Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Ben D. Marks is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Ben D. Marks.


Science | 2008

A phylogenomic study of birds reveals their evolutionary history.

Shannon J. Hackett; Rebecca T. Kimball; Sushma Reddy; Rauri C. K. Bowie; Edward L. Braun; Michael J. Braun; Jena L. Chojnowski; W. Andrew Cox; Kin-Lan Han; John Harshman; Christopher J. Huddleston; Ben D. Marks; Kathleen J. Miglia; William S. Moore; Frederick H. Sheldon; David W. Steadman; Christopher C. Witt; Tamaki Yuri

Deep avian evolutionary relationships have been difficult to resolve as a result of a putative explosive radiation. Our study examined ∼32 kilobases of aligned nuclear DNA sequences from 19 independent loci for 169 species, representing all major extant groups, and recovered a robust phylogeny from a genome-wide signal supported by multiple analytical methods. We documented well-supported, previously unrecognized interordinal relationships (such as a sister relationship between passerines and parrots) and corroborated previously contentious groupings (such as flamingos and grebes). Our conclusions challenge current classifications and alter our understanding of trait evolution; for example, some diurnal birds evolved from nocturnal ancestors. Our results provide a valuable resource for phylogenetic and comparative studies in birds.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2008

Phylogenomic evidence for multiple losses of flight in ratite birds

John Harshman; Edward L. Braun; Michael J. Braun; Christopher J. Huddleston; Rauri C. K. Bowie; Jena L. Chojnowski; Shannon J. Hackett; Kin-Lan Han; Rebecca T. Kimball; Ben D. Marks; Kathleen J. Miglia; William S. Moore; Sushma Reddy; Frederick H. Sheldon; David W. Steadman; Scott J. Steppan; Christopher C. Witt; Tamaki Yuri

Ratites (ostriches, emus, rheas, cassowaries, and kiwis) are large, flightless birds that have long fascinated biologists. Their current distribution on isolated southern land masses is believed to reflect the breakup of the paleocontinent of Gondwana. The prevailing view is that ratites are monophyletic, with the flighted tinamous as their sister group, suggesting a single loss of flight in the common ancestry of ratites. However, phylogenetic analyses of 20 unlinked nuclear genes reveal a genome-wide signal that unequivocally places tinamous within ratites, making ratites polyphyletic and suggesting multiple losses of flight. Phenomena that can mislead phylogenetic analyses, including long branch attraction, base compositional bias, discordance between gene trees and species trees, and sequence alignment errors, have been eliminated as explanations for this result. The most plausible hypothesis requires at least three losses of flight and explains the many morphological and behavioral similarities among ratites by parallel or convergent evolution. Finally, this phylogeny demands fundamental reconsideration of proposals that relate ratite evolution to continental drift.


Ecology and Evolution | 2013

River barriers and cryptic biodiversity in an evolutionary museum.

Gary Voelker; Ben D. Marks; Charles Kahindo; U A'genonga; F Bapeamoni; Laura Duffie; Jerry W. Huntley; E Mulotwa; S A Rosenbaum; Jessica E. Light

The Riverine Barriers Hypothesis (RBH) posits that tropical rivers can be effective barriers to gene flow, based on observations that range boundaries often coincide with river barriers. Over the last 160 years, the RBH has received attention from various perspectives, with a particular focus on vertebrates in the Amazon Basin. To our knowledge, no molecular assessment of the RBH has been conducted on birds in the Afrotropics, despite its rich avifauna and many Afrotropical bird species being widely distributed across numerous watersheds and basins. Here, we provide the first genetic evidence that an Afrotropical river has served as a barrier for birds and for their lice, based on four understory bird species collected from sites north and south of the Congo River. Our results indicate near-contemporaneous, Pleistocene lineage diversification across the Congo River in these species. Our results further indicate differing levels of genetic variation in bird lice; the extent of this variation appears linked to the life-history of both the host and the louse. Extensive cryptic diversity likely is being harbored in Afrotropical forests, in both understory birds and their lice. Therefore, these forests may not be “museums” of old lineages. Rather, substantial evolutionary diversification may have occurred in Afrotropical forests throughout the Pleistocene, supporting the Pleistocene Forest Refuge Hypothesis. Strong genetic variation in birds and their lice within a small part of the Congo Basin forest indicates that we may have grossly underestimated diversity in the Afrotropics, making these forests home of substantial biodiversity in need of conservation.


Systematic Biology | 2017

Why Do Phylogenomic Data Sets Yield Conflicting Trees? Data Type Influences the Avian Tree of Life more than Taxon Sampling

Sushma Reddy; Rebecca T. Kimball; Akanksha Pandey; Peter A. Hosner; Michael J. Braun; Shannon J. Hackett; Kin-Lan Han; John Harshman; Christopher J. Huddleston; Sarah E. Kingston; Ben D. Marks; Kathleen J. Miglia; William S. Moore; Frederick H. Sheldon; Christopher C. Witt; Tamaki Yuri; Edward L. Braun

&NA; Phylogenomics, the use of large‐scale data matrices in phylogenetic analyses, has been viewed as the ultimate solution to the problem of resolving difficult nodes in the tree of life. However, it has become clear that analyses of these large genomic data sets can also result in conflicting estimates of phylogeny. Here, we use the early divergences in Neoaves, the largest clade of extant birds, as a “model system” to understand the basis for incongruence among phylogenomic trees. We were motivated by the observation that trees from two recent avian phylogenomic studies exhibit conflicts. Those studies used different strategies: 1) collecting many characters [∼ 42 mega base pairs (Mbp) of sequence data] from 48 birds, sometimes including only one taxon for each major clade; and 2) collecting fewer characters (∼ 0.4 Mbp) from 198 birds, selected to subdivide long branches. However, the studies also used different data types: the taxon‐poor data matrix comprised 68% non‐coding sequences whereas coding exons dominated the taxon‐rich data matrix. This difference raises the question of whether the primary reason for incongruence is the number of sites, the number of taxa, or the data type. To test among these alternative hypotheses we assembled a novel, large‐scale data matrix comprising 90% non‐coding sequences from 235 bird species. Although increased taxon sampling appeared to have a positive impact on phylogenetic analyses the most important variable was data type. Indeed, by analyzing different subsets of the taxa in our data matrix we found that increased taxon sampling actually resulted in increased congruence with the tree from the previous taxon‐poor study (which had a majority of non‐coding data) instead of the taxon‐rich study (which largely used coding data). We suggest that the observed differences in the estimates of topology for these studies reflect data‐type effects due to violations of the models used in phylogenetic analyses, some of which may be difficult to detect. If incongruence among trees estimated using phylogenomic methods largely reflects problems with model fit developing more “biologically‐realistic” models is likely to be critical for efforts to reconstruct the tree of life. [Birds; coding exons; GTR model; model fit; Neoaves; non‐coding DNA; phylogenomics; taxon sampling.]


BMC Evolutionary Biology | 2011

Homoplastic microinversions and the avian tree of life

Edward L. Braun; Rebecca T. Kimball; Kin-Lan Han; Naomi R. Iuhasz-Velez; Amber J. Bonilla; Jena L. Chojnowski; Jordan V. Smith; Rauri C. K. Bowie; Michael J. Braun; Shannon J. Hackett; John Harshman; Christopher J. Huddleston; Ben D. Marks; Kathleen J. Miglia; William S. Moore; Sushma Reddy; Frederick H. Sheldon; Christopher C. Witt; Tamaki Yuri

BackgroundMicroinversions are cytologically undetectable inversions of DNA sequences that accumulate slowly in genomes. Like many other rare genomic changes (RGCs), microinversions are thought to be virtually homoplasy-free evolutionary characters, suggesting that they may be very useful for difficult phylogenetic problems such as the avian tree of life. However, few detailed surveys of these genomic rearrangements have been conducted, making it difficult to assess this hypothesis or understand the impact of microinversions upon genome evolution.ResultsWe surveyed non-coding sequence data from a recent avian phylogenetic study and found substantially more microinversions than expected based upon prior information about vertebrate inversion rates, although this is likely due to underestimation of these rates in previous studies. Most microinversions were lineage-specific or united well-accepted groups. However, some homoplastic microinversions were evident among the informative characters. Hemiplasy, which reflects differences between gene trees and the species tree, did not explain the observed homoplasy. Two specific loci were microinversion hotspots, with high numbers of inversions that included both the homoplastic as well as some overlapping microinversions. Neither stem-loop structures nor detectable sequence motifs were associated with microinversions in the hotspots.ConclusionsMicroinversions can provide valuable phylogenetic information, although power analysis indicates that large amounts of sequence data will be necessary to identify enough inversions (and similar RGCs) to resolve short branches in the tree of life. Moreover, microinversions are not perfect characters and should be interpreted with caution, just as with any other character type. Independent of their use for phylogenetic analyses, microinversions are important because they have the potential to complicate alignment of non-coding sequences. Despite their low rate of accumulation, they have clearly contributed to genome evolution, suggesting that active identification of microinversions will prove useful in future phylogenomic studies.


The Auk | 2010

A New Species of Boubou (Malaconotidae: Laniarius) from the Albertine Rift

Gary Voelker; Robert K. Outlaw; Sushma Reddy; Michael Tobler; John M. Bates; Shannon J. Hackett; Charles Kahindo; Ben D. Marks; Julian C. Kerbis Peterhans; Thomas P. Gnoske

ABSTRACT. We describe Laniarius willardi, a new species of boubou shrike (Malaconotidae) from the Albertine Rift of Africa. The most conspicuous, distinguishing morphological feature of the species is a gray to blue-gray iris. This and external morphometric data indicate that L. willardi is diagnosable from other black or sooty boubous. Further, L. willardi is genetically diagnosable, and its closest relative is the Mountain Sooty Boubou (L. poensis camerunensis) from Cameroon. The Crimson-breasted Bush-shrike (L. atrococcineus) and the Lowland Sooty Boubou (L. leucorhynchus) are together the sister clade to L. willardi—L.p. camerunensis. Laniarius willardi and the geographically codistributed L. p. holomelas differ by 11.5% in uncorrected sequence divergence, and elevational data taken from museum specimens suggest the possibility of elevational segregation of the species at ∼2,000 m, with L. willardi occurring at lower elevations. Our broad sampling of black and sooty boubou taxa indicate that (1) races of Mountain Sooty Boubou (L. poensis) do not form a monophyletic clade; (2) L. p. camerunensis may represent multiple, nonsister lineages; and (3) at least one race of Fülleborns Black Boubou (L. fuelleborni usambaricus) is genetically distinct from other races of that species.


Check List | 2015

Birds of the Man and Biosphere Reserve of Luki, Bas-Congo province, Democratic Republic of Congo

Tobit L.D. Liyandja; Michael J. Andersen; Carl H. Oliveros; Lem’s N. Kalemba; Trésor L. Bakambana; Ben D. Marks; Charles Kahindo; Jean Malekani

The Democratic Republic of Congo holds the most diverse assemblage of birds in Africa. However, ornithological surveys in its network of reserves are rare. In this paper we pre-sent the first detailed list of birds from the Man and Biosphere Reserve of Luki in the country’s southwestern tip based on collected specimens, photographs, audio recordings, and direct observations from two surveys conducted in 2012–2013. We document a total of 136 species, including the threatened Psittacus erithacus . Range extensions of four species and breeding records for 19 species are also reported. Further surveys in the reserve, which covers the largest remaining forest patch along the Lower Congo River, are highly recommended.


Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution | 2009

A well-tested set of primers to amplify regions spread across the avian genome

Rebecca T. Kimball; Edward L. Braun; F. Keith Barker; Rauri C. K. Bowie; Michael J. Braun; Jena L. Chojnowski; Shannon J. Hackett; Kin Lan Han; John Harshman; Victoria Heimer-Torres; Wallace Holznagel; Christopher J. Huddleston; Ben D. Marks; Kathleen J. Miglia; William S. Moore; Sushma Reddy; Frederick H. Sheldon; Jordan V. Smith; Christopher C. Witt; Tamaki Yuri


Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution | 2007

Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the Grey-cheeked Fulvetta (Alcippe morrisonia) of China and Indochina: A case of remarkable genetic divergence in a "species"

Fasheng Zou; Haw Chuan Lim; Ben D. Marks; Robert G. Moyle; Frederick H. Sheldon


Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution | 2006

Phylogenetic relationships of the bulbuls (Aves: Pycnonotidae) based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequence data.

Robert G. Moyle; Ben D. Marks

Collaboration


Dive into the Ben D. Marks's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Shannon J. Hackett

Field Museum of Natural History

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sushma Reddy

American Museum of Natural History

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John Harshman

Field Museum of Natural History

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge