GLM, this study demonstrated that direct screw fixation offers the strongest construct.