Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Becky M. Pierce is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Becky M. Pierce.


Journal of Wildlife Management | 2004

HABITAT SELECTION BY MULE DEER: FORAGE BENEFITS OR RISK OF PREDATION?

Becky M. Pierce; R. Terry Bowyer; Vernon C. Bleich

Abstract Risk of predation may affect individuals in prey populations by limiting their use of high-quality habitat. Predation risk, however, cannot be implicated as a factor in habitat selection by prey without data comparing quality of selected and avoided habitats, along with the predation risk associated with those habitats. If forage benefits and predation risk are not positively correlated among habitat types, then predation risk may have little influence on the habitat selected by prey. We evaluated habitat selection by mountain lions (Puma concolor) and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) in the eastern Sierra Nevada, California, USA, from 1994 to 1997, to determine how forage benefit or risk of predation by mountain lions affects habitat selection by mule deer. Mountain lions were the primary predator of mule deer in our study area. Stands of bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata) in the Great Basin provided more cover for mule deer than surrounding patches of rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus nauseosum) or desert peach (Prunus andersonii). Bitterbrush also was important forage for mule deer during winter. We hypothesized that mountain lions would be more successful at stalking and killing mule deer in habitats with more concealment cover than in habitats with less cover, and therefore mule deer would choose between foraging on bitterbush and avoiding predation by mountain lions. We collected data on habitat characteristics in 3 types of locations: random locations (n = 180), deer foraging locations (n = 179), and locations where mountain lions killed deer (n = 41). Mule deer selected habitat at greater elevations (P < 0.001) with more bitterbrush (P < 0.001) and less rabbitbrush (P = 0.033) when compared with random locations. Logistic regression indicated that mountain lions killed deer in relatively open areas with more desert peach (P < 0.001) than at locations in which deer foraged. Therefore, deer were not confronted with a trade-off when selecting habitat on winter range, and they minimized the ratio of predation risk to forage benefit by selecting habitat with more bitterbrush. Changes in diet among seasons, which occur for herds of migratory deer, lead to individuals experiencing changing predation risk to forage benefit ratios throughout the year. Hence, migratory populations of mule deer likely adopt different strategies of habitat selection among seasons.


Ecosphere | 2011

Timing of seasonal migration in mule deer: effects of climate, plant phenology, and life‐history characteristics

Kevin L. Monteith; Vernon C. Bleich; Thomas R. Stephenson; Becky M. Pierce; Mary M. Conner; Robert W. Klaver; R. Terry Bowyer

Phenological events of plants and animals are sensitive to climatic processes. Migration is a life-history event exhibited by most large herbivores living in seasonal environments, and is thought to occur in response to dynamics of forage and weather. Decisions regarding when to migrate, however, may be affected by differences in life-history characteristics of individuals. Long-term and intensive study of a population of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) in the Sierra Nevada, California, USA, allowed us to document patterns of migration during 11 years that encompassed a wide array of environmental conditions. We used two new techniques to properly account for interval-censored data and disentangle effects of broad-scale climate, local weather patterns, and plant phenology on seasonal patterns of migration, while incorporating effects of individual life-history characteristics. Timing of autumn migration varied substantially among individual deer, but was associated with the severity of winter weather, and in particular, snow depth and cold temperatures. Migratory responses to winter weather, however, were affected by age, nutritional condition, and summer residency of individual females. Old females and those in good nutritional condition risked encountering severe weather by delaying autumn migration, and were thus risk-prone with respect to the potential loss of foraging opportunities in deep snow compared with young females and those in poor nutritional condition. Females that summered on the west side of the crest of the Sierra Nevada delayed autumn migration relative to east-side females, which supports the influence of the local environment on timing of migration. In contrast, timing of spring migration was unrelated to individual life-history characteristics, was nearly twice as synchronous as autumn migration, differed among years, was related to the southern oscillation index, and was influenced by absolute snow depth and advancing phenology of plants. Plasticity in timing of migration in response to climatic conditions and plant phenology may be an adaptive behavioral strategy, which should reduce the detrimental effects of trophic mismatches between resources and other life-history events of large herbivores. Failure to consider effects of nutrition and other life-history traits may cloud interpretation of phenological patterns of mammals and conceal relationships associated with climate change.


