Ben Greijdanus

Method for therapeutic drug monitoring of azole antifungal drugs in human serum using LC/MS/MS

Fungal infections occur in immunocompromised patients. Azole antifungal agents are used for the prophylaxis and treatment of these infections. The interest in therapeutic drug monitoring azole agents has increased over the last few years. Inter- and intra-patient variability of pharmacokinetics, drug-drug interactions, serum concentration related toxicity and success of therapy has stressed the need of frequently therapeutic drug monitoring of the drugs, belonging to the group of azoles. Therefore a simple, rapid and flexible method of analysis is required. This method is based on the precipitation of proteins in human serum with LC/MS/MS detection. Validation was performed according to the guidelines for bioanalytical method validation of the food and drug administration agency. The four most used azole drugs can be detected in human serum within the clinical relevant serum levels with good accuracy and reproducibility at the limit of quantification. Intra- and inter-day validation demonstrated good accuracy and reproducibility. A rapid, sensitive and flexible LC/MS/MS method has been developed and validated to measure voriconazole (VRZ), fluconazole (FLZ), itraconazole (ITZ) and posaconazole (PSZ) in human serum. This new method is suitable for clinical pharmacokinetic studies and routine monitoring in daily practice.

Fast LC-MS/MS analysis of tacrolimus, sirolimus, everolimus and cyclosporin A in dried blood spots and the influence of the hematocrit and immunosuppressant concentration on recovery

We developed a method for the analysis of four immunosuppressants in dried blood spot (DBS) samples to facilitate therapeutic drug monitoring for transplant patients outside the hospital. An 8mm disc from the central part of the DBS was punched, extracted and followed by LC-MS/MS analysis. The method was validated with ranges from 1.00-50.0 µg/L for tacrolimus, sirolimus and everolimus, and from 20.0-2000 µg/L for cyclosporin A. The validation showed a maximum overall bias of 13.0% for the sirolimus LLOQ, while the maximum overall CV was 15.7% for the everolimus LLOQ. All four immunosuppressants showed to be stable in DBS for at least 7 days at 22°C. The volume of the blood spot showed to have minor effect on measured concentrations. A cross-validation test between the 31 ET CHR paper and the Whatman FTA DMPK-C cards showed no significant difference between the two types of paper. During validation the hematocrit (HT) showed to have significant influence on the analytical results. When the measured concentrations were corrected for the effect of the HT, biases improved significantly. Additional recovery tests proved that the combination of especially low HT and high concentration does not only affect the spot size but can also affect the extraction recoveries of sirolimus and especially everolimus. Although the tested parameters like HT and concentrations are extreme and unlikely for routine analysis of outpatients, the fundamental effect of the combination of these parameters on extraction recoveries are proven with this research. The protein binding in the blood and hydrogen binding to the cellulose of the paper is suggested to influence extractions and gives new insights in the extraction methodology of DBS samples. The observed HT effect during the validation appeared to be negligible during the correlation study as no concentration corrections for the HT values were needed. Nevertheless, results from DBS samples with extremely high concentrations combined with extremely low HT values should be interpreted with caution. The patient correlation study showed good correlations with R(2) values higher than 0.87 between venous whole blood and venous DBS samples were observed for all four immunosuppressants. The Passing & Bablok plots showed positive biases of the slopes of 18% for tacrolimus and less than 12% for sirolimus, everolimus and cyclosporin A. The validated method, proved stability of the immunosuppressants in DBS, and the correlation study showed the capability of the DBS method to be used as an alternative for whole blood analysis in therapeutic drug monitoring.

4-AMINOPYRIDINE KINETICS

Nine healthy subjects (7 men; 2 women) received single 20‐mg IV injections of 4‐aminopyridine (4‐AP). Six of the subjects received the same dose in the form of enteric‐coated tablets and four the same dose in uncoated tablets; treatments were at least 2 wk apart. Blood, saliva, and urine were assayed for 4‐AP using a high‐performance liquid chromatography. Kinetic analysis of serum concentrations after intravenous dosing resulted in the best fitting of a triexponential model in five and a biexponential model in four subjects. The apparent volume of distribution (V) was 2.6 ± 0.9 (mean ± SD) l/kg−1, the terminal half‐life (t½) 3.6 ± 0.9 hr, and the total serum clearance 0.61 ± 0.14 lhr−1kg−1. Saliva concentrations were higher than those in serum after 5 min, with a mean correlation coefficient of 0.989 (n = 5). The t½ and V calculated from serum and saliva concentrations were of the same order. The total urinary excretion of unchanged 4‐AP was 90.6 ± 7.8% after intravenous doses and 88.5 ± 4.8% after oral doses of enteric‐coated tablets. The bioavailability of the enteric‐coated tablets calculated from the area under the serum concentration curve (95 ± 29%) did not differ from that calculated from urinary excretion (98 ± 8%). Protein binding of 4‐AP was found to be negligible. Biotransformation is unlikely.

Dried Blood Spot Analysis for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Linezolid in Patients with Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis

ABSTRACT Linezolid is a promising antimicrobial agent for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), but its use is limited by toxicity. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may help to minimize toxicity while adequate drug exposure is maintained. Conventional plasma sampling and monitoring might be hindered in many parts of the world by logistical problems that may be solved by dried blood spot (DBS) sampling. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a novel method for TDM of linezolid in MDR-TB patients using DBS sampling. Plasma, venous DBS, and capillary DBS specimens were obtained simultaneously from eight patients receiving linezolid. A DBS sampling method was developed and clinically validated by comparing DBS with plasma results using Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman analysis. This study showed that DBS analysis was reproducible and robust. Accuracy and between- and within-day precision values from three validations presented as bias and coefficient of variation (CV) were less than 17.2% for the lower limit of quantification and less than 7.8% for other levels. The method showed a high recovery of approximately 95% and a low matrix effect of less than 8.7%. DBS specimens were stable at 37°C for 2 months and at 50°C for 1 week. The ratio of the concentration of linezolid in DBS samples to that in plasma was 1.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12 to 1.27). Linezolid exposure calculated from concentrations DBS samples and plasma showed good agreement. In conclusion, DBS analysis of linezolid is a promising tool to optimize linezolid treatment in MDR-TB patients. An easy sampling procedure and high sample stability may facilitate TDM, even in underdeveloped countries with limited resources and where conventional plasma sampling is not feasible.

Simultaneous determination of rifampicin, clarithromycin and their metabolites in dried blood spots using LC–MS/MS

INTRODUCTION Rifampicin (RIF) and clarithromycin (CLR) are common drugs for the treatment of infections like Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium ulcerans. Treatment for these diseases are long-term and the individual pharmacokinetic variation, drug-drug interactions or non-adherence may introduce sub-therapeutic exposure or toxicity. The application of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can be used to ensure efficacy and avoid toxicity. With the use of dried blood spot (DBS), TDM may be feasible in rural areas. During DBS method development, unexpected interactions or matrix effects may be encountered due to endogenous components in the blood. Another complication compared to plasma analysis is that RIF can form chelate complexes with ferric ions or can bind with hemes, which are potentially present in the extracts of dried blood spots. METHODS The investigation focused on the interaction between RIF and the endogenous components of the DBS. The use of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and deferoxamine (DFX) as chelator agents to improve recoveries and matrix effects were investigated. A rapid analytical method was developed and validated to quantify RIF and CLR and their active metabolites desacetyl rifampicin (DAc-RIF) and 14-hydroxyclarythromcin (14OH-CLR) in DBS samples. A clinical application study was performed in tuberculosis patients by comparing DBS concentrations with plasma concentrations. RESULTS The interaction between RIF and the DBS matrix was avoided using the complexing agents EDTA and DFX, which improved recoveries and matrix effects. The developed sample procedure resulted in a simple and fast method for the simultaneous quantification of RIF, CLR and their metabolites in DBS samples. High stability was observed as all four substances were stable at ambient temperature for 2 months. Deming regression analysis of the clinical application study showed no significant differences for RIF, DAc-RIF, CLR and 14OH-CLR between patient plasma and DBS analysis. The slopes of the correlation lines between DBS and plasma concentrations of RIF, DAc-RIF, CLR and 14OH-CLR were 0.90, 0.99, 0.80 and 1.09 respectively. High correlations between plasma and DBS concentrations were observed for RIF (R(2)=0.9076), CLR (R(2)=0.9752) and 14OH-CLR (R(2)=0.9421). Lower correlation was found for DAc-RIF (R(2) of 0.6856). CONCLUSION The validated method is applicable for TDM of RIF, CLR and their active metabolites. The stability of the DBS at high temperatures can facilitate the TDM and pharmacokinetic studies of RIF and CLR even in resource limited areas. The role of EDTA and DFX as complexing agents in the extraction was well investigated and may provide a solution for potential applications to other DBS analytical methods.

What is the right blood hematocrit preparation procedure for standards and quality control samples for dried blood spot analysis

Remco Koster is a research analyst and PhD candidate at the University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen. He has been working in the field of bioanalysis for over 13 years, where he has developed numerous analytical methods using LC-MS/MS. His main research focus is the influence of various matrices on the development and performance of analytical methods using LC-MS/MS. The development of high-speed extraction and analysis methods for drugs and drugs of abuse in human matrices like blood, plasma, hair, saliva and dried blood spots often leads to improved procedures for preparation of standards and quality control samples, sample handling and validation. Two hematocrit preparation procedures for standards and quality control samples were evaluated in order to improve the quality of procedures for dried blood spot validation and analysis.

Fast and Highly Selective LC-MS/MS Screening for THC and 16 Other Abused Drugs and Metabolites in Human Hair to Monitor Patients for Drug Abuse

Background: To facilitate the monitoring of drug abuse by patients, a method was developed and validated for the analysis of amphetamine, methamphetamine, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, methylenedioxyamphetamine, methylenedioxyethylamphetamine, methylphenidate, cocaine, benzoylecgonine, morphine, codeine, heroin, 6-monoacteylmorphine, methadone, 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP), delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), nicotine, and cotinine in human hair. Methods: The hair preparation method contains a 3-step wash procedure with dichloromethane followed by a simultaneous hair pulverization and extraction procedure with disposable metal balls. The developed liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method uses a single injection to detect and confirm all 17 abused drugs, including THC, within 4.8 minutes. Results: Nicotine was validated with a linear range of 800–25,000 pg/mg hair, and all other substances were validated with a linear range of 30.0–2500 pg/mg hair. For inaccuracy and imprecision, the overall bias did not exceed −8.2% and the overall coefficient of variation did not exceed 17.7%. Autosampler stability was proven for 48 hours at 10°C for all substances. Analytical cutoff concentrations were defined for each substance at the lowest validated inaccuracy and imprecision concentration with a bias and coefficient of variation within 15% and qualifier/quantifier ratios within 20% of the set ratio. The analytical cutoff concentrations were 200 pg/mg for codeine and 80.0 pg/mg for 6-MAM, heroin, EDDP, and THC. The analytical cutoff concentration for nicotine was 800 pg/mg and for all other validated substances 30.0 pg/mg. This method was successfully applied to analyze hair samples from patients who were monitored for drug abuse. Hair samples of 47 subjects (segmented into 129 samples) showed 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, methylphenidate, cocaine, benzoylecgonine, codeine, methadone, EDDP, THC, nicotine, and cotinine above the analytical cutoff. Conclusions: The method was fully validated, including the validation of the qualifier/quantifier ratios. The analysis of real hair samples proved the efficacy of the developed method for monitoring drug abuse. The results obtained by this method provide the physician or health-care professional with extensive information about actual drug abuse or relapse and can be used for patient-specific therapy.

A simple and sensitive fully validated HPLC-UV method for the determination of 5-fluorouracil and its metabolite 5.6-dihydrofluorouracil in plasma

The authors developed a simple and sensitive, fully validated HPLC-UV method for the determination of both 5-FU and its metabolite DHFU in small-volume plasma samples. The analytes were separated on a 4.6 × 250 mm ID Atlantis dC18 5-μm column with isocratic elution at room temperature. Chlorouracil was used as internal standard. The analytes were detected with an UV diode array detector. DHFU was detected at 205 nm, 5-FU at 266 nm, and chlorouracil at both wavelengths. The limits of quantification in plasma were 0.040 μg /mL for 5-FU and 0.075 μg/mL for DHFU. Linearity, accuracy, precision, recovery, dilution, freeze-thaw stability, and stability in the sample compartment were evaluated. The method appeared linear over a range from 0.04 to 15.90 μg/mL for 5-FU and from 0.075 to 3.84 μg/mL for DHFU. The method appeared very suitable for therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacokinetic studies of 5-FU because of its simple extraction and small sample volume. Problems in earlier published methods with interfering peaks and variable retention times were overcome. The method appeared also to be suitable for detection of uracil and its metabolite dihydrouracil in plasma.

Troubleshooting carry-over of LC–MS/MS method for rifampicin, clarithromycin and metabolites in human plasma

Clarithromycin and rifampicin are used for the treatment of Mycobacteria. Pharmacokinetic drug interaction is possibly due to the influence of the two drugs on the liver enzymes. Using a Hypurity Aquastar C18 column (50mm×2.1mm×5μm) for liquid chromatography including a polar end-capped phase for the determination of clarithromycin, rifampicin and their metabolites together in plasma using LC-MS/MS resulted in a substantial carry-over. As a consequence, the throughput of the method is not assured. Using a step-by-step troubleshooting procedure, such carry-over was found originating from column memory effect. With the use of another type of C18 column, the carry-over is eliminated. Due to the absence of carry-over, the analytical concentration ranges are extended and are therefore more appropriate for the analysis of patient samples. The method was re-validated for linearity, reproducibility and dilution integrity.

Clinical Validation of the Analysis of Linezolid and Clarithromycin in Oral Fluid of Patients with Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis

ABSTRACT Linezolid plays an increasingly important role in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). However, patients should be carefully monitored due to time- and dose-dependent toxicity. Clarithromycin plays a more modest role. Therapeutic drug monitoring may contribute to assessment of treatment regimens, helping to reduce toxicity while maintaining adequate drug exposure. Oral fluid sampling could provide a welcome alternative in cases where conventional plasma sampling is not possible or desirable. The aim of this study was to clinically validate the analysis of linezolid and clarithromycin and its metabolite hydroxyclarithromycin in oral fluid of patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Serum and oral fluid samples were simultaneously obtained and analyzed by using validated methods, after extensive cross-validation between the two matrices. Passing-Bablok regressions and Bland-Altman analysis showed that oral fluid analysis of linezolid and clarithromycin appeared to be suitable for therapeutic drug monitoring in MDR-TB patients. No correction factor is needed for the interpretation of linezolid oral fluid concentrations with a ratio of the linezolid concentration in serum to that in oral fluid of 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92 to 1.02). However, the clarithromycin concentration serum/clarithromycin concentration in oral fluid ratio is 3.07 (95% CI, 2.45 to 3.69). Analysis of hydroxyclarithromycin in oral fluid was not possible in this study due to a nonlinear relationship between the concentration in serum and that in oral fluid. In conclusion, the analysis of linezolid (no correction factor) and clarithromycin (correction factor of 3) in oral fluid is applicable for therapeutic drug monitoring in cases of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis as an alternative to conventional serum sampling. Easy sampling using a noninvasive technique may facilitate therapeutic drug monitoring for specific patient categories.