Becker Hewes
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Becker Hewes.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2009
Georg Hess; Raoul Herbrecht; Jorge Romaguera; Gregor Verhoef; Michael Crump; Christian Gisselbrecht; Anna Laurell; Fritz Offner; Andrew Strahs; Anna Berkenblit; Orysia Hanushevsky; Jill Clancy; Becker Hewes; Laurence Moore; Bertrand Coiffier
PURPOSE Temsirolimus, a specific inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin kinase, has shown clinical activity in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). We evaluated two dose regimens of temsirolimus in comparison with investigators choice single-agent therapy in relapsed or refractory disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this multicenter, open-label, phase III study, 162 patients with relapsed or refractory MCL were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive one of two temsirolimus regimens: 175 mg weekly for 3 weeks followed by either 75 mg (175/75-mg) or 25 mg (175/25-mg) weekly, or investigators choice therapy from prospectively approved options. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by independent assessment. RESULTS Median PFS was 4.8, 3.4, and 1.9 months for the temsirolimus 175/75-mg, 175/25-mg, and investigators choice groups, respectively. Patients treated with temsirolimus 175/75-mg had significantly longer PFS than those treated with investigators choice therapy (P = .0009; hazard ratio = 0.44); those treated with temsirolimus 175/25-mg showed a trend toward longer PFS (P = .0618; hazard ratio = 0.65). Objective response rate was significantly higher in the 175/75-mg group (22%) compared with the investigators choice group (2%; P = .0019). Median overall survival for the temsirolimus 175/75-mg group and the investigators choice group was 12.8 months and 9.7 months, respectively (P = .3519). The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events in the temsirolimus groups were thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia, and asthenia. CONCLUSION Temsirolimus 175 mg weekly for 3 weeks followed by 75 mg weekly significantly improved PFS and objective response rate compared with investigators choice therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL.
Cancer Research | 2016
Aditya Bardia; Shanu Modi; Mafalda Oliveira; Mario Campone; Brigette Ma; Luc Dirix; Amy Weise; L Nardi; V Zhang; Sg Bhansali; Becker Hewes; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor
Background: Everolimus (EVE; 10 mg) and exemestane (EXE; 25 mg) doublet therapy improved progression-free survival in women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/ HER2– advanced breast cancer (aBC; BOLERO-2), but was associated with significant mucositis as well as eventual disease progression. Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors have shown clinical activity in combination with endocrine therapy and could potentially overcome phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor resistance by acting downstream of the PI3K pathway. Methods: In this ongoing Phase Ib/II study (NCT01857193), postmenopausal women with anastrozole- or letrozole-resistant HR+/HER2– aBC received escalating doses of the CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib (LEE011 [LEE]; once daily [QD], days 1–21 of 28-day cycles) with EVE (1–5 mg QD) and EXE (25 mg QD). Dose escalation was guided by a Bayesian logic regression model with overdose control principle and real-time pharmacokinetics. Pre-treatment tumor samples were sequenced by the Foundation Medicine platform. Here we report on the safety and efficacy of triplet therapy, and explore potential predictive biomarkers of response. Results: At the cut-off date March 2, 2015, 84 patients (pts) had been treated; here we present results from the 70 pts in the triplet arm treated with LEE (200–350 mg), EVE (most at 2.5 mg), and EXE. The median number of prior regimens was 5, and 18 (25.7%) pts had received prior PI3K/AKT/mTOR or CDK4/6 inhibitors for metastatic disease. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs; ≥5% pts) were neutropenia (45.7%), leukopenia (8.6%), and thrombocytopenia (5.7%). Two (2.9%) pts discontinued due to AEs. Grade 3 dose-limiting toxicities were reported in 6 pts treated with LEE (300 mg) and EVE (2.5 mg): increased alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase (2 pts), febrile neutropenia and hypophosphatemia (1 pt), oral mucositis (1 pt), rash and thrombocytopenia (1 pt), and thrombocytopenia with bleeding (1 pt). The recommended Phase II dose will be reported at the meeting. Among 55 pts evaluable for best overall response, there was 1 (1.8%) complete response (CR), 2 (3.6%) confirmed and 3 (5.5%) unconfirmed partial responses (PR), 7 (12.7%) non-CR, non-progressive disease (NCRNPD), and 26 (47.3%) stable disease (SD). Disease control rate (CR+PR+SD+NCRNPD) was 70.9%. One pt received treatment for ≥14 months, and 23 (32.9%) pts for ≥4 months. There was a trend towards longer duration of treatment in the CCND1 amplified group (n=10; median 166 days) than in the non-amplified group (n=22; median 60 days). A retrospective analysis of BOLERO-2 showed no differential effect of CCND1 amplification on PFS. Conclusions: Triplet combination of endocrine therapy with mTOR and CDK4/6 inhibition is feasible, permits lower dosing of EVE (resulting in better tolerability), and shows encouraging signs of clinical activity, including in some pts with prior exposure to PI3K/AKT/mTOR or CDK4/6 inhibitors. Duration of treatment was longer in pts with cyclin D amplification, possibly due to inclusion of a CDK4/6 inhibitor. These results suggest that that triplet therapy might be beneficial for pts who progress on doublets or who have cyclin D amplification. Citation Format: Bardia A, Modi S, Oliveira M, Campone M, Ma B, Dirix L, Weise A, Nardi L, Zhang V, Bhansali SG, Hewes B, Chavez-MacGregor M. Triplet therapy with ribociclib, everolimus, and exemestane in women with HR+/HER2– advanced breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-13-01.
Blood | 2006
Jorge Cortes; Hagop M. Kantarjian; Michele Baccarani; Tim H. Brümmendorf; Delong Liu; Gert J. Ossenkoppele; Angela Volkert; Becker Hewes; Laurence Moore; Charles Zacharchuk; Carlo Gambacorti
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2008
Georg Hess; Jorge Romaguera; Gregor Verhoef; Raoul Herbrecht; Michael Crump; Andrew Strahs; Jill Clancy; Becker Hewes; Bertrand Coiffier
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2014
Pamela N. Munster; Erika Paige Hamilton; Catherine Franklin; Suraj G. Bhansali; Kitty Wan; Becker Hewes; Dejan Juric
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2007
Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini; Tim H. Brümmendorf; Hagop M. Kantarjian; G. Martinelli; D. Liu; T. Fisher; Becker Hewes; A. Volkert; Richat Abbas; Jorge Cortes
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2014
Aditya Bardia; Shanu Modi; Mariana Chavez-Mac Gregor; Muaiad Kittaneh; Alyssa J. Marino; Alessandro Matano; Suraj G. Bhansali; Becker Hewes; Javier Cortes
Blood | 2011
Geoffrey L. Uy; David Avigan; Jorge Cortes; Pamela S. Becker; Robert Chen; Jane L. Liesveld; Becker Hewes; Don Johns; Harry P. Erba
Cancer Research | 2017
Dejan Juric; Mario Campone; Pamela N. Munster; Roohi Ismail-Khan; Laura G. Estévez; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Antonio Frassoldati; Rina Hui; Ingrid A. Mayer; Javier Cortes; Anthony Gonçalves; Richard de Boer; Luc Dirix; Sara M. Tolaney; Soo-Chin Lee; Michela Maur; Yingbo Wang; Faye Su; Jason R. Dobson; Caroline Germa; Becker Hewes; Aditya Bardia
Blood | 2008
Jorge Romaguera; Bertrand Coiffier; Michael Crump; Raoul Herbrecht; Gregor Verhoef; Orysia Hanushevsky; Andrew Strahs; Becker Hewes; Anna Berkenblit; Georg Hess