Journal of Mammalogy | 2000

SELECTION OF MULE DEER BY MOUNTAIN LIONS AND COYOTES: EFFECTS OF HUNTING STYLE, BODY SIZE, AND REPRODUCTIVE STATUS

Becky M. Pierce; Vernon C. Bleich; R. Terry Bowyer

Abstract Predation on mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) by mountain lions (Puma concolor) and coyotes (Canis latrans) was examined to test effects of hunting style and body size, and for mountain lions reproductive status, on selection of prey. Mountain lions, which hunt by stalking, selected ≤1-year-old mule deer as prey. Body condition of mule deer did not affect prey selection by coyotes or mountain lions, and both predators preyed upon females and older adult deer more often than expected based on the percentage of these groups in the population. Female mountain lions selected female deer, but male mountain lions did not. Female mountain lions without offspring, however, did not differ from male mountain lions in prey selection. Coyotes did not select for young deer. Female mountain lions with kittens were selective for young deer in late summer.


Journal of Mammalogy | 2012

Top-down versus bottom-up forcing: evidence from mountain lions and mule deer

Becky M. Pierce; Vernon C. Bleich; Kevin L. Monteith; R. Terry Bowyer

Abstract We studied mountain lions (Puma concolor) and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) inhabiting a Great Basin ecosystem in Round Valley, California, to make inferences concerning predator–prey dynamics. Our purpose was to evaluate the relative role of top-down and bottom-up forcing on mule deer in this multiple-predator, multiple-prey system. We identified a period of decline (by 83%) of mule deer (1984–1990), and then a period of slow but steady increase (1991–1998). For mule deer, bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata) in diets, per capita availability of bitterbrush, kidney fat indexes, fetal rates (young per adult female), fetal weights, and survivorship of adults and young indicated that the period of decline was typical of a deer population near or above the carrying capacity (K) of its environment. Numbers of mountain lions also declined, but with a long time lag. The period of increase was typified by deer displaying life-history characteristics of a population below K, yet the finite rate of growth (λ = 1.10) remained below what would be expected for a population rebounding rapidly toward K (λ = 1.15–1.21) in the absence of limiting factors. Life-history characteristics were consistent with the mule deer population being regulated by bottom-up forcing through environmental effects on forage availability relative to population density; however, predation, mostly by mountain lions, was likely additive during the period of increase and thus, top-down forcing slowed but did not prevent population growth of mule deer. These outcomes indicate that resource availability (bottom-up processes) has an ever-present effect on dynamics of herbivore populations, but that the relationship can be altered by top-down effects. Indeed, top-down and bottom-up forces can act on populations simultaneously and, thus, should not be viewed as a stark dichotomy.


Wildlife Society Bulletin | 2004

Neck lesions in ungulates from collars incorporating satellite technology

Paul R. Krausman; Vernon C. Bleich; James W. Cain; Thomas R. Stephenson; Don W. DeYoung; Philip W. McGrath; Pamela K. Swift; Becky M. Pierce; Brian D. Jansen

Wildlife Society Bulletin 2004, 32(3):987–991 Peer edited Investigators have used marking collars and telemetry collars to enhance knowledge about movements of ungulates for many decades. Technological advances have provided increasingly dependable and sophisticated equipment (Fancy et al. 1988; Mourao and Merdi 2002), and methods of collar attachment have evolved substantially, particularly with respect to juvenile ungulates (Smith et al. 1998, Bleich and Pierce 1999). Nevertheless, recent observations of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and mountain sheep (Ovis canadensis) fitted with telemetry collars that incorporate Global Positioning Systems (GPS) and other satellite technology indicate those collars may cause injury to the study animal. The intent of investigators should be to minimize injuries and effects of marking on the behavior of animals (White and Garrott 1990), but our observations suggest lack of compliance in some cases with existing guidelines (Committee on Acceptable Field Methods 1987, Institutional Animal Use and Care Committee [Powell and Proulx 2003]). We placed collars incorporating GPS receivers and very high frequency (VHF) transmitters (Telonics, Mesa, Ariz.; and Posrec, TVP Positioning AB, Lindesberg, Sweden) on mule deer and mountain sheep. We collared female deer in Round Valley, Inyo, and Mono counties, California during March (n=12) and November 2002 (n=1). Four of 6 deer recaptured in November 2002, 2 of 3 recaptured in January 2003, and 2 of 2 recaptured in March 2003 (1 of which was collared in November 2002) exhibited all stages of ulcer formation except bone involvement. Patchy alopecia, nonblanchable erythema, induration, and edema of the intact skin surrounding ulceration were present. In some deer there was only partial skin loss and the ulcers were superficial; others revealed skin loss to the subcutaneous layer resembling a deep abrasion. The most severely affected deer had skin loss with extensive destruction of muscle on the dorsal aspect of the neck (Figure 1). Affected areas varied from 4–100 cm2 and extended from 4–8 cm distal of the occiput or jaw to the mid-cervical region on the dorsal and ventral surfaces of the neck, respectively; lateral surfaces were not involved. We removed collars from the 6 deer that exhibited lesions in November 2002 and January 2003. Three of those animals were recaptured in March 2003, and all lesions had healed completely. As part of long-term ecological investigations (Pierce et al. 2000a,b), we placed VHF collars from 3 manufacturers on 113 juvenile ( 500 adult mule deer of both sexes since 1992. We From the Field: Neck lesions in ungulates from collars incorporating satellite technology


Oecologia | 2013

Evaluating apparent competition in limiting the recovery of an endangered ungulate

Heather E. Johnson; Mark Hebblewhite; Thomas R. Stephenson; David W. German; Becky M. Pierce; Vernon C. Bleich

Predation can disproportionately affect endangered prey populations when generalist predators are numerically linked to more abundant primary prey. Apparent competition, the term for this phenomenon, has been increasingly implicated in the declines of endangered prey populations. We examined the potential for apparent competition to limit the recovery of Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis sierrae), an endangered subspecies under the US Endangered Species Act. Using a combination of location, demographic, and habitat data, we assessed whether cougar (Puma concolor) predation on endangered bighorn sheep was a consequence of their winter range overlap with abundant mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus). Consistent with the apparent competition hypothesis, bighorn sheep populations with higher spatial overlap with deer exhibited higher rates of cougar predation which had additive effects on adult survival. Bighorn sheep killed by cougars were primarily located within deer winter ranges, even though those areas constituted only a portion of the bighorn sheep winter ranges. We suspect that variation in sympatry between bighorn sheep and deer populations was largely driven by differences in habitat selection among bighorn sheep herds. Indeed, bighorn sheep herds that experienced the highest rates of predation and the greatest spatial overlap with deer also exhibited the strongest selection for low elevation habitat. Although predator-mediated apparent competition may limit some populations of bighorn sheep, it is not the primary factor limiting all populations, suggesting that the dynamics of different herds are highly idiosyncratic. Management plans for endangered species should consider the spatial distributions of key competitors and predators to reduce the potential for apparent competition to hijack conservation success.


Southwestern Naturalist | 2011

Diet of Cougars (Puma concolor) Following a Decline in a Population of Mule Deer (Odocoileus hemionus): Lack of Evidence for Switching Prey

Jeffrey T. Villepique; Becky M. Pierce; Vernon C. Bleich; R. Terry Bowyer

Abstract We investigated diet of cougars (Puma concolor) in the eastern Sierra Nevada, California, following a decline in the population of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus). Mule deer declined 84% from 1985 to 1991, a period concurrent with declines in bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis sierrae; an endangered taxon). An index to numbers of cougars lagged behind those declines, with a reduction of ca. 50% during 1992–1996. We determined diet of cougars by analysis of fecal samples collected during 1991–1995, when the population of mule deer was <25% of its former size. Mule deer was in 79% of 178 feces in winter and 58% of 74 feces in summer. Although most (69%) fecal samples in winter were <5 km from, or within (25%) winter range of bighorn sheep, none contained evidence of bighorn sheep. One fecal sample in summer contained remains of bighorn sheep, indicating that those ungulates were not an important component of the diet during our investigation.


Advances in Ecology | 2015

Resource Selection by an Endangered Ungulate: A Test of Predator-Induced Range Abandonment

Jeffrey T. Villepique; Becky M. Pierce; Vernon C. Bleich; Aleksandra Andic; R. Terry Bowyer

We investigated influences of risk of predation by mountain lions (Puma concolor), topographic metrics at multiple scales, and vegetation, land, and snow cover on resource selection by Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis sierrae), an endangered taxon, during winters 2002–2007, in the Sierra Nevada, California, USA. We hypothesized that those mountain ungulates would trade off rewards accrued from using critical low-elevation habitat in winter for the safety of areas with reduced risk of predation. Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep did not trade off benefits of forage for reduced risk of predation but selected areas of high solar radiation, a correlate of vegetation productivity, where risk of predation by mountain lions was greatest, while mitigating indirect risk of predation by selecting for steep, rugged terrain. Bighorn sheep selected more strongly for areas where mountain lions were active, than for low-elevation habitat in winter, likely because mountain lions were most active in those areas of bighorn sheep winter ranges overlapping ranges of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), where both ungulates accrued forage benefits. We demonstrated reduced benefit of migration to low elevation during drought years, providing an alternative explanation to the predator-induced abandonment hypothesis for the disuse of low-elevation winter range observed during drought years.


Southwestern Naturalist | 2007

BODY CONDITION OF RADIO-COLLARED MULE DEER WHILE INJURED AND FOLLOWING RECOVERY

Vernon C. Bleich; Thomas R. Stephenson; Becky M. Pierce; Morgan J. Warner

Abstract We evaluated levels of body fat, body condition scores, live weight, and fetal rates of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) compromised by injuries from radiocollars and compared them to non-injured animals before and after those injuries had healed. Compromised animals had lower values for all parameters at the time injuries were discovered, and that pattern repeated itself 4 mo later when subjects again were examined. Investigators must consider ramifications of their activities for research subjects, as well as for research results.


Wildlife Society Bulletin | 2005

From the Field Efficacy of aerial telemetry as an aid to capturing specific individuals- : a comparison of 2 techniques

Vernon C. Bleich; Jeffrey T. Villepique; Thomas R. Stephenson; Becky M. Pierce; Gochmurat M. Kutliyev

Abstract Long-term investigations of wild ungulates often dictate that telemetry collars on specific individuals be replaced. We described and evaluated the use of aerial telemetry to facilitate recapture of individual ungulates. Capture of marked animals was much more efficient using fixed-wing telemetry when compared to helicopter telemetry. Total time to capture (P=0.012) and pursuit time (P=0.002) differed significantly, but no difference (P=0.434) in body temperature of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) occurred at time of capture. Application of fixed-wing telemetry during net-gun captures of ungulates resulted in greater safety for capture crews and study animals and in potentially substantial monetary savings.

Collaboration


Dive into the Becky M. Pierce's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Vernon C. Bleich

California Department of Fish and Wildlife

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas R. Stephenson

California Department of Fish and Wildlife

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeffrey T. Villepique

California Department of Fish and Wildlife

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mary M. Conner

California Department of Fish and Wildlife

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pamela K. Swift

California Department of Fish and Wildlife

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James W. Cain

New Mexico State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge