Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Beatrice Eugster is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Beatrice Eugster.


Bulletin of The World Health Organization | 2014

Success factors for reducing maternal and child mortality

Shyama Kuruvilla; Julian Schweitzer; David Bishai; Sadia Chowdhury; Daniele Caramani; Laura Frost; Rafael Cortez; Bernadette Daelmans; Andres de Francisco; Taghreed Adam; Robert E. Cohen; Y. Natalia Alfonso; Jennifer Franz-Vasdeki; Seemeen Saadat; Beth Anne Pratt; Beatrice Eugster; Sarah Bandali; Pritha Venkatachalam; Rachael Hinton; John Murray; Sharon Arscott-Mills; Henrik Axelson; Blerta Maliqi; Intissar Sarker; Rama Lakshminarayanan; Troy Jacobs; Susan Jacks; Elizabeth Mason; Abdul Ghaffar; Nicholas Mays

Reducing maternal and child mortality is a priority in the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), and will likely remain so after 2015. Evidence exists on the investments, interventions and enabling policies required. Less is understood about why some countries achieve faster progress than other comparable countries. The Success Factors for Womens and Childrens Health studies sought to address this knowledge gap using statistical and econometric analyses of data from 144 low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) over 20 years; Boolean, qualitative comparative analysis; a literature review; and country-specific reviews in 10 fast-track countries for MDGs 4 and 5a. There is no standard formula--fast-track countries deploy tailored strategies and adapt quickly to change. However, fast-track countries share some effective approaches in addressing three main areas to reduce maternal and child mortality. First, these countries engage multiple sectors to address crucial health determinants. Around half the reduction in child mortality in LMICs since 1990 is the result of health sector investments, the other half is attributed to investments made in sectors outside health. Second, these countries use strategies to mobilize partners across society, using timely, robust evidence for decision-making and accountability and a triple planning approach to consider immediate needs, long-term vision and adaptation to change. Third, the countries establish guiding principles that orient progress, align stakeholder action and achieve results over time. This evidence synthesis contributes to global learning on accelerating improvements in womens and childrens health towards 2015 and beyond.


European Union Politics | 2017

Strategies of pro-European parties in the face of a Eurosceptic challenge

Silke Adam; Eva-Maria Antl-Wittenberg; Beatrice Eugster; Melanie Leidecker-Sandmann; Michaela Maier; Franzisca Schmidt

We ask how pro-European parties communicate in the face of a Eurosceptic challenge and how this affects the politicization of European Union integration within a country. We draw on a quantitative content analysis of parties’ press releases issued in the run-up to the 2014 European Parliament elections in seven countries. Our results show that pro-European parties as such put Europe on the agenda, debate issues similar to those voiced by Eurosceptics and defend their pro-European positions: yet, they do so to varying degrees and with major exceptions. It is pro-European catch-all parties with strong internal dissent that silence Europe and choose blurring or adoption strategies. Consequently, the politicization of European integration varies among countries, thereby high topic visibility is accompanied by low levels of party conflict.


Journal of European Public Policy | 2019

News media’s position-taking regarding the European Union: the synchronization of mass media’s reporting and commentating in the 2014 European Parliament elections

Silke Adam; Beatrice Eugster; Eva-Maria Antl-Wittenberg; Rachid Azrout; Judith Möller; Claes H. de Vreese; Michaela Maier; Sylvia Kritzinger

ABSTRACT We analyse whether a newspaper’s editorial position regarding the European Union is related to its selection decisions in the news section. We ask whether such a synchronization between news and editorials exists, whether it is conditioned by the type of media system and under which conditions it also affects the selection of transnational voices. Our study is based on a quantitative content analysis of the quality press in seven European countries (Austria, France, Germany, Greece, The Netherlands, Portugal and the United Kingdom) in the run-up to the 2014 European Parliament elections. Our results support a synchronization between editorials and news, specifically with regard to the selection of national speakers. With regard to transnational speakers, they are selectively chosen by a medium if its editorial position is not supported at the national level. Furthermore, they are used to put forward a portrayal of a political community in accordance with the editorial line.


Journal of European Social Policy | 2018

Immigrants and poverty, and conditionality of immigrants’ social rights:

Beatrice Eugster

It is not only immigration and the incorporation of immigrants into society that serve as challenges for post-industrialised countries, but also rising inequality and poverty. This article focuses on both issues and proposes a new theoretical perspective on the determinants of immigrant poverty. Building on comparative welfare state research and international migration literature, I argue that immigrants’ social rights – here understood as their access to paid employment and welfare benefits – condition the impact which both the labour market and welfare system have on immigrants’ poverty. The empirical analysis is based on a newly collected dataset on immigrants’ social rights in 19 advanced industrialised countries. The findings confirm the hypotheses: more regulated minimum wage setting institutions and generous traditional family programmes reduce immigrants’ poverty more strongly in countries where they are granted easier access to paid employment and social benefits.


Archive | 2014

The structure of the debate on EU integration issues. A comparative analysis of party communication in the EP 2014 elections

Beatrice Eugster

The results of Eurosceptic parties in the recent European parliament election provide further evidence that the “permissive consensus” on European integration blurred. This paper focuses on the structure of the debate on EU integration issues. Which EU integration issues and positions do parties put forward? Can the debate on EU integration issues be subsumed in one or several dimensions? Do they reflect national political conflicts such as the left-right and the ‘new politics’/cultural divide? Or do they form one unique or several EU-specific dimensions, e.g. national sovereignty versus integration? In order to address these questions, this paper departs from the assumption that debate on European integration is multidimensional in its nature and therefore entails a multitude of issue areas. In other words, it does not look at how socio-economic and cultural issues are related to European integration but focuses on its components, i.e. particular EU-specific policies such as EU-wide employment, environment, immigration and monetary policy. The paper departs from the cleavage theory on political di-visions and different approaches transferring them to EU politics. Two points should be noted; first, this paper does not compare the debate on European integration issues between the national level and the EU level, but whether domestic divisions are reflected at the EU level. Second, it is not concerned with the general ideo-logical profile of political parties on EU integration issues, but on EU issues that parties communicated through press releases. By doing this, the paper is concerned with the salient EU issues that parties touch upon.


Archive | 2014

How political economies affect immigrants' socio-economic incorporation. A comparative analysis of immigrants’ poverty risks across advanced industrialised countries

Beatrice Eugster

Immigration and the resulting increasing ethnic diversity have become an important characteristic of advanced industrialised countries. At the same time, the majority of the countries in question are confronted with structural transformation such as deindustrialisation and changes in family structures as well as economic downturn, which limit the capacities of nation-states in addressing rising inequality and supporting those individuals at the margins of the society. This paper addresses both issues, immigration and inequality, by focusing on immigrants’ socio-economic incorporation into the receiving societies of advanced industrialised countries. The aim of this paper is to explain cross-national variation in immigrants’ poverty risks. Drawing on the political economy as well as the migration literature, the paper develops a theoretical framework that considers how the impact of the national labour market and welfare system on immigrants’ poverty risks is moderated by the integration policies, which regulate immigrants’ access to the labour market and social programs (or immigrants’ economic and social rights). The empirical analysis draws on income surveys as well as a newly collected data set on economic and social rights of immigrants in 19 advanced industrialised countries, including European countries as well as Australia, and North America, for the year 2007. As the results from multilevel analysis show, integration policies concerning immigrants’ access to the labour market and social programs can partly explain cross-national variations in immigrants’ poverty risks. In line with the hypothesis, stricter labour market regulations such as minimum wage setting reduce immigrants’ poverty risks stronger in countries where they are granted easier access to the labour market. However, concerning the impact of more generous social programs the reductive poverty effect is stronger in countries with less inclusive access of immigrants to social programs. The paper concludes by discussing possible explanations for this puzzling finding.


Bulletin of The World Health Organization | 2014

Factores de éxito para reducir la mortalidad materna e infantil

Shyama Kuruvilla; Julian Schweitzer; David Bishai; Sadia Chowdhury; Daniele Caramani; Laura Frost; Rafael Cortez; Bernadette Daelmans; Andres de Francisco; Taghreed Adam; Robert E. Cohen; Y. Natalia Alfonso; Jennifer Franz-Vasdeki; Seemeen Saadat; Beth Anne Pratt; Beatrice Eugster; Sarah Bandali; Pritha Venkatachalam; Rachael Hinton; John Murray; Sharon Arscott-Mills; Henrik Axelson; Blerta Maliqi; Intissar Sarker; Rama Lakshminarayanan; Troy Jacobs; Susan Jacks; Elizabeth Mason; Abdul Ghaffar; Nicholas Mays

Reducing maternal and child mortality is a priority in the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), and will likely remain so after 2015. Evidence exists on the investments, interventions and enabling policies required. Less is understood about why some countries achieve faster progress than other comparable countries. The Success Factors for Womens and Childrens Health studies sought to address this knowledge gap using statistical and econometric analyses of data from 144 low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) over 20 years; Boolean, qualitative comparative analysis; a literature review; and country-specific reviews in 10 fast-track countries for MDGs 4 and 5a. There is no standard formula--fast-track countries deploy tailored strategies and adapt quickly to change. However, fast-track countries share some effective approaches in addressing three main areas to reduce maternal and child mortality. First, these countries engage multiple sectors to address crucial health determinants. Around half the reduction in child mortality in LMICs since 1990 is the result of health sector investments, the other half is attributed to investments made in sectors outside health. Second, these countries use strategies to mobilize partners across society, using timely, robust evidence for decision-making and accountability and a triple planning approach to consider immediate needs, long-term vision and adaptation to change. Third, the countries establish guiding principles that orient progress, align stakeholder action and achieve results over time. This evidence synthesis contributes to global learning on accelerating improvements in womens and childrens health towards 2015 and beyond.


Bulletin of The World Health Organization | 2014

Facteurs de réussite pour la réduction de la mortalité maternelle et infantile

Shyama Kuruvilla; Julian Schweitzer; David Bishai; Sadia Chowdhury; Daniele Caramani; Laura Frost; Rafael Cortez; Bernadette Daelmans; Andres de Francisco; Taghreed Adam; Robert E. Cohen; Y. Natalia Alfonso; Jennifer Franz-Vasdeki; Seemeen Saadat; Beth Anne Pratt; Beatrice Eugster; Sarah Bandali; Pritha Venkatachalam; Rachael Hinton; John Murray; Sharon Arscott-Mills; Henrik Axelson; Blerta Maliqi; Intissar Sarker; Rama Lakshminarayanan; Troy Jacobs; Susan Jacks; Elizabeth Mason; Abdul Ghaffar; Nicholas Mays

Reducing maternal and child mortality is a priority in the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), and will likely remain so after 2015. Evidence exists on the investments, interventions and enabling policies required. Less is understood about why some countries achieve faster progress than other comparable countries. The Success Factors for Womens and Childrens Health studies sought to address this knowledge gap using statistical and econometric analyses of data from 144 low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) over 20 years; Boolean, qualitative comparative analysis; a literature review; and country-specific reviews in 10 fast-track countries for MDGs 4 and 5a. There is no standard formula--fast-track countries deploy tailored strategies and adapt quickly to change. However, fast-track countries share some effective approaches in addressing three main areas to reduce maternal and child mortality. First, these countries engage multiple sectors to address crucial health determinants. Around half the reduction in child mortality in LMICs since 1990 is the result of health sector investments, the other half is attributed to investments made in sectors outside health. Second, these countries use strategies to mobilize partners across society, using timely, robust evidence for decision-making and accountability and a triple planning approach to consider immediate needs, long-term vision and adaptation to change. Third, the countries establish guiding principles that orient progress, align stakeholder action and achieve results over time. This evidence synthesis contributes to global learning on accelerating improvements in womens and childrens health towards 2015 and beyond.


Swiss Political Science Review | 2011

The Swiss: A Political Nation?

Beatrice Eugster; Oliver Strijbis


The International Journal of Press/Politics | 2018

Who Drives the Agenda: Media or Parties? A Seven-Country Comparison in the Run-Up to the 2014 European Parliament Elections

A. Severin Jansen; Beatrice Eugster; Michaela Maier; Silke Adam

Collaboration


Dive into the Beatrice Eugster's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michaela Maier

University of Koblenz and Landau

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Abdul Ghaffar

World Health Organization

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Blerta Maliqi

World Health Organization

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Elizabeth Mason

World Health Organization

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Henrik Axelson

World Health Organization

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge